Monday, February 8, 2016

Bigfoot And Infant In New York Classic Breakdown Video


In this classic breakdown video, Parabreakdown takes a look at some footage that is still talked about today, a possible bigfoot and infant seen in New York. This video looks decent on the outside, but what happens when Phil Poling starts digging a little deeper?


135 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Fake Joe has never seen a squatch!!

      Delete
    2. Neither has the real Joe or Iktomi or even Bob Gimlin for that matter.

      Delete
    3. Yep,another example of poor form! :-(

      Delete
    4. Bob Gimlin saw one for sure, surprised him enough to raise a loaded weapon at it. I know people who have seen them, people with three times the experience in the wilderness than most.

      Delete
    5. Once again PJ, you have no clue what Gimlin did or did not do. Gimlin claims he had a gun on the dude in the suit, yet there is zero evidence of that. We have no clue what Gimlin did or didn't do, we only have his word, which is dubious at best.

      I notice where lately you have been claiming that no one in there right mind would have hoaxed patterson, because gimling had a gun on it, and could have shot at any minute. You do realize PJ, that if indeed the film is a hoax (probable) then there was never any gun on the film subject. You are taking gilmlins word as gospel. You also like to talk about patterson being thrown from his horse. Where is your proof of that? You have none, yet you use it as evidence that the film subject was real. There may not have been a horse in the vicinity, yet you believe this man on his word? There are so many holes in the patterson story that it really is amusing. And when a new hole is poked, footers in mass are willing to make up 100 different scenarios to account for the inconsistency. You have no clue what Gimlin saw PJ. You have no clue what Gimlin did PJ. You simply are taking the word of a man who you do not know at all. You continue to show the viewers of this site your ignorance as usual PJ. I just sit back and watch and laugh. How's the bet going for you? :)

      Delete
    6. anon 6:19 -how's the search for the magic monkey suit going ?
      You know this is the year of the monkey . Most fittingly because you are a most useless chimp

      Joe

      Delete
    7. Several things to note in your racist post above "joe". First there are millions of monkey suits out there, available at any costume store, and for an extra 2 dollars, the store will even call it a magic monkey suit. Happy now? You only refer to the patterson suit as a magical suit, because you can't understand, or don't want to understand how it could be fake. It's ignorant logic "joe".

      I also hope that all the viewers of this site see how racist you apparently are "joe". You just called me a "useless chimp". I am in fact African American, and i take great offense at this. Why would you go racial? It is disgusting that in this day and age that racism like this still abounds. Calling me a chimp, simply because you don't like my opinion. Racism will never go away thanks to folks like you "joe". And this post is proof of that.

      "AnonymousMonday, February 8, 2016 at 6:32:00 AM PST
      anon 6:19 -how's the search for the magic monkey suit going ?
      You know this is the year of the monkey . Most fittingly because you are a most useless chimp

      Joe"

      I hope others who visit this site see what you are truly like "Joe".

      Delete
    8. right, whatever you say. You are just a troll who tries to start drama online. Go away idiot liar

      Joe

      Delete
    9. 6:19... You also like to claim that Bob Gimlin is one minute the best hoaxer on the planet having been a part of the best SFX defying scam of the world for the last 47 years... But the next too dumb to remember that he's lying about what horse he's riding. You claim that Bob is holding the hoax close to his heart, when he has had opportunities to stop people earning money from the film by unveiling the "hoax", because he has practically been cheated out of rights to the film by the major players, including Roger's wife. You forget that Bob was offered $1M by film producers to come clean and didn't bat an eyelid.

      It's pretty much logical to assume that two cowboys venturing into the wilderness where there are some pretty dangerous carnivores are going to possessing guns, but it appears logic escapes you like a hug from a loved one. We also have the best styrup that Al Hodgson is a witness to seeing. So are we to assume Bob is telling the truth after 47 years considering how much cancerous little nerds like you have failed to find a magic monkey suit??

      Got monkey suit??

