Bigfoot Blocks Trail on Researcher
From Blayne Tyler. "Something" knocked down a tree across the trail he was on. Was bigfoot trying to send him a message, or was it something more sinister they had planned?
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
A tree falls over and it was bigfoot. WOW! These stories just make the subject a laughing stock. I can guarantee you it wasn't bigfoot. They don't exist.
ReplyDeleteWhen you open your mouth shit comes out.
DeleteMaybe but it still wasn't bigfoot!
DeleteHave you ever seen a dead bigfoot while you were scraping up your dinner Mr Roadkill?
DeleteHe’s got a dead bigfoot in his underpants.
DeleteI think it is extremely funny that Mr Roadkill had to use a picture of a movie bigfoot for his avatar because there is no actually pics of a real one. That's because they don't exist.
DeleteThat goes for Itkomi as well. It's just too good. It sums up the entire bigfoot community perfectly.
DeleteI can well understand why lktomi and Joe are so bitter and belligerent. How sad to believe in something so badly and never have the satisfaction of proving it. To undergo daily ridicule and never be able to convince your critics. Like the proverbial itch you can never scratch, you must constantly endure the fact that it may truly not exist.
DeleteIt's pathetic really.
Bigfoot exists, because for the past 60 years, there has been so much physical evidence for it, that average height and weight ratios can be extrapolated, as well as Gaussian distribution noted in it. Some of which is now peer reviewed as well. There has also been very reliable footage of the hominin since the late 60’s, with accompanying footage demonstrating motion and mass outside of normal human capabilities. Not only is there plenty of reason to be satisfied if you’re enthusiastic about Bigfoot, but to suggest there is a lack of this is mere psychological projection for what has been pointed out in Stuey’s obvious behaviour in the last 24 hours;
DeleteIktomiSunday, March 25, 2018 at 11:40:00 AM PDT
Have they? Cool! Prove it... I’d love to see it. The fact that you’re here trying to claw back some satisfaction... Pretty much puts these “debunkings” into perspective.
IktomiSunday, March 25, 2018 at 12:24:00 PM PDT
Crying for a body when the creature is already being shown to be leaving its physical sign on the environment is futile. Trying to argue that you don’t have a burden about that, isn’t cutting it. You’d be behaving far less unhinged if you had a level of satisfaction, and you clearly don’t have any of that.
You have to remember that because Stuart can’t think for himself, that everything that comes to him has been commented to describe his behaviour and in turn projected on to others. To successfully ridicule someone on this subject, Stuey would also have to bring something more than mere conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories (the 3 C’s), as this never did anything other than make the person using such logical fallacies look foolish, and it’s always just a little bit cringey reading someone giving themselves far too much credit, especially as far as Stuey is concerned.
And Mark Roadkill’s comment was pretty funny, simply because it was so true.
^ Except you have nothing with which to prove your silly claim - have you
Deletehahahaha hahahaha
you pathetic and small child
I’ve avtually got too much to prove my claim. Role-playing empires; not so much.
DeleteWell, we've got too much evidence in that most of it is easily dismissable, like 99.9%, mate.
DeleteJoe
And how are you getting on with proving that, Stuey?
DeleteThere is no room in your faith to have one single piece of evidence be proven legitimate. It takes one piece of evidence for Bigfoot to be real... is this an admission that not all of Bigfoot evidence is bunk?
I think .1% of the bigfoot sightings could be dogman, but 99.9% is easily dismissible. Cheers!
DeleteJoe
I’ll now proceed to remind you of your little slip for weeks on end.
DeleteCheers!
I'm on your side mate. I'll remind you as well. 99.9% of bigfoot sightings are easily explained away. The remaining .1% are likely dogman sightings. Cheers!
DeleteJoe
tHE ONLY THING "SLIPPING" FOR 4;38 IS THE DICK SLIPPING INTO THE MOUTH OF IKKYJOE THE GLORY-HOLE MAESTRO
DeleteSTU always resorts to this distraction technique when he's busted and on the ropes. Boring.
Deletestu has been very busy today changing his identities between fake me and the various others he has crafted over the years. Iktomi is absolutely spot on with his responses to the stu the troll !
DeleteCheers
Joe
Another asinine BS bigfoot story.
ReplyDeleteIkdummyJo = cocksucker
ReplyDeleteHAHAH AHAHAH AAHAHAHAH
Delete