World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
I just dont like dealing with other monsters than Bigfoot!!
Like Itkomi and Joe?Dazz
What's up "Haints"? Particularly angry lately, eh?; )
I don't know if Itkomi is more obsessed with bigfoot or this Haints character. Itkomi,have you ever been to the states and searched for bigfoot? You and Joe should go to California. You can get married their I'm pretty sure. You could make it a bigfoot wedding and invite all the researchers you know.Dazz
This comment has been removed by the author.
ooooooohhhhhh snap. Itkomi has lost it and been given a total whiteout. He must have really gone crazy in his rant. I'm glad nobody can read it. Please think about the children on this site Itkomi. Dazz
Why don't the very best researchers have proof. They are either extremely bad at what they do or bigfoot just isn't out their.
haintsFriday, December 2, 2016 at 5:15:00 PM PSTSo, Joe -- this one is closer to home. You out searching for it?The only Squatch you will find is one living in your mum's basement. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!haintsSaturday, December 3, 2016 at 7:52:00 AM PSTSo why not, Itkomi? If you believe, why not go look? Or aren't you man enough?http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/uk-bigfoot-sighting-report.htmlI could have found a lot more comments from sockpuppet Haints where he claims I should "get out of the basement and into the field to look for "Bigfoot" in the UK, or the US"... But can't be bothered right now. I think by now it's blatantly obvious which ones are his butthurt comments.The thing is, "Dazz-Haints", I'm very, very fortunate to have constant contact with some of the very, very best researchers in the US. People who aren't merely posting videos on BFE of themselves, but people who have spent many decades in the wilderness of the US, who have seen these creatures on many occasions and regularly source physical evidence. Why do you think I'm so cocky about things? I don't even scrape the top of the iceberg as to what I know. And you sir, are simply a failure who struggles coming to terms with things. Who subsequently takes it out on other people online, as is expected from internet trolls who try and claw back some level of self esteem.
3:43... That's because the repercussions of what the evidence entails, means that extraordinary evidence will only ever be good enough for extraordinary ideas. There is already three times the trace evidence that the Bili Ape had at this stage of research, but until a body turns up, it won't matter because people understandably struggle with the idea that hominids are running around the wilbdernes of the US.
The old bigfoot moto. I have all this proof but I'm not going to tell anyone. I'm just going to continue to be a laughing stock while I sit on all this information. Not buying it, if the evidence was there then it wouldn't be a fringe subject that real scientists don't take seriously.
Allow me to highlight your rhetorical nonsense...If the ridge characteristics in dermatoglyphics are consistent with other examples from Sasquatch footprints, are verified in collaboration with tens of scientists who have determined anatomy like heels, ankles, and Achilles' tendons... And are consistent with casts over a period of 50 years (after examining hundreds of alleged Sasquatch footprints), then this is repeatable scientific evidence. There are ways of testing biological evidence in the many hair samples found at locations of alleged Sasquatch activity, notably primatology and field biology in comparing against known primates' uniform morphology. If repeated samples are all morphologically congruent (ruling out hoaxing), and are definitively indistinguishable from classified human and non-human primates but uniquely uniform... Then again you have repeatable scientific evidence. Even though you don’t have a means of classifying what that primate leaving that evidence is, the results of that evidence is you have the anatomical impression of an unclassified bipedal primate, that requires the same level of further investigation as the Bili Ape had. However, the extraordinary nature of what this evidence entails is in fact what's holding back the requirement to investigative further. It means that until extraordinary evidence surfaces (a body), the subject isn't going to draw the attention of a majority of mainstream scientists who would only THEN be in a position to become aware of the many evidences that preceded it. Without this, few will see beyond the hoaxing and pop culture. It's a very detrimental circle that can be simplified as the requirement of extraordinary evidence without the extraordinary effort it would require to source it.To the people who aren't being rhetorical towards the evidence, the current frequency of evidence wouldn't be there if the retakes didn't exist.
*creature didn't exist.
^Smoked a celebratory cigar after finishing off Joe. Weirdo!!!!!!!Dazz
^ hahahaso true , so true
F-AC 988 DEBATE WINS!!PEDO JOE F 988 DEBATE LOSSES!!
Wow, I'm surprised that you hasd the nerve to come around after you were made a fool of yesterday. One can only assume that you're not really worried about looking the fool because you use too many sockpuppet accounts for anyone to link the "beat down".What a silly coward.
haha, this dazz/haints sock puppet is trying so very hard but always coming up short as he does in his real life .completely knackered smoked like a kipper I may addJoe
Fish in a barrel.
I just love watching you two lovebirds protect each other. I am picturing you guys snuggled under a blanket watching finding bigfoot and eating fish and chips. Isn't love grand!!!!Dazz
Happiness is a young welsh boy!Pedo joe f
Hi Haints !having a lovely day ?it's so sad really that the only joy you get out of life is to come on here and troll like the sad sack sock puppet you really are.cheersJoe
I shudder to think what this psycho would stoop to if the Internet didn't exist. F-AC got his bum whipped yesterday... Now everyone else is a "pedo" even though he was busted posting child rape threats."Actually, the study may have some interesting implications. Since a sadistic person is characterised by being vicious and degrading toward others (sometimes physically), it’s possible that the internet allows them to redirect their energy. If they’re inflicting harm through anonymous words, perhaps it’s preventing them from doing something much more destructive in person. On the extreme end, and unsurprisingly, sadism is commonly seen in sexual offenders and serial killers."https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/25/internet-trolls-are-also-real-life-trolls
^ Such irony,,, Are you trying to convince everybody that you are not a obsessed weirdo from the UK?
