World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Premium 22HP/725cc Kohler 7000 Series OHV Engine•Overhead valve design for better fuel economy & top performance•Full-pressure lubrication system with full-flow filterDual Hydro-Gear™ EZT Hydrostatic Drive System•Fan cooled 10cc pumps and wheel motors on each drive wheel•No shifting necessary for effortless operation42-Inch, 3-Blade Fabricated Mower Deck•10-gauge steel deck design•4 support positions prevent excess deck movement•Mechanical foot lift raises & lowers mowing deckBest In Class Dial Height Of Cut Selector•Select 1 of 13 cutting positions in 1/4” increments with the turn of a dial•Cutting height range of 1.5” to 4.5”Fully Tubular 3-Inch Frame•Welded joints provide structural rigidity for added strength and stabilityFully Adjustable Control Arms•Adjust in three different directions to accommodate the operatorAdjustable Plush High-Back Seat w/ Arm Rests•Seat springs for added comfort and simple lever adjustment300 LB. Max Towing Capacity
Speechless. He's right in every way it has to be real.
Absolutely no way Todd and his Avon selling sister made those "masks". Even Lucasfilm would have to spend considerable budget to create that.
stfu ^ what about iktomi being a sex pervert ???
Todd has little "Standing" within the footer community.
He's really going to try to use the size of pine needles in a proven composite image?Does he think we don't know about the layer scaling tool sin photoshop?Todd Standing needs to shut up and produce a bigfoot body. If he's such an accomplished bigfoot researcher that should be no problem for him. And if he can't do it, well then he's just another bad hoaxer.
The russains hacked the elections ,, What specificly did they do to undermine the election??no one knows, they just did!WATCHES TOO MUCH MSNBC.
Such a liar!These creatures look nothing like what Standing shows as a Bigfoot. Instead of trying to convince everyone, how bout explaining why you left, and why ZERO evidence since these pics?Where's the entire footage of you walking in, and filming this?
He`s been caught out and has been hiding...like many researchers he`s full of shite but has also found out it`s a great way to make a living...folks fall over themselves with "donations" (not the same as Joe`s friends type of "donations").
Yes, one eye is usually six to eight inches below the other and the nose is around the forehead with the mouth resembling a blowhole
It really reminds me of myself looking in the mirror after a weekend benderjeez
^ the kind of "mouth" you refer to is a glory hole - have you been kissing it ?Tell the truth now.
Seems legit to me. Makes perfect sense. Now, let ol' Phil Polesmoker "break down" the video. He will groan and vomit something like, "A sasquatch would never allow someome to draw little green marks all over their face."
Are you suggesting the "bigfoot" in his video is real and not one of his fakes ?If he had evidence of a bigfoot he`d be a media sensation - instead of the pathetic liar and stage artist he has been shown to be.
He claims to have been on HUNDREDS of TV programs....Flat out lie right there!
Where's the bigfoot body Standing?Produce a specimen or STFU.Show me the monkey!
Standing said that he will show you his monkey after you wash your brown eye and lube it up.
Todd Standing is in the Bigfoot Hoaxer Hall of Shame:http://squatchdetective.weebly.com/hall-of-shame.html
So why don't we have a shot of its body? I would think that he didn't have his camera perfectly zoomed in focus to get a head shot when he pointed it at this bigfoot. Every one that I know usually get there subject in the frame and then zoom in on it. Does he have more footage that I haven't seen where he has the body on film before he zoomed in to the head? I know I would at least pull back the zoom to get the body shot, especially since it was poising for him. Show that part and maybe I'll believe him. Some how I doubt he will show that.
Here is where Todd's math is off. He claims that he reduced the 3/4" long needle by just 10%, in order to get the face at 14 needles wide. That would imply that the needles were 9 feet from the camera when the alleged Sasquatch was 10 feet from the camera. Except when you look at the photo, only the branch with the needle is in focus and the alleged Sasquatch is very much out of focus. Based on the width of the photo, the subject appears to be quite close at maybe 10 feet. So the branch was more than likely in the vicinity of 5 feet from the camera. The needle should have been reduced by 50% or so. This would make the width of the alleged Sasquatch face at (14/0.90) x 3/4" x 0.50 = 5.8" Which amazingly, is EXACTLY IN THE HUMAN RANGE. So the difference in focus of the objects in the photo, tends to prove that Todd's argument is without merit. So we are all back to square one, where Todd's photos are presumed to be the clever construction of an experienced movie maker and his wife, who is apparently a makeup artist. Personally, I was told by Robert Kennedy in BC, that Sasquatch prop heads were witnessed in the trunk of his car in about 2010 or so, by other Bigfoot researchers. But I have no easy way of verifying that either. A top habituator friend of mine who has seen dozens and dozens of different Sasquatch up close, stated to me that Todd's heads are not real Sasquatch heads.
Really does look like patty.... check the pgf turnaround still.... r they images that prove each other?
more likely a copy of Patty head and that's way it may look like her. I don't think it really looks like her though.
Standing has footage of these creatures bodies. It doesn't matter though, many will claim fake, others will say, "maybe" while the truth is in the woods.
Those that I've seen are from afar. Now if he has a video of the body from which he has a good close up of the head, that would be great. would show great details to the muscles and body mass size etc. He doesn't have that. Why? I don't see the video before the zoom shot to the head. Was he to close to the aledged Bigfoot? I know when I use my camera on a subject especially one in the woods I get it in the frame and then zoom in for a closer look. If I try to get something in the camera frame with the zoom engaged I have a hard time. How many times you have something in view using the zoom and you move to get a better position and you lose it and have to pull back the zoom to find it. His needle theory would be fine if all the needles where the same size. If you look in his hand it clearly shows they are not. So that said, just show the footage of the body that went with the head. I just can't believe someone with such a close view didn't even scan down the body. Now I'm not saying they're not real. I just don't believe Todds are real.