Sunday, March 13, 2016

Enhanced And Stabilized Paul Freeman Bigfoot Footage


This is one of the most famous, and most debated, pieces of bigfoot evidence. The Paul Freeman bigfoot footage. Was it a hoax, or is it one of the best sasquatch videos in existence? Youtube channel Nv Tv has tried to clean up the footage to give everyone a better look. Check it out:


30 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. ┏(-_-)┛┗(-_- )┓┗(-_-)┛┏(-_-)┓

      Delete
  2. The Freeman footage is second only to the PGF as the best bigfoot evidence caught on film !

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ I have a sneaking suspicion the footage is of a real creature...what helps is the image of Freeman himself,in that he never came over as being anything but a serious and honest person.

      Delete
    2. Shame the quality of this particular upload is not very good..it would be good to see the original copy.

      Delete
    3. yes, I would have loved to have seen this is much better quality but back then the recording quality wasn't as good as it is today

      Joe

      Delete
    4. I'm with you guys- he really sounds sincerely shaken. This footage and the patty footage both look real to me. I suspect there may be person or two today that have the GOODS but aren't sharing.

      Delete
    5. Freeman filmed this on video that he had recorded over several times, so even the original is not going to reveal anything we haven't already seen.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. HEY Alan ! , You're darn tootin that the freeman footage is a real modern Homo Sapien Sapien!! With our "exact" DNA!!!!

      Ain't that right JOE???? Lol!!

      Dr.B Sykes

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. That's a pitiful statement. You do understand that, right?

      Delete
  5. Yes I am blown away by this video as I do not see how or why anyone would want to go to this much trouble to do a hoax. IMO this is 100 percent a real species. Also in comparison to the Patterson film I see similarities with the way creature is walking as well as its fluidity. I do not see any deception whatsoever. I cannot wait until I eventually move up north and research and hopefully come in safe contact with these incredibly elusive beings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes,Yes,Yes Jason W! The Freeman video is definitive "PROOF" that sasquatch are retarded russian immigrants with modern Homo Sapien Sapien DNA!!

      HAAAAAAAA HAAAA BLAHAAAA !!
      Lol..
      Dr b sykes!

      Delete
    2. I disagree. If you were going to hoax a film wouldn't you make it look like the one that is most famous? Don't you find it suspicious that Freeman found so much evidence so frequently? I mean, they are elusive, right? Yet he saw it four times and filmed it twice? Why did so many of his finds have "dermal ridges" yet nobody else has had such luck? Doesn't it seem odd that after G.Krantz showed him handprints, he found....wait for it...handprints? He often took his son Dwayne along on expeditions. Where is Dwayne? Why hasn't he defended the veracity of his father's claims? Why is he impossible to find? Why is the foot morphology of Freeman's finds so different from other tracks? Why is it only Freeman that finds prints with that anatomy? Why did they stop after he died? Why does the subject in the film have to look down to see where it's stepping? Why did Rene Dahinden regard him as a fraud? Why did one of his trackways repeat a left foot instead of left-right? Why did footprints from one find only appear in the area most suitable for impressions, leaving no sign of entry or exit?

      Delete
    3. Maybe because Dahinden may have had a problem since he searched for years and years and died without ever seeing one. Perhaps bitter, perhaps he just wasn't a very nice guy, perhaps because he never got rich which was what he was looking to do, cash in.

      Delete
    4. Dahinden went out into the field with Freeman, and Freeman said he was going to go investigate a "hunch".... Sure enough, he came back saying he found prints, which as usual had dermal ridges. The ridges contained suspicious irregularities according to Dahinden. I have a hard time imagining Dahinden would be jealous as you suggest, seeing as he dedicated his life to investigating Sasquatch. He had a vested interest in evidence that supported the search, and detested false claims. And he was right about the ridiculous foot morphology, Freeman's "finds" fail in many respects when compared to other examples. What distinguishes them are the dermals, some of which J.Chillcut says were human. Freeman's evidence is very much worthy of doubt.

      Delete
    5. Freeman was a retired washington state forest ranger who would know better than him

      Delete
  6. "I can hear the brush poppin' n' stuff...oh! There he goes!"

    ReplyDelete
  7. NV TV took an older enhanced video ... and cut it → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z1XAK3W-CY ...also used this one → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdlUu3Ag_cU

    so, nothing new ...just steeling video-material

    ReplyDelete
  8. Freeman was a hoaxer plain and simple.

    This was Freeman's second piece of bigfoot footage.

    There are people who search for bigfoot for decades and never have a sighting. And Freeman films bigfoot twice. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't have to be down to anything Freeman was doing... It might have everything to do with how curious the subjects he was filming were.

      Stupid argument.

      Delete
  9. Hoax from an admitted hoaxer!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lies. Freeman never admitted to hoaxing, only admitting to making fake stompers to test if they could achieve what he was finding.

      Delete
    2. In other words Iktomi you stupid fuctard of bigfootery, Freeman hoaxed tracks by making stompers and he has hoaxed others as well. The video is a guy in a suit. Human proportions looks down to keep from falling over something. Come on are you that stupid!

      Delete
    3. Dude your in last place smh

      Delete