Thursday, February 18, 2016

New Bigfoot Video Commentary Sasquatch Sighting In Rock Creek


Parabreakdown's own Phil Poling takes a look at a recently published video of a bigfoot sighting that took place in Rock Creek State Park in Washington DC. Yep. Some people were out in the woods shooting a typical video for their vaporizer product, when all of a sudden...


56 comments:

  1. You don't need to be an expert to realize this was just a hoax. The dynamics of this fake Sasquatch makes it evident that it is just a guy wearing a suit.
    Being an engineer with considerable experience in dynamics, I can tell you that you would need more than a good coat to bring out a new credible video, such as the Patterson-Glimlin footage.
    Because of the size and massiveness of the supposed animal, you would need a combination of mass and stiffness that is really hard to recreate. You should need to add a lot of mass to the coat, and let a a fierce man wearing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Being the supervisor of a large group of engineers, I can tell you that the PGF is a bloke in a suit. NO merit raise for you this quarter.

      Delete
    2. Looks like you haven't got a magic monkey suit. Don't worry... You have a platform to meltdown for another three years about it here.

      Delete
    3. ^Where we live we have the mysterious Black Eyed Children. Where you live I hear reports of many BROWN EYED children in your neighborhood.^

      Delete
    4. You don't have the magic monkey.

      Delete
    5. ...I get what you are saying about the mass, but it is hard to quantify..The subject of the PGF "looks heavy and dense": it is an impression the viewer gets...

      Delete
    6. ...as heavy and dense as a footer`s brain ?

      Delete
    7. 5:29... Well if you haven't got the magic monkey suit, I guess we can at least point to a magic monkey from 47 years ago.

      5:53... As heavy as that burden to find a magic monkey suit, you mean.

      Delete
    8. ^ lighten up

      then brighten up

      Delete
    9. VERY satisfying BEAT-DOWN !!

      http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/02/man-defends-his-wife-from-muslim-migrants-you-have-to-see-this-3304034.html

      Delete
    10. Got specimen?

      Wait. Why am I asking. Of course you don't.

      Delete
    11. Got a skull;

      https://thedavisreport.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/unusual-skull-found-near-lovelock-nevada-in-1967/

      ... You only had to ask.

      Delete
    12. In this world there are two kinds of people.

      We know what kind the troll is

      Delete
    13. Bernie Sanders Actually Did in the Civil Rights Movement

      Delete
    14. Still trying to pass off that human skull as proof of bigfoot I see.

      This is why people don't take bigfoot "research" seriously.

      Delete
    15. Never used it as proof. That skull is so old that it's kind could easily have died out (in an impartial scientific sense). What it is however, is a skull that possessss all the morphological detail of what Sasquatch are reported to have, found in a place where Native Americans have always claimed tall, hairy, cannibalistic tribes had always resided. I also use it as a hominid fossil trail in the US that most anthropologists deny's there... Learn something for once in your existence.

      And Sasquatch are human.

      Delete
  2. Hi Shaun: Just FYI. new scientific paper shows that pygmies had at least one "admixture event" in the last 30.000 years with archaic humans. In other words: at a time when all known archaic humans were allegedly already extinct. So, more evidence for the late survival of archaic people From genome research: http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2016/02/08/gr.196634.115.abstract
    And more archaic humans: latest study that confirms Flores man was NOT modern man, but also late archaic human: http://news.discovery.com/human/evolution/mystery-hobbits-not-human-study-says-160216.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^Got autistic children put to bed?^

      Delete
    2. Just after dusk. Light rain and no wind. We heard a large tree knocked over in the woods. There was no wind or outside influence that should have caused the tree to crash down. About 30-45 minutes later, we heard a second tree fall, which sounded larger. Around 8pm we began to hear tree knocks coming from 3 different locations simultaneously. The first 2 sounded like someone hitting 2x4’s together. The 3rd on the other hand was much louder. It sounded like someone hit the tree with a very large Louisville Slugger. Around 10pm, we heard what sounded like someone walking through the woods whistling. It was a human-like whistle, but we were the only people around. At about 3am, my friend stepped out of the camper to use the bathroom. Upon walking outside, he heard another loud tree knock from the 3rd location as before.


      BRFO

      Delete
    3. We hunted all day and returned to camp. After dark, the tree knocks began. This time it was only 2 locations. Around 10 to 10:30pm we began to hear whooping sounds coming off of a ridge about a ¼ of a mile away. Still inside the camper, the sounds were so loud we could feel them. The whoops lasted 15-20 seconds without pause. Within 5 minutes we heard the call again, but this time the duration of the call was shorter. We stepped outside of the camper to get a better sound quality and then heard a 3rd set of whoops, this time so loud the calls could be felt in your chest. When these calls were finally finished the woods and entire area around us went quiet. Not a sound. Just as the night before we continued to hear wood knocks. Also noted we could hear something banging/ beating on cars in the junkyard below our camp site. At times it was so loud whatever this was seemed to be upset and trying to rip off a car door. The junkyard is inaccessible at night. Just as the night before my friend awoke around 3am to use the bathroom and upon stepping out of the camper was confronted with a very loud knock from the same area as the night before.

