World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
We go off trail to examine the knock location area. We find a super highway network of trees. I lift the camera to 13 feet and on the pan, it looks like it captures a face along the dense cut.
GO N GET EM'!!
If you have to highlight it, it's subjective bigfoot BS.
No monkey suit?
Dare I add a ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Patterson never went back to bluff creek, not even once. Instead he led a money making circus show to fund a trip to the far east.
"Roger's next plans were to capture a Bigfoot, which he planned a full expedition returning to California and searching all the way up to Canada. He planned a one-year expedition with tracking dogs, cages, a large crew, and the entire project filmed. This would have been a huge financial project. So they immediately went to Hollywood for funding, but they turned him down.Roger then went on his film tour- he made lots of money, started his own organization, and started investigating capture claims to bag one that way (and was duped in the process). He partnered with Ron Olson to fund the 'capture expedition' that he originally planned. They were going to fund the expedition themselves by making a movie, but that never panned out and the expedition never happened.Roger kept investigating claims. He eventually had Ron do investigations for him because by that time he was getting too sick. Roger died and Ron basically continued where they left off doing research, and ended up making a docudrama movie based on Roger's ideas (Sasquatch: Legend of Bigfoot).For one, a lot more people were in and out of that area immediately following the film. So the odds of seeing another in the general area were much more slim.He also had no means to capture a Bigfoot which would be the next logical step.We could speculate all day long and go over 'would haves' and 'could haves', but reality is never that black and white. The facts show that Patterson did make immediate plans for a return to California and a capture- it just didn't pan out financially."- Roguefooter from the BFF
Bigfootforums.com is currently unavailableWe are performing scheduled maintenance. The BFF will be up again tomorrow at 6am EST.Did pj/iktomi/dwa have another meltdown tantrum?
Yes of course. He is in full meltdown/damage control mode. It really is pretty damn funny.
The best Bigfoot evidence to date:https://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8The Patterson Hoax has been discredited and its so important to get the news out. I've got bigfooters sending me private messages thanking me. Then I show them some of the real Bigfoot Mark Anders has posted on Youtube and they get back to me saying that their eyes welled up. Its so cool seeing the real deal.
Haa haa haaaaa Lol ,,, Indeed. ^ AC c
If they found a bigfoot (and they won't), "I told you so" would be inappropriate, because the evidence at this time indicates clearly there never was a bigfoot. The correct position right now is that there is no bigfoot, regardless of future findings. In other words, if they find a bigfoot tomorrow, those who believed in bigfoot yesterday were still wrong.
^ISF mouth breather Maurice Ledouche ? That last sentence can only come from a simpleton.
No 4:25...I mean joe/iktomi posting anon.....if one was found right now I would glad eat my crow.Somehow I am pretty sure that day will never come.
^ how will you like your crow prepared sir ? because one day you will be gorging on oneJoe
Sykes say's ,,squatch live under trees , Patty is a man in a suit,Zana is a west african (dna), Yeti is a brown & polar bear hybrid,,,,The patrick DNA was from beringian american indian , eastern siberian hairs (immagrant logger) as sasquatch??? COME ON BRO!! mabe TK is on to somthing!! as the ONLY PROVABLE PHENOMEN IS THE PARACUS SKULLS!!AC c
Shouldn't text while driving .^rope a dope.
Paracus Skulls = Get yur ass's to church!!!Uno who,
Wow... And when I thought 4:25 couldn't get any denser, he goes and writes something like that. What a circular logic tool, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!AC... Your comment corrected with adult grammar; "Sykes says he's had a Sasquatch experience from one that allegedly lives under a tree, but likely just lives under ground. In his opinion Patty looks like a man in a suit. Zana has ancient West African DNA. He found what he believes is an ancient hybrid bear whilst looking for Yeti samples, and is trying to arrange an expedition to find more evidence for it. Nobody knows anything about Patrick's DNA as nothing has been made public. There has been no "Eastern Siberian hairs" tested and attributed to Sasquatch."There is lastly, no reliable source, no scientist's name to any alleged DNA testing of the Paracas skulls at this time, so even though they are amazingly interesting, in an impartial sense there is less information for you to celebrate than anything you can lie about regarding Sykes' work... Which is a double standard and as strange as your silly temperament.
Iktomi all I have is a cell phone bro ! doing the best I can . that being said , I have been reading up on the bigalow(skinwalker ranch) !check it out ,2+2 will start adding up to 4 .for a change!and your a ok person .so stop being such a cavernous Slit--- Wow -sheesh-Wow!AC c :-))
5000 uzbekistani immigration is A Fact 90% settled in south west canada & north west america!! many were morons and became feral humans and some became loggers!! notice how I AC c solved the great mystery of the 20th century ??aint no jump for a show DOG !!!!WOOF WOOF :-))
^ Very lame, however not as lame as the claim !! Fake Joe
Wow another Blur-squatch!
remarkable footage - keep up the good work lads !Joe
Thanks, dude.Here it is if anyone hasn't seen it:https://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8
Unless you can prove that this isn't a bigfoot, it's a bigfoot.Oh, and wait for Sykes.
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."- Bertrand Russell
Iktomi is a clueless jackass.-Bertrand Russell
Unless you can prove this is a bigfoot it isn't a bigfoot.Oh, and wait for Godot.