Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Top 5 Incredible Stories From Mulder's World [2-22-2017]

Watch: Motivation

Here are some fascinating stories from MuldersWorld.com, the front page of the strange and unexplained:
Watch: Snoop does Planet Earth

Watch: Magnet in a copper pipe

Watch: Valentine rockets

Watch: Drunk shower time




44 comments:

  1. Someone got a video of AC/Stuey/Peggy in the shower. Looks like he's wearing his toupee in the shower, and he's shaved some of his body hair since the last video we saw of him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Please order my new scifi paperback ,,"THE BARKING SPIDERS OF PLANET ZORN"-Joe Fitsgerald

      Delete
    2. It`s true that the "pipe" attracts Joe`s dick like a magnet - oh for the pull of a man`s "pipe" eh, Joe ?

      Delete
    3. You couldn't stop talking about Joe's dick if you tried. You could say you can't keep his dick out of your mouth.

      Delete
    4. Haaa haaaa thats good Uno! Looks like Stue is sucking on the shaver he just shaved his body with. Now he cant figure out why his tongue hurts. Its likely that hes fantasizing about something related to Vegasthedogs comment @ 9:40 :o

      Delete
  2. Top 5 incredible zero bigfoots

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ In more ways than one I say - Joe is an "iron" after all so your remark is perfectly apt - Joe, you are an Iron Hoof aren`t you.

      (For those who are unfamiliar with the term - Iron Hoof = Poof - yes, "suits you Sir")

      Delete
  3. Seems that bigfootery has died out. There used to be all sorts of up and coming "evidence" to be released. That has all passed and none of it stood up to scrutiny. Now there is literally nothing going on. Boring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it has something to do with the blog admins changing and the blog's articles? And I've yet to see any pseudosceptic successfully scrutinise the evidence around here. That's all I ever read is a whole bunch of wishful thinking and special pleading.

      Delete
    2. ^ Yes, there`s just isn`t any evidence offered...not that it`s available though.

      Delete
    3. So is there anything in the pipeline? Are any footers getting samples tested anywhere? Is there any new trail cam pics or videos getting released? What happened? Its almost like bigfoot has disapeared almost as if it never even existed

      Delete
    4. "That's all I ever read is a whole bunch of wishful thinking and special pleading." You see, every time an article is posted here, where someone is interviewed about a sightings, where track impressions are sourced, or a piece of footage is put up... You deny it outright only to request more later on. It's being rhetorical, dear boy, and a sure sign of denial. And again, that's all I ever read from you is a whole bunch of wishful thinking & special pleading.

      And just to come down to your level a minute, if something has disappeared, it must have existed in the first place? Do you ever read your comments before you press publish with those sausage fingers?

      Delete
    5. There is no request for "more". That implies there is already evidence, which there isnt. The request is for something which will move from there being zero evidence to there being some actual evidence.

      As for the last statement, are you really that thick as to not understand it?

      Delete
    6. It read like a massive contradiction there, dear boy. You appeared to acknowledge it yourself... You should really take the time to read over your comments before you press publish.

      "The Hoofnagle brothers, a lawyer and a physiologist from the United States, who have done much to develop the concept of denialism, have defined it as the employment of rhetorical arguments to give the appearance of legitimate debate where there is none, an approach that has the ultimate goal of rejecting a proposition on which a scientific consensus exists."

      Better to deny something exists than to look silly trying to explain it away.

      Delete
    7. The contradiction was the point you simpleton.

      Better to deny something exists than to believe in that without evidence.

      Delete
    8. So the intended point was to acknowledge that something might have existed in order for it to disappear, and to THEN contradict yourself by suggesting there was no indication of its existence beforehand? Wow, you're on form today Stuey... And that's all I ever read from, is a whole bunch of wishful thinking and special pleading. Five years, that burden must be getting pretty heavy?

      Delete
    9. Jesus christ. Absolute cement head. Honestly I have never known a more insufferable person.

      Luckily that can easily be overlooked with some of the side splitting howlers you come up with. Please continue.

      Delete
    10. Breath Stuey, you'll just have to be more careful next time. In the meantime, here's some exercise ideas for those sausage fingers;
      http://www.webmd.com/osteoarthritis/ss/slideshow-hand-finger-exercises

      Delete
    11. Joe doesnt like being told his religion is false

      Delete
    12. >>Better to deny something exists than to look silly trying to explain it away.

      cats,dogs,deer/elk and rabbits jumping through snow.

      fox,coyote,hurt/scared rabbits screaming in the dark.

      horse,racoon,dog and squirrel hair has been found.

      misidentification,hoax/liars and just plan crazy accout for the sightings.

      What no one has is a body,a clear picture or video or anything at all really.

      Delete
    13. "or anything at all really" that really is the crux of the issue. There is nothing. Absolutely nothing.

      Delete
    14. Uh oh - you compared Bigfoot belief with religion. Joerg doesn't like that. Now you will have to endure countless cut and paste articles on Bigfoot physical evidence.

      But your right of course - it IS a religion (to them).

      Delete
    15. 6:30... You've religiously cited the biggest JREF lies and misinformation since 2012, honestly, why can't you source a scientifically logical argument against something so allegedly obvious?

