Monday, April 30, 2018

Is Bigfoot Watching You?


From Barb and Gabby

Hello Everybody! We are back with more Bigfoot strangeness. We begin this video with Gabby's most recent experience... they have since been asked to quit picking on her. You might notice, throughout the video, she is watching the woods across the road. She does that a lot these days. Then we take you through the last week of activity around the cabin, including a visit with Sandy where she shares some pretty strange experiences of her own.

6 comments:

  1. Wow, broken sticks! Well I guess that settles it - Bigfoot is real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Bigfoot” is real because of the scientifically repeatable evidence it leaves on the environment of North America. Not because of broken sticks. Evidence that would be good enough to prove the existence of any other mammal.

      Delete
    2. ^ Stop telling lies - there is NO repeatable evidence and you well know this - grow up and stop lying.

      ALL other animals have been proven by the simple scientific process of an ability to show a specimen...NO other animals have been shown as real based upon assumptions ,surmising or based upon spurious footprints etc...so stop with the lies.

      Delete
    3. Grow up? Allow me to explain to you how repeatable scientific evidence works at GCSE level... Let’s start with the basics, just to get you up to teenage level science...

      “Repeatable and reproducible data -
      Once factors have been correctly controlled and the test is carried out well, reliable data should be obtained. If someone was to carry out the test again using the same method and got the same result, the data is said to be repeatable. If a measurement was taken using a different method and got the same result, the result is referred to as reproducible.”
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/21c/materials_choices/measuring_properties_materialsrev7.shtml

      So if a series of qualified professionals have examined the physical evidence for Bigfoot, over a 60 year period, and that evidence after repeated testing is producing reliable data for a genuine biological foot leaving it, and is now transcending continents... That’s repeatable scientific evidence. Peer review it, and then you have one big reason for people like you to cry like a little girl.

      Every single animal that has been classified off the back of research, gathering data and then tracking said animal... flies in the face of your embrassing cart before the horse special pleading. So please don’t claim to know the “simple process” of classification, because to you a primate must fall into your lap before efforts to track it even occur. You’re an idiot. There is also no other animal on the planet that has had the equivalent evidence Bigfoot has had verified prior to efforts tracking it. And the Bili Ape didn’t need a body before hand prior to primatologists taking a whole year... A WHOLE YEAR, tracking it. So whilst there is solid data for the existence of this hominin (data that a sad **** like you would love to pray and special plead away), to claim it doesn’t exist whilst nobody is finding the study to achieve that is...

      “Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that: there may have been an insufficient investigation, and therefore there is insufficient information to prove the proposition be either true or false.”

      Ya klutz.

      Delete
    4. So an unreadable wall of text proves bigfoot? Got it. Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    5. You always were a slow learner, Stuey... don’t worry, I’ll hold your hand through secondary school level science again some time.

      Don’t cry... Denunk Bigfoot.

      Delete