Monday, May 22, 2017

Bigfoot Stalks Man During Day Hike At Native American Reservation


Here's a story of a bigfoot encounter that took place on a Native American Reservation. A hiker claims the creature stalked him. Have a listen to see how it all turned out.

135 comments:

  1. I am NOT a "C0CK HOUND"!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IKTOMI,,!! quit calling Chick Chick a fat ugly C0ck hound!!

      MMC

      Delete
    2. "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,too late"-Joe Fitsgerald.

      Delete
    3. Juvenile arseholes! ^


      Joe

      Delete
    4. Don't worry Manchester, I've got things under control. An American with an advanced degree has written a paper declaring a hoaxed plaster cast a new species of 10 foot tall camera-shy apemen.

      Delete
    5. Shy, yes. Susceptible to mistakes, yes...

      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg

      And you're just as sick as the scum happy to target vulnerable children.

      Delete
  2. "CEMENT HEADS,CEMENT HEADS,CEMENT HEADS,,YUR ALL CEMENT HEADS!
    HAAA HAAA HAAA LOL"-BIG GINGER!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Someone please! For the love of God, put this blog out of its misery.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sucker! Made you look at nothing. Absolutely nothing. No you don't get back the time that you wasted looking at this video. There are a zillion such experiences like this that happen every year, yet the MC thinks that there are instead, so few that happen that it is important to waste your time in telling you about this ho hum sighting. Sucker!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Get Fucked FUCKERS!!! Fuck this shit!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone's quite clearly very, very upset about something.

      Dear lord.

      Does seeing this comment section double up as your self-esteem exercise, Haints, you big fat failure? I don't know what's more embarrassing. You being duped in Florida & blaming everyone else for it... Or Sanders thinking he's ruining lives by dominating an internet comment section.

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    2. Testicles are real, duh, I seen them and touched them

      Delete
    3. Ikdummy has a fat obsession. Everyone is fat or types with fat fingers in Ikdummy's world. Isn't that hate, Ikdummy? Isn't that fat shaming? Don't you have laws in the UK against speech? Is Joe F1tzgerald, born in 1982 and currently living in Wales, England, going against what he is allowed by his government to say?

      Delete
    4. I've never in my life, seen anything like the meltdown you're experiencing. Was it Meldrum recieving the 2016 Dinsdale Award? Was it his work published in Society for Scientific Exploration? If you were a human being, I might actually have felt bad for you. And wouldn't you just love to know anything about me.

      : )

      Carry on Stuey, it's your blog now.

      Delete
    5. Where is your evidence? Where is it Ikdummy?

      Delete
    6. "Refresh, refresh, refresh..."

      You're boiling inside Stuey!

      Delete
    7. Stuey, Nicki, bigfoot, fat men... poor ikdummy lives in his own imaginary-man world. LOL

      Delete
    8. Buddy... It doesn't matter how ridiculous the idea of Bigfoot is to you, it doesn't matter how much of your days you spend abusing people on here about it... I am at least not as psychologically messed up as you, ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    9. Tell me Stuey... What is it exactly that you think you achieve by obsessing like this?

      Delete
    10. Actually any Dr could use your posts on here to lock you up and throw away the key

      Delete
    11. Argh come on now Stuey, surely you're not worried about having to answer that basic question. What do you think you achieve by doing what you do?

      Delete
    12. Projecting your insecurities on others now? If you embrace full woo like myself and your good friend Khat Hansen you can hasten your descent down the rabbit hole

      Delete
    13. Woo testicles come out and play woo woo testicles come out and play woo

      Delete
    14. Come on Stuey, surely you're not too much of a wimp to answer that basic question? That's unless you're not even sure yourself?