      Delete
    10. And you still accept no responsibility for your statements and the harm they may have caused. Typical. People like you make it so much more difficult for some of us.

      Delete
    11. Who's been racist? This coming from someone who appeals to Dmaker to be racist towards me?

      You're a ******** loon mate, ha ha ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    12. Serious, I've never in my life experienced such a psychopath as yourself mate... You have more obvious social problems than anyone I've even heard of, and I've heard of a few. Oh! And I forgot! Why am I knot referring to you as Winky!

      Eh Winky?

      Delete
    13. You need to make sure you are addressing the correct troll when you write your paragraphs Joe. I have never made those claims you state about special effects, etc. The only claims i have made are in the above paragraphs. You do realize that there are other people on this site who question gimlin, right? Make sure you are addressing the correct person, or it makes you look silly. Nothing magical about the patterson suit. Just a monkey suit. Thats all. How many times have you seen your bigfooting icons of old carrying guns Joe? Green? Dahinden? etc. And they are working the same territory as patterson did. So your logic about toting guns doesn't hold up. Plus, many have stated that the film site had fresh dozer roads cut leading almost to the site. So its not like they were blazing these trails in the middle of nowhere. Why would a gun be needed to walk off of a dozer road a hundred yards and film your friend in a suit?

      Delete
    14. I don't understand the term winky joe, please explain. Secondly, i am not the troll you speak of in regards to racism and dmaker. Please make sure you have the right troll before throwing accusations.

      Delete
    15. Joe got blown the fu ck out. You can always tell when it happens due to the ad hominems and zero bigfoots.

      Delete
    16. yes he did 7:31, and what do you think about "joes" racist comments?

      Delete
    17. They dont surprise me. He did the same thing when he endorsed the story of zana, a poor african woman who was abused and tormented back when such activity was allowed to go on. Even though dna proved she was 100% human pj prefers the original events and likens zana to an ape. Disgusting behaviour.

      Delete
    18. what a surprise Another day of attempted cyber bullying by jotomi.. a life revolving attacking people on a bigfoot blog is truly a sad and meaningless existence! maybe u should get a job make your mother proud.. and no playing sasquatch wannabe doesn't count.

      Delete
    19. Joe fears Shribes with a passion. Shribes gets under Joes skin something crazy. Keep up the good work Stevie. Joe is truly scared of you.

      Delete
    20. 7:28... Oh I'm surer than anything I've ever claimed that you're the psycho racist nerd. I'm going to find your posts to compare to your easily recognisable writing style once this is posted.

      Actually, when putting on a costume, it always adds and never subtracts from the proportions of the person wearing the costume... However, we see that in comparison to a normal human being, the upper leg of Patty is far shorter. That's just one area of analysis among so many others, such as flexing muscles in the next and shoulders that possess bending fingers in arms that are 10% longer than a normal human's, bending and flexing toes in the step, etc. Magic is an understatement considering what we know from SFX abilities even in the 70's (Google Bionic Man Bigfoot if you're not too scared, Winky). How many times have I seen Green and Dahinden carrying guns? Have you ever seen them to not have them on their person? It is without question, without doubt that they would have a gun on them in that type of environment, considering Green's background for sure. The dozer trails are irrelevant... Sasquatch are seen increasingly as civilisation encroaches on wilderness areas, it's a stupid argument. However, you'll use this as evidence that the footage was staged, and then suggest that the processing timeline was impossible due to the remote areas that they attained the footage, no doubt?

      You're called "Winky" because that what your rear ended does when you think of large relict hominids roaming the wilderness that can twist your head off like a soda bottle.

      Delete
    21. Maybe Anons could choose a number?so they can be distinguished xx

      Delete
    22. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3433594/Early-humans-glass-jaws-cracked-simply-biting-nuts-Fossils-dispute-claims-2-million-year-old-species-ate-seeds-tree-bark.html

      Delete
    23. If anyone suggesting Zana was African and anyone promoting that idea is racist, then I would love for them to take Zana's son's skull and compare it to West African people of the time (150 years ago). Sorry kids, you're with adults now... And oh no! It's not homophobic Shribes?! Brrrrrrrr... Shaking in my boots!

