Thursday, January 4, 2018

Bigfoot On Military Bases


Bigfoot eyewitness stories from military bases. Bigfoot reports come from all over, even from military bases. Soldiers spot sasquatch during exercise drills on base. Why are the bigfoot there?

39 comments:

  1. Does anybody listen to this shit ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course he didn’t... Stuey doesn’t educate himself on any of the subject he’s obsessed with trolling. That isn’t important to him anymore (after he got schooled on the PGF). What is, is trying to support his emotional problems.

      Someone please help Stuart.

      Delete
    2. No one listens to this shit. I can sit n listen to youtube video on ghosts and fairy tales all day long and in no way does it equal education. It seems like Iktomi needs to go back and revisit his "elementary" education.

      Delete
    3. Daily reminder...

      Nobody is publishing the evidence for ghosts and fairy tales in journals, Stuey. You’re getting a little excited again. Put yourself away and let’s go through the physical evidence for 10,000 10 foot tall apemen again. I can’t promise it will end well for your emotional issues but you might at least learn something the millionth time around.

      Delete
    4. LMAO...now we are reaching for the scientific journal argument. I love this one. First anyone can write a scientific journal and have it published. The best consensus that you will find is that yetis are polar bears, Stuey.

      So, Stuey, I'm still waiting for this evidence for 10,000 10 foot tall monkey men you have been dreaming of. For every legit piece of scientific data concerning 10 foot tall apemen living all over North America I will offer up evidence of giant sloths...legit evidence....Stuey.

      Delete
    5. Actually, anyone can’t just simply write a scientific journal, because of the editorial process which dictates there can’t be any publication bias. The best consensus I can reference, actually, is the footprint evidence of the exact same foot morphology as “Bigfoot” in the US being documented by government employees in China.

      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      The paper published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–374, 2016. You'll notice that Jeff Meldrum presents the exact same foot morphology from two casts found in North America, with that of one sourced in China, essentially providing irrefutable proof that the track impressions are of the same biped. Hoaxers from different continents would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand. And that’s just one piece of evidence I can reference.

      Do you have the equivalent evidence for extant giant sloths, Stuey?

      Delete
    6. Actually...Stuey...anyone can publish scientific journals and articles on anything. There are plenty that people have published on your 10 foot tall monkey men but they don't amount to jack. Maybe you should educate YOURSELF and look into what it takes to publish one.

      Oh look...

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634953/

      An extensive paper over on NCBI about South American megafauna and their migration into North America. Can you believe that...but guess what there is ZERO mention of....10 foot tall monkey men. I know a lot of that science is way above your head...but since you like to invest your time into the gospel of youtube videos you may wanna watch up on a coupe things. The part about "protein sequencing" of the giant sloths are very intriguing. But do you know what they didn't sequence? 10 foot tall monkey man proteins.

      But hey...they have never found chimp fossils so that's all we need to go by...right?

      Delete
    7. Ok... So let me get this straight, because there are papers published on megafauna, and because there are papers on the footprint morphology for what is widely reported in “Sasquatch” across two different continents... It effects my case how? How does this demonstrate rhat anyone can publish a paper? If you didn’t already notice in the link I gave you (it helps if you actually read the arguments of others you are attempting to engage with), the same archaic foot morphology that is being reported across continents, which is repeatable scientific evidence (essential to the scientific method)... Is your paper on “10 foot tall monkey men”. Alternatively, you COULD suggest to me what other creature is coincidentally running around the US and China that hust is happens to have exact the same morphology as “Bigfoot”?

      Oh dear... Was taking the time to draw upon something utterly irrelevant on the immediate subject matter, meant to be an attempt at debate?

      I might add... It's impossible for a hoaxer from another continent to guess the exact same archaic foot morphology, and then find a method of having this morphology arranged in a trackway, whereby such a trackway encompasses different footballs only indicative of a genuine biological foot... And THEN ensures that such a trackway is found by, & then fools a government employee. Oh.. And if footage of a creature that cannot be hoaxed (PGF) has a subject in it that leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later, then you are either too stupid to understand how profound that data is, or are in a perverse state of denial to suggest that this is down to the creativity of hoaxers.

      Got any other irrelevances I can embarrass you about?