      Delete
    15. There you are testicles, I love you

      Delete
    16. School them Iktomi, you're winning, you're a winning winner's winner

      Delete
    17. Being published in SSE is nothing to crow about. It is a journal that deals with fringe science.

      http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1064461,00.html

      " The opinions of the organization in regard to what are the proper limits of scientific exploration are often at odds with those of mainstream science.[2] Critics argue that the SSE is devoted to disreputable ideas far outside the scientific mainstream"

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Scientific_Exploration

      Delete
    18. From the same wiki:

      "The JSE, while presented as neutral and objective, appears to hold a hidden agenda. They seem to be interested in promoting fringe topics as real mysteries and they tend to ignore most evidence to the contrary. They publish "scholarly" articles promoting the reality of dowsing, neo-astrology, ESP, and psychokinesis. Most of the prominent and active members are strong believers in the reality of such phenomena.[7]"


      LOL, ya, why don't you tell us all about the 2016 Dingdong awar some more?

      Do you never research anything before you blabber on about it?

      Delete
    19. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    20. Oh dMaKeR, so it's back to ad hominem again? Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! You seem a little angry, there Don? It might be because you can't demand evidence to be published in a journal anymore.

      EDITOR IN-CHIEF
      Stephen E. Braude, Ph.D. Emeritus Prof. of Philosophy U. of MD Baltimore County
      ASSOCIATE EDITORS
      Carlos S. Alvarado, Ph.D. Parapsychology Foundation, New York, NY. Imants Barušs, Ph.D. University of Western Ontario, Canada Daryl Bem, Ph.D. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Robert Bobrow, Ph.D. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Emory University, Alanta, GA. Etzel Cardeña, Ph.D. University of Lund, Lund, Sweden. Jeremy Drake, Ph.D. Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA
      Roger D. Nelson, Ph.D. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ Mark Rodeghier, Ph.D. Center for UFO Studies, Chicago, IL Daniel Sheehan, Ph.D. University of San Diego, San Diego, CA
      EDITORIAL BOARD
      Richard C. Henry, Ph.D. (Editorial Chair). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Mikel Aickin, Ph.D. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. Steven J. Dick, Ph.D. U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC. Peter Fenwick, Ph.D.
      Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK. Alan Gauld, Ph.D.
      University of Nottingham, UK. Robert G. Jahn, Ph.D.
      Princeton University, NJ. Wayne B. Jonas, Ph.D. Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA. Michael Levin, Ph.D. Tufts University, Boston, MA. David C. Pieri, Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. Juan Roederer, Ph.D. University of Alaska–Fairbanks, AK. Yervant Terzian, Ph.D. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. N. C. Wickramasinghe, Ph.D Churchill College, Cambridge, UK

      I read a lot of "PhD" there, did you not? How's this read... IF YOU DON'T LIKE JOURNALS THAT PUBLISH FORWARD THINKING SCIENCE, AKA "FRINGE TOPICS", you're gonna have to suck it up. Because as long as there's an academic consensus, and there is now Donny, then you're gonna have to go and find an equivalent academic consensus that adequately disputes what's in that paper. And whilst you're at it, see you if you can ad hominem Martin Lockley, University of Colorado Denver. And Jeong Yul Kim, Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education, Cheongwon, Chungbuk, Korea.

      : p

      Delete
    21. HAHAHHAHAHAH!!!! Ikdummy busted by fringe journal info.

      Ikdummy is so uneducated that anyone with a Phd could convince him that the sky is plaid.

      HAAAAAAAHAHA!!!! Ikdummy strikes again!

      Delete
    22. Sorry Stuey! Last time I checked, the journal process has been adhered to. But carry on fake laughing of course, nobody for one minute thinks you're not beating off with anxiety instead.

      : p

      Delete
    23. ikfringey damage control. BUSTED!

      Delete
    24. Yeah... Just think, when you're hyper-typing "hahahaha", I've still got that list of PhD's happy to publish Meldrum's work. You take care now Stuart. Watch out for pesky "fringe journals"... They're the scourge of science after all!!

      : )

      Delete
    25. Is Dr.Bryan Sykes the PHD ^ that you were BOASTING about saying Tic Tock,Tic Tock he's
      comming?. Well He Came and Left!! AND HE LEFT MAKING YOU LOOK LIKE QUITE THE IDIOT SON!!

      Delete
    26. ^^ Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, SAME AS IT EVER WAS!

