Sunday, September 3, 2017

Woman Has Terrifying Dogman Encounter


From Dogman Encounters Radio:

If you listened to Episode 155, titled "Dogman Country," you'll remember tonight's guest, Clara Dutcher. On Episode 155, Clara talked about Dogman encounters she had last year as well as encounters her son, Jared, has had. Even though Clara had more than 1 encounter with Dogmen, none of her experiences with them terrified her. They left her curious about Dogmen and wanting to see them again. Well, a couple of days ago, Clara contacted me to let me know about an encounter she had earlier that day with one that DID leave her terrified. In fact, this most recent encounter she had with what she describes as a huge, pissed off, heavy duty Dogman has left her never wanting to see one again!

Click here to listen

72 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. That's right Chick you got them on the run.

      MMC :)

      Delete
    2. The only flake around here is you Stu so piss off.

      Delete
    3. stu resorts to being fake Joe to piss people off but i think few people are buying it
      sorry Stu/ fake Joe and many of your other aliases , you are one really horrible person

      Joe

      Delete
    4. Stu is probably the idiot who has been fake Joe on here. His only mission it seems is to piss people off
      Sorry stuey, no one is buying that you are me so go back to playing with you toy trucks

      Joe

      Delete
  2. IKTOMI+MMC+ZABO+CC+UNO+PIB = STUPERCHUMPS!!!!!!
    HAAAA HAAAHAAA LOL!! Subcribe,,
    GUTLESS???????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barret(superfriends are racist)SandersSunday, September 3, 2017 at 3:14:00 AM PDT

      Hey UNO just wbat kinda GUTTLESS COWARDLY PIZZA PERV ENABLE PERVERTS?
      You can leave a message at my YouTube channel. ????

      Barret SANDERS

      Delete
    2. ^ only when your ass is open wide and winking...it already is ,you say ?

      I`m IN.

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Fake Joe, you wouldn't know how to use your inch worm if your life depended on it so go and bugger off !

      Joe

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Thousands year old, culture hopping, continent jumping Bigfoot hoaxing conspiracy theory? Far more ridiculous than Bigfoot existing based on the evidence.

      Six year long tantrum about what cleverer people think on the internet, racial attacks and other antisocial behaviour that would equate to criminal activity in any modern society, & sockpuppets galore? Embarrassing for a grown man.

      As PIB said... Get to your room!

      Delete
    2. Hey anonman, or H.T. For short!
      Don't talk that rubbish to Dr. Squatch/Dogman #1 researcher outside of Matt Moneymaker that is.
      Have you seen his YouTube channel? That guy has nailed Barksquatch, Tree-dogbarker, and the Falling leaf-yeti on numerous occasions. I mean it seems every time that field researcher goes into his local park he finds something that would be considered fake news even for CNN Bigfoot Standards! It's amazing the pictures this guy takes. Even when one of those above named beasts are standing right in front of his Cracker Jack box camera he refuses to film it moving or in many cases shape shifting. He goes to that always reliable still photo shot. No way he'd ever take the chance if on one of his numerous cryptoids moving to a better vantage point.

      No way not or bat-guano crazy regular Dr. Squatch would throw his good name into the mud with some obvious tree bark photo stills or leafs falling out of tress to give him that classic blob Squatch!

      Dr. Squatch you are losing your GOD DAMNED MIND with that crap you peddle off as Sasquatch or frogmen/women/children. Dr. Squatch you always talk about the lord judging you and others? You better hope he has a sense of humor when he pulls your YouTube channel up and he asks you for some honest explanation for those big FIBS you have been pushing for channel hits in exchange for cash!

      Delete
    3. Hey Zabo, would you agree that:

      “Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation."

      http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.20995/abstract

      Delete
    4. Well Harriet I thought you liberal progressive type people think that race is just socially constructed?

      Delete
    5. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Delete
    6. Stuey... "Plaster" appears to be your biggest meltdown of late.

      Any substance yet?

      Or can we expect you to continue to lash out on normal human beings because of it for the next couple of weeks?

      Delete
    7. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Delete
    8. Game, set, match.

      Just your friendly daily reminder of why you're such a plum.

      Delete
    9. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Delete
    10. I wonder whether the level of severity of Joerg's meltdowns would form a Gaussian distribution curve? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    11. I'm not sure 10:00, but it's certainly likely that his deformed head is shaped like a Gaussian distribution curve!

      Delete
    12. D'you know what would cause me to have a "meltdown"? If you finally provided some substance against track impressions, "plaster", Gaussian distribution, and all the other terminology you learned from getting your fat backside handed to you around here.

