Friday, February 3, 2017

Bigfoot In The Area Caught On Audio


Robert Dodson shares some audio he recorded in his research area. Dodson hits the woods every night, and has acquired some amazing audio.

13 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. KELLY SHAW IS SIMPLY JEALOUS OF DR.SQUATCH AND ROBERT DODSON AND THAT GUY THAT HAS THE BOOK STORE UP THERE BY BLUFF CREEK.

      KEKKY SHAW,,,"SHAME ON YOU"

      Collins

      Delete
    2. Steven S. showed off his nice legs at a Bigfoot BBQ function when he wore short pants and tube socks!

      Delete
    3. Tube sock? lol, Poor rictor,
      Ever the Sucker!!

      Delete
  2. This sounds pretty clearly like Ron Moreheads Sierra sounds being played at a distance. If you are going to make some fake bigfoot noises to present to the public, you should at least be creative enough not to use someone elses fake bigfoot noises. Only Trump supporters are dumb enough to believe this crap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wouldn't all "Bigfoot" sound the same? Snarls and snorts among fast chattering are reported from the US to Australia.

      Delete
    2. Apart from a couple of howls, I couldn't hear anything that was similar to the Sierra Sounds.

      Delete
  3. I now conceive of Bigfootery as being as intellectually bankrupt as creationism. Why? Because the Bigfoot proposition, like creationism, is tested on a daily basis. It has failed on a daily basis, and has failed on a daily failed for decades.

    How specifically is the Bigfoot proposition tested on a daily basis? First off, as mentioned earlier, roadkill. Bigfoot is asserted to be a real animal, whose range is the entire North American continent. For decades now, drivers travel literally billions of miles on those roads each year. Traffic is constant. Animals of all kinds both common and rare, like Florida panthers, are killed. Not a single Sasquatch. Hikers traverse the wilderness daily, including the alleged habitation areas of Bigfoot. Humans by nature are curious, and anomalous details stand out. A human shaped skull the size of a basketball would stand out, as would virtually ANY part of a humanoid carcass. The natural curiosity of hikers is an unintentional test for all sorts of anomalies, such as aircraft debris occasionally found in the wilderness. No Bigfoot carcass has ever been found in North America. Geologists, road engineers, paleontologists, and others dig and move earth on a daily basis in North America. Though most are not intentionally looking for Bigfoot fossils, anomalous fossils would be noticed, as would all sorts of anomalies. Wildlife photographers capture high resolution, unambiguous photographs of all sorts of animals, including very rare ones, on a daily basis. In 50 years of Bigfootery, the number of clear and unambiguous photographs or motion pictures of Sasquatch produced by non-Bigfoot advocates is zero.

    The claim by Bigfoot advocates that Bigfootery is a legitimate scientific question continues to function as effective propaganda because the notion of unintentional testing is non-obvious.

    For many years now, creationists have tried to argue that creationism is a legitimate scientific question. “Teach the Controversy” they argue. It’s a subtle form of propaganda. Creationists attempt to stage public “debates” with top scientists. In this way, creationists are subtly attempting to persuade by suggesting the issue is a legitimate controversy, and that the creationist’s argument and evidence is equivalent to that offered by legitimate scientists. Bigfoot advocates engage in a similar form of propaganda, though I suspect that they do so unconsciously.

    By causing “Bigfoot skeptics” to continually respond to putative evidence, Bigfoot advocates tacitly position the Bigfoot proposition as a valid scientific question. Furthermore, this obscures the damning flaw of Bigfootery, which is that the Bigfoot proposition is unintentionally tested daily, and fails daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is 150 years worth of archeological records that have documented 7-8 foot skeletons in the US. Sasquatch isn't a dumb animal that's gonna decide to run across the path of a vehicle like cats do on occasions. The amount of eyewitnesses that account for people reporting sightings whilst in vehicles is phenomenal.

      For the circumstances of recognised creatures being photographed, these images are attained by professionals with professional equipment and are in a familiar, relaxed environments. I find it laughable that most "sceptics" require photographs when every photograph or footage has and always will be a "man in a suit" to them. This is the appliance of rhetorical arguments to make the perception of normal debate. Even wildlife photographers are assigned specific instructions and are allocated specific areas that would imply specific results. You would have to know how to track a Sasquatch for that. They erect little hideouts that don't do much for hiding against a creature with the wilderness awareness of five green berets, whereas the majority of this field are people from the general public who have to capture images of a far more evasive and intelligent creature than that of the projects of most wildlife biologists (the innumerable blobsquatches testify to this)."

      Apart from that, a whole load of classic pseudosceptical special pleading. It doesn't matter how many rants & tantrums these people have, they can't wish away the track impressions & hair samples.

      The Virgin Mary doesn't leave tracks.

      Delete
  4. Bigfoot died on the X shaped trees for your sins

    ReplyDelete
  5. सुपर संडे: UP में आज सभी बड़े दिग्गज की रैलियां
    read more todaynews18.com http://bit.ly/2l6PytK

    ReplyDelete
  6. What f'fn waste of time. Crappy 9 minute recording that is completely useless. The moron that posted this should have A. broke it down to cut out the first 8 minutes and posted only the important 60 seconds, and B. should have cleaned it up to remove all the white noise.

    ReplyDelete