      Delete
    27. I thought I'd never laughed so hard after Bigfoot Files aired and it was obvious he still had research to do on Zana's genetics. But wen you maintained he was done whilst he was publishing a book on the subject... On wow, you just can't get a break, can you? Pathological denial at its most creepy.

      Delete
    28. Yes, your retardation is incurable anonytroll.

      Delete
  6. It's a fringe journal, idiot, doesn't matter how many names you copy and paste. It is not highly respected. You're trying to make like it's a great accomplishment for Meldrum to be published there. It's not surprising at all. One of the editors thinks the Loch Ness monster is real.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "It's not highly respected"... Sounds like a big fat boo-hoo cry to me Donny? And who cares if one of the editor's thinks the Loch Ness Monster is real? Fair play to the boy for being willing to ask the questions.

      Delete
    2. Hey ikdummy, the sky is falling.

      Delete
    3. AC collinsThursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:18:00 AM PST
      hey iktomi was up bro , check this out ,sceret life of plants, this phd,had a philadendren that was imprinted to him ,,every time he made love to his girlfriend the philadendren would have WILD ELECTRICAL SPIKES(the phd had electrical sensers attached to said plant) fully documented in book. Anyways he lives in LA,so this phd takes a weekend trip to san fransisco...in frisco hes making love to his girlfriend.
      At,say 1:00,,at the EXACT SAME TIME IN LA HIS PLANT(philadendren)was going Crazy,As if he was in his bedroom next door.now if sasquatch truly are the BOSS OF THE WOODS .maybe they can pick up on what the trees are communacating..just like what a imprinted phadendren can know when its friend(the phd) is having sex with his girlfriend...yea yea i just drank a fith of cheap vodka so im sorry if my thoughts dont come across as lucid as I would hope..
      Whatever THINK ABOUT I JUST SAID! Oh and that aint the 1/2
      Of it!!!
      ACcollins

      AC collinsThursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:24:00 AM PST
      TREES DONT LIKE TRAIL CAMS ATTACHED TO THEM ,AND SASQUATCH KNOW WHAT THE TREES ARE TALKIN ABOUT,,,,
      CARLOS CASTENADA 101???????
      AC collins

      Delete
    4. Do you think you can get a PhD to endorse that, F-AC??

      Delete
    5. ikfringey REEKS lack of education. REEKS!

      Delete
    6. HOW MANY AC COLLINS ARE THERE NOW LOWIQMI??

      a.c.collins

      Delete
    7. Just one... Just you.

      And when you're trying your best to write with half decent grammar (before you get more drunk), remember that you're around people who have caught on to your BS months and months ago.

      There's one troll on this blog (when "Haints" isn't in anon mode too), and it's you.

      Delete
    8. So when haints or me are Not The posters of negative comments it's gotta be you(makes perfect sense),thanks for your Honesty, You strange little welsh man!
      LOL,

      a.c.collins

      Delete
    9. Mystery solved,Iktomi says "Its your blog Now",HEY IKTOMI,, IT WAS NEVER YOUR BLOG TO GIVE AWAY, all I have ever done was destroy your cut&paste point by point And with intelluctual honesty,,
      wich upset you to the ragefull point of posting hatefull comments then trying to blame others for the comments,
      Shame on you Joe,iktomi!

      Delete
    10. All I know is Ikdummy consistantly projects his feelings on to everybody else.
      One can always tell Joe F state of mind! by what he is Accusing others of being!

      I kinda find his psych entertaining,because hes so stupid to the fact,yet thinks himself some great welsh expert on bigfoot ..lol

      Delete
    11. Sod off ya crazy troll... You've only ever destroyed a 2 for 1 at Dominos, ha ha ha!! Nobody has ever fit the troll Dark Tedrad psychologists are writing about more than you. You're sick individual who I've exposed too many times to count, for being a racist and a pervert. And I absolutely LOVE it that you hate me for it. If I've got perverts like you on the internet having me, I MUST be doing something right.

      Loon.

      : )

      And there's NOTHING you can ever do to intimidate me.

      Delete
    12. Iktomi @12:37 must be communcating to the blog that he is OFF TO THE PUB!!!

      Delete
    13. Iktomi @1:49 is obviously eppressing his opionion of himself.and state of mind !!
      lol...!