      Delete
    24. Please do compare writing styles Joe. It will only make you look all the more foolish. Why would anyone compare the patterson film to the bionic man episode Joe? That TV show wasn't even remotely trying to come up with a realistic bigfoot costume. It was more of a joke than anything else, and the TV show meant it to be that way. Yet you are somehow using the bionic man as proof?

      And why are you making up names for adult men about rear ends and bigfoot? No one here has resorted to petty insults so far except you Joe. Why do you immediately attack those who question you? And your explanation of rear ends and Winky doesn't really make any sense. Please explain how a rear end could spawn the name winky?

      Delete
    25. Make no mistake Eva, it's him... The little psycho.

      Delete
    26. The sad reality is joe is too stubborn to even consider the posibility of a world with no bigfoot.

      Delete
    27. Why would anyone compare the two film sources?! Well according to people like you, the subject in the Patterson film is costume making in it's mastery, and the costume in the Bionic Man is the extent of SFX cababilities, even years after the PGF was filmed. You expect anyone to believe that a prime time major budget show wouldn't try and make a costume look as real as possible? Do you honestly expect anyone to swallow that? Or expect the producers of Bionic Man to try and make a costume that was meant to be "more of a joke"? Is that your idea of logic??

      You're complaining of your name Winky when you're attempting to pin empty allegations of racism on people?

      Delete
    28. 8:01... The reality of the situation is far sadder considering you spend every day of your life trying to convince people of that... And are no closer for your efforts.

      Delete
    29. How's the PR business going Joerg?

      Delete
    30. There is no convincing you joe we all know that but someone else may be reading and they should be aware of all the facts regarding this topic.

      Delete
    31. I have never stated that the patterson film is mastery. I think it is a rather poor suit to be honest. Yes the bionic man costume was a joke as far as realism. If you think anyone tried to make that costume realistic, then i don't know what to tell you. You still don't seem to have an explanation for this winky name. I could care less if you refer to me as that, but your explanation for the name lacks any real sense. Please explain?

      Delete
    32. The facts? Would you like to continue this with your latest pathetic come back so that we can continue with the facts? If you didn't notice... Every one of your ridiculous claims has been knocked out of the ball park... Shall we continue?

      That would mean you finding another excuse... I'm waiting.

      Delete
    33. A poor suit? Then why can't you offer one explanation for the details that is seen in this alleged costume? It doesn't support your argument, it in fact exposes it even more. So you actually expect people around here to believe that a big budget Hollywood show like The Bionic Man would deliberately paint it's producers in a light as joking around and not making a good effort at a costume? Is this your idea of logic? You're on the ropes I think Winky?!

      I've given you an explanation... It's the motion your rear end does at the thought of this topic being legitimate.

      Delete
    34. Knocked out of the ball park? Which which verified bigfoot did you do that with exactly?

      Delete
    35. how do by have time to post so much? seriously no kids? boyfriend or girlfriend? just u and your mum playing smart ass on bigfootevidence. what a sorry sorry situation..

      Delete
    36. "Every one of your ridiculous claims has been knocked out of the ball park..."

      Not so much, Stinktomi.

      Delete
    37. Another often repeated racist idea of Joetomi's is the notion that red haired giant Europeans are responsible for all of the cultural wonders (e.g. burial mounds) that predate Columbus. In Joetomi's racist mind, only white Europeans were intelligent enough to be responsible for such amazing constructions.

      Racism is behind all of Joetomi's bizarre bigfoot theories.

