Sasquatch - The Legend of Bigfoot
Sasquatch - The Legend of Bigfoot came out in 1977. It's a classic among anyone who considers themself a bigfoot enthusiast. Check it out.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Whats crackin Gs? Dis be off da chain yo. Biggie a movie star!
ReplyDeleteAnonymousSaturday, March 31, 2018 at 1:25:00 PM PDT
DeleteI believe in Biggie but this is FAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKEE!
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/todd-standings-bigfoot-exposed.html?m=0
^ obsessed idiot
Deletehaha haha hahahahahahah
Or are you just busted?
Delete^ proof is in your obsessive response to every post and the belief that all posters are "Stuey"
DeleteHello Stuey.
DeleteOver 40 years later and still no proof, still no acceptance by science.
ReplyDeleteReality;
Delete60 years of scientific evidence, some of it of which is now peer reviewed.
AnonymousSaturday, March 31, 2018 at 1:25:00 PM PDT
DeleteI believe in Biggie but this is FAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKEE!
So if “Biggie” is real but there’s “no proof”... what are you investing your belief on, the paranormal? You are on record saying that’s it’s a skinwalker-squatch.
Peer reviewed and still no sasquatch.
ReplyDeleteAll of Sykes's hair samples turned out to be known animals. Every one of them.
Bigfoot is folklore. That's all there is to it. There never will be a bigfoot in the catalogs of science because there is no actual bigfoot.
That’s because scientific research does not start with a conclusion. Remember the secondary school level lesson we had yesterday on the scientific method? You should probably have bookmarked that and gone over it a little bit. A body can simply materialise once further research has commenced off the back of that peer reviewed study.
DeleteThe only notable researchers who submitted samples to Sykes were Dan Shirley, Marcel Cagey, Justin Smeja and Derek Randles. The BFRO did not provide any of the North American samples.
“Folklore” with respect to this subject is in fact oral histories and therefore anthropological data. Transitioning that, there is 60 years of physical evidence that’s had the scientific method applied, and which is complaint & repeatable enough for publishing. Don’t like it... do something about it you lazy klutz.
Happy easter to you Lktomi!
ReplyDeleteRemember when Ikcomments was all like, "Wait for Sykes! Wait for Sykes!"
ReplyDeleteWell, Skyes was a bust. So was EVERYTHING else that "proves" the existence of bigfoot.
A bigfoot body can simply materialize once further research has commenced off the back of a peer reviewed study.
Delete