Bigfoot youtuber Bob Gymlan talks about the surprising outcome when he decided to create a hoax to test the bigfoot community. Don't throw him to the fire quite yet.
4:07- I'm going with a big fat 'No' on the brain/intelligence part. You definitely aren't a anthropologist or you would know basic grammar. It is 'doesn't' instead of 'don't', numbskull.
There he is. There he goes again. Look, everyone! He posted it once again! Isn't he just the funniest guy around?! Oh my God.
I can almost see your pathetic overweight frame glowing in the dark, lit by your computer screen which is the only source of light in your room, giggling like a like girl as you once again type your little "explain away the evidence" drivel and fill in the captcha. Or maybe you don't even fill in the captcha. Maybe you're such a disgusting NEET that you actually signed up for a blogger account, so you just choose a dumb native american name and equally moronic profile picture. Oh, and we all know the picture. The "epic" forest people, isn't it? I imagine you little shiit laughing so hard as you click post that you drop your Doritos on the floor, but it's ok, your mother will clean it up in the morning. Oh, that's right. Did I fail to mention? You live with your mother. You are a fat fu cking fu ckup, she's probably so sick of you already. So sick of having to do everything for you all goddamn day, every day, for a grown man who spends all his time on a bigfoot blog posting about a non existent monkey man. Just imagine this. She had you, and then she thought you were gonna be a scientist or an astronaut or something grand, and then you became a footer. A pathetic footer. She probably cries herself to sleep everyday thinking about how bad it is and how she wishes she could just disappear. She can't even try to talk with you because all you say is "GOT MONKEY SUIT???" You've become a parody of your own self. And that's all you are. A sad little man laughing in the dark by himself as he prepares to indulge in the same old dance that he's done a million times now. And that's all you'll ever be.
4:21. The international skeptics forum is looking for members for their cozy circle jerk...you still here? Keep up the good work Iktomi...cement heads are relentless!
4:45 - Speaking of a "special type of stupid", two complete sentences require a period between them and not a comma. So much for being an "anthropology PhD." You are nothing but a numbskull!
You tout this evidence but all I ever see are a few people advocating it. If you convince other experts through some type of peer review it would be helpful.
^I'm sure it did. One of the deranged footers talking trying to hang with Andy White asks him about "the giant jawbone found in Canada." Andy White asks the footer for a source for this info, and she gives him a link. Unfortunately, she didn't realize that her link was for a fake news blog just like The Onion!
Here is Andy's response regarding Bigfoot "evidence":
"Every case that I've looked at so far (whether a claim for a giant, or bigfoot, or both) has turned out to be based on misinformation, misidentification, or some kind of fraud/hoax. It is easy to make mistakes when you're not trained in human and animal skeletal anatomy - people have been interpreting animal remains as the remains of giants for hundreds if not thousands of years."
Joetomi is crying, losing hope. Read all about it here! Watch what happens when Joetomi tries to step up to an actual anthropologist and get slammed down, hard!
Andy White, like most people naive to the current state of evidence assumes "Bigfoot" is a non-human primate. The whole fundamental argument of that blog article revolves around this very fundamentally flawed assumption, and this is why he argues that the Humbolt skull isn't from a "Bigfoot" and that the information about remains of this nature are "misinformed". If you have a preconception of "Bigfoot" being an ape and not an archaic human, then his approach is at least understood. The humbolt skull when attached to a living body would have belonged to an archaic version of us, which is what Sasquatch are. The parts of Daniel Dover's work (the subject of scrutiny in that article) that are relevant are the parts that Andy White agrees with... That the morphology is akin to that of prehistoric peoples, and the occipital bun is not seen in any known example of modern human. AGAIN; the PHD agrees with me, that the skull is prehistoric in morphological detail and is lacking a comparison of occipital bun. It's really not my fault that Andy adheres to the fairy tail monkey avenue that tainted his premise from the offset.
Well, thanks for digging up all the bones, that is helpful, but the bullshit story you wrapped around the bones means your fields are completely discredited forever.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Got monkey?
ReplyDelete^ Got brain or any intelligence?
DeleteYes along with fellow anthropology phds who say bigfoot dont exist
Delete4:07- I'm going with a big fat 'No' on the brain/intelligence part. You definitely aren't a anthropologist or you would know basic grammar. It is 'doesn't' instead of 'don't', numbskull.
DeleteI see you dont understand the concept of irony. Shame. Using "dont" just highlights the laughability of the topic.
DeleteHa ha ha ha!! An anthropologist can say "Bigfoot don't exist"... Like anyone else that brings a burden.
