if that's the case then I guess their count is drastically off wouldn't you say ?that means there obviously are more than just 2000 roaming this area If you can just stumble across a structure in the forest.
There are probably 2000 right in that valley, at least. Sorry if that offends your sensibilities but you better get used to the idea because the truth is coming out even if you kick and scream and throw a hissy fit.
By now I've gotten used to the idea that I'm a member of a species who can no longer even see what is in nature much less survive out there. We have become hive creatures who are barely aware of our surroundings.
Modern humans have been undergoing non-Darwinian evolution for a long time. It is not the strongest who survive but the most social and congenial who prosper and produce offspring.
Meanwhile the big guys have been subject to classical Darwinian evolution where the strong survive and the fittest individuals procreate.
The divergence could not be more clear.
As individuals we are the weaker species, unfit to even survive without grocery stores and chiropractors and hybrid automobiles. We are the monsters.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Hey mom! I'm first! Did you hear me upstairs mom? I'm first! Woo hoo!
ReplyDeleteif that's the case then I guess their count is drastically off wouldn't you say ?that means there obviously are more than just 2000 roaming this area
ReplyDeleteIf you can just stumble across a structure in the forest.
Uhm, there are like 200 visible in this video.
ReplyDeleteThere are probably 2000 right in that valley, at least. Sorry if that offends your sensibilities but you better get used to the idea because the truth is coming out even if you kick and scream and throw a hissy fit.
By now I've gotten used to the idea that I'm a member of a species who can no longer even see what is in nature much less survive out there. We have become hive creatures who are barely aware of our surroundings.
Modern humans have been undergoing non-Darwinian evolution for a long time. It is not the strongest who survive but the most social and congenial who prosper and produce offspring.
Meanwhile the big guys have been subject to classical Darwinian evolution where the strong survive and the fittest individuals procreate.
The divergence could not be more clear.
As individuals we are the weaker species, unfit to even survive without grocery stores and chiropractors and hybrid automobiles. We are the monsters.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uam1q45wn8rwoan/dunnowhat.png?dl=0