Wednesday, March 23, 2016

New Report: Man And Wife Spot Possible Bigfoot Creature On Bridge In Texas


The Sam Houston forest in Texas is known for the many bigfoot sightings that occur there on a regular basis. The Lake Conroe area is also another known hot spot for these creatures, so it's no surprise that a sighting report would come from this area. A man and wife separately spotted a large bigfoot type creature an hour apart on a bridge that crosses Lake Conroe. Check it out:

From the North American Wood Ape Conservancy-
Husband and wife observe massive upright animal in Sam Houston National Forest on FM 1375 Baker Bridge at Lake Conroe one hour apart.

Report#01160002Occurred January 4, 2016 (Submitted January 26, 2016)

Witness Observation
At approximately 0500 on January 4, 2016 I was traveling to work on FM 1375 heading east towards I-45. As I was approaching the river bridge I saw a reflection of eyes from the bridge and thought it was deer eyes. As I got closer the eyes were approximately 7-8 feet high. Then I noticed the body of this "thing." It was huge. I have spent many a year in the woods and I have never seen anything like this. When I first saw it I thought it was a person or maybe a bear standing on its hind legs. But by its size alone it was clear it was not a person.

Time and Conditions
5:00 am - Dark and clear skies.

Investigator's Comments
Daryl G Colyer, Shannon Graham, and Shannon Mason
This investigation was conducted as a result of an incident that allegedly occurred in Walker County, Texas in January 2016.
I interviewed the primary witness at length about his reported observation and I also interviewed his wife, the secondary witness. Shannon Graham and Shannon Mason went onsite and conducted a comprehensive examination and search for trace evidence. I assessed the primary observer as a clear-headed, straightforward individual who believes that what he saw cannot be attributed to any known animal or person. His wife also struck me similarly. The observers live in a nearby town and they both clearly communicated to me that they had never given any thought to the subject nor did they have any prior knowledge that such a thing was even possible, particularly in areas near where they live. Nowadays, when they travel by vehicle, they are constantly on watch, hoping to see something similar again.

The first and primary reporting witness told me that he was on his way to work and he was approaching the west end of Baker Bridge (the bridge over Lake Conroe on FM 1375); he was driving east. The time was approximately 05:00. He first observed a pair of reflective eyes that he initially thought was likely a white-tailed deer. The eyes were on an animal that was directly up ahead actually on the pavement on the right side near the guardrail. As he drew nearer to the actual subject, he began to realize that the reflective eyes were of some other kind of animal that was massive and upright. Its color was dark, either “black or dark brown.” The hue of the eyes was very similar to that of a white-tailed deer, with a greenish tint that seemed almost bluish.

As the observer drove by the subject, he swerved over into the opposite lane; the subject watched the witness, and the witness watched the subject, as the witness drove by. The witness was overall stunned by what he had just seen, but the size and thickness of the subject truly impressed him: He estimated its height to be at least seven feet and possibly as tall as eight feet. He told me that what he saw was absolutely not a human in an ape suit; the size alone disqualified a human as a possibility, not to mention the sheer lunacy of someone who might attempt to hoax such an act. After he began to process what he had seen, for a second the observer contemplated turning around and shooting the subject. He was certain the subject was not human.

The reporting witness's spouse was equally as certain that what she saw was no human. The husband did not call anyone or talk to anyone about what he saw as he continued on to work. About one hour later, his wife called him and told him that she had seen something "really strange" on her way to work as she crossed the Lake Conroe bridge on FM 1375. She too was heading east across the bridge.

As she drove out onto the bridge, she saw up ahead a very large figure that she at first thought was a person jogging across the bridge, clearly seeing arms and legs. She described the subject as very large, black in color, and seven to eight feet in height; it was facing east with its back to her as she drove toward it and then passed it. She never saw it from the front and never saw reflective eyes. The subject was actually out on the bridge, and it was her impression that it was walking east crossing the bridge from west to east. She was in a small car and she had to look up at the subject as she passed it, coming to within “10-15 feet” of it as she passed it. Like her husband, she too was stunned.

For the full report, and photos of the location, click here.

48 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hi Iktomi!

      A big shoutout to Eva and Chick!

      Good night!

      Delete
    2. Whatever happened to that idiot Chuck?

      Did his autism finally overwhelm him?

      Delete
    3. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists

      Delete
  2. "Spots a possible bigfoot"

    But is it probable ?

    Hmmmm ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Based on the readily observable physical evidence, there are at least a legitimate quantity of people spotting what is commonly known as "Bigfoot".

      Delete
    2. ^ but can they prove it ?

      Delete
    3. You mean, "can they present a specimen"? At present, I'm not sure how you would catch something that's as big as what's being widely reported, and there's 70% of the country that's wilderness to bury a cadaver. A lack of specimen doesn't mean a lack of supporting evidence, however.