      Delete
    8. And yes... that’s exactly what you need to go by. Since recognised primates do not leave any fossil evidence. It’s in fact utterly relevant to what you’re arguing. You dense twit.

      Would you like me to now provide you with references to 7-8 foot tall skeletons in the US?

      Delete
  2. Where do all of these humans in a bigfoot costume photos come from? They are everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Argh yes!! For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla costume wearing conspirators, all out to gain. These conspirators, spanning different cultures, and though finding each others customs undesirable, have managed to role-play up the same creature with non-human primate features and behavioural traits, when they didn't even know what one looked like, and have in fact managed to cheat experts with fake morphological traits that span decades and continents!

      "Bleevers" live in such a fantasy world, eh?

      Delete
    2. Except white bigfoot role players assigned bigfoot meaning to otherwise bigfoot-free native American traditions. The worst are the Welsh.

      Delete
    3. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/man-in-ohio-claims-to-have-shot-bigfoot.html?m=0

      There we go Stuart. Spend a little time on the above comment section from the other day where attempts were made to educate you on actual native beliefs on American hominins.

      Remember Mayak Datat? Stick Indians? Or were you too blind drunk with your hands down your shorts again?

      Delete
    4. Shun him, internet bully^

      Delete
    5. AnonymousFriday, December 30, 2016 at 2:32:00 PM PST
      I've systematically destroyed the disbarred lawyer Brookreson, Big John, Leon, and countless other bigfoot bird brains who were so humiliated that they abandoned the blog. You (and your various sock puppets) are the only ones left who are willing to continue to sustain repeated daily beat downs. So congratulations on that!
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/bigfoot-hunter-trailcam-results.html

      Delete
    6. Joe, if you take pride in disbarring lawyers then I don't know what to say.

      Delete
    7. Oh I’m sure you’ll have lots to say, (cry about)... Once I rub more evidence for 10,000 10 foot tall apemen in your face.

      Delete
    8. HAHAHAHAHA.....well make us cry with all of your evidence!Let's have you tell everyone to get "educated" on this mysterious boogeyman that no one can get on any kind of media whatsoever.

      Delete
    9. No media??

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc
      ... There’s a few more instances of Bigfoot being around the same time as cameras. Would you like some thermal as well? Since you have such a sudden fascination with probability scales... What’s the odds in there being an actual thousands year old, culture hopping hoaxing conspiracy who guess up the exact same archaic foot morphology? Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    10. ikdummy posted 3 dead links before and 8 blurry compression damaged small indiscernable "bigfoot". idiot.

      Delete
    11. Youtube Bigfoot speculation videos are now official media people...cuz Iktomi says so.

      Oh yeah....giant ten foot tall apemen roaming the entire North American continent for thousands and thousands and thousands of years yet no fossil evidence of any kind. I mean everything from giant sloths and new species of mammoths are being found all the time but the only evidence for 10 foot tall monkey men are youtube videos.

      Do you have a list of any other native american spooks and boogeymen that you would like to offer up as being "real" just cuz they say so?

      The bible mentions unicorns and dragons. I suppose you believe in them along with European fairies....fairy.

      My name is Bill Jackson faggot. Look back through the archives of this site and "educate" yourself. I am not a suddenly fascinated by anything that has been posted or talked about on here.

      You are dumb and you are wrong and would take me a lifetime of Sundays to lay out why so just accept it cuz I said it!

      Delete
    12. 2:05 posts get whited out with words like f@g and sometime with too many paragraphs.

      Youtube Bigfoot speculation videos are now official media people...cuz Iktomi says so.
      Oh yeah....giant ten foot tall apemen roaming the entire North American continent for thousands and thousands and thousands of years yet no fossil evidence of any kind. I mean everything from giant sloths and new species of mammoths are being found all the time but the only evidence for 10 foot tall monkey men are youtube videos.

      Do you have a list of any other native american spooks and boogeymen that you would like to offer up as being "real" just cuz they say so?
      The bible mentions unicorns and dragons. I suppose you believe in them along with European fairies....fairy. My name is Bill Jackson f@ggot. Look back through the archives of this site and "educate" yourself. I am not a suddenly fascinated by anything that has been posted or talked about on here.
      You are dumb and you are wrong and would take me a lifetime of Sundays to lay out why so just accept it cuz I said it!