      Delete
    13. Regarding the ding dong who made up the nonsense about a Gaussian distribution of footprint sizes:

      Drawing on interviews with dozens of eye-witnesses, Fahrenbach went on to say that Bigfoot’s diet is rich in mussels, clams, peacocks, and the “hindquarter” of deer. He insisted that Bigfoots enjoy wrestling, tickle fights, and, most surprisingly, gangbangs. He assured us that even a horny Sasquatch has an impeccable sense of orgy etiquette.

      “When an especially large male came onto the scene,” Fahrenbach said, describing a sexual pileup involving one willing female and lots of dudes, “he didn’t try to buck the line but simply stood there and took his turn in good time.”
      In the beginning of his lecture, there was some nervous giggling from those in the audience. After a while, they just stared at Fahrenbach, a few with jaws agape. Somewhere in the back row, a woman turned to her husband and whispered, “I can’t tell if he’s kidding.”

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/10/everythings-bigfoot-in-texas



      Delete
    14. Sometimes I can't tell if Joerg is kidding! Ha ha ha! Please tell me you are!

      Delete
    15. I have a serious question Joerg. Does the number of bigfoots who participate in a random sampling of bigfoot orgies form a Gaussian distribution curve???? Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    16. Joetomi also botched the definition of Freudian Slip. His meltdown was a doubly whammy.

      I think Joe's low iq'd mind reads science journals and processes them as a smattering of big words confusingly structured and tries to imitate this bizarre perception in his posts.

      Delete
    17. Notice that none of that actually addressss the work Henner has put together which amounts to something like this?

      "Measurements and estimates on Sasquatch dimensions, collected over the last 40 years in the Western U.S and Canada, were subjected to statistical analysis and extrapolation by scaling laws appropriate to primates and mammals. The study has yielded average population values for foot length and width, scaling factors of foot length to height, values for weight, plantar pressure, walking and running gait, speed, and a tentative growth curve as a function of time for the female of the species. The results suggest a substantial population with traits different from those of other higher primates and humans."
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm

      Sasq'ets are wild archaic humans, and I would therefore expect them to behave as humans would do during close social bonds. Ever seen primates in the wild? Pretty liberal with what they get up to when they're bored.

      Substance... It's a tricky thing trying to get some out of a troll who's level is ad hominem.

      Delete
    18. Stuey...If you knew what Gaussian Distribution meant, why did you demand me "define" it for you, especially after I had explained it in relation Sasq'ets tracks a couple of comments prior?

      Freudian slip
      ˌfrɔɪdɪən ˈslɪp/Submit
      noun
      an unintentional error regarded as revealing subconscious feelings.

      ... It's ok Stuey. I've had to hold your hand through the meaning of things like "rhetorical questions" and basic UK wildlife (no wild bears)... You don't surprise anyone any more. I'm here to help.

      Delete
    19. Oh wait, there's more from the same song dong:

      “Their top speed for running is between 42 and 45 miles per hour,” Fahrenbach told the crowd, in a thick German accent. “They can cover 90 feet in just three steps, or 30 feet per step. So obviously, they have immensely powerful thighs and legs in general. . . "

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/10/everythings-bigfoot-in-texas

      Just for point of reference, the fastest human in the world Usain Bolt can run the 100 meters at 28 miles per hour. So this buffoon is actually claiming that Patty can run 17 miles per hour faster than Usain Bolt! Ha ha ha!!!!



      Delete
    20. Post the quote of where the unintentional error was ikdummy.

      Delete
    21. "The maximal speed that a Sasquatch is capable of attaining has not been reliably tracked, although many casual reports refer to observers driving in a vehicle parallel to a running Sasquatch. Before rejecting unbelievable sounding speeds or step intervals, it is well worth keeping human records in mind. For example, the world record walking speed over 20 km is about 11 mph (18 kph), the top running burst speed about 27 mph (43 kph), the longest single jump near 30’ (9 in), and the longest triple jump—in effect, three running steps—about 60’ (18 in), all this with a physique of decidedly smaller scale than that of a Sasquatch. I would estimate the top running speed of the Sasquatch to be near 35 mph (56 kph), the speed of a galloping horse."
      - Henner Fahrenbach
      http://www.bfro.net/ref/theories/whf/fahrenbacharticle.htm

      Kelly Shaw has in the past found prints showing one had leapt a creek of over 15′ in one stride. Coonbo measured one from a subject that would have had to have leaped 20 feet plus from a standing position, and then longer after it took off. Given Fahrenbach's research up top, imagine one running 35, almost 40mph then leaping? We also have eyewitness testimony such as this;
      "I am not sure as to total distance, but I can say what we witnessed leaped entirely across a logging road that was easily 20+ feet, more likely 25 from tree line to tree line. It was airborne all the way into the opposing tree line from its departure. I cannot relate accurately how fast that thing was… It was fast enough to still be a living “blobsquatch” in my memory. Never did get to see anything other than vague size and shape. And that was literally a car length ahead of us or so."
      - Steven J
      https://sasquatchchronicles.com/topic/how-far-can-big-foots-jump/

      If something is twice, maybe three times the size of a normal human, has twice maybe three times the muscle mass than the average human, has to rely on its physically to hunt to survive... Basic common sense would say it would be quicker than civilised humans.

