North Pacific Coastal Trail Bigfoot Expedition


Check out this expedition footage from the RMSO of some amazing bigfoot country.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Stunning country... And keep up the good work RMSO!!

      Delete
    2. ^ country bumpkin - emphasis on "bum"

      Delete
    3. Stick to the "zero bigfoots" personality, it's more becoming of your intelligence, F-AC.

      Delete
    4. Stunning country Iktomi? Have you lost your mind? I mean really, you of all people? I love your Bigfoot enthusiasm, but you complimenting Kekky Shaw is beyond INSANE.....Stunning country.....I'm at a total loss for words!

      MAJOR PROOF ON MY SITE!!

      2 BABY BIGFOOT....KABOOM!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7oRr1B6L3o

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMhJ_mSAhDE

      Delete
    5. DS, check this out...

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/kelly-shaw-may-have-filmed-something.html?m=0

      ... It's Kelly Shaw casting a track impression.

      Delete
    6. 2014 IKTOMI? No proof since then? Where are his pictures of Bigfoot?

      Can you prove he didn't make this footprint? That's why footprints aren't solid proof.......Dermal ridges, ok, does Shaw have them...Bet he doesn't!

      Give credit where credit is due Iktomi....and there's absolutely no reason whatsoever you would compliment Shaw, you've lost your mind, and i mean that as nicely as possible.

      MORE MEGA-PROOF ON MY SITE!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnsGAF9piEQ

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUuP1RFp6Nk

      Delete
    7. I've lost my mind? Get some physical evidence DS, then come pipe at me for supporting someone who has.

      Delete
    8. I have more Physical evidence than ANYONE! Kekky has one supposed footprint, and i have HUNDREDS UPON HUNDREDS OF PICTURES????

      Shaw is a joke, and you should be ashamed of yourself for even giving him ONE compliment, he wastes people's time!

      Delete
    9. I like Kelly Shaws reports and the beautiful country side we see in his videos..oops i appear to lost my mind...send the men in white coats..quick! xx

      Delete
    10. Dont mind Joergy, he is just mad that his precious bigfoot site has given him the boot..

      Delete
    11. PIB thats not what this site is supposed to be about.

      Yes, you've lost your mind also, and I also say that nicely.

      Delete
    12. Gee, might as well turn this site into a beautiful scenery site...look at the beautiful woods in Oklahoma by Robert Dodson, and the flat plains of Ohio, by Tim Stover...C'mon.....no evidence is being shown, just pathetic!

      Delete
    13. Doc, this buffoon Iktomi is just jealous of the wonderful work you're doing!

      Delete
    14. DS, that's one example of physical evidence that Kelly has accumulated over the past few years. If you spend some time looking at his work, it gets a little more significant than the odd sightings report and nice location.

      DS, you don't have to go around attacking other researchers to make your work seem more sincere. Personally, I think you have one or two decent images out of everything I've seen, but you could reinforce a lot of your work by sourcing and documenting one piece of physical evidence such as a track impression.

      At this point, you don't have anything near that which could be defined as proof, so please stop running around the internet attacking people who are working just as hard as you are, I would expect a lot more from someone who has religious moral ideals as you do. Putting down others who are working as hard as you are (because I know for a fact you are in the field a lot and admire you for it) is exactly what is wrong with the whole field and one reason mainstream science won't get involved, it's a soap opera.

      And I mean that as nicely as is remotely possible brother... And please don't start thinking you have any support from the blog's multiple personality psycho. He's egging you on for a reaction, you're getting trolled brother.

      Delete
    15. I'm sure Doc appreciates that you mean that as nicely "as is remotely possible" !

      Delete
    16. Hey sockpuppet... I think you meant to substantiate your ideas, but your try-hard grammar hunting makes your inferiority complex about that a little too obvious.

      Delete
    17. ... And there's no requirement for a space before your exclamation mark.

      Delete
    18. Happy New Year Iktomi and I mean that "as nicely as is remotely possible"!

      Delete
    19. "Personally, I think you have one or two decent images out of everything I've seen."

      Haha - now THERE'S a vote of confidence considering Doc has hundreds of these images.

      Delete
    20. At least you got the exclamation mark right this time.

      Delete
  2. Jotomi`s hero Kakky Shaw has never seen a bigfoot

    just like JoTomi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, it's the blog's resident psychopath! How many personalities you playing with today, F-AC?

      Delete
    2. Thats the stalker S. Stoopidfoot

      Delete
    3. 5:53 self projecting Agai?
      The ironie of Joe f's comment is so obviously laughable that it is a MONUMENT TO LOW IQ !!

      LOL!

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Sorry... I can't tell what personality you are today, you're melting several into one in that comment, not that I can get around your grammar too well.

      Delete
    6. Joe f,I bet you can't tell much about Anything,except the obvious,, even then you still don't get it,"amigo"!

      Unbelivable :-P

      Delete
    7. who's calling Jotomi stupid?
      stop it

      Delete
    8. NO MAKE ME!

      HAA HAA HAA LOL!

      Delete
  3. STOP the trolling Stupid Steven! Everyone knows its you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What is this? Some blog about some creature called bigfoot? And some story about stunning scenery? And a bunch of comments that are pretty much unintelligible? More liberal propaganda from the lame stream media. I'm not interested. Done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If I had a serious cruel streak... I'd reel off some evidence and sit back while you make a total prat of yourself...