      Delete
    38. Yes Joe, it is a poor suit in my opinion. The details you see in my opinion, are simply wishful thinking. You are seeing what you want to see. Yes indeed, the bionic man put zero effort in trying to make a bigfoot suit. Just as other 70s shows had goofy, foolish looking costumes. The point wasn't to create a good suit, it was trying to produce an entertaining show episode with some sort of villian. It was a horrid looking costume. It really is shocking you would try and use it for any type of bigfoot legitimacy. If you call using common sense, being on the ropes, then i am happy to be on the ropes all day Joe.

      That explanation of winky still doesn't hold up Joe. Your explanation makes no sense. Was it you who thought up the winky name Joe? I hope not, because it really is a very odd name to come up with for an insult. I would think you could do better.

      Delete
    39. To be fair, I know Joetomi believes that aliens built many of the ancient wonders. Perhaps he doesn't have much confidence in humans either way. We know he doesn't think we are capable of building an ape suit.

      Delete
    40. "Winky" is a common nickname that cruel bullies use to relentlessly tease people with vision disabilities. It makes sense that a hateful troll like Joetomi would use it.

      Delete
    41. "If you don't believe in aliens you should be shot"

      Joe "Iktomi" F.

      Delete
    42. A prominent bigfoot enthusiast named Kitakaze has seen the PGF suit on display at Al Deatley's house.

      Delete
    43. "Extraordinary claims shouldn't require extraordinary evidence"

      Joe "lktomi" F

      Delete
    44. Kitakaze and Alaskan Bush Pilot are both trolled and hated on this site exclusively by joetomi. They know the truth about the PGF film, and joetomi is scared to death of it. Thats why he always is insulting them. They hold the keys to the magical monkey suit. BTFO!

      Delete
    45. 8:22... Ever heard of Kennewick man? Are you aware that Native Americans wanted to have the remains of this morphologically European person back claiming that it was their ancestry? I've never claimed that Europeans made the elaborate burial mounds, in fact the Adena were ancient North Americans. The Nevada Humbolt skull has prehistoric traits only found in European Paleo peoples, and studies on hair fibres on the Lovelock skulls indicates hair pigmant only found in European people, but that's about it.

      8:24... So why can't you point out any suit anomalies? Why is that so difficult for you considering you are so keen to point out the "wishful thinking" of others? Why is this so difficult, anyone would think you're a little scared to point out anomalies because you know what's coming? Come on! It's an obvious suit, yet you can't point out any obvious anomalies?

      The Bionic Man costume is "horrid" because that's the extent of SFX in the 70's. That's the extent that a high budget Hollywood show could devise. Are we to expect a broke cowboy could trump that, but the following decades' fur cloth techniques also? Allow me to educate you some more... There is no known fur cloth technique for over a 100 years of costume making that accounts for what we see in the PGF. Even though you embarrassing logic that Hollywood producers were trying to look incompetent doesn't wash, there is no method of replicating what we see in that footage today with modern materials, and even it it were accomplished, the budget and materials would far exceed anything probably from Roger Patterson in 1967.

      "There is no convincing you joe we all know that but someone else may be reading and they should be aware of all the facts regarding this topic."
      ... You're not doing a very good attempt at these "facts", Winky!

      Delete
    46. My, my, Joe. You're really busting out the arguments from incredulity here, aren't you?

      Just because you cannot understand why someone would do something, or how they may have done it, does not make it impossible. Please try to bear that in mind when attempting to build an argument.

      Delete
    47. 8:32... I have in fact posted to link to "Ancient Aliens Debunked" here more than anyone else.

      8:40... Yet he didn't get a photograph? That's a lie... Anything to help little kids sleep better at night from the Boogeyman, I guess. Kitakrazy has been taken to town about his lies, what a joke that someone should stoop so low to support what is allegedly so "obvious".

      8:43... I don't know Alaskan Bush Dude, and never heard of him before his crazy quotes were posted around here. Now that's comedy gold.

      Delete
    48. Bionic Man is hardly the pinnacle of SFX achievement. The Planet of the Apes movies predate the Bionic Man and they are way more realistic.

      Delete
    49. That's about it? Nothing regarding European giant skeletons found in burial mounds and covered up by the Smithsonian?

