Woman Suing on Behalf of Bigfoot Tells Story
Claudia Ackley shares her amazing story of what happened that has led her to take on the task of suing California on behalf of bigfoot's existence.
 |
| Click here to watch |
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
She’s a crazy role player:
ReplyDelete"They're on our property. They knock on our walls. They look through our windows," Ackley said. "It's more and more and more.”
http://abc7.com/society/crestline-wo...gfoot/3090517/
Privately, I wish she was peer reviewed. I'm at a higher level of role-play.
DeleteThere is no reason to doubt her claims, because not only is Bigfoot being shown to exist by the evidence it’s left across the country for the past 60 years, but because people generally don’t try and take on the State for mere attention. This is because she would risk being sued back. Though she would need an extremely strong case, it is unlikely that she would prove the existence of a new biological species through the court of law. And allow me to explain how the peer review process works...
Delete“Peer review does the same thing for science that the "inspected by #7" sticker does for your t-shirt: provides assurance that someone who knows what they're doing has double-checked it. In science, peer review typically works something like this:
1. A group of scientists completes a study and writes it up in the form of an article. They submit it to a journal for publication.
2. The journal's editors send the article to several other scientists who work in the same field (i.e., the "peers" of peer review).
3. Those reviewers provide feedback on the article and tell the editor whether or not they think the study is of high enough quality to be published.
4. The authors may then revise their article and resubmit it for consideration.
5. Only articles that meet good scientific standards (e.g., acknowledge and build upon other work in the field, rely on logical reasoning and well-designed studies, back up claims with evidence, etc.) are accepted for publication.
the peer review process.”
So now that you are finally up to scratch with a process that you have demanded of enthusiasts for 8 years (sigh), you’ll see that there is no room for role-play. “Role-play” does not begin to adhere to the scientific standards that would now scrutinise that paper, and by your own words, role-play cannot be a factor outside of a stark minority since the vast “overwhelming majority” of people providing important data for this subject are not guilty of such.
There is no reason to doubt shart shart on her morphing owl bigfoot. She is certainly not a nutty middle aged woman with an overactive imagination. Now, if cc ever goes DS on you, then you could be honest. DS was a role playing, email sharing buddy, till he went rogue.
DeleteThough I could never prove her experience, there is no reason for someone like me to doubt it because she comes across as utterly sane, reasonable, thoughtful and logical towards the subject matter. There is also audio evidence from habituation sites that attest to these hominins imitating the exact animal Chick has alluded to. I have no doubt to question that audio, since there is reliable scientific evidence for the existence of the hominin allegedly making those noises.
DeleteBruce started off as someone who had the right enthusiasm and was somewhat likeable. Obviously extremely eccentric right from the off, but likeable. People like that need encouragement and believe it or not, I’m a nice guy. If people approach me in a civil manner, they’re guaranteed to get it back. However, over time, with Bruce’s increasingly bizarre behaviour, snowballing illogical ad hoc fantasies that exclude every logical idea other than his own, and strange & unnecessary antisocial approaches towards people he had no reason to attack except for showing an interest in real researchers... Simply makes people like me change their opinions. Bruce is either an egomaniac who has found purpose in this subject. Or a troll willing to go the extra mile, looking to sadistically dupe people whilst getting YouTube hits.
It’s as simple as that.
And by the manner in which Bruce seemed to needlessly turn on people after they didn’t buy his blurs, it really wouldn’t surprise me if his character is a parody you’ve made for what you perceive this subject to be. After your burden on the PGF was never shifted.
He's named Joe. Why call him Bruce and insist on him being named Bruce? When you're dishonest about many things it not easy to view you as a nice person.
DeleteYou have never, ever demonstrated that I am a dishonest person. You dislike me because for a long time you had free reign to harrass and spread misinformation about the subject. Which offered you some level of cyber-indentity & self perceived relevance. But that doesn’t make me a bad person.
Delete“I’m a nice guy.”
Deletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gaPzM4ExbJ4
Iktomi: "You have never, ever demonstrated that I am a dishonest person."
DeleteYes, I have, at least 3 times on this thread. On this thread you repeatedly refer to Joe K. as Bruce. You are lying. He has repeatedly told you that his name is Joe. It's listed as Joe many times for his business. You lied about "Bruce" and you lied about not being dishonest and you lied about me never demonstrating your dishonesty. I just did, again.
I call Bruce, “Bruce”, because that’s what Steve Kulls called him. To think that someone was desperate enough to allow him to take part in a convention, where the audience ripped him apart. It's thanks to people like Kulls, that people doubt the integrity of such events.
DeleteI have seen no evidence that “Joe” is his real name, and for all I know “Bruce” could have been his originally intended name of a crazy parody character he’s portraying to suck people in.
LIAR. You just lied again. You know his real last name. Google "Joe, his last name, and D.C." and you'll get nothing but evidence that you are lying. His D.C. face perfectly matches his DS face. Same person.
DeleteYou are a LIAR. You keep lying. I offer you indisputable evidence and you LIE about that. You're not seeking truth. You're constantly lying.
I still don’t see proof that’s him. And I’ll call him Bruce just the same, thanks.
DeleteDeal with it.
I “don’t seek truth”? You sound a little bit like Bruce there you know?
Retard, you can look up his Dr license, you lying retard
Delete... And I don’t intend on spending on second doing so.
Delete9:18, ikdummy is a prized prat, so he’ll keep calling him Bruce.
DeleteThere seems to be quite a bit of confusion about this DS chap so let's clear it up shall we.
