Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Bigfoot vs. Yeti A Cryptid Card Game


From Shoot Again Games, check out this awesome card game shared by Sasquatch Central.

A battle is brewing between the undisputed king of the cryptids Bigfoot and his stone cold cousin the Yeti, who is sick of playing second fiddle. In Bigfoot vs. Yeti you are an up and coming cryptozoologist mounting expeditions in the hopes of proving the existence of unknown creatures such as Bigfoot, Yeti, The Loch Ness Monster, the Jersey Devil or Chupacabra. Somehow you have landed yourself smack dab in the middle of feud between Bigfoot and Yeti so it's time to choose your side as it will help shape the fate of your research and ultimately your success! 2 - 4 players, 13 & older, 30 - 45 minutes

45 comments:

  1. Who`s been tossing and turning all night long eh ?

    the whirring and whirling of "Stuey" turning around in Joe`s head that is soooo heavy with worry yet can`t get to sleep for the nightmares - ooooh the pain the pain the pain


    hahaha hahahah hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your last comment earlier was here;

      AnonymousTuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:17:00 AM PDT
      There is no confirmation that bigfoot or any other cryptid creature exists outside of folklore and fantasy.

      Your next comment (in response to me) was here (as well as below);

      AnonymousTuesday, April 3, 2018 at 5:51:00 AM PDT
      You are a nut, ikdumm├┐. Are you crazier than you are stupid?

      You’ve slept 4.5 hours, woken and straight away responded to my comments, as well as partaking in your usual BFE crusade here. Something about “tossing and turning”?

      Delete
    2. ^ Continues under the delusion that there is only one person making all these comments who never sleeps or is away from this forum.

      There IS something seriously wrong with him.

      Delete
    3. Stuey, you’re clinging to this sockpuppet facade because you need people to think you’re not obsessed with me, or the subject.

      Give it up chump, everyone knows you’re nuts and Bigfoot exists.

      Delete
    4. The mental gymnastics that Joe/ikdummy has to perform in order to seem less isolated and crazy. "All anonymous posters are the same guy with different writing styles, occasionally different opinions, on different devices, posting 24/7, sometimes at the exact same time, for 8 years, all because this one guy doesn't want to seem obsessed with Joe/ikdummy. LOL Then there's ikdummy/Joe's 10,000 hairy tall men belief...

      ikdummy/Joe "backs up" his one anon theory/lie with psychology magazine quotes "proving" his inane conclusions, once again in his own mind.

      Delete
    5. F-AC Sockpuppet Style Proven -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/strange-cases-of-missing-people.html?m=0

      Rape Threat Boasts With Same “>>” As Quotations -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      And Your Twisted “Free Speech” Sentiment linked with the above “>>” Quotation Marks -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/bigfoot-truth-told.html



      That is PROOF above that you’re the the same sick psycho who both pushes the paranormal and has boasted about harassing people for YEARS. It’s really pretty simple... You obsess about this blog 24/7. You have always used two main writing styles but since I exposed your F-AC Collins sockpuppet, we don’t see it anymore, unless you get so emotionally invested that you accidentally bust out the “,,,,,,,”. It’s unclear whether you pretended to be into the paranormal side of Bigfoot to bait people, or that you still believe in paranormal Bigfoot which would mean (that to you) every scrap of physical evidence shouldn’t exist, thus you need to deny it. And if the latter is indeed the case, then you still need to attack enthusiasts because like all psycho-trolls, they “inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense” (Suler 2013).

      By sockpuppeting you can declare Bigfoot is all role-play one minute with one sockpuppet, and then backtrack and claim it’s all misidentification the next with another sockpuppet when pressed to provide substance to such a claim... and by claiming there’s two or three of you, the contradiction for the sake of trying to get the last word flies under the radar of your imaginary audience who don’t know your slimy ways.

      Facts are... this subject attracts the craziest of the crazy.

      Delete
    6. Linking to your own crazy theories or anon posts that may be YOU isn't proof,,,





      Delete
    7. Like I said Stuey... those three links are PROOF you’re the same psycho, PLUS I have at least another ten links to substantiate that. It’s like the Dark Tetrad was modelled on you, ya poor dumb loony toon.

      Delete


    8. No, they are not, Ms. Credentials. What is your degree and credentials that allows you to decide which anonymous poster is the same person? You can post another 10,000 links and it still would be meaningless. You're a dimwit with a mental disorder. You have no science background.

      Schooled!

      Delete
    9. I’m sorry... I need to be a scientist to expose a psycho-nerd now?!!

      Ha ha ha ha ha!!

      Well done Mr. Science. You don’t know the first thing about my academic background, or my credentials, and I’ve proven in those links you’re the same psycho who’s harassed people for years. Even stooped to criminal behaviour AND boasted about it. That’s not even a third of what I’ve got on you either.

      : p

      Delete
    10. You have no post-high school education, Joe F1tzgerald. You have no credentials, Joe F2tzgerald. You have no science background, Joe F3tzgerald. You proved nothing, Joe F4tzgerald. You are a bigfoot role-player who thinks he's a scientist. Too easy.