      Well, I'm glad that you have given up on that strange, racist conspiracy theory. You're making progress kid!

      Delete
    50. Don... It's pretty simple. If the subject in the footage is "so obviously a costume", then it is he burden of anyone, including you should you be endorsing that idea, to lift the burden by presenting a case for that.

      This should be easy for you. A costume expert has attempted to make what we see in that footage, and by his expert opinion... It is indeed impossible. The obstacles will stack up one by one until anyone's case for a costume in that footage is taken apart.

      Remember; an obvious suit should have obvious explanations. Your hole being dug, not mine.

      Delete
    51. The Bionic Man bigfoot episode was in 1976. That is one year before Star Wars and Chewbecca.

      Joe, there are plenty of examples of SFX superior to the Bionic Man. You really need to drop that line of logic. That dog don't hunt.

      Delete
    52. Is your statement about ancient aliens indicate that you think the whole theory is wrong, or just parts of it?

      Delete
    53. Recreating the PGF costume is a fools errand. Why would anyone need to spend the time and money? What is the motivation and what is the payoff? The film cannot prove, or disprove, bigfoot as a species. So what is the point? File it away as "undetermined" if it makes you feel better. I really don't care. It looks fake to me, the provenance stinks, and there is no proof anywhere that a creature like the one depicted in the film even exists. Why bother spending any more time or energy on it than that? All you would be doing is building a bone for rabid footers to chew on.

      Delete
    54. So your only counter-argument to Kitikaze is to make fun of his name and call him a liar? Anything besides ad hominem attacks? Thanks for playing!

      Delete
    55. Don... The apes in the Planet of the Apes wore suits. There is rarely any visible fur cloth to draw any real comparison.

      8:49... Sorry, never have claimed that European giants were found in burial mounds. You must have the wrong person. There are write me statements from Smithsonian anthropologists from European decent that have stated that any remains of the sort would not be considered, but nothing that amounts to a conspiracy.

      Sorry! Your next racism claims? You're a bit of an intellectual coward claiming the moral high ground because you're too stupid to devise an intelligent counter argument, aren't you?

      Delete
    56. Joe is getting blown the f#ck out from all angles!!!

      Delete
    57. Joe is getting double and triple teamed from a bunch of dudes. How is that any different than a typical Saturday night?

      Delete
    58. Joe, do you realize how stupid you are looking trying to use the bionic man costume as any proof of bigfoot or of special effects technology? Man you are showing just how crazy you are. The bionic man costume is hardly even a costume. Its a tall man with a beard, with black face paint on and a frizzy wig. And literally a fur shirt and pants that seem to be made of bear fur. They tried so hard that they used black face paint joe? AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHA. You are melting down today. Do you realize how crazy you are sounding. And who has destroyed Kitakaze's arguements? You? that would require debate from both sides, and you don't leave this blog joe. You simply make one sided insults and never take the fight to the man you are inuslting. Dmaker is chewing you too pieces todtay too. I mean this bionic man cosutme argument is one of the most laughable i have ever heard in all of bigfoot. I might expect his from DS, but you Joe? I thought you were more intelligent than that. But what was i thinking. I mean the bionic man bigfoot suit? AHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    59. Don 8:53... And do you claim that Chewie's costume is better than the PGF? Does it show muscle flexing and tone? Last time I checked, and I've seen Star Wars a million times, the mask is massive to accommodate a head, and the long hair all over his body hides any attempt at muscle tone? That dog hunts just fine.

      8:54... Watch Ancient Aliens Debunked and stop bitchin' like a little girl.

      Don 8:56... It's about as relevant as you've take the time to compare it to various costumes on the BFF. Why is it suddenly irrelevant, because those arguments didn't hold water? If the footage is presented by a list of scientists and experts, then it is scientifically required to test that premise and there is only one method of testing the claim of organic tissue. The footage does not prove the existence of Sasquatch, because the subject in that footage may have been the last of it's kind and died out in 47 years. But if it's real, then there you have a living breathing hominid living on the planet JUST 47 years ago... And we all know what that means for the physical evidence and reports that flow to this day.