DeleteBruce is the role playing name he likes to be called when he's out playing the part of the world famous bigfoot investigator and that's what he asked Kulls to call him
Joe is his role playing name when he plays the part of doctor at his make believe clinic and exams all his mates
His real name is Francis and all the kids on the street know him by that moniker and refer to him by that
It's kinda sad , i mean the whole split personality thing going on with him but some people go along with his role playing games to humor him
Hope this clears everything up about him
cheers
Joe
Yeah, it's easier for you to make things up, thanks for verification
DeleteYeah thanks Joe, I mean Iktomi , mental case
DeleteYawn, when you have proven Bigfoot I'll come back and talk to you, I'll be gone for awhile
Deleteno problem stuey, have fun on your vacations
Deletecheers
Joe
Iktomi: "You have never, ever demonstrated that I am a dishonest person."
DeleteIktomi: "I “don’t seek truth” ... And I don’t intend on spending on second doing so."
LOL What a buffoon.
“Yeah, it's easier for you to make things up, thanks for verification.”
DeleteDon’t we know it.
“The researchers found that reasons for believing in conspiracy theories can be grouped into three categories:
• The desire for understanding and certainty
• The desire for control and security
• The desire to maintain a positive self-image”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/talking-apes/201801/why-do-people-believe-in-conspiracy-theories
You’ll be back in the very next comment and you’ll remain here 24/7, as you have done. Proof is a body, in the meantime you can content yourself with peer reviewed physical evidence.
Iktomi: "You have never, ever demonstrated that I am a dishonest person."
DeleteIktomi: "I “don’t seek truth” ... And I don’t intend on spending on second doing so."
LOL What a buffoon.
You do realise people can read my comments, right?
DeleteYou do realize that you said "And I don’t intend on spending on second doing so." when asked to seek the truth about someone you repeated misrepresented and were proven to do so? Right? You do get that? Right?
DeleteAnonymousSaturday, March 3, 2018 at 9:18:00 AM PST
DeleteRetard, you can look up his Dr license, you lying retard
IktomiSaturday, March 3, 2018 at 9:20:00 AM PST
... And I don’t intend on spending one second doing so.
Bizarre behaviour.
^ Bizarre behaviour for a "truth seeker".
DeleteYou’re unhinged.
DeleteLOL.
You’re a liar.
DeleteLOL.
It’s getting to the point that you just need company now, isn’t it?
Delete^ Says the numpty who’s already commented over 100 times today.
DeleteAnonymousSaturday, March 3, 2018 at 9:25:00 AM PST
DeleteYawn, when you have proven Bigfoot I'll come back and talk to you, I'll be gone for awhile
^Iktomi: "Yawn, when you have proven Bigfoot I'll come back and talk to you, I'll be gone for awhile."
DeleteWhen WE have proven bigfoot? I guess you're never coming back. Now, your comment was a Freudian slip because deep down you know Bigfoot will never be proven real so keep your word and stay away..
Oh dear.
DeleteLook at the time stamp that’s published with that comment. You’ve been staring at that screen so long you don’t know when you’re being made a fool of.
“when you have proven Bigfoot I'll come back”
And look at you, back. I guess something’s bugging, eh?
: p
iktomi: "I'll be gone for awhile"
DeleteSure, guy.
^ bugged.
DeleteYep she has booger problems. And they always get worse before the get better. She needs to call the bluff creek scam project. Boogers will leave her alone, none of them have ever saw bigfoot, unless doing a national television show. Then its only a two minute story & then back to non-believer again.
ReplyDeletehttps://goo.gl/images/KtBT3D
DeleteListen, I've been a regular on this site for years now, way before Iktomi got here, and I can promise you this blog was a thousand times better before he arrived. All he did was bring a horrendous argumentative nature, as well a 'holier than thou' attitude, whilst also talking a load of bollocks.
ReplyDeleteNow, I'm someone who would like to believe that a creature like Bigfoot did, or does still, exist somewhere in the world, but I also like a bit more evidence than your average footer.
All Iktomi did was arrive here, thinking he knew it all, spouting utter bullshit and literally drove all the original and interesting regulars away from the site by thinking he owned the blog, which in turn brings in loads of trolls, who come here just to wind him up, which in turn made everyone leave the site. In fact the few original regular users from the site have told me in no uncertain terms that it was Iktomi that ultimately stopped them from coming here. Now it's just made up of him, talking endless rubbish to himself, or trolls that couldn't care less, and it's all gone to shit.
I hope you're happy with yourself Iktomi you stupid fucking prick.
AnonymousTuesday, June 20, 2017 at 2:50:00 PM PDT
Deleteits so funny how easy it was to kill this site.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/bigfoot-watches-fishermen-two-part.html?m=0
AnonymousFriday, December 30, 2016 at 2:32:00 PM PST
I've systematically destroyed the disbarred lawyer Brookreson, Big John, Leon, and countless other bigfoot bird brains who were so humiliated that they abandoned the blog. You (and your various sock puppets) are the only ones left who are willing to continue to sustain repeated daily beat downs. So congratulations on that!
https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/bigfoot-hunter-trailcam-results.html
Nice try Stuey. And there is one troll. There has only ever been one troll. And there will only ever be one troll.
EXPOSED!
DeleteWhen did the disbarred lawyer leave? lol
DeleteSome years after your mother.
Delete"Woman sues court to take her delusions seriously."
ReplyDeleteShe's asking for a 5150.
By the way, Iktomi, is Inktomi from the old James Randi forum, which went extinct. That forum changed to International Skeptics forum, which has virtually no traffic anymore. Inktomi is a under nourished disc jockey on Vancouver Island. He used to shove the James Randi Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge in every researchers face, but James Randi withdrew that challenge because paranormal was getting easier to prove with all the ghost hunter shows on TV, and thermal imagers, and ghost boxes, etc.
ReplyDelete