      Delete
    14. You were told only the other day, you fat drunk. You don't exist, you are nothing unless someone chimes in to make you look like an idiot. You're just too stupid to realise it.

      Delete
    15. *AC Collins "PHD"!!
      LOL,

      Delete
    16. OH NO LOWIQMI IKDUMMY IS NOW "TRIGGERED"! HAAA HAAA HAA LOL!

      AC Collins,PHD

      Delete
    17. There "he" goes again, everyone is fat to ikdummy.

      Ad Hominem Ikdummy

      Could ikdummy be struggling with the pounds? Pounds, as in measure of weight, you anemic Taffy.

      Delete
    18. Unlucky Fatty... I took your best arguments apart years ago, I could call you names all day and still not be at fault for AH.

      Delete
  7. What academic consensus are you babbling about? Even that paper of Meldrum's mentioned in the dingdong award does absolutely nothing to even attempt to prove that bigfoot is real, but merely raises the question if relict hominoids could exist.

    So, what is this consensus, moron?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can feel you BURNING Don. How many times can you type the word "dingdong" do you think, and not get any closer to demonstrating Meldrum's paper is bunk? Actually, it was only a few years ago that Daegling published a paper through that journal, condemning Meldrum's work. Haven't you championed him over the years? I wonder if this "horrible fringe journal" was so disagreeable then?

      Popular topics in their journals are consciousness, Psi, sociology of science, healing, physics, biology, medicine, mediumship, intuition, anomalies, quantum mechanics, REG/RNG, subtle energy, EMF, parapsychology, health, UFO, remote viewing, mind-matter, interaction, paradigms, alternative energy, the brain, dreams, LENR, global consciousness, evolution, cold fusion, spirituality, synchronicity, xenoglossy, skepticism, cancer, philosophy, anthropology earthquakes, gravity, genetics, biochemistry, EEG, astronomy, and cosmology. I'd be MORE than happy to read any of those subjects, and plenty of forward thinking people would too.

      And if you didn't notice, what Meldrum does is actually provide repeatable scientific evidence for a creature with the exact same foot morphology, across continents. It's from here that science should have a basis to use that physical evidence to track the hominins leaving it (not that I particularly want that to happen, but that's what should happen all the same).

      Delete
    2. ikdummy can't win. HAHHAHAHAHA!!!!!

      Hey ikdummy, a Phd is telling you to jump off a cliff.


      ikdummy in hospital, "buu he haaa a Phd...".

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ikfringey!

      Delete
    3. What repeatable evidence?

      Again, what consensus are you talking about?

      Delete
    4. Consensus
      kənˈsɛnsəs/
      noun
      a general agreement.
      "there is a growing consensus that the current regime has failed"

      Whether you like it or not, there is a consensus between many of the world's PhD's, that Meldrum's work is a basis from which further investigation is warranted. And I thought you read Meldrum's paper? "Do you never research anything before you blabber on about it?" Don, you'd use the word "fringe" like it's some a sort of derogatory given that the subjects that fall within that label lack any credibility in science. I LOVE the fringe, it represents everything people like you are too narrow minded to have any interest in. Personally, I think it's desperately sad that in an age where the greatest minds on the planet can explore quantum physics, that people like you are unable to either think for themselves, or think that the subjects up top are unworthy, and I laugh at you for being such a throwback.

      “…this depends on whether we think that science is all worked out or whether it’s, let’s say, an ongoing process. If we think that scientists know all there is to know, then there is no need for the, the Journal for Scientific Exploration, but if we think science is an ongoing process that has problems to work through and work out, and some of which are ignored by mainstream science, and many of which are of interest to the public, then there’s a real need for the Journal of Scientific Exploration.”
      - Dr. Peter Sturrock on the legitimacy of the Journal of Scientific Exploration

      Delete
    5. That is not a consensus of many of the world's phds. Why must you always inflate everything?

      According to Quora, there could be around 10-15 million phds in the world. You listed approximately 20. That is 0.002% That is many?