      Delete
    4. >>At present, I'm not sure how you would catch something that's as big as what's being widely reported

      With a gun or trap like every other animal.

      >>and there's 70% of the country that's wilderness to bury a cadaver.

      Most of which is tree-less.

      Delete
    5. "With a gun or trap like every other animal."
      ... Yes, and what are you going to do when moma and popa Squatch come and see what the commotion is? Plenty of missing hunters remember.

      "Most of which is tree-less."
      ... But you still have reports from Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and tree-less does not make it any less wild.

      Delete
    6. ^ calm yourself .. we believe,we believe.

      Honestly we do.

      Delete
  3. Did you ever notice that no one has proven that bigfoot exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have however managed to prove that there is forensic evidence for something that has the same a anatomy as what is being widely reported.

      Occam's Razor.

      Delete
    2. I noticed that. Has anyone else noticed that?

      Delete
    3. Ooh. 5:08 said "Occam's razor". Does that mean he wins?

      Delete
    4. No... It's referencing the one thing your religion denies is existent that makes me win in this instance.

      Evidence.

      Delete
    5. So if you say the word "evidence", then you win?

      Delete
    6. No... If I provide it as well as saying that word, and you don't source a logically scientific response to explain it away, then I win...

      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints

      ... You're new to this, are you?

      Delete
    7. Ah. So post a link and you win, correct?

      Delete
    8. No, you failing at your burden means I'll win.

      Delete
    9. So claiming it's someone else's burden regardless of whether you have actually fulfilled your's means you win?

      Delete
    10. My burden is to present a case for the existence of something I claim does. I would naturally have to go about that by presenting repeatable scientific evidence... I did. Now, to suggest otherwise, would bring a burden to show that this evidence is unreliable.

      Delete
    11. ^ loser of today`s game

      Delete
    12. Only if you're unable to read properly.

      Delete
    13. NOT all Muslims are terrorist - but most are and it only takes most of them - to commit terror attacks -

      Delete
    14. 7:39 ... try to calm yourself a little as you may be in danger of a heart attack the way you seem to believe bigfoot is a life or death issue...get a grip of yourself.

      Delete
    15. Hello lktomi, Have you come across any recent worth while news or other information regarding Sasquatch of course, Thanks Mate.........

      Delete
    16. 8:44... You have an opinion, so do I. This is how it works... Nobody is losing their calm because they disagree with you.

      9:18... Nothing springs to mind my friend!

      Delete
    17. Did you ever notice that no one had proven the existence of bigfoot and that Iktomi keeps using the same arguments again anf again and yet no one has proven that bigfoot exists.

      Delete
    18. Trapper and the Mountain Monsters AIMS team got plenty of evidence on all of their hunts for BIGFOOTS

      Delete
    19. 4:34... Did you ever notice that you never get around to proving that the evidence for Sasquatch doesn't exist? And while a body will only do for mainstream scientists, nobody with a brain thinks that the evidence would be present without a body... That's unless you are subsceptible to perverse denial.

      "Same old arguments"? Like... "Duuuuuuuuh, Bigfoot don't exist"? Grow a brain cell and tackle the evidence, or are you really that hideously out of your depth?

      Delete
  4. Yet another worthless story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could just find something else to follow every day of your life?

      Delete
    2. 5:14 must hear that phrase a lot in his day to day life.

      Delete
    3. I don't follow every day of my life. Assume much? You however are the poster child for following every day of your life.

      Delete
    4. 5:23, only when visiting this blog.

      Delete
    5. SO let me get this RIGHT ...
      Kasich getting $$$ from SOROS
      Cruz getting $$$ JEB to back him
      TRUMP .... need I say more ...

      Delete
    6. 5:14 prepares himself for his daily dose of this site by smearing vaseline all over himself
      I know that i would never follow a site about a subject I do not believe in unless I had a very lonely life
      "Hello, my name is Francis . I have no life and I go on this site because I am super lonely"

      Ha

      Joe

      Delete
    7. 10:01, this site is bigfoot evidence (draw your own conclusions), not bigfoot believers. I want to see quality evidence and so far I'm not seeing any. That's why I'm here, to see if quality evidence exists.

      Delete
    8. ^ so if you don't see any evidence that satisfies you then i suggest you leave and find a forum that interests you such as blow up doll fetish sites - good luck with the air pump mate

      Joe

      Delete
    9. 7:06... You are quite simply rhetorical. You demand evidence like a spoiled child and then deny it's legitmacy when it's provided. Cleverer people see through your methods.

      Delete
    10. If you could read, you'll notice I took apart his argument. Learn the big words you use, it helps a against looking even more stupid.

      Delete
  5. Everyone here obviously got their degree from Trump University.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we heers gits sume gummint schollin ans webe voting fer Trump shure is

      Delete