Huge Footprints Found in the Sand
Some deer hunters find huge, fresh footprints while in the Three Sisters wilderness area in Oregon. The tracks cut deeply in the dark, volcanic sand. They knew instantly, they weren't alone.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
I woke up this morning and found a huge footprint on my arse hole!
ReplyDeletecheers
Joe
^ hahahah hahah hahahahahahahah
DeleteIs that because somebody kicked it fake Joe? xx
Delete^ They`re ALL "fake" - haven`t you worked that out yet for goodness sake?#
DeleteExcept for the glory-hole queen Joe F - who is all he is said to be.
Obvious bear double print is obvious. You can even see the claw impressions from the hind foot in the front.
ReplyDeleteSo long as bigfoot believers keep promoting blatant cases of misidentification like this, not to mention all the outright frauds, nobody is going to take them seriously if they ever do somehow come up with something legitimate.