Thursday, February 11, 2016

Local Bigfoot Expert Discusses His Findings And Experiences


From the youtube channel of D Starcher and Sasquatch Times: 

Sasquatch Times - Meet Ray Gardner, a Field Researcher with American Primate Exploration. Ray is a knowledgeable speaker & lecturer on the topic of Bigfoot. We caught up with Ray at one of his many research locations where he shared some of his experience with us.

93 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Just some guy with a creepy fetish for Joe.

      Delete
    2. He's an odd ball of Bigfoot proportions; The Airforce base Racist.

      Delete
    3. ^ right on cue! When is the ward gonna realise he's accessing the desktop?!

      Delete
    4. ^^ bad case of resting bitch face ^^

      Delete
    5. Welcome back Iktomi! It wasn't the same without you :)

      Delete
    6. Hello TCT!! Has a busy day yesterday! Bless ya!!

      Delete
    7. How was theropy joe? Get well soon

      Delete
    8. I was ever so sorry to **** on your parade with the Bionic Man stuff. Not that anyone's suggesting you have the courage to read your schooling.

      : )

      Delete
    9. Once again confirmation that iktomi is joe^

      Delete
    10. Once again confirmation you are obsessed with a person on the Internet.

      Delete
    11. Well one would conclude you itkomi after directly responding to a comment aimed specifically at joe

      Delete
    12. But everyone is Joe, are they not? How can anyone not respond to the name if everyone on the Internet is Joe?

      Delete
    13. Desperate attemps at deflection. Moron.

      Delete
    14. There is a million comment sections that hang you in this respect, not to mention this very one as below.

      Remember... Everyone is "Joe".

      PS. Learn the definition of "deflection" and the ability to self reflect.

      Delete
    15. You have your little personal victory and pat yourself on the back but at the end of the day you believe in magic apes and that will never stop being hilarious.

      Delete
    16. "Magic apes" that for all your claims are "obviously mythological", you end up getting pulverised by little people like me. I'll pat myself on the back just fine, thanks.

      Delete
    17. Pulverised by you presenting which bigfoot exactly?

      Delete
    18. The "Bigfoot" that wouldn't leave it's physical evidence if it didn't exist.

      Delete
    19. What physical evidence? Not seen any

      Delete
    20. You didn't get by in school too well I take it?

      Delete
    21. Avoiding the question doesnt do you any favours.

      Delete
    22. I answered it with something called an "observation", ironic in your case.

      Delete
    23. Iktomi, 6:59 is your classic cement head ! Special schooling required.

      Delete
    24. ^ But hasn`t got any proof,eh ?

      Oh,really ? ...show us !!

      Delete
    25. Nobody claims to have proof, Einstein, only the evidence... But you know what that means, when you're checking be "Bigfoot blogs" for boogeyman reassurance.

      Delete
    26. ^ any evidence of dogman or the cloaked version of bigfoot among the "evidence" you mention ?

      Delete
    27. Um... No sorry. Any actual intelligent arguments when you're trying to bait people about what they endorse?

      Delete
    28. ^ wow .. you really are stupid if you thought the above was a real question.

      Delete
    29. No "stupid" is someone devoting their life to something that so obviously makes them behave so insanely.

      Delete
    30. like bigfooting for which there`s no evidence?

      Delete
    31. You can't handle the evidence, let alone have the intelligence to understand it.

      Delete
  2. Wow that guy looks like a really educated person. Is that really Iktomi/Joe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It`s JoeTomi with one of those plastic glasses,nose and beard sets .

      Delete
    2. Everyone on the Internet is Joe... Or in the case of the crazy-nerds at 3:34 and 4:54, is everything on the mind Joe? Is Joe around every corner, in every mirror and behind every personal life shortfall?

      Delete
    3. it's so nice that we have them thinking about us all day and night. This obsession will turn into a big meltdown for them at some point. pity

      Joe

      Delete
    4. It's the meltdown of all meltdowns... Can you imagine thinking of another man the first thing as you wake in the morning, and the last thing at night?

