Saturday, July 16, 2016

Sasquatching Legend John Bindernagel Explains Why Science Finds Bigfoot Taboo


Here's a fantastic presentation by John Bindernagel explaining the types of evidence and how evidence can ultimately provide the conclusion of existence. So why does science ignore the evidence?


11 comments:

  1. Joerg my face and call me daddy

    ReplyDelete
  2. The majority of science ignores the evidence because the only evidence they will accept is a type specimen, living or dead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because that's the only evidence that's actually evidence.

      Footprints can be faked. Photographs can be faked. Videos can be faked. Audio can be faked. Stories can be easily faked. Modern technology is bringing us ever closer t the day when even DNA can be faked.

      A type specimen cannot be faked, especially if it's alive. But even bare bones would be enough if their discovery is properly documented. It's just too bad that most bigfoot researches couldn't tell proper specimen recovery from a hole in the ground.

      Delete
  3. DON'T BOTHER TO WASTE YOUR TWELVE MINUTES.

    HE ONLY EXPLAINS THE MECHANICAL SIDE OF THE HUMAN REASONING, BUT NEVER GETS TO THE ROOT CAUSE.

    SCIENCE IS IGNORANT AND HAS BEEN JADED SINCE THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION-------

    BIGFOOT WOULD BLOW THAT OUT OF THE WATER RENDERING ALL THIER DEGREES USELESS. In other words----- they studied up and paid for an education that was completely WRONG.

    Why do you think one of the top evolutioniosts went down to Glenrose Texas and took a steal pipe to the Dino and HUMAN tracks that were laid together.

    Because evolutionists are completely wrong and the theory is coming further un-raveled on a daily basis.

    THEY WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH BIGFOOT BECAIUSE IT WILL MAKE THEM LOOK,-- (MORE) STUPID!

    That is your answer John!!!!! Try being honest!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evolution is the biggest fraud ever foisted on society. But people will tightly cling to it ridiculousness and all because the have to, because they refuse to accept any alternative (the implication that a designer of some sort was involved).

      Delete
    2. Yup. There is no way that a blind, mindless process like evolution which advocates very gradual change over large periods of time would ever result in something like butterfly metamorphosis. It would never happen.

      Delete
    3. ^ this is awesome. Thanks for the laugh everyone.

      Delete
    4. it's 120 years down the road. It's still a theory and Scientists around the world are bailing on it because the more we know about DNA, the more we know ---- evolution didn't happen!

      Just go watch Ben Stiens movie.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha
      Your Suppreme "cult " leader bows out and lays it at the feet of Aliens much older than us, ha ha ha ha ha

      That's the head Evolution Guru pussing out, what do you have to contribute, jack-ass!

      Delete
    5. Did you get that Dope

      Your "boy" goes paranormal to explain the origins of life on this planet, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h ah ah ha haha hah ah ah ahahah ah hah ah ahh ahahhahahah hahha ha h hahah hahaha h ahah ah ahhahahh ahahah ah ahahah hahahahahahahahahha hah.

      Delete
  4. Science ignores the mounting evidence simply because it rocks the boat too much. Those at the top of academia, the egos that control what goes in those books that get taught in schools, can't have their egos deflated with a truth that tosses all the spoon fed crap shoved down our throats for the past number of centuries, in the garbage. Science doesn't act like science should when it comes to a non biased approach of taking all aspects into account. It's the same old approach as always, biased, forced and full of shite.

    ReplyDelete