      Delete
    4. We set up a two man deer drive for the morning down the same ridges and holler from where the screams the night before were moving through. Moving as quickly as possible, it still took me an hour to cover and navigate the same ground as the high pitched screaming the night before. We decided to check out the area around the waterway for tracks to try and confirm what we thought we had been hearing throughout the week. At one end of the spillway, the water had receded to depths of only about 4 inches. There were nearly 20 tracks coming from the main ravine and rail road tracks and into the shallow end of the spillway. They all enter at the same place but veer off in 3 different directions. The tracks appeared to be 14-16 inches in length, 3-4 inches at the heel and 6 to 8 inches at the toe. This creature appeared to have a stride of nearly or about 5ft toe to toe. My friend documented these as pictures on his cell phone. Upon further investigation we found more tracks 20-30 yards away in the sand on the bank. We took pictures of these as well. One set was slightly smaller but when up next to my 11 ½ size hunting boot it dwarfed my feet in comparison. We found another, larger track near these. This footprint was 16-18 inches long at least 4 inches at the heel and 8 inches or more at the toes. It was an older track but still stood out to us. We have a clear picture of this track up against my friends size 13 hunting boot and this track just swallowed it. These impressions sunk deeper than anything my friend or myself could recreate, and we are not small men at 210 and 185 lbs respectively. Investigating the bank line we could see multiple shellfish that had been eaten (potential secondary food source to all of the gut piles and wounded deer from gun season) There were no other animal tracks in the area that would have been known to be feeding on these aka raccoons. Also noted we noticed multiple footprints that looked to be from a child barefoot. These looked fresh. Why someone would let their child run around barefoot in December in cold water and mud is beyond me? Still not sure what to make of this.

      BRFO

      Delete
    5. ...What is the definition of archaic human?..It is certainly not a taxonomy category....

      Delete
    6. 5:39... It would pigeon whole what Sasquatch are until we have a definitive classification.

      Delete
    7. You of all people should be sympathetic of typos.

      Delete
    8. I didn't think it was a typo -- I figured that Iktomi was lamenting the fact that, because his local food bank closed, he was forced to eat a dead bird that he found on the street -- thus his reference to eating a "pigeon whole"! Ha ha, sorry for your misfortune Iktomi!

      Delete
    9. Argh, I thought it was you, Mr Inferiority Complex. Get an argument instead of watching the comment sections every day of your life, waiting for my typos... It's a little sad.

      Delete
    10. Good point, but I do have one question -- what is it like eating a "pigeon whole"?

      Delete
    11. This as a full stop, "--". Delicious.

      Delete
  3. Gee...incontrovertible evidence for once !

    Footers got it made now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big deal 4:09. up in Enumclaw in the heart of bigfoot country some dude died after having sex with a horse due to a perforated colon. That is a very old admixture.

      Delete
    2. ..It happened on Broke-ass Mountain...lol...

      Delete
    3. He looking for Bent Over Canyon

      Delete
  4. Phil is just sooooooo cynical, ain`t `e ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cynical? How? You mean he calls out bull*hit? There are a few videos he is genuinely intrigued by. Looking at evidence critically is an important part of determining it's likely validity. On the other end of the spectrum, we have people who proclaim themselves "open minded" and accept all kinds of specious material, asking as it supports their position. Of course this is not being open minded at all, it is instead, faith based gullibility.

      Delete
    2. ifn youd meenin schoolin wes gots sume frum da gummint shure do

      Delete
    3. WHEN LOBSTER TROUBLE IS A TALKING YOU'ALL LISTEN UP !!!

      UDIGG?

      Big Ghey Jon!!

      Delete
  5. I am not a man of violence ( but DO like to see injustice or other mean behaviour put down) but this is good to watch a man defend his wife from the beginnings of obvious harassment from what are termed "muslim migrants"...


    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/02/man-defends-his-wife-from-muslim-migrants-you-have-to-see-this-3304034.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump - going to take care of them muzzrats, YES SIR Trump going to FIX IT

      Delete
  6. this one is an obvious hoax. It doesn't fool me even the slightest . But it doesn't mean that every video is a hoax (just this one is) sorry skeptical clowns who think you may have got me to admit everything is a hoax because it isn't. Lots of really quality videos out there and the best one is still the PGF. and that reminds me- how is the magic monkey suit search going lads ? Tough it out mates and one day it might pop out from behind someone's wall where it's been buried for years- kinda like your minds

    Pip pip cheerio

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please tell us about the ones that you think are authentic.

      Delete
    2. You're just trying to be silly now. The Patterson one is clearly above all others because it was filmed in the open without any trees in the way. There are many more that are good but because trees are in the way you would discount them
      pity

      Joe

      Delete
    3. 9:49 , please tell us why you come on here ? i get the sense it's only to be a smart Alec troll on a subject you have diddly interest in

      Joe

      Delete
    4. I agree the Patterson one is above all others, although I'm not sure if it's actually real. The only other one that I recall that might be real is the Freeman video.

      I just wanted to see what you though.

      Delete
    5. fair enough, just wanted to make sure you were legit.
      Both of those are quality as well as a couple of others . getting one in the open not behind trees or leaves is harder . if it does happen it will be by chance and even then people will always be skeptical .

      Joe

      Delete
  7. POPE PICKS FIGHT WITH TRUMP
    ENTERS U.S. ELECTION BATTLE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pope that's bad move warring with the TRUMP he already at the top of his game - Pope not so much

      Delete