An aggressive Bigfoot Encounter In Mississippi


Sasquatch Central shares a terrifying tale of a bigfoot encounter that took place in Mississippi. The bigfoot creatures in the south do not have the reputation of the "gentle giants" of the Pacific Northwest.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Dirt bikes mean a lot to Brian. And video games.

      Delete
    2. Has Torpedo Stu debunked Bigfoot yet?

      Just wondering...

      Delete
    3. Didn’t you notice that my name is actually Brian and not Stuart? And yes, in your absence, I completely debunked bigfoot — so you can leave again and never return. Bye bye!

      Delete
    4. Put the cheese out and the little mouse comes running every time.

      Argh great... So not only are you pleading for people to forget your name, Stuart, but you’re now claiming to have achieved what no academic/scientist has ever managed to do yet?

      This’ll be special... Hit me with it Stu...

      Delete
    5. Isn't Hayden a girls name.... you aren't one but you are still a little bitch. Jeremy should have warned you better. And do you know he has a record?

      Delete
    6. Be ready for troll #4 to pop his head out of the ground soon.

      Delete
    7. Do you have a record too Hayden?

      Delete
    8. Are you and Jeremy cousins Hayden?

      Delete
    9. You having another manic episode, Stuey?

      I asked for some substance on the subject of Bigfoot. Try to leave out the logical fallacies that have embarrassed you for so long... there’s a good psycho-nerd.

      Delete
    10. Stuart made for 80%. These other 3 made up the remaining and they work together. Wait and see they will be gone, I can take it all the way with personal info. One more to go.

      Delete
    11. Jeremy 27 yrs. Lives in Mississippi and has a problem with weed. Hes done some stealing lives with his mom and step dad whom he doesn't like. He has a record. Hayden 23 will have the state soon. Cousins. Not sussed out #3's details yet.

      Delete
    12. Argh right... so how d’you know all this?

      Delete
    13. I can't say. Sry, wait and see.

      Delete
    14. Oh well Stuey... looks like you bottled it again.

      I’ll be back later to remind you of the elephant in the room.

      Delete
    15. is stuey off his meds again ?
      Oh dear, the poor sod is gone loco
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    16. You see Joe, it’s not that I want to avoid being called Stuey, it’s that this Internet Nancy Drew has figured out my real name (which is Brian) along with the real names of the other three trolls. At least I proved that bigfoot doesn’t exist before any of that happened. That’s a relief!

      Delete
    17. There is one troll. There has only ever been one troll... and there will only ever be one troll. You, Stuey.

      At least you can pretend Bigfoot doesn’t exist.

      Delete
    18. Sorry, as you now know, I have five kids (six if we include you) and I need to leave so I can fulfill my parental duties. You can read over the comments from the last few weeks and see where I debunked bigfoot. Leave whatever responses you have and I’ll reply later, thanks.

      Brian

      Delete
    19. There’s about as much chance that Torpedo Stu is allowed to look after children... as there is for him debunking Bigfoot.

      Delete
    20. ^ likes a fat throbbing "torpedo" shoved in his mouth and butthole.

      You filthy homo

      Delete
    21. Getting angry there, Torpedo Stu?

      That’s probably a sheer inability to control a subject like this simply by merely repelling people from an Internet comment section, paired with being addressed in a manner that’s making you sensitive.

      Delete
    22. I’m angry that my idiot cousin Hayden ruined Darth Vader in the prequels! Damn it!

      Jeremy

      Delete
    23. Sure bigfoot exists, he's magical, just ask Khat Hansen, right Iktomi?

      Delete
    24. You tell me... You seem to be the one obsessed with her.

      Bigfoot exists because it leaves an impossible level of eyewitness testimony and corroborating physical evidence, that no amount of logical fallacies, excuses and special pleading dreams away.

      Bypassing your biggest problem, by drawing attention to people who believe that Bigfoot is paranormal isn’t shifting your burden... Stuey.

      Delete
    25. Bypassing your friend Khat, answering would just dig you deeper into your hole. Poor idiot

      Delete
    26. Tell me Stuey... what difference is there from Khat’s paranormal beliefs, to your own beliefs that encompass anything from tree people to skinwalkers?

      Or is your psychopathy so extreme that the narcissism just flies over your head?

      Delete
    27. And I’ll say it again... Bypassing your biggest problem, by drawing attention to LIKE-MINDED people who believe that Bigfoot is paranormal isn’t shifting your burden... Stuey. Doesn’t matter how much you role play for your sadistic fetish.