      Also, just wanted to be sure you were not trying to say that there was a consensus that bigfoot is real. Who really cares if 20 phds, all who are members of a journal that deals with fringe topics, happen to think bigfoot might worth looking into? It would be more surprising if those particular 0.002% of all phds thought otherwise.

      Delete
    6. And how many of the world's PhD's are actually affiliated to journals, Donny? And how many out of all the world's PhD's have a case against what's being proposed in that paper, Donny? Come on now pal, you're with adults now. Furthermore, who the **** are you to be needing to be sure about anything? Ha ha ha!! The evidence in that paper is as solid as anything you'll ever need. If a track impression in America has the same archaic morphology to that of a track impression in China, then the subject leaving those track impressions is real. Where scientific prudence is required, is falling short of claiming that before a type specimen is sourced. But if you've ever listening to anyhing I've ever had to force feed you, ya muppet, you'd know that a paper on track impressions will only ever be able to manage that. The very fact that there's such a requirement for extraordinary evidence, renders the subject worthy of "fringe"... But that don't mean crud to someone who's willing and able to think for themselves. The paper does what it does, it presents solid enough evidence for people to know go and ask the solid questions.

      Delete
    7. Yes,school them Iktomi, they are jealous

      Delete
    8. It's too bad only 0.002% of the worlds phds agree with you. That's not much of a consensus, doofus.

      I love how you called your list "innumerable". LOL, 20 out of millions is innumerable.

      Why do you have to rely on hyperbole and exaggeration if your evidence is so convincing on it's own? Why does it need constant embellishment from you?

      Delete
    9. If a track impression was made in America with a fake foot, and a track impression was made in China with a fake foot, then they are both still just fake tracks.

      You're kind of dense, aren't you, Joe?

      Delete
    10. A consensus nevertheless... you pulled the same strawman crud when I listed off the Relict Hominid Inquiry editorial board, guess that list just got a little bigger. Maybe you can find 0.002% of PhDs to counter what's in that paper? Here's news for you Einstein, it usually takes about that many PhDs to endorse the output of any journal, and that's what makes the world go around. Once I spam up this comment section with PhD's and academics who are willing to consider this subject a scientifically legitimate one; then we're into the territory of the innumerable.

      Delete
    11. Hoaxers would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand... Thank **** for cut and paste. It's only taken you 50 attempts to fail in grasping that. But we DO struggle to think for ourselves, don't we Don?

      Delete
    12. "Nelson would have a tough time getting this stuff published in a major journal like Science or Nature. But he doesn't have to, thanks to an organization called the Society for Scientific Exploration... Pretty much anything that might have shown up on The X-Files or in the National Enquirer shows up first here."

      http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1064461,00.html

      Delete
    13. Morphology like, perhaps, mid tarsal break? Oh wait, Meldrum was wrong on that one.

      Hoaxers don't have to do anything beyond create something that looks like a foot. Enthusiasts take care of the rest. Look at some of the tracks that have been declared real. They look almost cartoonish. And you talk about morphology, you meathead.

      You seem a little flustered today, Joe. Sorry to snatch the "Meldrum was published in a reputable scientific journal" balloon out of your sticky little paws. Actually, no I'm not.

      Delete
    14. "Here's news for you Einstein, it usually takes about that many PhDs to endorse the output of any journal, and that's what makes the world go around"

      I thought you were very anti peer reviewed journals? Suddenly, now, they make the world go around?

      Delete
    15. "This interpretive model of the sasquatch foot function received dramatic corroboration during a visit to China’s Shennongjia Nature Reserve, in Hubei province. It was there that in 1995, a park ranger, Mr. Yuan Yuhao, claimed to have witnessed an upright, hair-covered hominoid, a yeren (Chinese—wildman) while patrolling within the park (Meldrum & Zhou 2012). He was climbing a slope near the head of a valley at an elevation of approximately 2100 m. The site, which I inspected, is a mosaic of fir forest and sedge meadows, not unlike the Rocky Mountain habitat I am so familiar with. Yuan observed the yeren through binoculars at a distance of approximately 500 m. It was covered in reddish brown hair, reclining, and sunning itself on the exposed facing slope. When Yuan called out to it, it returned his gaze. Instead of the expected snout and prick ears atop its head, he described a flat face. Furthermore, it arose and walked away bipedally into the nearby tree line. Yuan estimated its height at 2.3 m. He subsequently tracked the creature and cast a clear pair of its footprints on the banks of a spring.