      There's been nothing like it, I'm sure of that.

      Delete
    5. The name JOE written in the clouds. And in the alphabet soup. And on the toast.

      Delete
    6. Maybe even in shapes in the cat litter tray?

      Delete
    7. ^ Calls Joe`s name as he pumps deeply into his rear brown place.

      Delete
    8. Wow... Aren't you the one that always claims Joe doesn't provide any substantial input? Classic narcissistic trait of the psycho-troll.

      Delete
    9. ^ he certainly provides a substantial amount of hard skin into your rear end eh ? ..clearly it has affected your balance of mind

      Delete
    10. Wow... I bet you're a hit on the schoolyard. All these references of rectal activity when your blood's up, anyone would you're prone to a little Freudian slip occasionally?

      Delete
    11. 8:20 not only a Joe fetish but also a rectal fetish...schooling not enough maybe try therapy.

      Delete
    12. 8;27 " anyone would you're prone to a little Freudian slip occasionally?"

      As always,you make no sense...

      Freudian slip ?

      Delete
    13. Wow, that's what it's come to. You really have been soundly defeated.

      Delete
    14. And you obviously don't know what a Freudian slip is, ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    15. might i ask vesthedog, what do you bring to the forum? you never post on topic ( well maybe 2-3 times) in all the month's you have visited here.all you seem to want here is to be iktomi's sidekick..why?

      MMG

      Delete
    16. ^ and what do you bring to the forum MMG ? Outside of being a troll , zero and that is being kind

      Joe

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. I've got Sykes insisting it will be... Patience! You of all people should practice it after the Bigfoot Files embarrassment.

      (In a few posts... The anon will post something in reference to "the bet" and cry and cry that I shouldn't be here and that I'm in fact the one complaining, ha ha ha!!)

      Delete
    2. The bigfoot files embarrasment?

      Correctly predicting that the bigfoot files would contain zero bigfoots? That one?

      The only embarasment there was for those who said the bigfoot files would provide dna proof of bigfoot. Yes. That would be you.

      Mark Evans blew your pathetic deluded soul clean out the water. Moron.

      Delete
    3. No... As in your case, incorrectly claiming Sykes' Collateral Hominid study was complete in accordance with that two part series ending. This is all that's ever been maintained by myself, and I absolutely love it.

      Sykes did find the DNA, and it's lineage comes from West Africa, just lie ancient fossil versions of us that share our DNA. This is something I have always maintained, therefore be results of Sykes' long term study turned out better for me than was ever anticipated.

      Mark Evans misinformed about Smeja and bear prints double step prints... He's at least keeping consistent with the tactics of people like you who struggle proving what allegedly is so obvious.

      I wonder why that is? Cry some more about Sykes? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    4. Why didnt sykes mention his bigfoot dna in the show he had THAT WAS ABOUT BIGFOOT?

      You have absolutely nothing but hearsay, rumours, conjection and NO actual verified evidence of any bigfoots anywhere ever.

      As for evans he actually PROVED double stepped bear prints are an explanation for some prints.

      Moron.

      Delete
    5. I love how joe states that he knows the results of sykes long term study despite it not being published. Footer dishonesty at its best.

      Delete
    6. "Why didnt sykes mention his bigfoot dna in the show he had THAT WAS ABOUT BIGFOOT?"
      ... Because the Bigfoot Files aired during the earliest stages of his hominid study. After the Bigfoot Files and as Sykes' research progressed, he conducted DNA tests on saliva from six of Zana's living descendants and on a tooth from Khwit. He has also done further research on Zana since writing the book... This has been pointed out one million times practically, you can't see past the Bigfoot Files because you are clinging to it like a pathetic troll because you THOUGHT you'd won something akin to a debate for once in your life.

      You'll notice that in his book, he has alluded to Walla Walla hairs, that were located by three government officials that were linked to a direct sigtings and tracks, have also been tested to have genetic links to a feral human from Uzbekistan. He did suggest that he is researching his further. Watch this space.