      Delete
    28. You’ve made some good points there Ikitomi, but I just want to point out to Jeremy that I did NOT ruin Darth Vader. I did the best I could with the material I was given, all of the blame should be directed at that senile old f*rt George Lucas — they should not have allowed him to touch the prequels damn it!

      Hayden

      Delete
    29. You know Iktomi it's sad how you project your hangups onto others and I see at least 4 "stueys" here calling you out but you just go ahead and stick with the one person conspiracy theory, as for bigfoot, where's the bigfoot retard? Is it Dyer's model? Where's the bigfoot? Put up or shut up

      Delete
    30. Jeremy. Hows that heavy ankle bracelet you are sporting? Maybe it will help you build muscle on that skinny leg.

      Delete
    31. Stuey... and I am only talking to one psycho... and Bigfoot is in the impossible level of eyewitness testimony and corroborating physical evidence, that no amount of logical fallacies, excuses and special pleading dreams away.

      Stuey... It’s unclear whether you pretended to be into the paranormal side of Bigfoot to bait people, or that you still believe in paranormal Bigfoot which would mean (that to you) every scrap of physical evidence shouldn’t exist, thus you need to deny it. And if the latter is indeed the case, then you still need to attack enthusiasts because like all psycho-trolls, they “inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity.” It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense” (Suler 2013).

      By sockpuppeting you can declare Bigfoot is all role-play one minute with one sockpuppet, and then backtrack and claim it’s all misidentification the next with another sockpuppet when pressed to provide substance to such a claim... and by claiming there’s two or three of you, the contradiction for the sake of trying to get the last word flies under the radar of your imaginary audience who don’t know your slimy ways.

      Facts are... this subject attracts the craziest of the crazy. That’s Torpedo Stu.

      Delete
    32. That was quite eloquently stated Ikitomi, but I was really hoping that you might chime in on the whole Darth Vader debate — maybe another time bud!

      Jeremy

      Delete
    33. You moron Jeremy, no one here gives a flying f*ck about Darth Vader, does this look like a Star Wars nerd forum?

      Hayden

      Delete
    34. Except that you have no facts, that is a fact, you only have theories and conjectures therefore it is you who are torpedoed and sinking fast, magic bigfoot or bigfoot the forest friend doesn't seem to be recognized by any scientific institution or authority, why is that? Spin on Iktomi I'm through beating a dead horse like you, it's to easy to drive trucks through all your bullshit, go back to hiding as Joe

      Delete
    35. Does this one want a debate or discussion on the subject or to act like a raving ass? Lets wait and see.^

      Delete
    36. If it is Doc Squatch above, Im betting on raving ass. He just can't help himself.

      Delete
    37. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    38. Actually Stuart... what is established as factual via tried and tested methods, is the evidence for a creature with the same widely reported anatomy as “Bigfoot”, is leaving data that is repeatable to scientific standards.

      “Repeatable and reproducible data -
      Once factors have been correctly controlled and the test is carried out well, reliable data should be obtained. If someone was to carry out the test again using the same method and got the same result, the data is said to be repeatable. If a measurement was taken using a different method and got the same result, the result is referred to as reproducible.”
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/21c/materials_choices/measuring_properties_materialsrev7.shtml

      So if a series of qualified professionals who are authorities in their respected fields (which is what we have for this subject, no matter how much you special plead and role play it away), have examined the physical evidence for Bigfoot, over a 60 year period, and that evidence after repeated testing is producing reliable data for a genuine biological foot leaving it, that is now transcending continents... That’s repeatable scientific evidence. Peer review it, and then you have one big reason for people like you to cry like sad little girls.

      The only thing you’ve ever beaten is that c*cktail sausage between ya legs. Do you want me to hold your hand through the basics of scientific method again? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    39. I can’t read any of that Ikitomi, but I’m sure it’s wonderful.

      Brian

      Delete
    40. It’s ok... I published it again, just to sit back and watch you go extra manic.

      I am guilty of having a cruel streak after all.

      Delete
    41. So you want to hold my c*cktail sausage?

      Delete
    42. I don't post as Anon, or have fake accounts like Ikdummy.
      Where' a Body Ikdummy? How bout a Bone? LOL, you're so clueless!
      "So if a series of qualified professionals who are authorities in their respected fields (which is what we have for this subject" == SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID!

      Delete
    43. That's right DS, still no bigfoot or bigfoot evidence anyone accepts, guess they hide too well, looks like Iktomi loses yet again but this is bigfoot so he can never win. On the plus side he seethes so badly he forgets to chime in as Joe

      Delete
    44. DS back into bigfoot and dancing with the devil!