      Delete
    22. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      uv already proven ur inabilty to process info, ikdummy

      Delete
    23. IktomiThursday, August 31, 2017 at 10:07:00 PM PDT
      Casts of track impressions even show size variation of that follow what is called Gaussian distribution. That would not be the case if tracks were being hoaxed on a large scale. These casts follow a natural pattern of said distribution, and as a result belong to a real bipedal hominin.

      AnonymousFriday, September 1, 2017 at 9:32:00 AM PDT
      ikdummy Gaussian definition: "Casts of track impressions...."Gaussian distribution has nothing to do with tracks. I asked you to define or explain Gaussian distribution.

      IktomiFriday, September 1, 2017 at 9:57:00 AM PDT
      I explained Gaussian distribution. Nobody said it defines tracks, Stuey, but it can be applied to variation in tack impressions all the same. It's ok, there's a few around here that recognise you struggle with literacy, you're excused. And all the while, Gaussian distribution in said impressions doesn't go debunked.

      IktomiFriday, September 1, 2017 at 12:17:00 PM PDT
      Stuey, you didn't answer the question... If you know what it means, why do I need to "define" Gaussian distribution? Are you sure there is actual relevance in your little deflections? Was that a little Freudian slip, dear boy?

      Delete
    24. ... And then you inadvertently asked what "Freudian Slip" meant. It's ok... I'm gonna make sure you're up to scratch with adult level terminology by the time you're sectioned again.

      Delete
    25. u still havent provided a def. of gd..using a word in a sentence is not a definition

      Delete
    26. If you knew what it meant, why would you need a definition? How does a written definition on my part, somehow support your effort in debunking its application to Sasq'ets tracks?

      You're a busy idiot... All your efforts in aaaaaaaall the wrong places.

      And clearly a Freudian slip.

      Delete
    27. I knew your inability to process info had repercussions outside the bigfoot world.

      You STILL think your use of fs was appropriate.

      I know for a FACT that you have a job that requires little intelligence.

      Delete
    28. ^ JoeTomi has been succking so long his lips are in a permanent round "dick-sucker" position and he finds it difficult to speak properly now...he doesn`t mind though as he`s intent of finding a dick to cover with his superbly practised lips.

      Delete
    29. How many times have you reported yourself to blogger today? Is that comment one for the complaint bank? How's your mission to take down the blog coming along, on track?

      Utter psycho.

      Delete
    30. ^ has his ass contorted into a permanent funnel shape ready to receive all the 6 inch lurve he wants

      Delete
    31. Not me ikdummy but ur inability to process info and surplus of ability to inaccurately conflate never fails to entertain.

      Delete
    32. That's it... Stick to your level, Stuey. Attempting adult debate about a subject you're clueless about isn't your thing.

      Ciao!

      Delete
    33. Joe doesn`t know much about barrels of fish - but does know a helluva lot about "shooting" as long as "cum" is being "shot" into his funnel-shaped corn-hole or round hole of a mouth.

      Delete
    34. Poor Joe - reduced to "conversing" on a blog with a person he detests - how lonely are you exactly ?

      Very,t`would seem.

      Delete
    35. I wouldn't call it "conversing" per say, more like totally destroying the little idiot who deserves it.  Lonely is Stuey crying for attention 24/7 on a blog he detests.

      Delete
    36. Stopped for a quick lunch (yes, I'm working today) but had to comment on that article about Fahrenbach. I brought that article up a while back here and discussed it with lktomi. I have no idea where Fahrenbach came up with some of these assumptions such as gangbangs and orgies but to me it puts everything he has put forth in a dubious light. Frankly I was quite surprised when I read that article as it really made Fahrenbach come across as unhinged. Of course lktomi defended him as he has done here now but I have to think even some advocates would have to roll their eyes at this speculation.

      Will check back later to follow-up on further discussion.

      Delete
    37. I really dunno what to think of "Bigfoot orgies" (creased), I can only assume that Henner was trying to apply the same liberal sexual behaviour that recognised great apes are known to express in social groups, such as bonobos.

      However, if drawing upon the behaviour of recognised primates (Henner was zoologist who worked thirty years as Chairman of the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy at the Oregon Regional Primate Center in Beaverton in Oregon), is somehow a means of rendering measurements on Sasq'ets dimensions over the last 40 years in North America as "dubious"... Then we can all go home safe in the knowledge that Curious has debunked "Bigfoot".

      Of course, people like Curious use such cynical and outright character attacking sources as the best means of confronting scientific research for over 40 years' of track impressions... It's called ad hominem. Something pseudosceptics do well.

