Monday, November 5, 2018

New Interview With Dr. Jeff Meldrum


Check out this recent interview with Idaho State University professor, and bigfoot enthusiast Dr. Jeff Meldrum.

47 comments:

  1. Meldrum is an ace bloke who has forgotten more than most of the foolish skeptics will ever know . if any skeptic with a degree care to argue with him go right ahead, you'll be crushed like a bug on a cheap carpet !
    cheers

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ doesn`t know a fraction of what the skeptics have forgotten - go back to your comics and daytime telly.

      Delete
    2. Your foolish pride has gotten the best of you PSS. so what degree do you have hanging on your wall ? i'll guess your walls are covered in various degrees of stank and semen
      go back to playing donkey kong and smoking meth mate
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Pedo Stu... does it make you feel special, intelligent and important referring to sceptics? Do you refer to yourself as a sceptic? Does it make you feel clever, like you belong to some advanced cyber-community?

      And please clarify your drivel. What do you mean about sceptics forgetting things? Is that meant to make Meldrum bunk?

      Delete
    4. It's a bigfoot, you're a pedo

      Delete
    5. Anybody else picking up that PS don’t like being reminded of being PS?

      Delete
    6. 'Gug',i'm enjoying a Hairy Cane too, look at me Joe Ha ha ha Haaaa'gug'

      Delete
    7. It's a bigfoot,you're a pedo

      Delete
  2. is that "jeff i`ve got a humming-bum" (stinky stinky) talking fantasy and speculation again?

    yawn - think i`ll catch a few zzzz`s while he drones on about plaster-cast feet...(made by guy`s using lumps of wood and large boots on sticks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Pedo, here’s your reminder...

      https://images1.opb.org/c_limit%2Cg_center%2Ch_1000%2Cq_90%2Cw_640/news_comp_00000_fwgems.jpg

      Three decades that have produced morphological congruency in footprint casts, before particular replica casts were even made, and before things like mid-tarsal breaks had attention drawn to them... aligned with track ways that show that a genuine biological foot has made contact with the ground.

      Explain to me Pedo, did the “hoaxers” use a time machine to achieve that?

      Delete
    2. So what you're saying is that there are scientifically recognized bigfoot? Where can we see the bigfoot?

      Delete
    3. Sure you can see one! Here we go Pedo;

      https://i.cbc.ca/1.4362553.1508441707!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/bigfoot-film-patterson-gimlin.jpg

      “So what you’re saying is...” what I’m saying is, Pedo, is the exact evidence left behind by the creature in that photo, which fits every eyewitness description of “Bigfoot”, is now shown to be impossible to hoax, and subsequently published.

      Don’t like it? Stop being a Pedo and do something about it.

      : )

      Delete
    4. So what you're saying is that that evidence 100% proves bigfoot? Is that what you're saying because I actually didn't like it, it seemed awfully flimsy? I guess what you're saying is bigfoot evidence is flimsy at best?

      Delete
    5. It's a bigfoot,you're a pedo

      Delete
    6. “So what you’re saying is... “

      No Pedo, what I’m saying is... the exact evidence left behind by the creature in that photo (the PGF subject), which fits every eyewitness description of “Bigfoot”, is now shown to be impossible to hoax, and subsequently published.

      So unless there’s another hair covered biped that isn’t Bigfoot running around North America and Asia, then there’s as good a level of evidence as you need without an adequate field study being put forward.

      If you don’t like it, hurry up and debunk it after the 10th time of asking. It’s “flimsy” after all.

      : p

      Delete
    7. So what you're saying is 'no', it's not 100% evidence of bigfoot but really just your opinion? Your opinion doesn't seem to mean much to anyone does it?

      Delete
    8. Nargh!

      What I’m saying is, the exact evidence left behind by the creature in that photo, which fits every eyewitness description of “Bigfoot”, is now shown to be impossible to hoax, and subsequently published.

      My opinion means little where facts are concerned.

      Delete
    9. So what you're saying is that you're basing all your evidence for bigfoot on a piece of film that is factually disputed as be genuine? Is that what makes you so angry?

      Delete
    10. so what you're saying PSS is you enjoy arguing with us over a subject you have zero interest in but happened to come upon this site while in the middle of playing donkey kong ,smoking your meth and being a predator online looking for some young lads to bugger. Where do you find the time PSS ?
      Cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    11. Actually 'Gug 'Joe, what I'm saying is that you/Iktomi sure talk a lot without saying anything, know what I'm saying? Sorry to upset you tender girls, I'm going to stop interrupting your bigfoot dream, isn't that all it is?

      Delete
    12. Nargh, what I was saying was the physical evidence is irrefutable, I didn’t even start with the footage. But what I’m saying now if you’re a stupid Pedo who will have nothing tomorrow to explain it away... nothing next week, nothing next month and nothing next year.

      Laters Pedo!!

      Delete
    13. So what you're saying is that you're an expert on nothing, I don't think anyone here would disagree, don't you?

