Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Capturing Bigfoot On Coast To Coast AM


From Coast to Coast AM Feb 5, 2017:

Peter von Puttkamer is an award-winning television and Independent documentary filmmaker with special interest in wildlife/travel/adventure/Cryptozoology and environmental issues.

95 comments:

  1. Zero bigfoots today. How many days in a row is it now?

    Dazz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There being zero is a requirement for belief in a mythical creature. Believers embrace the zero and know it will always be zero.

      Delete
    2. mythical creatures don't leave footprints or are seen by credible witnesses .
      boy you twonks sound like warped lp whose needle is stuck in the same groove and plays the same note over and over again
      You've already lost the argument long before you opened your gobs !
      I don't give a flying shag what you spout, you'll always be wrong ,you silly prats

      Joe

      Delete
    3. You cant claim we are wrong unless you can produce the actual bigfoot

      Delete
    4. Yet you'd believe Stephen Hawking if he told you there were many different dimensions. Would you ask him to produce one ? I don't think so.
      Blown away , like cheap lint on the shoulder of my blazer !

      Joe

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. ^ sum total of his knowledge

      Delete
    7. 3;29

      there you go misquoting again - Hawking has not said there are other dimensions ,merely that current scientific equations show there is a theory that such things may exist - he would not lay claim to this as fact and is merely speculating.

      Delete
    8. Any Brujo(shaman) can experence what steven hawkins is talking about at Will!

      Delete
    9. Here's a better question for you, are virtual particles really constantly popping in and out of existence?

      Delete
    10. ... Even more relevant... Have you ever seen this happen?

      Delete
    11. Have you ever seen a bigfoot?

      Delete
    12. I'll take that answer as the proverbial penny dropping, and Joe's point proven.

      I haven't seen a "Bigfoot". But I don't discredit tens of thousands of people who have based on double standards & fear... Nor do I deny the scientists who've actually looked at the corroborating evidence via consistent scientific methods.

      Delete
    13. Pfft, but you'd believe his theory quicker than you'd believe in bigfoot despite all the footprints , despite all the credible witnesses , despite all the stories that go back hundreds of years . You still think bigfoot is nothing more than a three legged bear or some hoaxer or a history of hoaxers going back to the time natives first came here . sir, you are a clown and not just any type of clown but mime repeating the same gestures . Your mantra is becoming tiresome . i think it's time for you to find some new toys to play with. could i recommend a train set
      Choo, choo. The train is about to leave the station . Better not miss it bro

      Joe

      Delete
    14. Iktomi and Joe just schooling on the Hawkings thing there :) xx

      Delete
    15. Real tough guy that's too scared to email the people he hates, in da house.

      Delete
    16. Give ^ us your address and we will knock on your door WITH THICK PECKERS IN HAND!

      Delete
    17. The only way your gonna have anything thick in your hands is if you are holding on to one of these:

      http://pre01.deviantart.net/31c2/th/pre/f/2013/069/6/8/woody_woodpecker_gets_fat_by_footballlover-d5xmu8e.png

      Delete
    18. Otherwise your'e just another door to door toothpick salesman.

      https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1KMo7MVXXXXXKXVXXq6xXFXXX9/Wood-font-b-round-b-font-font-b-toothpick-b-font-holder-box-Korean-cans-bottles.jpg

      Delete
  2. "The Humboldt skull is that of an anatomically modern human. It is robust, but it is a human skull that has features that are found in many other anatomically modern human skulls."

    Andy White, PhD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stuey, the question of "Bigfeets" existing isn't remotely important to you. You've scoured the Internet, no doubt, getting banned from anything up to 50 forums (and this one anything up to 20 times) and you've finally come across somewhere that doesn't get moderated (anymore) and you simply thrive of spending all day, every day of your life trying to aggravate people... That's a pretty sad existence. One of a chronic sadist in fact.

      "The Hoofnagle brothers, a lawyer and a physiologist from the United States, who have done much to develop the concept of denialism, have defined it as the employment of rhetorical arguments to give the appearance of legitimate debate where there is none, an approach that has the ultimate goal of rejecting a proposition on which a scientific consensus exists."

