Thursday, October 27, 2016

24/7 LIVE Outdoor Wildlife Cam In Minnesota - Watch For Bigfoot


Wildlife webcams deliver a 24/7 live feed to youtube. Keep your eyes peeled, you never know what you might catch a glimpse of.

17 comments:

  1. I think everyone would agree that Chick is the best thing that ever happened to Bigfoot Evidence.

    Yep !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In most cases, misogynists do not even know that they hate women. Misogyny is typically an unconscious hatred that men form early in life, often as a result of a trauma involving a female figure they trusted. An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter.
      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

      Delete
  2. How about actually finding a bigfoot? Have we given up on that pipe dream?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hate Halloween. All of those punks in their Chewbacca costumes raiding my gifting bowls. Stay off my property, or I'll show you my crawlspace!

      Delete
    2. Look at that footage. Clear as a bell. You can plainly see it's deer. All that is needed is one clear video such as that showing a Bigfoot going thru the motions. Thousands of these webcams set up by hunters and never a clear shot of a Bigfoot. Very telling don't you think?

      Cue the 'Bigfoot can sense cameras' comments.

      Delete
    3. Not only can they sense cameras, but they are also sensitive to fluctuations in the stock market, and trends in women's foot ware. I can't explain it. It is what it isn't.

      Delete
    4. Considering there are thousands of contemporary reports that have forensic evidence in substantiation... It pretty much falls within the definition of finding something. What your rhetorical BS needs is the correction of "classification". Suggesting that every single sighting and every single track impressions over thousands of years is down to misunderstanding and conspiracies (running around in Chewie costumes); now that's a pipe dream.

      Here's a trail camera photo;
      http://cliffbarackman.com/research/field-investigations/the-duhon-photograph/
      And here's another;
      http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp

      Basically outlining that these creatures are very rarely susceptible to mistakes. There are also examples of thermal hits with subjects in the height ranges of 8.5 foot in height and multiple subjects in the region of 7 foot. Hunters also make up the majority of eyewitness reports, but you would have to detract yourself from your perverse denial and look at some basic level of the evidence to know that. It's very simple; there is repeatable scientific evidence for a creature with the same widely reported anatomy as what is commonly known as "Sasquatch". To someone who's not in denial about that, there is no doubt in their minds that based on the frequency of evidence; they exist. From here, it is more than logical to assume that "Sasquatch" has observational wilderness abilities that one would expect from a seriously clever primate. Every living creature leaves sign of their passage in addition to tracks. These include chewed or bruised vegetation, droppings, scratches in tree bark, hairs snagged on branches or in bark, rubbings on trees, gnawed bones, feathers, opened nuts, dens, burrows, and nests. You may also find well-worn trails and runways through the grass that many animals use regularly. Studies have showed that chimpanzees for example, have startling photographic memories and easily beat humans every time in experiments. If Sasquatch somehow had Photographic memories as well as the level of sentience as humans, all this could be why they see sign of human interference and things like trail cams having been erected.

      Delete
  3. Yawning at iktomi and his repeated statements. Unable to accept that bullish!t can last for thousands of years if it's fulfilling a need. If you want to make a humanoid monster, do you make them big and hairy or small with scales? Nothing spectacular about converging mythology. Nothing spectacular about scary hairy things in the woods. Nothing spectacular about the bogeyman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry chump! Your version of events requires far more special pleading and far more leaps of faith. Are we to believe that for thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping society of monster myth makers all out to trick people? Different cultures coming up with the same intricate details, though finding each other's customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like? Hey, they must have mythed-up forensic species traits to cheat the best experts, in lottery win fashion too, eh??

      You need to learn what oral history means, become a little more cultured (civilised) and show a little respect.

      Sorry, your version of events is far more difficult to swallow with all the very credible people reporting something that would do nothing but tarnish their reputations and professions. The people who are willing to accept these facts, also have something you don't and that's scientific data. Don't like it? Do something about it pal, because if anything makes anyone yawn, it's you crying about it every day of your life like a little girl.

      Delete
  4. Yawn.


    Get a useful hobby and stop pretending that every critic is a troll.
    Videos of nothing.
    And pictures of nothing.
    And piggybacking on a creationist idea of giants.
    And not one single real academic willing to say more than "maybe".
    The difference between the bili ape and Bigfoot is that you can tell it's a real thing in the footage of a bili ape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spending every day of your life rhetorically publishing "Bigfoot doesn't exist", regardless of how much evidence has been rubbed in your face? That's the actions of a troll if ever I've seen it.

      Videos and pictures are necessary evidence, if something exists it is gerenally documented this way. If it didn't exist, you'd demand it (more rhetorical nonsense). Creationist ideas about giants have nothing to do with the average height range of "Sasquatch" (7-8 foot in height), nor does it have anything on the skeletal remains documented by three generations of archaeologists with the same height ratios. If anyone's "piggybacking", it would be you worming for an avenue by applying concepts to people's theories.

      "I am convinced that the Sasquatch exists, but whether it is all that it is cracked up to be is another matter altogether. There must be SOMETHING in north-west America that needs explaining, and that something leaves man-like footprints. The evidence I have adduced in favour of the reality of the Sasquatch is not hard evidence; few physicists, biologists or chemists would accept it, but nevertheless it IS evidence and cannot be ignored."
      John Napier MRCS, LRCP, DSC(Lond.) "Bigfoot- The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality"- Sphere Books Ltd.

      The difference between Sasquatch and the Bili Ape, is the study that occurred to track the Bill Ape. The frequency of evidence at this stage in fact dwarfs that which the Bili Ape enjoyed. Again... All this has been rubbed in your face, rhetorical cry baby.

      Delete
    2. And I'll be back later to respond any other rhetorical whining's left here.

      Delete
    3. Sent you a bombshell pic iktomi!!!!!

      Delete
    4. 4;29 is dmaker is his anon halloween disguise
      Trick or treat Donald- you get no treat but the trick is on you because you've been outed
      Now go back to your ISF forum where you can gush over things with your fellow indoor sweater vest campers

      Joe

      Delete