DeleteThere he is. There he goes again. Look, everyone! He posted it once again! Isn't he just the funniest guy around?! Oh my God.
DeleteI can almost see your pathetic overweight frame glowing in the dark, lit by your computer screen which is the only source of light in your room, giggling like a like girl as you once again type your little "explain away the evidence" drivel and fill in the captcha. Or maybe you don't even fill in the captcha. Maybe you're such a disgusting NEET that you actually signed up for a blogger account, so you just choose a dumb native american name and equally moronic profile picture. Oh, and we all know the picture. The "epic" forest people, isn't it? I imagine you little shiit laughing so hard as you click post that you drop your Doritos on the floor, but it's ok, your mother will clean it up in the morning. Oh, that's right. Did I fail to mention? You live with your mother. You are a fat fu cking fu ckup, she's probably so sick of you already. So sick of having to do everything for you all goddamn day, every day, for a grown man who spends all his time on a bigfoot blog posting about a non existent monkey man. Just imagine this. She had you, and then she thought you were gonna be a scientist or an astronaut or something grand, and then you became a footer. A pathetic footer. She probably cries herself to sleep everyday thinking about how bad it is and how she wishes she could just disappear. She can't even try to talk with you because all you say is "GOT MONKEY SUIT???" You've become a parody of your own self. And that's all you are. A sad little man laughing in the dark by himself as he prepares to indulge in the same old dance that he's done a million times now. And that's all you'll ever be.
4:21. The international skeptics forum is looking for members for their cozy circle jerk...you still here? Keep up the good work Iktomi...cement heads are relentless!
DeleteI think I'm starting to send some people over the edge ya know.
Delete: )
4:19 - I don't believe you! And I'm laughing at you! I'm probably not the only one laughing at you either!
DeleteYou are a special type of stupid, most of us would admit that.
DeleteCan you send me "over the edge", mate? I think you know what I mean!
DeleteJoe
4:45 - Speaking of a "special type of stupid", two complete sentences require a period between them and not a comma. So much for being an "anthropology PhD." You are nothing but a numbskull!
DeleteWhere did I claim anything about a PhD? The ultimate stupidity is believing in a nine foot magic ape. I believe that trumps anything.
Delete"Nine foot magic apes" have physical evidence that drives you crazy, remember?
DeleteYou tout this evidence but all I ever see are a few people advocating it. If you convince other experts through some type of peer review it would be helpful.
DeleteWhen Andy White called you an idiot, did it your little feelings Joey?
Delete^I'm sure it did. One of the deranged footers talking trying to hang with Andy White asks him about "the giant jawbone found in Canada." Andy White asks the footer for a source for this info, and she gives him a link. Unfortunately, she didn't realize that her link was for a fake news blog just like The Onion!
DeleteHere is Andy's response regarding Bigfoot "evidence":
"Every case that I've looked at so far (whether a claim for a giant, or bigfoot, or both) has turned out to be based on misinformation, misidentification, or some kind of fraud/hoax. It is easy to make mistakes when you're not trained in human and animal skeletal anatomy - people have been interpreting animal remains as the remains of giants for hundreds if not thousands of years."
Joetomi is crying, losing hope. Read all about it here! Watch what happens when Joetomi tries to step up to an actual anthropologist and get slammed down, hard!
http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/bigfoot-researchers-still-insist-native-american-skull-is-not-human
Thank god for copy and paste...
DeleteAndy White, like most people naive to the current state of evidence assumes "Bigfoot" is a non-human primate. The whole fundamental argument of that blog article revolves around this very fundamentally flawed assumption, and this is why he argues that the Humbolt skull isn't from a "Bigfoot" and that the information about remains of this nature are "misinformed". If you have a preconception of "Bigfoot" being an ape and not an archaic human, then his approach is at least understood. The humbolt skull when attached to a living body would have belonged to an archaic version of us, which is what Sasquatch are. The parts of Daniel Dover's work (the subject of scrutiny in that article) that are relevant are the parts that Andy White agrees with... That the morphology is akin to that of prehistoric peoples, and the occipital bun is not seen in any known example of modern human. AGAIN; the PHD agrees with me, that the skull is prehistoric in morphological detail and is lacking a comparison of occipital bun. It's really not my fault that Andy adheres to the fairy tail monkey avenue that tainted his premise from the offset.
Test? No such thing.
ReplyDeleteOnce you've hoaxed you are done.
Anthropologist? Archeologist?
Well, thanks for digging up all the bones, that is helpful, but the bullshit story you wrapped around the bones means your fields are completely discredited forever.