      So by being this rhetorical, bearing in mind every day of your life is spent pretending like the previous 24 hours hasn't happened & you've not been made to look like a fool... It kind of puts the level of denial you're in into perspective. I think anyone with a brain & having spent any significant time here would concede that they know not of a bigger example in their lives. If someone doesn't respond to you, your life has no significance. Think about that a minute... You need us. And "Bigfeets exist" in the physical evidence that you are too dense to explain away for years invested in looking at other people's arguments.

      "Since a sadistic person is characterised by being vicious and degrading toward others (sometimes physically), it’s possible that the internet allows them to redirect their energy. If they’re inflicting harm through anonymous words, perhaps it’s preventing them from doing something much more destructive in person. On the extreme end, and unsurprisingly, sadism is commonly seen in sexual offenders and serial killers."
      https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/25/internet-trolls-are-also-real-life-trolls

      Delete
    2. ^ The suit fits you perfectly, Joe.

      Delete
    3. @4:20 Yet joe is the only one that does not realize it

      poor Joe F,,Always gonna smell
      like a Dead Fish,,,SNIIFFF!!

      Delete
    4. Got skull suit? Unless you can produce the skull suit bigfoot is 100% modern human and we are all infact bigfoots

      Delete
    5. I'll take that as a big fat failing no.

      Delete
    6. It was rhetorical ya bellend

      Delete
    7. No... That was you again failing to man up to the requimemts of testing evidence, as well as flunking yet further in being responsible for your burden of maintaining there is evidence for disproof... All stemming from you being unable to find a magic monkey suit (one of the main reasons you've hated me for four years).

      Upset about yesterday? I would be... You looked like a right prat.

      Delete
    8. Define irony: saying someone looks like a pratt despite believing in bigfoot

      Delete
    9. Irony
      ˈʌɪrəni/
      noun
      A state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often wryly amusing as a result.

      Kind of like someone chasing others around on their literacy, only to have be most epic shortcoming of their own.

      : )

      Delete
    10. He cant even spot the error after its pointed out to him. Facepalm.

      Delete
    11. No "facepalm" like alleging false facepalms because his own jig has faceplamed himself.

      Delete
    12. I can only conclude that you are mentally ill. Hope you get some help fella.

      Delete
    13. Only one of us had genuine psychologists writing articles about our mental state. Does that ever actually resonate in you?

      Delete
    14. Well you have on many occassions refered to yourself as "king troll" so I assume you are talking about yourself

      Delete
    15. That's King Troll to the likes of you... And there's nothing more poetic than a troll crying about being trolled. I also don't stoop to the sadistic levels you do.

      Delete
    16. I make amends by offering you all the help you need; attention. I take solace in knowing you're acting out your sadism here intead of your local community.

      Delete
    17. Joergy had an amazing dream sighting last night. He has finally seen a bigfoot folks!

      Delete
    18. Would you care to reference two cases of "dream sightings"?

      Delete
    19. Sucker Jotomi suffers another humiliation today - what a stoopit prick he truly is.

      Delete
    20. Would you care to reference two cases of "dream sightings"?

      Delete
    21. How about I reference my two fists on your face?

      Delete
  3. JUST KILLING THE SKEPTICS!!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8zX6xdtdjk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also destroying the years of work joe has done trying to convince people bigfoot is a legitimate topic. Good work.

      Delete
    2. Just time enough to pop in for a quick look but I do want to thank Dr.Squatch for the courtesy of following up with my request. Mind you I'm not saying I am convinced of anything but I will give it more attention when I have the free time to review some of your other videos which show blurring. I will say the sign you focused in on was crystal clear.

      Back to work now.

      Delete
    3. JUST AWESOME!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ5dQ6qgd4k

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYDPWA63IpA

      Delete
    4. Although it sound have been better if you had used a mask.

      Delete
    5. I don't know anything about cameras but does that mean if bigfoot was working as a lolly pop lady would the camera show a clear lolly pop with a blurred bigfoot? xx

      Delete
    6. Here he is PIB:

      https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder774/26334774.jpg

      Delete
    7. Oh Chick... Thanks for that, ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
  4. Bigfoot
    Noun

    A mythical man-like ape creature

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bigfoot
      ˈbɪɡfʊt/
      noun
      a large, hairy apelike creature resembling a yeti, supposedly found in NW America.