      Delete
    2. How in the world can you possibly say anything negative about 6:13 Iktomi, and not Matt, or Shaw, or Dodson, or any of the other researchers who waste everyone's time here???

      WOW???

      Delete
    3. All I know about the "evidence is this"!

      AC collins 943 debate WINS!!
      iKTOMI 943 debate LOSS'S

      sad but true!

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. DS, because the troll at 6:13 wouldn't recognise evidence if it fed him a foot-long. Stop running around jumping down people's throats about what they can at least substantiate, and you might sustain what meagre support you have.

      F-AC doesn't count by the way, he's trolling you.

      Delete
    6. Sorry Iktomi, there's a serious problem with you not complimenting me on my overwhelming evidence, that no one can prove otherwise, yet you say "Stunning scenery" to Shaw?
      So you want to see stunning scenery on this site, and not Bigfoot proof, is that correct?

      Delete
    7. LOL - Relax DS.  You take Bigfoot and yourself far too seriously.

      Delete
    8. According to the recent vote you're #0.

      Delete
    9. I think Iktomi should start complimenting Dr. Squatch on all his exciting evidence. He compilments all the other researchers on here.

      Delete
    10. DS is giving Joergy a thumping

      Delete
    11. 8:25, Goes to show there aren't any truth seekers on this site! I could have voted for myself, and told all of my subscribers to vote, but no need to play into click bait. 8:25, you care to tell me who's a better researcher and post their best evidence? Bet you don't!
      9:37, There are no researchers featured on this site, and you know it!
      9:41, It makes no sense, no one in their right mind would compliment shaw.....finding a footprint in 2014, and nothing since, no pics?......C'mon!

      Delete
    12. please take some time out of busy day and vote here


      http://www.poll-maker.com/poll930308x6F864cc0-38

      Delete
  5. What's this? Some kind of video of the Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization walking around and talking about Bigfoot? Isn't that Kelly Shaw doing most of the talking? Even Dr. Squatch has more evidence of Bigfoot then that group. All the same -

    Not interested. Done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's this? Some poster named lktomi who thinks Kelly Shaw does good work and gives Dr. Squatch lectures on how to behave responds with sockpuppet? What's that mean? Never mind...

      Not interested. Done.

      Delete
    2. That's right Joerg, we're all one person posting from a magic Air Force base!

      Delete
    3. Nargh, not all of you... Just two trolls maximum. And none from a magic psy-ops airforce base.

      Delete
    4. Maybe not from a magic psy-ops airforce base. But definitely from a psycho home base in the basement.

      Delete
    5. Basement references are such boring attempts at Internet humour, Haints. Maybe you should stick to picking up people's grammar, to make up for being too stupid to notice when you were being duped as an enthusiast?

      Delete
    6. Haints is only one of the names he uses on here along with the fake Joe,Not interested done guy, Satan, Lucifer, el Diablo and ye Olde neckbeard to name a few
      You get the idea
      He's got multiple personalities and they are all rotten

      Joe

      Delete
    7. You've done an excellent Job up there Joe. May I add: MilliPete, Golden boy, Sweet cheeks, and Sausage Fingered Sally.

      Delete
    8. What type of scummy excuse embarks on a hate campaign on people because he was a failure?

      A spoiled brat, that's who!

      Delete
    9. Much obliged Iktomi, now would you fancy a shag with me to celebrate our victory over the sock puppet?

      Joe

      Delete
    10. ^ Here you go- Haints as the fake Joe.
      Speak of the devil, or satan, or lucifer
      They are all haints in his little imaginary world
      The only shag this fake Joe will see is the carpet in his basement he will need to clean up after spilling all his junk food on when he got all excited about trolling this site.
      Clean up fake Joe before mummy finds out and takes away your xbox

      Joe

      Delete
    11. ^I think we deserve something more than this played out drivel.

      Delete
    12. Please apply the above to Super Wanksalot at 4:43

      Delete
    13. The real Joe is spot on about you as always. Hurts doesn't it?

      Delete
    14. Fake Joe scouring the posts for spelling mistakes now.

      Delete
    15. I'd rather fancy scouring a cute bloke's bollocks!

      Joe

      Delete
    16. Couldn't find any spellings so he's back to asses.

      Delete
  6. I called it, just a matter of time before DS went after Iktomi. You are not allowed to have an opinion which doesn't put DS firmly at #1. Weird how everyone sees what you can't, right DS? The irony is you think you are seeing something everyone else isn't. Poor guy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's weird is you can't see God, and you're going to Hell Vegas.
      Forget my research, read a Bible and find God!

      Delete
  7. +1 Vegas.

    Doc is clearly mentally ill. His research is absurd. He literally can not cope with attention being given to legitimate researchers. Its killing him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The polls can't be argued with 103-0 in favor of Doc having fake evidence
      poor doc, he may need to see a doc of his own soon

      Delete
    2. 103 fake jealous people....BWHAHAHHAHAHHAHA

      Delete
    3. 103 PEOPLE AND YOU'RE TELLING ME NOT A SINGLE ONE CAN PROVE ANY OF MY PICS FAKE???

      JUST DESTROYED 103 IDIOTS....LOVE IT!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?