Todd Disotell Bigfoot DNA Scientist
From Sasquatch: Out of the Shadows
Interview with Anthropologist & DNA Expert Todd Disotell (Bigfoot DNA?)
An interview with noted NYU professor, biological anthropologist & molecular primatologist Todd Disotell about Sasquatch, his work in examining alleged Sasquatch DNA samples and various related subjects.
"that kind of trace material is not adequate if they want to find it they need real biological material from an animal that can be tested".
ReplyDeleteEXACTLY what I have been saying all along.
In the meantime, you have peer reviewed physical evidence that is doubled in adequacy at this stage of research compared to the Bili Ape.
DeleteDNA has been sequenced a number of times; it comes back human. As much as I love Disotell, if he’s expecting an undiscovered non-human primate, then he’ll be waiting forever. If that’s actually convenient for him, then he’s being as rhetorical as clowns like you are when you expect Bigfoot to die out on the open like deer.
Hahaha, stu pwned by Iktomi once again, such a glutton for punishment !
DeleteAsk any expert as to how many wild animal remains are found where they died natural deaths and get back to us my dear stu because the answer will always be zero just like your I.Q
cheers
Joe
Stu is a biotch!
Deletestu just laid a mega stinky duece
DeleteHa ! Maybe Todd can sequence it for chimp DNA. Pretty sure PSS is part ape
Deletecheers
Joe
"Peer reviewed! Peer reviewed! Ikky wanna cracker! Peer reviewed!"
DeleteNot this again.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 6:49:00 AM PST
DeleteSo you can't link to a paper? You lose. Good game.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 3:34:00 AM PST
Lol^
Bigfoot follows the exact path of all the classic woo topics to the letter.
Got link to peer reviewed paper?
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 5:42:00 AM PST
You can not link to a published peer reviewed paper proving bigfoot is real. Fact. Looks like you lose buddy. Schooled. Too easy. Fish in a barrel.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 8:10:00 AM PST
I scanned through your wall of text and saw no links so I assume you have none.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 8:16:00 AM PST
I wasn't asking for any counter points I was asking for the paper. You failed to provide it so you lose. Sorry buddy.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 7:30:00 AM PST
You were asked one question which is a fair question when talking about biology. Provide a single link to a paper that verifies bigfoot. You failed to do that so you lose. Don't feel bad, we all have our off days.
And I could have gone on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on...
DeleteSomething reference to Polly wanting crackers? Ha ha ha!! Don’t you rhetorically wish, you might just get... Pedo. As times goes by this subject is getting nothing but more credible while your hoax cult dies a slow death.
Unlucky punk!
the problem is that unless someone actually sees a bigfoot leaving hair or other samples it's hard to determine what left it behind so it's usually the results will yield something else . Maybe one day he will get a real bigfoot sample
ReplyDeletecheers
Joe
Iktomi what peer reviewed DNA evidence of bigfoot is there?
ReplyDeleteThat’s a peer reviewed study of footprint evidence, PS... But unless you can point to another bipedal primate that’s leaving its evidence on two continents, then it’s attributed to what is commonly referred to as Bigfoot.
DeleteI’m not putting the link here a 50th time, go check out Meldrum’s online journal, ya rhetorical twit, you might learn something.
Well, I think you got your answer 11:53 - there is none.
DeleteDeflect, deflect, deflect.
You answering yourself again PS? Normal people don’t get themselves off to people repeating themselves on a comment section.
DeleteOh yes, I keep forgetting. EVERYONE who raises any questions of doubt in Bigfoot's existence is this "Stu". You really believe there is only one person here writing these comments??? In any case you never answered 11:53's specific question.
DeleteDeflect, deflect, deflect.
Plenty of people raise a very rational and understanding doubt about the existence of something they haven’t seen, Pedo Stu, but few display such a pathological need for Bigfoot to not exist... regardless of how much of a fool they’ve been made to look... to the point of obsessing about the subject’s blogs and YouTube channels daily in case a Bigfoot shows up.
DeleteAnd I did answer your question the first time around, Pedo Stu, it’s linked on his online journal.
Jeff Meldrum is an embarrassment. He regularly gets taken in by hoaxes and misidentified bear tracks. He was even fooled by Todd Standing, of all people, and that's just sad.
DeleteYou really should know better than to try dropping his name.
Um, reality check, since your fake Distotell sockpuppet didn’t get the attention you wanted...
DeleteJeffrey Meldrum actually has the backing of some of the best scientists in the world at the moment. I think he’s actually been hoaxed by one cast, and one piece of footage. But since no other anthropologist is having evidence hoaxed to catch them out, and since he’s not a footage expert... I think he can be excused.
So how’s this... JEFF... MELDRUM.
Pedo Stu, Meldrum has forgotten more in his career than you will ever know or learn in a lifetime. When you have the same educational credentials as Meldrum does please come back luv and we'll listen to you otherwise don't waste our time with your blithering bollocks. You really must think Meldrum makes zillions selling books on bigfoot , how else do you explain your rabid obsessive hatred towards him ? Put down the meth PSS
Deletecheers
Joe
you guys crack me up but you really, really need to find yourselves a life.
ReplyDeleteWhen a DNA contributor makes a telephone call to Todd, and tells him when and how a DNA sample will be arriving, their is a 100% chance that the sample will be intercepted and a known animal's DNA substituted.
ReplyDelete