      The casts measure approximately 38 cm in length, 16.5 cm across the forefoot, and 10 cm across the heel. A distinct midtarsal pressure ridge indicates a significant degree of flexibility in the midfoot (Figure 5, top). Presumably the right and left footprints were left as the yeren squatted beside the spring to drink. This action apparently elevated the hindfoot, concentrating pressure beneath the forefoot distal to the transverse tarsal joint. The plasticity of the moist bare soil resulted in a pressure ridge proximal to the transverse tarsal joint. The deepest points on the cast lie just distal to the pressure ridge, apparently beneath the talonavicular joint medially, and to a lesser degree beneath the cuboid laterally. These two points of concentrated plantar pressure lend a distinctive appearance to the proximal edge of the forefoot ahead of the transverse pressure ridge. The margin is marked by a double convexity. In all distinguishing characteristics the casts resemble those of North American sasquatch footprints, especially those recovered at the Patterson-Gimlin film site. This resemblance not only substantiates the model of foot form and function, but indicates a circum- Pacific distribution to this form of relict hominoid, with its likely origin in Asia (Meldrum 2006)."


      You don't get that from a fake foot. Frustrated? Not by mere ad hominem... You may want to hold yourself a little prematurely, but you've got a paper to show's bunk. And finding a quote, labelling a paper in a "fringe" journal as "X-Files" doesn't achieve that.

      70000 posts... Jeez.

      Delete
    16. I stand by my assertion that peer review is anti-scientific, and if anything, the general attitude towards the journal in question perfectly highlights how much of a contradictory, messy world abides by that process. You still have your cherished process adhered to in that journal, and you still have mere ad hominem as ya strawman.

      : )

      Delete
    17. Yeah, you go ahead now and try and make yourself feel better on the next few comment sections, ya loon. I'll be back tomorrow to mop up the vomit left here.

      Delete
    18. What strawman was that? Do you even understand what a strawman means?

      Delete
    19. ikdummy is giving the impression of refuting your argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by you....and then accused you of doing what HE just did.


      ikdummy: the most uneducated, confused, cut-n-paste "scientist" in bigfootdom.

      Delete
    20. What can you expect from someone who thinks "many" or "innumerable" are the same thing as 0.002% Or in other words, 2 in 1000 phds accounts for many. I would hate to see what "lots" would be? Perhaps 0.05 even?

      Delete
    21. Kind of like when he said that Patty's limb proportions were within human range..yeah, what was it? 1 in 36 million or something?

      Delete
    22. straw man
      noun
      noun: strawman
      1. an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.
      "her familiar procedure of creating a straw man by exaggerating their approach"
      2. a person regarded as having no substance or integrity.
      "a photogenic straw man gets inserted into office and advisers dictate policy"

      Yeah, I got what strawman was the first time, Donny. And for someone who's supposed to understand the peer review process, you're making a bit of a pigs ear of understanding how many people it takes to review a paper, eh? Do you even understand how it works? You do realise that your nonsense falls flat at the very first look at any othe journal that adheres to the same format? Tee-hee! What a patoot!


      AnonymousTuesday, May 23, 2017 at 5:35:00 PM PDT
      ikdummy is giving the impression of refuting your argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by you....and then accused you of doing what HE just did.

      dMaKeRTuesday, May 23, 2017 at 6:36:00 PM PDT
      Kind of like when he said that Patty's limb proportions were within human range..yeah, what was it? 1 in 36 million or something?




      Anyone spot the difference in grammar? Yeah, me neither... Ha!!

      Delete
    23. What proposition did I misrepresent? I interpreted your words literally.

      Delete
    24. You're full of ****. Tell me, when you're in anon mode, do you use two monitors to keep track of your drivel?

      Delete
    25. What are you babbling about now? I don't post anon, I've told you that numerous times.

