Sunday, March 25, 2018

Bigfoot Blocks Trail on Researcher


From Blayne Tyler. "Something" knocked down a tree across the trail he was on. Was bigfoot trying to send him a message, or was it something more sinister they had planned?

22 comments:

  1. A tree falls over and it was bigfoot. WOW! These stories just make the subject a laughing stock. I can guarantee you it wasn't bigfoot. They don't exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you open your mouth shit comes out.

      Delete
    2. Maybe but it still wasn't bigfoot!

      Delete
    3. Have you ever seen a dead bigfoot while you were scraping up your dinner Mr Roadkill?

      Delete
    4. He’s got a dead bigfoot in his underpants.

      Delete
    5. I think it is extremely funny that Mr Roadkill had to use a picture of a movie bigfoot for his avatar because there is no actually pics of a real one. That's because they don't exist.

      Delete
    6. That goes for Itkomi as well. It's just too good. It sums up the entire bigfoot community perfectly.

      Delete
    7. I can well understand why lktomi and Joe are so bitter and belligerent. How sad to believe in something so badly and never have the satisfaction of proving it. To undergo daily ridicule and never be able to convince your critics. Like the proverbial itch you can never scratch, you must constantly endure the fact that it may truly not exist.

      It's pathetic really.

      Delete
    8. Bigfoot exists, because for the past 60 years, there has been so much physical evidence for it, that average height and weight ratios can be extrapolated, as well as Gaussian distribution noted in it. Some of which is now peer reviewed as well. There has also been very reliable footage of the hominin since the late 60’s, with accompanying footage demonstrating motion and mass outside of normal human capabilities. Not only is there plenty of reason to be satisfied if you’re enthusiastic about Bigfoot, but to suggest there is a lack of this is mere psychological projection for what has been pointed out in Stuey’s obvious behaviour in the last 24 hours;

      IktomiSunday, March 25, 2018 at 11:40:00 AM PDT
      Have they? Cool! Prove it... I’d love to see it. The fact that you’re here trying to claw back some satisfaction... Pretty much puts these “debunkings” into perspective.

      IktomiSunday, March 25, 2018 at 12:24:00 PM PDT
      Crying for a body when the creature is already being shown to be leaving its physical sign on the environment is futile. Trying to argue that you don’t have a burden about that, isn’t cutting it. You’d be behaving far less unhinged if you had a level of satisfaction, and you clearly don’t have any of that.

      You have to remember that because Stuart can’t think for himself, that everything that comes to him has been commented to describe his behaviour and in turn projected on to others. To successfully ridicule someone on this subject, Stuey would also have to bring something more than mere conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories (the 3 C’s), as this never did anything other than make the person using such logical fallacies look foolish, and it’s always just a little bit cringey reading someone giving themselves far too much credit, especially as far as Stuey is concerned.

      And Mark Roadkill’s comment was pretty funny, simply because it was so true.

      Delete
    9. ^ Except you have nothing with which to prove your silly claim - have you

      hahahaha hahahaha

      you pathetic and small child

      Delete
    10. I’ve avtually got too much to prove my claim. Role-playing empires; not so much.

      Delete
    11. Well, we've got too much evidence in that most of it is easily dismissable, like 99.9%, mate.

      Joe

      Delete
    12. And how are you getting on with proving that, Stuey?

      There is no room in your faith to have one single piece of evidence be proven legitimate. It takes one piece of evidence for Bigfoot to be real... is this an admission that not all of Bigfoot evidence is bunk?

      Delete
    13. I think .1% of the bigfoot sightings could be dogman, but 99.9% is easily dismissible. Cheers!

      Joe

      Delete
    14. I’ll now proceed to remind you of your little slip for weeks on end.

      Cheers!

      Delete
    15. I'm on your side mate. I'll remind you as well. 99.9% of bigfoot sightings are easily explained away. The remaining .1% are likely dogman sightings. Cheers!

      Joe

      Delete
    16. tHE ONLY THING "SLIPPING" FOR 4;38 IS THE DICK SLIPPING INTO THE MOUTH OF IKKYJOE THE GLORY-HOLE MAESTRO

      Delete
    17. STU always resorts to this distraction technique when he's busted and on the ropes. Boring.

      Delete
    18. stu has been very busy today changing his identities between fake me and the various others he has crafted over the years. Iktomi is absolutely spot on with his responses to the stu the troll !
      Cheers

      Joe

      Delete
  2. Another asinine BS bigfoot story.

    ReplyDelete