I've never denied where I'm from, in fact, it must kill you to know someone from across the pond annihilates you about what's in your back yard, eh?Troll on psycho, you got smoked about the subject and that's good enough for me. : )
maybe 7:48 is trying gloss over the simple fact that He got his"arse" whooped by AC collins the other day!!
Yeah F-AC... People can read. Adios, loon.
^ pedo joe's sockpuppet
Strange 8:59,As all your so called experts you consult with,Say you would belive any ole thing as long as it jives with your wacky ideas that bigfoot(patty) is a sub saharan african hss!!NO WONDER YOU'RE KNOWN AS "THE CHUMP"!!Uno who
As modern humans spread out from Africa, they encountered other hominins such as Homo neanderthalensis and the so-called Denisovans, that likely evolved from populations of Homo erectus that had left Africa around 2 million years ago.Consider this another step towards your initiation into adult level anthropology. We're all from Africa, tw*t... Zana included. And though we can't take a DNA sample of Patty, Sykes has already tested a North American sample and it was a match to a feral human from Uzbekistan.
Normally I just let all the garbage go, but Sykes is a scientist and has been nasty about our study, yet he’s not been at Oxford for many years (quote from Oxford) and without keeping up with the technology, you’re a dinosaur within a year or so at the rate technology is developing. He makes up an “institute” at Oxford to publish his paper which you NEVER do (once again quoting Oxford as saying there is no such institute). He disses bioinformatics which is the most cutting edge analysis method for whole genomes known to mankind, preferring the “golden age of genetics”. His paper was proven wrong about the bear genetics by other geneticists and they wrote a published response to the Royal Academy.All of this can be found in the UK press and the Royal Academy so I’m not saying anything that’s not public knowledge. He’s a mtDNA scientist so he’s not skilled in all of the disciplines in our paper. I’m not either on all of it, that’s why there are numerous authors in our manuscript. Each scientist wrote according to their discipline. Like the bioinformatics was written by the bioinformaticist.The electron microscopy by the head of that department at Texas A&M and so forth. I’m only the lead author and therefore responsible for answering the questions and correspondence for it writing my part and putting it all together. We used 12 labs and they used one US mtDNA lab, not Oxford and only tested a small portion of the mtDNA loop. No other genetic testing was done.. And after all of this, he has the audacity to diss our work. How unprofessional and naive. Bless his heart. I can prove ours in not contaminated by human or other mammals. I did a video on it. He forgets I’m a forensic scientist and all crime scenes are subject to contamination so I know how to make sure it’s not there.
"If that wasn’t enough, Sykes admitted to telling a “little white lie” about his affiliation noted in his published paper. He put down for the journal that he was the chair of the Institute of Human Genetics at Wolfson College, Oxford. He, however, admitted in March 2015 that the institute is mythical. He told the media, “The journal required some sort of additional address in the college and, hey, presto, I became an institute!”The original publication of Sykes’ paper had to issue a correction about his “institute” during the Spring of 2015.None of these clarifications of the sampling, his affiliation, or this discussion are to be found in The Nature of the Beast. It remains an enigma why Coronet/Hodder & Stoughton, since they held up the book already a year, did not wait a bit longer and add this information to the end of this new book. That’s a shame."- Loren Coleman
^ = CHUMP!
Iktomi = cocksucker
I liked the bigfoot report at the end.Shame he took a shot at it though xx
^ Condom puppet xx
^ smelly sock
Did somebody say Joe has never been on a Bigfoot expedition?
No, but I did hear someone say that you have never kissed a girlSchooled like a insolent toddler !Joe
^ only kisses welsh boy's
^ fixated on Welsh boys for some strange reason.it's ok, 2017 is the year you can finally tell the world without any shameJoe
And tiddly doo!
Aren't you the same Joe that hunts sexy blokes here all the time?
That's me, would you fancy a shag mate ?Joe
^ no, that's fake Joe who is into the blokesI'm the real Joe who is warring against the trolls , sock puppets and snot nosed toddlers on here and for all i know they are most likely all haints cheers and happy 2017 - don't be a wankerJoe
Oh and I almost forgot, "tiddly doo!
You have some serious problems Joe.
^ yes i do, and they are called trolls and sock puppets. you should know because you are one of them bozototal loonJoe
By the way mate, my most serious problem now is finding a cute bloke to snog with ! Would you fancy a snog ?Joe
F-AC 989 debate wins!Pedo Joe f 989 debate losses! Yawn!
Still can't make up your mind, huh Joe. Good luck with your crazy personalities. Get help.
No I would not !
^ some people need to take a mid tarsal break from wanking so muchJoe
^ prefers sucking cock