      No... Evans "forgot" to mention that the actual bear expert he consulted debunked the double step trackway theory years prior, because Sasquatch tracks are singular trackways. This is a painfully fundamental piece of information that was not fed to people like you with lesser knowledge of the subject so you can sleep better at night. If any other documentary presenter had not presented fundamental evidence to any other subject, someone "sceptical" would be all over it as well as his integrity.

      6:24... The comment sections don't lie.

      Delete
    7. And do you know what? The cry baby troll will bring this up time and time again, like he's scarred for life, and will receive the same reality check for his stupidity because I have a cruel streak.

      : p

      Delete
    8. Wow joe is in really deep here. I dont think anyone can save him. Well at least i tried.

      Delete
    9. I'm not the one requiring a counter argument, mate.

      Delete
    10. You still havent even presented an argument

      Delete
    11. Definitely didn't get by too well in school.

      Delete
    12. Again avoiding the question

      Delete
    13. Ironic considering I'm the one waiting.

      Delete
    14. 7;34

      You`ll be waiting a long time for any proof of bigfoot...that`s for sure !!

      Delete
    15. In the mean time you can content yourself with the evidence.

      Delete
    16. ^ when you manage to provide any then i`ll be pleased to consider it

      Delete
    17. The Iktomi troll loves these descents into the mire as it deflects from the debate he is always losing...but it doesn`t alter the end result Joeyboy...there`s no convincing evidence of bigfoot.

      Delete
    18. 8:18... Are you this much in denial when you're trying to do your jeans up in the mirror?

      8:23... This coming from someone who hasn't one argument to explain the evidence away for the couple of years you've been running around scared of this subject? Just putting "there is no evidence" in writing on a comment section doesn't get around to making it a reality. Why don't you post an example of where the evidence doesn't stand up, I'd be very happy to see you trying to be creative for once, apart from merely attempting the most humourless of toilet jokes.

      Delete
    19. ^ has no starting point for the "argument" he`s always spouting about...in truth,I think you just like arguing with all and sundry...it seems to be just the way you function - start calling people names and then when they respond you get all annoyed and can`t handle it - there`s countless examples throughout the blog of you breaking down...but the irony is that it is you that initiates the abuse...!!

      Go talk to your therapist about it.

      You Moron.

      Delete
    20. And here again we find ourselves in the constantly swirling toilet of "bigfoot evidence" with Iktomi. He is the turd that swirls around and just when you think is about to go down the drain, pops back out of the hole, until you try and flush it again. Those arguing must realize you are dealing with the 3rd or 4th incantation of Iktomi. Hes gone by many names and has to reinvent himself everytime one of his upcoming mind blowing revelations ends up being hogwash. Ive followed him here for a few years now and its always "Just wait for and you will be the one that looks stupid." First he let us know that Melba Ketchum would revolutionize the field, wait and see. Fail. Then it was Todd Standing and the muppets, who was so close, but dammit someone stole his DNA sample. Fail. Then it was Sykes. Fail. Now its Sykes again... I think you see where this is going. Soon it will be Ketchum again, so on, so forth. With Iktomi its a body of evidence that's just so crystal clear and convincing that all the scientists in the world would be convinced if they just quit being closed minded and actually look at it. And hes always just that one wait and see moment away from jumping up and down screaming he told you so. But like his handle, that moment constantly changes because each and every time it only concludes the obvious, that there is no Bigfoot. And when that failure is made obvious we are then treated to the excuses and then handwalked into what will be his next non-triumph, we'll just have to wait and see. But I've been watching for years now and that moment never comes. It never will come. He will be buried in the ground and his tombstone will read "Just wait and see". In the meantime I hope this puts into perspective the psyche of the person you are trying to argue with. Someone so sure of himself, someone so convinced that his big discovery is right around the corner. Someone who at this point desperately latches on to any piece of evidence despite all the red flags surrounding it ::Standing::cough::cough:: And time and time again gets rejected by reality and has to reinvent himself, his name, and his entire argument and begin his desperate search for the next big discovery that will end up being nothing. So stop and think of what that does to you emotionally and mentally, and even though I've only followed for a few years I'm guessing this pattern has been stamped into his entire life. So instead of arguing with him, we should be trying to find a cure for him. Maybe we can find a pill that will keep people from being and endless cycle of disappointment.