      Delete
    38. I just got here All i gotta say is 10:14 is funny as hell

      LOL

      A C Collins

      Delete
    39. Everything is funny as hell when you're drunk all the time AC.

      Delete
  4. ikdummy doesn't even know what ad hominem means.

    according to ikdummy logic, if you use someone's past credibility to assess their current credibility, that is an ad hominem attack.

    This happens OVER and OVER again with ikdummy. He is not formally educated and has a horrible time piecing meaning and information together.

    This is so painfully obvious and why ikdummy is so tragically entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you'd had but a meagre education, you'd be able to read properly and know that little scenario you've just dreamed up isn't anywhere in writing on this entire comment section.

      Yes Stuey, you know what ad hominem means alright.

      (Creased)

      You'd also know that you need capital letters for the first letters of names.

      See ya tomorrow!

      Delete
    2. The only way I can explain Joe is that he has a low Iq but he also way kept away from education until later in life and he is scrambling to make sense of it all. Joe, were you not interested in school or kept away from it and are now working hard to figure things out in your mid 30s? Maybe you're from a culture or neighborhood that doesn't value education and u broke away and are trying to make up for lost time? You're in way over your head intellectually but have the scrappy false bravado of a street punk.

      Delete
    3. ad hominem
      ad ˈhɒmɪnɛm/Submit
      adverb & adjective
      (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
      "an ad hominem response"

      Delete
    4. @ I aggree totally with your assessment of iktomi,"false bravado of a street punk".

      The only thing you might have added was "The false bravado of a very dumb street Punk!

      AC Collins

      Delete
    5. Curious' argument was against Fahrenbach's IDEAS, not as a person.

      For your idiot brain, ikdummy, here is an explanation of Freudian Slip.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aCFIKR-X0s

      The key word is "slip", meaning mistake. I didn't make a mistake.

      BTW, Freud has been debunked on many things over the years but the definition for his term remains constant.

      Honestly, ikdummy, it is so obvious that you are trying to catch up on a lost education. Am I right or wrong?

      You are picking an obscure inconsequential subject like bigfoot to delve into because 99% of people including bigfooters won't delve into it deep enough to correct you.

      Delete
    6. Good point 3:18. I was insinuating that because ikdummy is an idiot, his bravado is unearned and therefore false, but it never hurts to be direct when describing a fool.

      Delete
    7. "Curious' argument was against Fahrenbach's IDEAS, not as a person."
      ... Cool, care to point it out? Henner's work is on track impressions. And here's that definition again...
      Freudian slip
      ˌfrɔɪdɪən ˈslɪp/Submit
      noun
      an unintentional error regarded as revealing subconscious feelings.

      "A Freudian slip, also called parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference of an unconscious subdued wish or internal train of thought. The concept is part of classical psychoanalysis. Classical examples of parapraxes involve slips of the tongue and of the pen, but psychoanalytic theory also embraces misreadings, mishearings, temporary forgettings, and the mislaying and losing of objects."

      Oh, and if you're on about mistakes, yours was to be too dense to notice that I explained how Gaussian distribution is applied to this subject, notably the track impressions that have got you all angry lately.

      What a patoot.

      Delete
    8. Some people have to be up for work.

      Schooled on Freudian slips. Maybe next time you'll be more careful?

      Delete
    9. You are an absolute fool, ikdummy. Paste my "Freudian slip" on a psychology forum and ask experts if it is one. You are an absolute idiot. You are missing the point about slip. Watch the video I linked.
      I think seeing you would explain a lot. For whatever reason you are a person who delves in to a lot of minutia without understanding major or even simple concepts but has a ton of confidence even though you are an idiot. Your job, though, reveals your intellect though.

      What work do you do, ikdummy? Your work doesn't lie. What do you do for a living, fool?

      Delete
    10. I don't need to watch the dodgy videos you link, and I don't need to tell a cyber-stalker psycho like you what I do for a living. You wouldn't last two seconds on a psychology forum, and you're only lasting here because Matt doesn't monitor the comment sections.

      There is the definition up top that I pasted.

      Freudian slip.

      ; )

      Delete
    11. You pasted the definition but you still don't understand the meaning.

      ikdummy = idiocy + hubris

      You know what you do for a living and that's what matters. A high iq'd person wouldn't be doing what you do. You have trouble processing information and delve into minutia without understanding basic concepts and premises. All done with clueless confidence.

      Delete
    12. Hmmmmmm... So I pasted the definition, which mirrors perfectly what I have asserted all along... Yet I allegedly don't understand the meaning? Are you struggling Stue?

      You're angry. That's understandable... But not a good look when your sole purpose in life is to try and make others angry. You plead for attention all day, every day, only to end up getting angrier? Give yourself a break Stuart, you're going to do yourself some mischief at this rate mate.

      Delete
    13. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Delete