      What did I misrepresent? You said "many". I simply pointed out that 0.002% is hardly many.

      Delete
    26. Argh read back over my comments you idiot, ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    27. Now, now, stop dodging. You need to point out where I supposedly misrepresented your comments in order to build a strawman argument.

      It is not up to me to pick through your comments to look for support for your argument. That's your job.

      Delete
    28. straw man
      noun
      noun: strawman
      1. an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

      Like the journal I cite allegedly lacking credibility because of its "fringe" nature... Instead actually addressing the data published in it. It gets boring holding your hand through your own shortfalls.

      Grow the **** up.

      Delete
    29. That is not a strawman argument. What did I misrepresent? The journal is a fringe journal. That is hardly a strawman.

      Clearly you do not understand what a strawman argument means. No surprise. You constantly throw around phrases and words that you do not understand.

      Delete
    30. You are aware other people CAN read your comments, right? Don't get carried away because I reassured you that nobody comes here to here to read you being an idiot.

      Delete
    31. You do know that saying Ha I win isn't really winning, you know that don't you?

      Delete
    32. You do realise that following people around using "T" word for genitals doesn't magic up your desired monkey suit, don't you?

      Delete
    33. Hundreds of years of expert witness testimonyWednesday, May 24, 2017 at 9:57:00 AM PDT

      Pardon me Sir, I believe you and your friend Vegas are the ones always spouting off about testicles here

      Delete
    34. Well I for one am glad to see he knows that although his deflection on it annoys me slightly, anyway I win

      Delete
    35. Oooh, testicles please
      JOE

      Delete
    36. Upon closer examination of the Patterson Gimlin film it should be noted that Patty actually had both breasts and testicles, this is exciting pre massacre evidence

      Delete
  8. I like Joe but he lost this round.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the second I published a comment with innumerable PhD's that approved the publication of Meldrum's work. Maybe you should stick to your F-AC account and explain more about your plant people theory?

      Adios!!

      Delete
    2. Adios, you should leave after that beating, what a sad liar you are, join the woo side, at least then when you make things up the cult will still follow you

      Delete
    3. ... Yes, I took a beating the second I published a comment with innumerable PhD's that approved the publication of Meldrum's work. And of course, you're very much invited to show where I've lied... But we all know you're just a nut job who's level of us merely abusing people like a coward.

      Tee hee!

      And expect me to copy and paste that journal time and time and time and time and time and time...

      Delete
    4. I'm sorry attention whore, are you still here, we were all under the impression you'd left.Being a PhD myself I'll gladly endorse your Meldrum paper, but remember it's Gimlin himself, the only man who supposedly ever filmed Bigfoot, a hero of yours I believe

      Delete
    5. I'm sorry... Yeah, I'm still here, it's just too tempting adding to your meltdown. And did you actually just have the audacity to label anyone else a sodding "attention whore"? Psychos ARE narcissistic at the end of the day.

      Just imagine your temper by the end of this month, let alone the end of the year?

      Jeez.

      Delete
    6. That's who endorsed my great AND factual book,have you written a book? no.

      Delete
    7. Ignore him testicles, he's jealous

      Delete
    8. "My other new book, SYKES IS COMMING TIC, TOCK!"- Joe Fitsgerald

      Delete
    9. My diagnosis of Iktomi is that he is desperate for attention and acceptance, I am a Dr so everything I say is true, also please buy my Bigfoot book, everything in it is true, only 8 dollars for shipping and handling plus 30 dollars for my wonderful true book, Bob Gimlin endorsed, really all the Bigfoot facts you need from an actual PhD

      Delete
    10. JoeDummy has gone from "Sykes is coming" to "nonstop Lovelock Skulls" to " the P/G hoax" to "the Journal of Fringe Science". He was even a DS supporter when DS first came here. He communicated with DS though private emails and defended DS's videos.

      JoeDummy has a whole lot of......nothing.

      But...JoeDummy is entertaining.

      Joe is wearing a hijab today in honor of the recent colonization of Europe.

      Delete
    11. That reads like your meltdown list, Stuey. I've got the cut and pastes to all the comment sections remember... Domt make me embarrass you, again.