      Delete
    13. “Oh yeah....giant ten foot tall apemen roaming the entire North American continent for thousands and thousands and thousands of years yet no fossil evidence of any kind.”
      ... Stuey, are you aware that for a fossil trail of chimps and gorillas in Africa, there’s only a few teeth? (Something tells me you really didn’t watch that YouTube link I gave you yesterday, tut, tut). Also... there are three generations of archeologists and anthropologists who have documented 7-8 feet tall human remains in the US. Just ask Andy White PhD.

      I could list you any number of “Native American Spooks”. Native Americans appear to be just like any other culture in having lore and mythology, the problem is they also have oral histories... if you’re too dense to educate yourself on what separates the two, then that’s ok... I’ll just add salt to the wounds by reminding you that for one of their oral histories; Sasq’ets, there’s 60 years worth of physical evidence in footprints. Footprints that are now being shown to exist from the same biped in places like China. Oh... and nobody is seeing unicorns and dragons. There certainly isn’t three databases of reports that transition thousands of years of oral histories.

      I couldn’t understand the last bit of your comment... You appear to have let your emotions get the better of you.

      Delete
    14. I’ll be back tomorrow morning to respond to any drivel left here.

      : )

      Delete
    15. So, you'll be responding to yourself?

      Delete
    16. Hey Stuey...the chimp/fossil crap is getting old and is a worthless point. Giant sloths roamed this continent at the same time that chimps were around and yet their bones have been recovered. A population of ten foot tall monkey men that supposedly spans the entire continent shouldn't be too hard to find. This isn't China...no one is grinding up dragon bones and giganto teeth as a cure for impotence. Your footprint evidence doesn't cut it either. If all you wanna go by are fake footprints and tracks left by bears walking over their own tracks then you have nothing to stand on.

      Yeah...here we go with oral histories. That is a tired and useless argument too. If science was to believe every ancient tale about mythical creatures then they would be believing in stupid crap like centaurs.

      They can track a single mountain lion across the eastern US but no one can come up with real proof of a population of ten foot tall monkey men in Ohio let.

      Stick to your youtube videos Stuey. I'll stick with common sense and science.

      Delete
    17. One last thing Stuey. We don't need fossil evidence of chimps or gorillas. Why? Because we can walk out into the jungle and study them. Another reason why using the lack of chimp fossils as proof for your mythical 10 foot tall monkey man is just useless.

      Please don't change...everyone thinks its funny to see a smug prick posting his foolish drivel.

      Delete
    18. A worthless point? Are you able to differentiate what’s relevant and “worthless”? Recognised primates don’t leave fossil evidence, never have in fact. Actually... anthropologists regularly state that it’s like they, “came from nowhere” with respect to their fossil lineage. This would be the same approach of anthropologists should a 10 foot tall monkey man suddenly end up on a dissecting lab table. Might I add, that this was a “worthless” approach that you raised. Something tells me you won’t anymore now you’re up to scratch with a ten years old’s understanding of anthropology.

      A population of ten foot tall monkey men that supposedly spans the entire continent shouldn't be too hard to find... And they have been. That’s why we have 60 years of footprint evidence. Footage, hair samples, thermal, audio evidence... The only thing that is left to do is successfully track one to classification. And nobody is funding that kind of expedition at present. Might I add AGAIN, that in a country where an archaic human with average height ratios of 7-8 feet tall in height has been reported for thousands of years, there are three generations of archeologists and anthropologists that have documented human remains with average height ratios of guess what? 7-8 feet tall. Those aren’t mefauana bones, do you know what archeologists and anthropologists are qualified to do?

      My footprint evidence doesn’t cut what? By whose authority does footprint evidence not amount to solid evidence? Biologists use it for wildlife surveys, & especially mammal surveys, where they are able to determine the presence of a mammals in an area on the basis of its tracks. Might I remind you... That not by all the sceptical academics in the entire world has this equivalent for the Sasq'ets been shown to be bunk. Neither has it in this BFE fantasy world you live in, where you control the Bigfoot universe. So a little substance on “fake footprints” if you don’t mind, Einstein?