      Delete
    2. "Supposedly"

      BLOWN THE FU CK OUT

      Delete
    3. supposedly
      səˈpəʊzɪdli/
      adverb
      according to what is generally assumed or believed.

      Delete
    4. "assumed"
      "believed"
      ABSOLUTELY BLOWN THE FU.CK OUT

      Delete
    5. generally
      ˈdʒɛn(ə)rəli/
      adverb
      in most cases; usually.

      Delete
    6. Keep digging old boy this is too funny

      Delete
    7. You're learning basic word meanings again today... if you can laugh in class you're at least enjoying whilst you learn.

      Delete
    8. Unfortunately it seems those basic definitions are completely lost on you.

      Delete
    9. Of course... Says the troll who fabricates definitions. You really have no self awareness at all, do you?

      Delete
    10. Bigfoot IS a mythical ape man numbnuts

      Delete
    11. Not according to the definition I sourced... And most certainly not according to the evidence it leaves.

      Delete
    12. Another day of zero bigfoots?? shocking

      Delete
    13. Zero explanations for the evidence more like.

      Delete
    14. another day of trolls with zero lives coming on a forum of a fringe subject that makes skeptics look more insane than believers .
      Listen mate, I don't waste my valuable time going on a forum of something I have zero belief in but if that's the way you live your life all I can say is you're pretty pathetic . I come on here because I am a hardcore believer in bigfoot and have concluded by the evidence it exists.
      So why are you here other than :
      A) your xbox is broken ?
      B) you lead a sad existence ?
      c) you like to argue for the sake of arguing ?
      D) you're in reality a closet bigfoot believer
      E) this is the only site that hasn't banned your sorry arse ?
      F) you're a silly prat off his meds ?

      So which answer is correct- tick , tock , the clock is running down and we need your answer
      Cheerio

      Joe

      Delete
  5. Let’s just run down a few things we are supposed to swallow here in order to buy this story…

    There is an ape that has eluded capture for 100 years in the U.S.
    It’s living in rural areas outside of the nation’s capital on a highly populated coastline.
    This guy saw it while fishing.
    He saw one and shot at it decades ago. In the same place.
    The creature leaves no definitive evidence behind.
    Yeah… I see a burned stump (or a dozen other possibilities). We’re supposed to believe this is Bigfoot? Absurd.

    Don’t be this gullible, no matter how much you want to believe.

    I love the mythology and lore of Bigfoot, I really do. I ALWAYS will – it’s an iconic part of American culture and a beloved “monster”. But I am so very tired of the bottom of the barrel content about it. How insulting is this idiotic “evidence”? The Bigfoot blogs, internet radio shows, Finding Bigfoot, the endless You Tube vids, hoaxes, and blobsquatches. The field is pathological.

    No picture or video or footprint will EVER be conclusive evidence. So, unless you have a collection of solid evidence, DNA, or a body part reviewed by an actual scientist who knows what they are doing, shut up already.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Is the present "Bigfoot" evidence reliable? Well about as reliable as any falsifiable source that can be presented as evidence in any scientific or judicial arena. There are in fact plenty of facts that denialists choose to ignore, like the pristine professionalism that has transitioned scientific careers into this field, by methods tried and tested to be legitimate and totally reliable. Like biologists endorsing physical evidence, repeatedly telling you that there is nothing in the environment of the US that prohibits the existence of an unknown primate, and in fact... Is likely to be there. Considering that every single source of evidence exists short of type specimen, is it healthy to maintain the tunnel vision that there is nothing what so ever to the claims of an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the US until a body is sourced?

      DNA has also been sequenced and it's human.

      If someone hit you around the head with a footprint cast, you'd feel that solid evidence alright... And the suggestion that scientists who have verified that evidence don't know what they're doing, is mere ad hominem. If the subject upsets you that much, why don't you obsess about something else and feel better for it? Because to anyone who isn't in denial about this subject, this stuff is a source of warranted interest... And nobody's gonna shut up because of your prolonged whining.