      Delete
    21. Phew!

      I struggled to get through that, I'll be honest. Sorry, I wasn't around for the Ketchum stuff, as much as I've acknowledged how controversial Standing's evidence is he got a DNA result (“Based on my results, it looks like it’s human hair,” said Stephen Fratpietro, who conducted the tests.").. And Sykes' theories surrounding Zana are well documented.

      So... No example???

      Delete
    22. What's with this guy demanding an "example" of evidence that doesn't stand up when several have already been repeatedly rubbed in his face.

      He still owes me a tooth.

      Delete
    23. And you were given a skull;
      https://thedavisreport.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/unusual-skull-found-near-lovelock-nevada-in-1967/

      ... How are those excuses going for you? God you're lucky no one was around to see your education.

      : )

      Delete
    24. And you were told, repeatedly, that a HUMAN skull is not evidence for bigfoot. Not even if you think it's a little strange looking. And so then you made up all sorts of bullshit about bigfoot being human when you want it to be and inhuman when you don't.

      You're the only one making excuses here. Sad, pathetic excuses.

      Delete
    25. And you were told that "Bigfoot" is human, with supporting evidence that made you look like a naive little fool. It's not what I think that's important, it's what I can support with evidence, and if you don't like it... Go find a similar skull to show how "normal" it is.

      Didn't you run away?

      : p

      Delete
    26. Getting bored of the bullshit from some twit who wants to have things both ways is not running away. Unlike you, I have real work to do, and can't waste hours of time on the clownshow that is bigfoot "research".

      After the third or fourth time you make the same empty assertions with nothing to back them up people get tired of reading it. What's the point in continuing a thread when you aren't going to bring up anything new or interesting?

      Oh, and bigfoot is not human. If it is human then there's no such thing as bigfoot.

      Delete
    27. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/dr-jeffrey-meldrum-removes-myth-out-of.html?m=0

      Plenty of things to back up my assertions in the link above, old boy, and nobody is requiring things both ways. I have never claimed that "Bigfoot" is anything other than a wild archaic human. There is not a thing about the subject in the Patterson Gimlin footage that cannot be attributed to a human. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise! Fly through every one of my points in the link above and demonstrate how they don't stand up, because you really didn't do a good job of it last time...

      I'd call it a day if I were you, you seem to have steam coming out of your ears already... Bigfoot is human, no animal on the planet has anatomical features like it enjoys. Very basic, very simple observational skills would realise this.

      Delete
  4. PAGING DR. JOHNSON - PAGING DR. MATTHEW JOHNSON:

    A Mr. Streufert and Mr. Wayne are here to see you sir. They can be found at the SOHA-2 courtesy desk. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does anyone believe dr johnson when he says a bigfoot leant over him while he was asleep and whispered in his ear and he opened his eyes and the bigfoot was still there but he was "cloaked"?

    Any takers? Joe?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm a local Leprechaun Expert....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fascinating considering nobody's seeing them.

      Delete
    2. Ain't nobody seeing a large, hairy primate, either, but there's no shortage of 'experts'.

      Delete
    3. I think you'll find there's three whole databases of people seeing large hairy primates.

      There's expert denialists, that's for sure.

      Delete
    4. You're a moron. Folks cannot be an expert in something that has no entry in the current taxonomy - with no baseline of data, there is nothing to measure the knowledge against. That is a fact regardless of how you want to change the narrative to fit your agenda. And this is why folks like you, will continue to be ridiculed - professionalism within the ranks of bigfooters is non-existent and ranks up there with snake-oil salesmen and palm readers.

      Delete