Monday, October 24, 2016

Colorado Investigator Believes They Captured A Sasquatch On Video


What do you think? Is this a bigfoot?

This is a Sasquatch I found in my Video October Hunters Moon Part TWO/ Just a little sneak preview of whats to come. I got many more at this place. (screen shot at end) .Thank you to my supporters. Hard work pays off.

27 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. What happened to big dumb john and ernie? dorks

      Delete
    2. Does it make you feel good to pretend to play the piano Barret?

      Delete
    3. Thanks Chick! Love the red (my fav color) boots! Hope you corner some of those cockroach trolls with them!

      Delete
    4. Its" MR, BIG GHEY JON"!!!!!! to you 7:11.

      Delete
    5. ^Still butthurt after all these years? Tragic.

      Delete
    6. ^ wished she was a real woman without hairs on chin

      Delete
    7. ^ wished he was a real man with hairs on chin

      Delete
  2. uh...right. That 'sasquatch' looks like the kid from 'Mask'. Sorry, but that is part of the trunk.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this what Bigfoot research has degenerated to? Taking videos of trees and later picking out images you believe to be of a Sasquatch? I'm have been seeing more of this type of thing lately and to my amusement I see many comments on YouTube praising this effort. Although this fits in with my thoughts that people see what they want to see, I don't believe it's of any benefit to those who actually want to vindicated in proving Sasquatch actually exists. How could this method possibly contribute in doing this???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When the topic in question is a mythical creature what else can you do?

      Delete
    2. Couldnt agree more,these so called researchers are grasping at straws.

      Delete
    3. Mr Curious... What I find amusing... Is that you should complain about "this form of research degenerating things", yet have a hoaxing conspiracy to explain away people sourcing physical evidence like tracks nearly every week. When did the standards of scepticism degenerate so badly? Oh that's right... When pseudosceptics totally missunderstood the concept for denial.

      5:16... mythical creatures don't leave tracks; your daily wake up call.

      Delete
    4. There "so called researchers" are probably doing more research than both Curious and D.M. have both combined. These researchers owe you nothing, not even better evidence.

      What I find "curious" is how you both sit around nitpicking others, yet provide nothing of your own of evidence. You just visit a blog devoted to bigfoot to trash others' evidence, yet seem to be mystified by the subject.

      If you want evidence of persuasion, why don't you go get your own? If you don't believe, why are you here?

      Delete
    5. *These (not there). Also, no "of" in the second paragraph, third line. Yes, I'll try and start proofing.

      Delete
    6. BRAVO BRAVO UNO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! + 1,000,000!!

      GOOD PIC COLORADO DUDE!

      Delete
  4. Joe Iktomi where are u bud?We need your opinion on this video.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Mazzini my friend!

      It certainly looks like a face in the foliage. I've looked at the footage a couple of times now and the alleged face doesn't appear to move at all. My thoughts are that it's probably foliage, but without a comparison it's pretty much a lost cause. This is so important in potential evidence sources like this these days. It's not like the people who filmed it are guilty of simple pareidolia in this instance; a worthy talking point I think. The alleged subject appears to have a beard and dark sunken eyes, flat nose with a brow ridge. Interesting photo for sure.

      When you study photos of gorillas for example, and realise how well they can hide in foliage, it really isn't unrealistic that "Sasquatch" can achieve the same. For these reasons it's very important to look at pieces of footage like this and I really don't agree that it "degenerates research" at all. After all, if something exists, it can be filmed (and has). There are some great photos on the internet where there could be anything up to four mountain gorillas in a photo, within 20 feet of the camera, yet it's a serious exercise in observation to be able to spot where they are and need them pointed out.

      Delete
    2. ^ f` christ` sake

      `shakes head sadly`

      Delete
  5. If you look closely at the supposed sasquatch, then do a google search of Barack Obama's friends. You will find that the "sasquatch" is simply Baracks male lover patiently waiting in the swamps for Hussein to cum to him in January after the witch flies Broom Stick One onto the roof of her new lair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At a site where stupid comments are the norm the above is the stupidest I have seen yet.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 10:35. Excellent observations. I would have never realized this w/o your professional input. Great Job!

      Delete
    3. ^ i agree ,, almost as moronic as iktommi nonsense

      Delete
  6. the fact that this video is even being posted speaks VOLUMES about this website & who runs it.. why are we giving these LOONY LOONS a platform to be LOONY? that is CLEARLY & OBVIOUSLY a face due to the foilage debri making a facelike apparation. videos like these do absolutely NOTHING but litter the web with more & more trash making it harder & harder to weed out the AUTHENTIC videos and researchers! the fact that you posted this video must mean you're a LOON just like this person.... probably someone that records random videos of dark spots in the forest then goes home only to find " a family of 24 Sasquatch with 18 juveniles" hiding behind the surrounding bushes & trees, aren't ya? Lmfao give me a damn break.... it's such a shame because these creatures really do exist but posting STUPID unintelligent videos like these cause more harm than good and makes YOU look overall like an amateur!

    ReplyDelete