      Schooled!

      Delete
    11. Is that name meant to offend me, Stuart? Oh, and here I prove you’re the same psycho-troll because of your use of “F1tzgerald”;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/the-future-of-squatching-is-here.html?m=0

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      I’m sorry that by introducing you to secondary school level textbook science has made you feel like I’m exceeding my credentials, but that’ll be your own shortcomings. I’m just a Bigfoot enthusiast who actually spent some time looking into the subject. Where’s the F-AC Collins paranormal Bigfoot dude your were role-playing for so long?

      AnonymousSaturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:04:00 PM PDT
      Whats crackin Gs? Dis be off da chain yo. Biggie a movie star!
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/sasquatch-legend-of-bigfoot.html?m=0

      AnonymousSaturday, March 31, 2018 at 1:25:00 PM PDT
      I believe in Biggie but this is FAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKEE!
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/todd-standings-bigfoot-exposed.html?m=0

      Tell me Stuey... which side are YOU role-playing? The psuedosceptic or the woo-Squatch?? Tee-hee!!

      Delete
    12. I’ll leave you with this little reminder, Stuey;

      AnonymousMonday, August 15, 2016 at 7:16:00 AM PDT
      Im starting to think somthing along the line of skinwalker ranch paranormal..
      by the way thnx for asking 5:49,you are a true gentelman
      AC collins



      ... You’ve either been role-playing a pseudosceptic for YEARS to draw others into negativity, just to self-medicate your depression and emotional issues... or you’ve been role-playing a woo-fan for JUST AS LONG to impress people into thinking you’re “cool”, which is so desperately sad and says so much about you. Either way, role-players are real alright... ha ha ha ha!!

      Night sweetheart!!

      Delete
    13. What are your credentials and degree that allow your wild claims to be taken seriously, ikdummy?

      ,,,,,,,,,?

      Delete
    14. Stick it on the list of things about me you’re gonna have to take to the grave obsessing about.

      Delete
  2. No actual creature? No problem play this game!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plenty of this creature in the 60 years its trace evidence has been documented.

      Delete
  3. Trump cards are included:

    Bob hieronimus
    Upright bear
    Zorths free energy device

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob H isn’t tall enough to be the PGF subject, whilst the physical evidence left by that hominin is compliant with the standards of repeatable science.

      When bears start walking with a stride, lose the snout for a flat face and grow crazy width in their shoulders... then all reports might be considered as misidentification. Until then, you’ll have to contend with the numbers of professional, long-term experienced hunters, forestry officers, etc, that have reported full frontal, very distinct features of the anatomy that account for nothing that looks like a bear.

      Bears don’t walk with a stride.

      Delete
    2. Post a link to a forestry officer that has a photo of him or her, a name and where it happened.

      Delete
    3. ....or just a name to start with...

      Delete
    4. Why don’t you go and take your face to the toilet? There’s three databases of reports online, go learn something by yourself and not rely on others to do your work for you, lazy nerd.

      Delete
    5. You want photos of these forestry workers?! Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    6. Post the name forestry officer who encountered bigfoot, ikdummy. Back up your claim.

      You throw a lot of "evidence" around but when someone calls you out, you run. Coward.

      Delete
    7. Forestry Worker Observes a Sasquatch in Clear-Cut Near Feather River -
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=26850

      Forest worker has many encounters with bigfoot -
      http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=7441

      In the Sawtooth Nat'l Forest, three forestry workers spot a eight to nine foot tall figure walking on 2 legs across a clearing located about 150 yards upslope -
      http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=2061

      Delete
    8. And I need to be concerned when you “call me out”? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    9. Just as I suspected, forestry "workers", no names other than "Tom".

      Still waiting for the FORESTRY OFFICER you claim saw bigfoot.

      Delete
    10. You’ve got several up top from a Google search that took me under a couple of minutes. People who report “Bigfoot” generally have their livelihoods to look after, so full details and photos (HAAA!!!) isn’t generally the done thing. You’re so utterly naive and ignorant to this subject that it’s hard to believe you’ve been obsessively harassing people online about it for almost ten years. What a lazy slob you are.

      Oh, and if you access John Green’s database and word search, you’ll find every credible pillar of society reporting these hominins. Some of whom are very happy to disclose their names.

      Klutz.

      Delete
    11. Dusk sighting by a US Forest Service Law Enforcement Officer on the beach south of Tillamook -
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=13653

      Military officer recalls possible daylight sighting while driving in the Croatan National Forest -
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=33358



      ... Basics, Stuey. These are the basics I’m having to educate you on.

      Delete
    12. Sounds like the US Forest Service takes it seriously:


      https://www.fs.fed.us/fs-tags/bigfoot


      They joke about the U.S. Forest Service Mythical Wildlife Division on their OWN website.

      Delete
    13. I’m sorry... Was that link meant to bolster your argument?!!

      Delete
    14. Pop culture is pop culture. Stating the obvious is stating the obvious. Neither take away from the experienced people who have seen these hominins. You’ll find a majority of forestry officers, just like hunters, just like anyone from any walk of life within a majority of the population that think this subject is mythological and the brunt of jokes. That doesn’t take away from the minority of people who have the experience to know what they’re seeing, and who HAVE seen these rare hominins.