      Might I add, that science does generally believe the oral histories of indigenous peoples, that’s what (cough, cough), there’s a whole branch of anthropology devoted to its importance? (Wow... just wow). Nobody is seeing centaurs. And they certainly aren’t leaving forensic evidence in the present. track a single mountain lion across the eastern US, but they also have 60 yeas of footprint evidence from a hominin that isn’t a dumb animal. Even chimps know how to hide their tracks in the jungle... And we’re talking about a primate in Sasquatch that has far more human descriptions than that of a chimp, thus logical to deduce that it can evade far more elusively. And no... you do need fossil evidence for chimps and gorillas for your drivel to apply, because since nobody has ever put an expedition together to track a “Bigfoot”, a comparative example of recognised primates having the exact same frequency of fossil trail as “Bigfoot”, is pretty much as fundamental point as you’re likely to ever fathom.

      Something tells me you don’t actually find this remotely funny.

      Delete
  3. A worthless point? Are you able to differentiate what’s relevant and “worthless”? Recognised primates don’t leave fossil evidence, never have in fact. Actually... anthropologists regularly state that it’s like they, “came from nowhere” with respect to their fossil lineage. This would be the same approach of anthropologists should a 10 foot tall monkey man suddenly end up on a dissecting lab table. Might I add, that this was a “worthless” approach that you raised. Something tells me you won’t anymore now you’re up to scratch with a ten years old’s understanding of anthropology.

    A population of ten foot tall monkey men that supposedly spans the entire continent shouldn't be too hard to find... And they have been. That’s why we have 60 years of footprint evidence. Footage, hair samples, thermal, audio evidence... The only thing that is left to do is successfully track one to classification. And nobody is funding that kind of expedition at present. Might I add AGAIN, that in a country where an archaic human with average height ratios of 7-8 feet tall in height has been reported for thousands of years, there are three generations of archeologists and anthropologists that have documented human remains with average height ratios of guess what? 7-8 feet tall. Those aren’t mefauana bones, do you know what archeologists and anthropologists are qualified to do?

    My footprint evidence doesn’t cut what? By whose authority does footprint evidence not amount to solid evidence? Biologists use it for wildlife surveys, & especially mammal surveys, where they are able to determine the presence of a mammals in an area on the basis of its tracks. Might I remind you... That not by all the sceptical academics in the entire world has this equivalent for the Sasq'ets been shown to be bunk. Neither has it in this BFE fantasy world you live in, where you control the Bigfoot universe. So a little substance on “fake footprints” if you don’t mind, Einstein?

    Might I add, that science does generally believe the oral histories of indigenous peoples, that’s what (cough, cough), there’s a whole branch of anthropology devoted to its importance? (Wow... just wow). Nobody is seeing centaurs. And they certainly aren’t leaving forensic evidence in the present. track a single mountain lion across the eastern US, but they also have 60 yeas of footprint evidence from a hominin that isn’t a dumb animal. Even chimps know how to hide their tracks in the jungle... And we’re talking about a primate in Sasquatch that has far more human descriptions than that of a chimp, thus logical to deduce that it can evade far more elusively. And no... you do need fossil evidence for chimps and gorillas for your drivel to apply, because since nobody has ever put an expedition together to track a “Bigfoot”, a comparative example of recognised primates having the exact same frequency of fossil trail as “Bigfoot”, is pretty much as fundamental point as you’re likely to ever fathom.

    Something tells me you don’t actually find this remotely funny.
    Reply

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well...well...well...I see Stuey here is starting go go off the deep end here with the same old tiresome drivel.

    Well...let's begin Stuey. You keep bringing up anthropology. I wonder if you even know what that even is. Since we are suppose to be talking about 10 foot tall monkey men and not cave people drawing on walls or indians dancing around campfires....I'm gonna stick with paleontology and wildlife biology. You can keep citing prehistoric fairy tales but I'll stick with evidence...biological that is.

    Let's first start with the most idiotic claim that you have pulled out of your sore ass..."primates don’t leave fossil evidence, never have in fact". The fossil record is full of primate fossils. I know that you are "choosing" to deny this...just like all of those nice people that are choosing to believe that the Earth is indeed round...I'm just gonna leave you with one little tidbit that you can look into for yourself on youtube since that is your go to source for "scientific" data.

    Australopithecus...you can start there.