      D'you know who's a whole lot o'nothing? You are Stuey, to your pseudosceptical peers. Six years and still nothing to show for it. And when Meldrum's "lies" are far beyond getting published in journals, you'll still be here every day of your life reassuring yourself & thinking you have a world audience at the same time.

      "Bigfoot" is the only fringe topic where it's "sceptics" are more demented than its enthusiasts.

      Delete
    12. Yes, ikdummy, you have cut and paste bigfoot into existence. Job well done.

      Delete
    13. Nargh, "Bigfoot" has done that with its own feet.

      Six years... Jeez.

      Delete
    14. "Nargh" Is that what the UK says when they have been massacred but focus on fake creatures instead?

      Delete
    15. ^ Have fun at the "PUB" wearing your Hijab,fishnets and high heel's.

      Delete
    16. * was Ment for 1:35 ^

      Delete
    17. Nargh! It's what I use when addressing a racist who hides behind anon mode... I'm pretty sure there'd be a similar mindset to racists who hide behind religion there somewhere.

      Delete
    18. ^ Hopelessly brainwashed ikdummy.

      Massacred people and he's petrified of being of being called racist and focused on imaginary creatures.

      Don't you get it? Will you ever? The UK wouldn't exist if your ancestor's were as insanely stupid as you.

      Delete
    19. Wow, I understood that alright... What's the matter, the meth making those sausage fingers do uncontrollable things? A "proud racist" who can't put his name to his racism, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Can you remember when I made you look like an idiot about the UK being taken over by muslim extremists?

      "American trolls wrap themselves in the American flag like nobody I've seen. They consider themselves patriots as far as the Constitution goes. There's a sense that if we can, we should. That's still the narrative of America. Trolls are taking [a] much-lauded American ideal and turning it into this grotesque satire of itself.
      http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-morrison-phillips-20150701-column.html

      Beautiful.

      Delete
    20. Fantasy view of the US. Ikdummy and her fat delusion.

      yes, ikdummy, the massacre of 22 people and 50 others with the flesh and organs ripped apart makes you look brilliant. It's not really happening.

      More cut and paste, this time of biased opinion, not news.

      You were brainwashed. Stop seeking news that validates your brainwashed mind.

      Delete
    21. That's a psychologist's view of your abhorrent behaviour, you scummy ****. I'm sorry... Are you claiming that these poor people's deaths are my fault directly? What's not happening?

      You're utterly bat **** crazy, boy.

      I saw what happened... And I continue to see what happens when scum like you hand pick what's allegedly going on in the world. Racist scum.

      Delete
    22. Maybe you are too young and know no different and were also indoctrinated from a young age. Throughout human history, countries never facilitated their own demise because they were afraid of being called a name.

      Its only going to get worse but you'll be okay as long as you don't say anything "racist"....except you may learn that although you're down with the cause, the cause isn't down with you.

      Delete
    23. Can you name one country that's facilitated their demise that way? Let's see what loony racist material you've got to prop up your drivel this time, eh?

      Delete
    24. Yes. A country where you wouldn't find one loon like you.

      Delete
  9. Yes Iktomi, school them, they are jealous of your wonderful PhD paper, Heavenly Father told me that he loves you almost as much as Vegas loves testicles

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes hevenly fat her will lead iktomi to the land of of hot salty testictular abundance!!

      Salty testicals gives me a sweaty quim

      Delete
    2. You're lucky you're too much of a wuss to put your name to that crud. You'd be trolled harder than anything you can muster towards actual human beings.

      Delete
    3. Hypocrite weasel ikdummy. Post your real name.

      Delete
    4. I thought you knew my real name, and ALL my personal details? Silly delusional troll...

      Delete
    5. You think everyone on here that knows you're a fool is the same person?

      Delete
    6. I thought you knew my real name, and ALL my personal details?

      Silly delusional racist.

      Delete
    7. Duh, you're so silly testicles, and full of crap too!

      Delete
    8. I guess you're a "proud racist" that doesn't know my personal details?

      Delete
    9. No one really cares about you testicles

      Delete