The Angeles Crest Dogman Encounter


Dogs might be man's best friend, but it's a different story when it comes to their bi-pedal, monster relatives the dogman.

Comments

  1. Dogman - a subject no one takes seriously or cares about so why make up stories about it? Are Bigfoot sites so desperate for material they have to resort to this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you so desperate to throw your two pence in and comment ? Snookered bro !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    2. This is Stuey’s blog, ok?! If he doesn’t like it, he’s going to stamp his feet and go, “WAAAAAHHH!!!!!”

      Delete
    3. See - one critical comment and it's "Stuey, Stuey, Stuey". These two above (probably the same person) are so crazy they now are defending Dogman stories. I guess if you have to accept witness credibility at seeing Bigfoot you have to accept eyewitness accounts of Dogman as well. In for a penny, in for a pound as they say.

      Delete
    4. Not like you to sensationalise & exaggerate what people believe in, because you don’t have one good argument against the scientific evidence that supports people who see Bigfoot?

      Oh wait...

      I remember...

      How would you and your foot long meatball sub spend your lonely evenings if you didn’t have eyewitness YouTube channels to obsess about? That’s why you don’t have even one good argument, why would you bother if you’re in character? Give over Stuey... you’re the biggest Bigfoot fan here.

      Delete
    5. Whoa - barely 13 minutes passed after my previous post and there you are! Now who's obsessed with whom?

      So let's hear it straight out. Do you believe the reports of "Dogman" or not? Remember the creature is described as wolf-like with prominent pointed ears and conspicuous muzzle quite unlike what Bigfoot has been described as. Omitting any "evidence" of the encounter, are people who witness Bigfoot any more credible than those who claim to have seen Dogman?

      Delete
    6. Stuey... you might have gotten a little too used to this place being your personal crypto-blog where you can post things all day nobody gives a **** about... but the very essence of this place is for people to publish comments whenever they like. Just like when you want to pretend to be three different people in a thread of comments pretending to be critical of Bigfoot... I’m more than welcome to be critical of you as just myself.

      Yeah... we’ve done this dance about 100 times before. People who report Bigfoot have done so for thousands of years, there is footage, hair fibres, audio and now peer reviewed physical evidence. The physical evidence is so extensive, that it spans continents in accordance with sightings reports. There is no equivalent for the evidence for dogmen.

      Tell me Stuey... If Bigfoot are paranormal like you claim, why can’t dogmen be paranormal? There is never any consistency in your drivel.

      Delete
    7. So what you are saying is that Dogman witnesses have no credibility because no evidence supports it. Good - at least we can agree upon that.

      As far as paranormal claims I have made no such thing. Sorry - wrong "Stuey". To me those are bunk as well.

      Delete
    8. I’ll add that to the tally chart of un-thought out inconsistencies then, Stuey.

      Ciao!

      Delete
    9. So.... Dogman. Utter horse manure.

      Now having said that. I've seen the tufts of hair, its quite common on Bigfoot. They aren't ears. I've also seen what can only be described as a snout with the mouth jutting out from the face along with a large hooded nose. Additionally I've read many eyewitness accounts relating seeing Bigfoot on all fours when they are trying to really haul the mail.

      Cleary I think Dogman is a misidentification of Bigfoot.

      Not throwing shade in any particular direction but one cryptid at a time please.

      Now Iktomi/Joe/FakeJoe can blame this post on Stuey and continue his insane rant.

      Delete
    10. Clearly this is posted by everyone is Stu guy or gal. How are you? I enjoy your comments. I'm the other so called Stu. I live in Australia but of course Itkomi can't handle any of that so he calls me Stu from the U.S.
      Yowies are definitely not real because i haven't seen one. Case closed!

      Delete
    11. Care to unpack that riddle, Stuey? Are you trying to claim that Bigfoot have what can be mistaken for pointed ears and snout? Is that an effort at claiming Bigfoot are bear?

      Stuey... are you aware of the sheer amount of testimony, some of which are attributed to multiple eyewitnesses at the same time? Do you understand the process of denial some people go through when seeing what is quite clearly reported as a large hair covered human?

      Come on now Stuey... you’ve spent nearly every day of your life for the last few years listening to eyewitness YouTube channels wishing you had one yourself. Surely you know of the complexity and denial and sometimes the withholding of such reports due to the fear of ridicule?

      In your rookie understanding of reports, and having championed researchers who adhere do the most embarrassing pareidolia, you think people generally report what they need to see. But that’s your shortcoming, Stuey... Not the impossible amount of eyewitness that literally span thousands of years.