      Delete
    45. Where are the expeditions to find bodies? Even the most primitive of hominids found ways of maintaining their dead through close social bonds. Learn something about our evolution before ad hoc’n away common sense for the sake of trying to make your “lionmen and witches” seem more plausible, doesn’t work. Nobody cares who you are Bruce... and trying to make arguments here for the sake of getting your magic Pokemon a little more attention still just leaves you as a big fat nobody. Coming from someone who takes photos of brush on the footpath and who has never even found a verifiable footprint, requesting bones is a tad bit audacious.

      And yes Stuey... they hide exceptionally well. Ever seen how gorillas blend in with their environments? Ever actually watched a wildlife documentary to know how primatologists only get fleeting glympses of chimps that they’ve tracked for years? And they know how to track chimps, Stuey.

      Doesn’t make the evidence go away. And an argument from ignorance fallacy never got around to helping you special plead all to successfully either. Stuey and Bruce... you know this blog has hit rock bottom when these are the best an enthusiast had to contend with.

      Good job Matt.

      Delete
    46. Iktomi just lost an argument with himself. Ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    47. IktomiSaturday, March 3, 2018 at 2:27:00 AM PST
      Bruce started off as someone who had the right enthusiasm and was somewhat likeable. Obviously extremely eccentric right from the off, but likeable. People like that need encouragement and believe it or not, I’m a nice guy. If people approach me in a civil manner, they’re guaranteed to get it back. However, over time, with Bruce’s increasingly bizarre behaviour, snowballing illogical ad hoc fantasies that exclude every logical idea other than his own, and strange & unnecessary antisocial approaches towards people he had no reason to attack except for showing an interest in real researchers... Simply makes people like me change their opinions. Bruce is either an egomaniac who has found purpose in this subject. Or a troll willing to go the extra mile, looking to sadistically dupe people whilst getting YouTube hits.

      It’s as simple as that.

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2018/03/woman-suing-on-behalf-of-bigfoot-tells.html?m=0

      Delete
    48. Quick Stuey... Switch to “Hayden & Jeremy” to self-medicate against being called Stuey...

      Delete
    49. Oh I see, you never actually found “some of his tree structures very relevant to other examples around the country that have recognised activity.” You were outright lying to him as some weird way of “encouraging” him? That makes it so much better! Ha ha ha ha!

      So what else have you been lying about?

      Delete
    50. IktomiWednesday, November 18, 2015 at 2:12:00 PM PST
      Keep up the good work DS!! The toilet pizza eating psycho-perv is having heck of a meltdown, posting essays now!

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-breakdown-video-alpine-loop-bigfoot.html?m=1

      Delete
    51. Apparently, the “toilet pizza eating psycho-perv” was right all along about DS! Maybe you owe that person an apology now?

      Ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    52. Nargh!

      There’s nothing to lie about Stuey. I still think some of his tree structures pretty interesting... As countless others have. But that’s the extent of it. And since there’s no school of science that verifies such structures, that’s the brunt of it. You’re just upset that’s another example of me beating you up around here.

      Did it hurt?

      Delete
    53. Sorry, let me rephrase that...

      As I’ve found countless others’ tree structures interesting. Not that countless others have found Bruce’s tree structures interesting.

      Just wanna clear that up before Bruce thinks he’s finally achieved Bigfoot celebrity status.

      Delete
    54. Bruce has to be a troll or certifiable lunatic. no one in their right mind takes photos of trees and claims to find strange creatures and then he changes mid stream and now claims bigfoot and dogmen are evil spirits and he saw a demon in poop. if that isn't total bonkers i don't know what is. I wonder if the medical board know of his antics ?
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    55. That’s funny “Joe” — you once considered DS to be a “friend” who was doing “good work”:

      AnonymousSunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:30:00 PM PST
      Hey DS my friend, i enjoy your work, but i do think the blue bag idea is a little too far fetched. Its an interesting observation mate, but i just dont see it happening. Sometimes a bag in a tree is just a bag in a tree. But keep up the good work my friend!

      Joe

      Delete
    56. Once Iktomi and Joe realized DS was an adult and not a child they no longer liked him , that's how those freaks roll

      Delete
    57. No school of science that verifies, thanks Iktomi, you really are stupid

      Delete
    58. Yeah... Stick structures. You can read alright, yeah?

      And it doesn’t matter how many times you call others it, Stuey... you were reported to the American authorities for saying you wanted to rape children on the internet.

      Psycho.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story