Is this a bigfoot? A lot of people think it certainly looks like the face of one. NvTv shared this image with their viewers, which was originally posted by "Seattle Sasquatch".
Its an interesting image. If the researcher returns to the same area and repeatedly captures compelling imagery then one would be inclined to say that it sure looks like a BF. If no additional imagery was subsequently captured from this area then one might be inclined to say that it is a very strong paredolia image.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Is it levitating??
ReplyDeleteIts an interesting image. If the researcher returns to the same area and repeatedly captures compelling imagery then one would be inclined to say that it sure looks like a BF. If no additional imagery was subsequently captured from this area then one might be inclined to say that it is a very strong paredolia image.
ReplyDeleteSee how that works? REPEATABILITY