This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
This is old footage, correct? Sounds like a fox to me.
ReplyDeleteSock puppet^
Deleteac collins
^ 100% intimidated by me.
DeleteAlso true.
DeleteDon't mind F-AC, he's a hard day.
DeleteWhen I think of F-AC two word comes to mind "sock puppet".
DeleteSo... nothing.
ReplyDelete^ make a resolution to yourself and stick to it - go away and find a new hobby - like playing with hard dicks or something.
DeleteHe cant get his hands on any.
DeleteVey short memory.
DeleteWouldn't it be nice to actually get something in 2017?
ReplyDeletelol. 40 year old virgin @ 5:52
Delete^ no way is Joe that young - he`s at least 55 - 60 ish
DeleteAlways liked this clip. I don't draw any conclusions from it, I just like it.
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year to all researchers and enthusiasts!