      Delete
    12. You see Stuey, sightings reports are not black and white. For example, people don’t run to report something they can’t confidently identity, which MIGHT in some instances be indicative of someone wanting to see something. Eyewitnesses don’t necessarily have the confidence in what they report won’t be ridiculed. To elaborate... there are instances where multiple witnesses at the same time are in fact in DENIAL about that collective experience. Only to have these opinions changed after lengthy reflection, being better educated about the subject, or by means of supporting evidence that turns up (example provided below)? This happens an awful lot, but you would have first needed to have actually spend time reading what people are reporting (as opposed to listening to YouTube channels that cut often cut to the chase to the certainty for the sake of credibility for the YouTube host), to really be aware of it. In short... for the time you’ve spent listening to youtube channels, you still don’t know what the **** you’re talking about. In fact, given the fact that most people in wilderness areas are likely to be in the statistical majority of the population who don’t believe in such hominin, this naturally has a direct impact on the agendas of eyewitnesses, and eradicates any possibility that powers of suggestion are molding their conclusions as to what they’re experiencing. You have to remember, that 99% of researchers have never seen a Bigfoot (though innumerable have come across excellent physical evidence), or if they have, it was an experience BEFORE they even knew they existed which has set them on a quest to verifying such experiences.

      Delete
    13. Report # 6804 (Class A)
      Submitted by witness on Saturday, August 23, 2003.
      Two ourtdoorsmen chased by a large bear like biped recount 25+ years of strange occurrences.
      YEAR: 1995 to 2003
      SEASON: Unknown
      STATE: Ohio
      COUNTY: Butler County
      LOCATION DETAILS: From I-75 take State Route 73 west into Trenton. Once you get in town look for the Skate Way Roller Rink then make a right follow it till you have to turn right or left then make a right. Follow it till it dead ends. There will be the woods and creek in front of you. there is 96.6 acres of woods there with about another 100 to the left and about 105 up on the hill.
      NEAREST TOWN: Trenton
      NEAREST ROAD: State Route 73

      OBSERVED: My friend and I have been camping, hunting and fishing a part of Butler County that would be the last place I ever thought I would be so afraid that I would wet myself. From about 1985 to 2003 he and I have went to these woods to camp and fish the creek that runs to the river. One calm night we were camping about four miles from the nearest dirt road. We had a small fire and our tents were already up and we were talking about fishing and catching the big one when we heard a sound that neither he or I could explain. Both of us thought wolf or something? We stayed by the fire and talked some more about fishing then we got a strong odor of something like dead flesh or something like that. We then got up and took the light and started looking for the source of the smell and sound we heard. As we got closer to the middle of the forest my friend said listen....we could hear something moving towards us. We started running and could hear that it was getting closer to us. We made it to a clearing where we could see the moon and the sky very well so we could catch our breath. Then, there it was, "a bear" I said!! I raised my shot gun and fired it in the air but it didn't stop coming towards us (it was on two legs the whole time). We ran in the creek and out of the woods until we reached a store and called my wife to come get us. We told her what happened but she laughed at us. She later asked us if it could have been Bigfoot. We both said no back then but as time has gone by we have found small trees broken off above 10 feet and footprints that only it could make so we thought we should make this report. On August 22, 2003, my friend and I were fishing at the river and we heard the same sound we have heard for the last 25 years. We think there is a Bigfoot that lives somewhere in the woods or passes through regularly where we camp, fish, and hunt. Everyone who lives in this small city by these woods can tell you we believe this to be true.
      http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=6804

      Delete
    14. Stuey, the failed bigfot researcher who has pedo fantasies . Iktomi just schooled him for the umpteenth time (I have lost track )and he is quite the stubborn goat refusing to admit his error . So many reports that could stand as evidence all by themselves and yet he's obsessed with proving the PGf is fake and Gimlin is only in it for the money. Quite a sad pathetic toddler who has dribble running down his bib. Time for nanny to come and clean you up boyo !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    15. And yet everyone agrees you two are full of shit

      Delete
  2. Why do people call them Dogmen and insist they don't change shape? Who followed one for days or a month to find out?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Itkomi rides Dogman while chasing bigfoot around. That's how he knows so much. He is really smart and cool and the ladies can't get enough of him. He is also packing a huge purple headed yoghurt slinger.

      Delete
    2. I've often wondered the same thing. Werewolves and were animals of all sorts have a long history coexisting with humans. Now all of a sudden people see creatures that they say looked exactly like the werewolf in Van Helsing and call it a dogman? Furthermore they claim without any shred of evidence that these creatures stay in the shape of a werewolf at all times. Like you said did Vic Cundiff follow one around for several weeks?

      Delete
  3. These creatures whatever they are not a natural animal. My opinion is they are several different creatures, shape shifting humans or werewolves are real I believe. In the 1970s David Berkowitz aka the "Son of Sam" claimed he was part of a Satanic cult from Minot North Dakota and that they were able to conjure demons who looked like werewolves. Recently Linda Godfrey wrote an article about the "Sewer Werewolves of Minot". Coinidince? I don't think so. I also think whatever ethereal beings that are known by various names such as get, jinn, demons, phantoms, aliens a recall one and the same in different guises.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

The Clearest Photo Of Bigfoot Since Patterson-Gimlin Released By Melissa Hovey?