    "Footage, hair samples, thermal, audio evidence...". This is a compete joke. Especially the audio and thermal nonsense. Everyone has seen this crap and the only people that are convinced that it is real is you and Todd Standing. Not a single bit of those thermals have been accepted as anything more than bullshit. Howling in the woods at night and "samurai chatter" is also bullshit. If you need to be told why it's bullshit then you really are stupid.

    And again with the footprints. No one other than the idiots that sign on up to buy every Jeff Meldrum book that comes out buys into this crap. Yeah...wildlife biologists have an enormous library of footprint that they use to track animals with....known animals.

    "Might I add AGAIN, that in a country where an archaic human with average height ratios of 7-8 feet tall in height has been reported for thousands of years".

    Hahaha...reported for thousands of years to who? According to what just dripped outta your mouth this was suppose to be a viable population of 7-8 foot tall humans. Yet...no archeological evidence has been uncovered. There are 8 foot tall people today and there were 8 foot tall people yesterday and there will be 8 foot tall people tomorrow. But guess what...they're not giant monkey men.

    Here is another myth...chimps hide their tracks. I keep hearing this garbage from you armchair youtube primate experts. This bullshit comes directly from this ignorant community and there is 0 evidence to back this claim up.

    Still waiting for that hard evidence Stuey. My giant sloth has a skeleton on display at the Smithsonian. Your 10 foot tall monkey man has a display....in your head. And to be honest.....I actually do find this very funny.

    Oh...one last thing...exactly how much does it cost to fund an expedition into the remote and dark wilderness of Coshocton, Ohio?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, you’re talking about “10 foot tall monkey men”... I just use that terminology to mock you. I’m talking about an archaic human, that has all the facial and anatomical features of an archaic human, and even leaves the physical evidence of an archaic foot. And yes, just as there are fossils of hominids like Australopithecus, there are also three generations of archeologists and anthropologists that have documented 7-8 foot tall skeletons in the US, not to mention archaic skulls studies like this;
      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/
      ... sourced in places in the US where there are rich oral histories of hairy hominin tribes (just like every other tribe in North America). And since what is commonly known as Sasquatch is extant (unlike Australopithecus), given the sheer amount of physical evidence, extant forest dwelling primates as we know them have never left fossil trails. Oh... and primates encompass both human and non-human variations. It doesn’t matter if you want to draw upon any number of rare fossil finds, because there are any number of equally rare fossils out there waiting to be discovered. Our theories of human evolution are based on surprisingly little evidence. Perhaps 200 skulls, half a dozen skeletons and a confusing pile of fossil fragments. All we have to explain 7 million years of evolution. The fact that such finds are so rare does by no means take away the fact that recognised primates do not leave fossil trials. And here in lies an adequate example that “Bigfoot” not having a primate’s fossil trail.

      A complete joke? Starting with thermal, two pieces that stand out are Bart Cutino’s that has two subjects in the height range of 7.5 feet tall. And the Brown’s thermal that has a subject in the height range of 8.5 feet tall. You are very welcome to challenge these, but something tells me your level is just writing “BS” like you’re somehow qualified. And as for audio;
      “CONCLUSION REACHED BY DR. KIRLIN AND LASSE HERTEL ON THE SIERRA SOUNDS
      The results indicate more than one speaker, one or more of which is of larger physical size than an average human adult male. The formant frequencies found were clearly lower than for human data, and their distribution does not indicate that they were a product of human vocalizations and tape speed alteration.”
      http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf
      ... Do you understand what a conclusion on such audio data means, or do I need to explain the big words? The only people who are convinced of this level of evidence are those who are firstly interested in the subject enough to spend the time looking into it, and the obsessed denialists who learn about it when they’re getting educated on said subject. What I need from you is someone with equivalent credentials as the scientists who’ve actually studied the audio delivering a contradictory opinion... That’s what adult debate demands. Your mere unqualified, uneducated opinion doesn’t really matter.