      6:35...
      1. Possibly, but tack impressions that can't be hoaxed lend to the credibility that SOME of those tacks in snow must be real.
      2. "CONCLUSION REACHED BY DR. KIRLIN AND LASSE HERTEL ON THE SIERRA SOUNDS
      The results indicate more than one speaker, one or more of which is of larger physical size than an average human adult male. The formant frequencies found were clearly lower than for human data, and their distribution does not indicate that they were a product of human vocalizations and tape speed alteration."
      3. If repeated hair samples are all morphologically congruent (ruling out hoaxing), and are definitively indistinguishable from known animal, classified human and non-human primates but uniquely uniform... Then they can't be anything else.
      4. Argh yes!! For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing liars and hoaxers all out to get your money. These people, though finding each others customs undesirable, and "misidentifying" the same anatomical & behavioural traits across cultures & vast geographical divide, AND spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like... Have in fact managed to cheat the best experts with fake biological species traits that span decades and States in lottery win fashion too!!
      5. Clear photos;
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      What researchers don't know, is how to track these hominins. And there is yet to be a consorted effort from mainstream scientists to do so. That's all I ever read is a whole bunch of wishful thinking and special pleading.

      Delete
    16. And the Virgin Mary doesn't leave tracks! Now pray to your JREF god that they've got another special plead that you can lift for your next rush of blood!

      Delete
    17. "AnonymousThursday, November 3, 2016 at 8:30:00 AM PDT
      >>Freedom of speech does not equate to posting child rape comments towards posters. You couldn't walk down the street and do it to somebody.

      Yes it does and yes I could."




      What a vile creature.

      Delete
    18. >>What researchers don't know, is how to track these hominins.

      Oh please. Yet every other animal can be tracked...including long extinct animals? What a ridiculous statement.

      >>And there is yet to be a consorted effort from mainstream scientists to do so.

      Simply not true. Professional men and women have looked at this and found nothing to warrant further investigation.

      Delete
    19. "Oh please. Yet every other animal can be tracked...including long extinct animals? What a ridiculous statement."
      ... Actually, not so. All creatures, however big and small need to be researched adequately to be tracked sufficiently. Remember the length of time it took to tack the Bili Ape? Katy Gonder PhD, Biological Anthropologist, had been tracking and studying a group of chimpanzees in the wild for 20 years... In that time she'd only actually had "very fleeting glimpses" of them about 10 times. You have he naivety of a child, dear boy.

      "Professional men and women have looked at this and found nothing to warrant further investigation."
      With hundreds of thousands of walkers, hunters, scientists, campers, hikers, photographers, runners, forestry workers, etc, all out in the places where this species has been found to leave physical evidence, there is three database of reports that transition from thousands of years of cultural acknowledgement. If there was no physical evidence to substantiate such a frequency of reports, then your drivel would have some basis in fact... But the problem is there is too much of it.

      Delete
    20. jotomi's beatdown is extra harsh today.

      Delete
  4. When you find something, it normally doesn't tend to get lost again immediately after being found, though... Why is Bigfoot so hard to keep a hold of? That's like saying your numbers came up in the lottery but you didn't play it that weekend.

    If you're finding this creature, and doing it with relative ease, then why are we still waiting for literally any kind of credible evidence?

    All of these people finding Bigfoot, and having their winning numbers show up, but nobody has seemed to ever claim the prize. Odd, that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oops! Bit of a meltdown there Stuey? Quick consecutive copy & pastes that you didn't reference! "dmaker" don't be pleased!
      http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=11717834

      Not that I personally want anyone partaking in anything of the sort... Tracking "Bigfoot" is the last piece of the puzzle, and that needs adequate finances and resources from funded professionals. Could you keep hold of something height range of 7-10 feet, 500-1000 lbs, that has agility far exceeding anything modern Homo sapiens can achieve, and that also evades in social groups? Oh... And "credible evidence" would account for that which has been accumulated by amateur researchers, subsequently verified by professionals for the past 50 years.

      Delete
    2. #1 In Bigfootery Dr Zachary SmithThursday, February 23, 2017 at 6:10:00 AM PST

      Yes you fools,modern homos can't keep up with the homos of old, yes,yes. Oh how I miss earth and peasant under glass

      Delete
    3. You're starting to learn, at least, F-AC/Stuey!

      http://gainweightjournal.com/prehistoric-men-and-the-ancients-were-better-faster-stronger/

      Delete
    4. #1 In Bigfootery Dr Zachary SmithThursday, February 23, 2017 at 6:17:00 AM PST

      Burly hairy men of old, oh the pain dear boy, ignore that cantankerous clunk robot, he's an idiot

      Delete
  5. Just like the NAWACOs, you're either immune to the absurdity of that statement or in on it. This isn't you failing to get proof of a certain species of woodpecker thought to have gone extinct, this is a beast that has supposedly been seen by thousands of people and whose genuine existence would literally change human kind forever and make you rich at the same time, but you just can't find the time to prove it? That's Incredible™.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IktomiThursday, February 23, 2017 at 6:07:00 AM PST

      Delete
  6. #1 In Bigfootery Dr Zachary SmithThursday, February 23, 2017 at 6:04:00 AM PST

    Dear boy...dear dear boy, the pain, the pain

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think you should crack out the joe fitsgerald account for old time sake. I know you are desperate to

    ReplyDelete