      Delete
    3. Any dream sightings lately joergy??? AHHHH HAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. Would you care to reference two cases of "dream sightings"?

      Delete
    5. Any one but iktomi,I HAVE A QUESTION. IF SASQUATCH DNA IS HUMAN ? what species of human?
      Homo erectus? Homo Habilis? Homo Heidelbergensis? Homo sapien ? Homo Floresiensis?
      Homo Neanderthalensis?
      or is sasquatch a Sub-species
      of Homo Sapien? like a pygmy,bushman(khoisan),Bantu,
      Hazda,Masai,zandawie,?
      or maybe a cro magnon(neanderthal&masai) or melanesian(masai&denisovan&neanderthal&unknown human sub species) HOPEFULLY ANDY WHITE CAN WEIGH IN ON THIS QUESTION.
      since now for less than $100 anyone can get a comprehensive
      Mito DNA profile!!
      thnx, ,,AC collins

      Delete
    6. sasquatch are human? maybe, but not Homo sapien sapien.otherwise we would not even be looking for them,as they(bigfoot) would be indistinguishable from any other race of homo sapien on this earth.

      Delete
    7. OR MAYBE THEY ARE A SUB-SPECIES OF HOMO NEANDERTHAL,
      OR A SUB-SPECIES OF HOMO HIDELBERGENSIS SINCE ALL ANECDOTAL SIGHTINGS DESCRIBE A MASSIVE JAW THAT LACK'S A GRACILE CHIN,AND MANY OTHER PHYSICAL DISCRIPTIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE PHYSICAL PERAMETERS OF HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN (intermembralbral index, just to mention one of hundreds). if just one fact is correct(out of hundreds) then sasquatch is NOT a homo sapien sapien, maybe a hybred of some sort,BUT NOT HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN.

      Delete
    8. Your best Zana nonsense & lies smashed;
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/new-interview-with-dr-melba-ketchum-and.html

      Your best HSS lies nailed;
      https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/surprise-guests-on-thanksgiving-coast.html

      How Patty is human;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/the-teddy-roosevelt-bigfoot-story.html?m=0
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/dr-jeffrey-meldrum-removes-myth-out-of.html?m=0

      Now, let's just say at a hypothetical level that I'm wrong about Patty or Sasquatch being ancient Homo Sapien... Sasquatch is still being shown to exist (which is a major fundamental reason behind your little hate campaign from when you're in "zero bigfeets" mode), with human anatomical features that can be pointed to in humans in our distant lineage. Open the links F-AC!! You might need it explained to you 50 times before it even starts to sink in, but I'm not in the mood to spam for your intellectual shortfalls. But I expect as much from someone who didn't know humans are primates.

      (Sigh)

      And I'll also take your fake AC account, and fake enthusiasm for the "paranormal Bigfoot" as a capitulation. Instead of failing to explain away the existence of "Bigfoot", you now have to pretend to be an enthusiast so you can settle for trying to aggravate people with their theories instead. That's pretty sad and desperate.

      Now Professor Bryan Sykes at the University of Oxford says he believes Zana had a strain of West African DNA that belonged to a subspecies of modern humans. "They will be published in the regular scientific press so I can't be more specific," he (Sykes) said."
      https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.techtimes.com/amp/articles/44347/20150406/dna-test-suggests-russian-apewoman-zana-was-not-human-and-yeti-may-not-be-a-myth.htm

      Delete
    9. Melba Ketchum = you lose. ^

      Delete
    10. Who has nothing whatsoever to the point in hand.

      Delete
    11. Your link@11:13 CHUMP = you LOSE!

      Delete
  6. It is impossible to capture a Bigfoot alive and keep it alive for any period of time. The Feds limit was 2 weeks and they had tens of millions of dollars at their disposal. Some redneck yahoo with a dart gun, doesn't have a prayer.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Doc that pic looks like a plate of celery with peanut butter. I think you are a foody.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why don't they send a squad of big game hunters with fully automatic machine guns into known bigfoot hot spots? They WOULD kill one.

    ReplyDelete