      Delete
    2. “No one other than the idiots that sign on up to buy every Jeff Meldrum book that comes out buys into this crap.Yeah...wildlife biologists have an enormous library of footprint that they use to track animals with....known animals.”
      Why don't you have a little listen what Meldrum has to say from the 27mins mark in this link?
      https://youtu.be/BS1jPUz5CDg
      ... And take note of the calibre of world renowned scientists that are defending Jeff Meldrum’s work? Martin Lockley, University of Colorado Denver... And Jeong Yul Kim, Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education, Cheongwon, Chungbuk, Korea. Other notable scientists are John Bindernagel, PhD Courtenay, BC, Canada, Colin Groves, PhD Australian National University Canberra, Australia, Chris Loether, PhD Idaho Sate University Pocatello, ID, Jeffrey McNeely, PhD Chief Scientist IUCN - World Conservation Union Gland, Switzerland, Lyn Miles, PhD University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, John Mionczynski Wildlife Consultant Atlantic City, WY, Anna Nekaris, PhD Oxford Brooks University Oxford, England, Ian Redmond, OBE Conservation Consultant Manchester, England, Esteban Sarmiento, PhD Human Evolution Foundation East Brunswick, NJ, Zhoua Guoxing, PhD Beijing Museum of Natural History Beijing, China. Might I add, that Meldrum’s work on footprints has just been peer reviewed, so it appears there’s in fact no end to the amount of people “buying” into his work. And might I add... the only difference between this mammal and that which are tracked by wildlife biologists, is the finding & adequate resources to accomplish that. For example, it took a whole year to track and film the Bili Ape. A lack of expedition just means a lack of expedition. How much did that cost? I don’t know... But all that matters is an equivalent study is not being funded at present. Not that the data to warrant such a study doesn’t exist.

      Delete
    3. “Yet...no archeological evidence has been uncovered.” Hmmmm... you see, I I wasn’t mistaken, I’m pretty sure a alluded to institutions such as the Smithsonian documenting 7-8 foot tall skeletons? Sure, people grow to 8 feet tall over time... But in a country where for thousands of years there are cultural and contemporary anecdotes of 7-8 feet tall hominins... where there are things like hairy man pictographs with true to size 7-8 feet tall subjects depicted in them... And where there is 60 years’ worth of footprint data that yield average height ratios of 7-8 feet tall subjects leaving them... The archeological studies are just fine & dandy. Only a couple of years ago, a new species of primitive hominin, homo Naledi was discovered that buried it's dead in caves. These were very primitive hominids that lacked the evolved brain capacity and intelligence of more modern hominids such as Neanderthals that also buried their dead. By this, it is not a stretch to assume that Sasquatch bury their dead. In fact, there is more reason to assume so than otherwise, given the fact that they are quite clearly human and not a dumb animal. Even if we didn't have the hairs that are morphologically consistent with a wild human, if we didn't have the track castings that quite clearly show a large human, then the innumerable reports that basically describe what one would expect from a caveman attest to this. Given the high frequency of science journals that account for such large human remains being found, and the long standing cultures to which state that Sasquatch are another tribe of large humans, one does not require Sherlock Holmes to be able to draw a link from such data. Don't take my word about 7-8 foot skeletons, take it from sceptical PhD Andy White who's literally making a name for himself debunking giant claims lately. "Bigfoot" burying their dead is logical. Because people like you fail every day of your obsessed lives to explain away the evidence, then there is little doubt that they exist. From this premise it is possible to use heuristical principles such as Occam's Razor, and it is therefore logical to theorise as to how they might deal with their dead in-line with accepted hominid behaviour. Do you see how this works? Try it one time... Substantiate one of your claims and from their there is reason to make educated theories.

      And whilst I find reference to chimps hiding their tracks... I’ll leave you with this link that shows giant human remains in the height regions of 7-8 feet tall. Remains that aren’t in museums, because of the reputation process;
      http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/gigantes/esp_gigantes_15.htm
      ... be a brave boy and open it.

      Delete
    4. Oh... and I’ll be back in the morning.

      Delete
    5. Here we go... the first 2.5mins of this video;

      https://youtu.be/z0eUKV4m2z4

      See ya tomorrow!

      Delete
  5. Woops...let me fix this before you really go off the deep end.

    Let's first start with the most idiotic claim that you have pulled out of your sore ass..."primates don’t leave fossil evidence, never have in fact". The fossil record is full of primate fossils. I know that you are "choosing" to deny this...just like all of those nice people that are choosing to believe that the Earth is "flat"...I'm just gonna leave you with one little tidbit that you can look into for yourself on youtube since that is your go to source for "scientific" data.

    ReplyDelete