SquatchDetective Bigfoot Photo Analysis
The SquatchDetective Steve Kulls takes a look at a photo that has been making the rounds lately in the bigfoot community, to try and determine if it is in fact a picture of an actual sasquatch. Check it out.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
It just goes to show how unrealiable low quality photos can be.I really hope someone gets some good quality moving footage some time.A modern equivalent of Patty would be nice. xx
ReplyDeleteYes it does Puss In Boots however there are those that accept them without question until proven wrong.
Delete"It’s either a chimp, or a juvenile hominid. It can’t be anything else." - lktomi
spot on it's a bigfoot !
No doubt in my mind about it !
What a great photo !
skeptics will be eating crow today and in 2019 !
cheers
Joe
If nothing else pictures like this show how we can so easily misjudge what we see. It also shows how we see what we very strongly want or expect to see. Isn't it odd that most trail cams will take multiple pics of moving objects, but there always just one as “proof of Bigfoot”? Furthermore Stacy Brown has a rather sketchy history in Bigfoot evidence and even he seems to be making light of this photo.
DeleteLet's ask Matt Moneymaker, he likes to chime in here
DeleteThe vegetation does not look it is native to North America. It looks to be a semi-arid climate like South America or Africa, both of which have lots of monkeys. Based on the relative height to the grass, it appears to be 2 foot tall in the seated position, making it a monkey.
ReplyDelete