      Delete
    14. Don’t focus on me, I’m not important, PS!

      The evidence... you’d be able to give this place half a day’s rest if you debunked something and felt better about yourself.

      Maybe in 2019?

      Delete
    15. Do you know who i am PSS ? I used to be a friend with Grover Krantz ! what the hell have you ever done other than play donkey kong, smoke meth and threaten rape on this site ? Please go away
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    16. Blowing Grover Krantz in a men's room stall 'Gug '
      Joe

      Delete
    17. Joe remember when Grover Krantz peed on our faces? Good times, good times

      Delete
    18. Ikdummy started an argument with Gug Gug Guy and Gug Gug Guy won — again!

      Great job Gug Gug Guy! Ha ha ha!

      Delete
  3. Meldrum is a genius.Legend meets Science was a fascinating book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Jeffrey "keep the legend alive" Meldrum is a genius....at making money off of Bigfoot. It's easy money when you can write a book simply speculating and give talks at conferences to unquestioning and adoring fans who believe every word because he has a PH.D. behind his name. It's in his best interest to state Bigfoot exists because he can continue this ruse for the rest of his life as a nice little profitable sideline. He realizes that the believers will never relinquish their faith in it's existence and as a Mormon he knows all too well about faith and foolish beliefs. Hell - I can't blame him for taking advantage of all the suckers out there, it's just good business.

      Delete
    2. Pedo Stu has been pushing his money making hoaxing conspiracy theory for almost ten years around here. Notice how nobody else jumps on and celebrates his bat **** crazy theory? It’s because it lacks the very first piece of substance to convince anyone. It lacks any foundation for any alleged enthusiast’s wrong-doing... Bigfoot being a hoax. In any adult debate, in any of the few attempts made to debunk Bigfoot, it starts with an argument against the evidence (it’s existence), then why people might need to do that (that would be his money making conspiracy). It’s the cart before the horse, just like the idiot expects someone to find an intelligent primate without a professional effort.

      Just take a look at the link I published above. That work has finally been published and is as solid as you can get as repeatable scientific evidence.

      If Meldrum is hoaxing then he’s a fraud, but to prove that then the average hoaxer, WHO HAS NEVER CAME FORWARD TO TAKE CREDIT FOR IT LIKE HOAXERS DO, has a time machine because congruent footprint casts have the exact same foot morphology before replica casts were even made. No other expert in evolutionary bipedalism had even heard of the link to mid-tarsal breaks and Bigfoot casts, how is the average Joe gonna know? This would require a consorted effort between hoaxers and academics to manufacture and make footprints convincing enough to fool biologists as well as anthropologists.

      Show my the proof.

      This is the logic of Pedo Stu. Someone who quite clearly has his hand down his shorts, getting off to the next person who responds to him. In his psycho mind, a response equates to someone’s blood raised, and he’s brought someone down to his level with his anger issues and depression. It gives him a sense of control... Something thstd clearly lacking in his cruddy little existence.

      Delete
    3. You're either just stupid or willfully ignorant, I actually have a great life because unlike you I live in America, and there are no magic forest monsters here because again I live here and know this for a fact. I understand you wanting to forget your crapulent existence but there's reality and make believe, You can't prove bigfoot exists and sadly never will

      Delete
    4. Well I'm not "Pedo Stu" (although according to lktomi every skeptical post is) and I'm not 5:30 (however I agree with him/her) but lktomi's constant demand of disproving the so-called evidence lies in the interpretation of that so-called evidence. Bigfoot proponents claim it as proof and skeptics dismiss it so whatever is put forward is summarily dismissed by the other side. Just ONE piece of actual physical evidence and case closed Bigfoot is proven but THAT is never brought forward. Bring in a hand, leg or whole body and there is no debate - game over. But it's just excuse after excuse with the same so-called evidence being presented over and over with the same predictable results. Really, the excuses for why a body is never brought forward are just plain crazy and getting old. If the so-called evidence presented hasn't convinced mainstream biologists by now it never will.

      I have on more question. How many Bigfoot conferences and appearances would Meldrum attend if he wasn't getting paid to do so and peddle his books and merchandise? It's a nice extra income for him and in his financial interest to promote the Bigfoot myth (if he gets paid to do so).

      Delete
    5. “I haven got a crap life, you have.”

      And that’s it, Einstein. You’re an old fogey going on 13. Sums up your intelligence really. And I’m sorry Pedo Stu, but if you type in “psycho troll” into any search engine, you get a list of psychologists writing articles and essays about your behaviour... characterised by a lack of self-esteem, anger issues and depression. Don’t take it from me, take it from the experts.

      “lktomi's constant demand of disproving the so-called evidence lies in the interpretation of that so-called evidence.”