      Simple as that!

      Delete
    15. Exactly, The US Forest Service treats bigfoot as pop culture. Good point.

      I wonder why they don't have that attitude towards bears or wolves?

      They joke about the U.S. Forest Service Mythical Wildlife Division on their OWN website.

      Delete
    16. I know you lack creativity at the best of times and need to rely on mere word play... But using Bigfoot as pop culture or to sell something does not invalidate its existence. It’s like anything else that can be used in a product, plus Bigfoot is free to use.

      They probably haven’t got the same attitude towards bears and wolves, because in accordance with how few people have seen a Bigfoot, the majority of them haven’t seen one. Doesn’t mean Bigfoot hasn’t seen them. There are plenty of instances of forestry workers being ridiculed for their reports, their industry is no different to any other.

      For every ten jokes there is about “Bigfoot”, there’s a sighting by a credible and experienced person who knows the difference between a bear and a large hairy humanoid. And they just so happen to have peer reviewed science backing up their experiences.

      Delete
    17. On the official US Forest Service website??? Referring to bigfoot as a mythical creature???? Get real, Joe F1tzgerald!


      Schooled!

      Delete
    18. The majority of the population refer to Bigfoot as a mythical creature. Just like the majority of anthropologists dismiss the subject, it’s not stopped a pioneering minority peer reviewing the evidence. Forestry workers still report Bigfoot and what they report is in accordance with thousands of other experienced woodsman, substantiated by repeatable scientific evidence.

      You show your scars beautifully when you quote me.

      Delete
    19. Alleged 10 foot tall, 1000 lb, 10,000 of them and the US Forest Service themselves considers them mythological. You can't put two and two together, ikdummy, after 60 years???????

      Delete
    20. Clearly, not all of the US Forest Service does, since some of them are contributing to three databases of reports that are now substantiated by peer reviewed science!

      Night Stuey!

      Delete
    21. Hieronimus ??? are you daft ? have you seen the recreation they attempted ? so pathetic , does not even look like the PGF on a good day. Are you trying to say that Patterson with his limited knowledge of costume making could have produced something that spectacular in a short time with 60's fabric technology while Morris couldn't even come piss close with current technology ? His recreation with Hieronimus was bloody awful and laughable .
      Please go back to your room and hide under your sheets because you offer nothing on here but pure bollocks
      go away
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    22. The US Forest Service is not run by half a dozen people that claimed they saw bigfoot, ikdummy.

      Delete
    23. Addicted to his own narcissistic narrative.^ Crazy.

      Delete
    24. "Clearly, not all of the US Forest Service does, since some of them are contributing to three databases of reports ..."

      Or, the stories and names are made up. That sounds more likely. Especially given the Forestry Service clearly thinks bigfoot is not real and is a source of jokes.

      Delete
    25. Blah, blah, blah-di-blah...

      Let’s apply the same rhetorical logic to science (like I attempted up top, but you were too stupid to pick up on it). “Just like the majority of anthropologists dismiss the subject, it’s not stopped a pioneering minority peer reviewing the evidence. Forestry workers still report Bigfoot and what they report is in accordance with thousands of other experienced woodsman, substantiated by repeatable scientific evidence.” Just like the majority of the forestry service might not have seen, thus don’t believe in Bigfoot... it’s not stopped some of them who have coming forward to report it. Might I add that forestry officers carry guns like police officers. Most police officers would refrain from coming forward, and have in the past, because not only would they be ridiculed, but they’d risk having their weapons taken from them, etc. AGAIN, this has not stopped some of them coming forward.

      And of course! The names of these people are just “made up”. The thing is Baby-D, that’s pretty much impossbile. To have to make these things up, one would have to refer to the same plethota of data that substantiates such reports and write that off as made up as well. Every last person from every last professional and credible background have reported these hominins in places were forestry officers are going to be. ESPECIALLY hunters. For that drivel to apply, it would mean that for thousands of years there has been cultures who are vastly experienced in the wilderness of North America, all making the same creature up. Though finding each others customs undesirable, have managed to make up the same creature with non-human primate features & behaviours, when they didn't even know what one looked like, and have in fact managed to cheat experts with fake morphological traits that span decades and continents. The chain of substantiating data is simply too great... as much as it is plausible for so few forestry personal either reporting it, or having the courage to do so.

      People “making things up” is such a pathetic psuedosceptical cop out. You’ve got forestry officers seeing Bigfoot; they’re in the minority since people who see and believe in Bigfoot are in a stark minority. And you’ve got some of the most experienced people in wilderness areas, who are able to tell the difference between a bear and a humanoid, seeing them thus believing They’re too are in the minority since people who see and believe in Bigfoot are in a stark minority.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    26. https://www.thecryptocrew.com/2011/10/forest-ranger-charles-branson-shocking.html?m=1

      Delete
  4. Google bigfoot forums: Good read no trolls.xxx

    ReplyDelete