      Not my interpretation Pedo, but through scientifically testing of said evidence. The most absolute method of demonstrating that traits in casts are biologically water tight are those that are found in dermatoglyphics across various impressions, by testing it against the casting process, along with long-standing fields of biological & forensic science. If you are attempting to prove the antithesis of this with the same methods to which support it (for example Matt Crowley's technique), then this evidence is unequivocally falsifiable and the testing stands up. And the Elk Wallow casts do not fit any of Crowley’s casting artefacts, and have a long line forensic experts authenticating them.

      So!!! Not only is there multiple examples of the same physical evidence left behind by the creature in the PGF, transcending continents (China)... Not only is this impossible to hoax due to the requirement a time machine to know what anatomical features experts would identity and publish in the future... The scientifically objective outcome is you have the anatomical impression of an unclassified bipedal primate that has not only been falsifiably tested to your standards, but requires the same level of subsequent investigation as the Bili Ape had. The testing of multiple aspects of these tracks just keeps yielding more and more authentication, FACT.

      You’re unqualified backside doesn’t get to say that consistent science doesn’t stand up because someone isn’t interested in it without an ounce of scientifc equivalent. And as a means of substantiating your case, you just have faith, circular logic, an argument from ignorance fallacy and an impossible conspiracy theory as an excuses.

      “But it's just excuse after excuse with the same so-called evidence being presented over and over with the same predictable results.”

      Cool Pedo! Cut & paste it already! Don’t you want to shut me up? You have nothing boio. Nout. And a lack of experts investing via an expedition means that there is a lack of experts investigating in an expedition. Not that Bigfoot doesn’t exist. Just because you NEED Bigfoot to be a stupid animal that dies out in the open, just to give you that little head start on a creature that allegedly so obviously doesn’t exist (ha!), doesn’t make it so Pedo. Throwing something out because it doesn't fit your expectations of something who's existence you don’t even think is credible, isn't very good logic. It’s a moving the goal posts logical fallacy. Scientists get paid for hard work and touring their research. If you had buy a rundimentary education, you’d know that. And he’s sitting on published evidence.

      Delete
    6. Look it's really nobody's fault here you have a crap life, location is a big part of it and you live on an island full of child molesters, that already tells us a lot about you. Life is great in America and I live here and we have not classified bigfoot as a species, sorry but this is a fact

      Delete
    7. F’n schooled.

      Science v logical fallacies. Never a fair fight.

      Delete
    8. Not true, it's a fact that your very government is full of child molesters same as it's a fact that bigfoot is not a scientifically recognized species, there's some schoolin' for you, you actually need to know something to school people, little future reference for you

      Delete
    9. Let me guess Pedo... are the British government satanist pedos who traffic children around the world, eating them and running the Illuminati?

      No, a lack of classification does not equate to a lack of existence. The Bili Ape was documented before it was classified, and innumerable other smaller primates have been documented for years and not classifed due to low breeding populations for harvesting type specimens.

      You’re literally learning new things every comment. That’s what happens when you attempt to tackle science with logical fallacies; never a contest.

      Delete
    10. Look, you're a terrible teacher and a terrible liar. Why are you so delusional as to think you can tell someone who actually lives in America that the forests of America are full of gorillas? You really bring nothing to the table. Your idea of what's actually science is even more jaw dropping. You certainly are a special individual, sadly not in a good way. Good day to you sir

      Delete
    11. Because I know people who have actually spent all their lives in the wildnerness of the US, who have had multiple sightings of these things. Not only that... but I can point to reliable science for their existence.

      Maybe you should get out of the city and spend some time in the woods? Go get some fresh air. It’s a big wide world out there, Pedo.

      Science. You’ll challenge me when you start using it.

      Delete
    12. You know what lktomi - you may have a point about learning things. Since I am well versed in Bigfoot lore I should just put out a book with made up crap and speculation. There's plenty of Bigfoot groupies who will buy it and there is money to be made. It couldn't be worse than half the crap out there. Hey - it worked for Matthew Johnson!

      Delete
    13. I’m surprised you’re not a Bigfoot millionaire already, with all these money making hoaxes so easily knocked together!

      Ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    14. Nice to see you finally admitting to bigfoot millions

      Delete
    15. Oh they’re everywhere alright! But at the same time only attributed to 100. Or are you still “joking” about that?

      Tee hee!!

      Delete
    16. Actually you made up that number, just like everything else you make up, I told you you're a bad liar
      Tee-hee? Still reading Richie Rich comics?

      Delete
    17. IktomiTuesday, February 20, 2018 at 10:38:00 AM PST
      How many hoaxers, liars & role players running around the woods of the US?
      10,000?
      20,000?
      30,000?

      AnonymousTuesday, February 20, 2018 at 10:42:00 AM PST
      I would guess around a hundred or so judging from the stories reported here.

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2018/02/werewolves-dont-exist-but-dogmen-do.html?m=0

      Delete
    18. Right, you responded to yourself, your point?

      Delete
    19. You’re one craaaaaaaaaaaaazy old man.

      Delete