      Delete
    60. Bionic man bigfoot costume as evidence..................AHHHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      COOKOO COOKOO COOKOOO COOKOOO

      AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    61. Bionic man bigfoot costume as evidence..................AHHHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      COOKOO COOKOO COOKOOO COOKOOO

      AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    62. 9:05... Again... That's the best Hollywood SFX is capable of years after the PGF was filmed. You've obviously Googled it and realised that your arguments erode like snow flakes... Take a look at the Bionic Man Bigfoot's body and explain to me how it feels to have your arguments taken apart too many times to count. Take a look at the BMB's arms, do you see any muscle tone? I see a really obvious fur cloth for a Hollywood budget.

      So... Do you have any "obvious" suit anomalies for Patty?

      Delete
    63. 9:09... You're experiencing a serious emotional breakdown, please step away from the desktop and have some more pizza.

      Delete
    64. Yes, the chewbaca costume is a million times better than the patterson film joe. And no, that dog doesn't hunt. That dog doesnt even see, smell, or hear. You have lost it you nutjob. I wish we could insert pictures here just to give a visual reference of what the bionic man bigfoot looked like. It was laughable ontop of laughable ontop of laughable. I seriously am in shock joe is using it as a point.

      Shribes is going to have a field day when he sees this meltdown of yours Joe.

      The patterson suit is on display at deatleys house. This is well known. Joe is just made he will never be allowed to see it.

      Joe also supported the falcoln project and MIke B's involvement with it. Enough said. AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    65. Hollywood budget??? Please produce one piece of evidence showing how much money was put into the bigfoot costume of the bionic man. One piece of evidence showing the cost to make it? Please Joe, show us. If you can't then shut up. Thats your argument, so its time for you to pony up. Show us how much moey it took to make that suit. If you can't, then shut your mouth. Simples.

      Delete
    66. Joe is getting blown the f#ck out!!!! I mean he is really getting it hard!!! I mean dag on, he is getting seriously blown the f#ck out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    67. Cool... Can you post an example of muscle tone and texture, as well as the manner in which Chewie achieves the display of skin folds under the long hair he enjoys? Can you manage the same with the BMB?

      It would be great for you to provide substance for your ideas, I don't think we'll even go there with Kit's claims that he's seen a magic monkey suit... They are well known embarrassment. Did it help you sleep better at night?

      Delete
    68. Produce the cost of the bionic man bigfoot suit or shut up!!! Produce the cost joerg!!!! Simples!!

      Delete
    69. "The Six Million Dollar Man is an American television series about a former astronaut with bionic implants working for a fictional government office known as OSI.[n 1] The series is based on the Martin Caidin novel Cyborg, which was the proposed title of the series during pre-production.[2] Following three television movies aired in 1973, The Six Million Dollar Man aired on the ABC network as a regular series for five seasons from 1974 to 1978. The title role of Steve Austin was played by Lee Majors, who subsequently became a pop culture icon of the 1970s. A spin-off series, The Bionic Woman, ran from 1976 to 1978 (and, in turn, was the subject of a remake in 2007). Three television movies featuring both eponymous characters were also produced between 1987 and 1994."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Six_Million_Dollar_Man

      "The American Broadcasting Company (ABC) (stylized in its logo as abc since 1957) is an American commercial broadcast television network that is owned by the Disney–ABC Television Group, a subsidiary of Disney Media Networks division of The Walt Disney Company. The network is part of the Big Three television networks. The network is headquartered on Columbus Avenue and West 66th Street in Manhattan, with additional major offices and production facilities in New York City, Los Angeles and Burbank, California.
      Since 2007, when ABC Radio (also known as Cumulus Media Networks) was sold to Citadel Broadcasting, ABC has reduced its broadcasting operations almost exclusively to television. The fifth-oldest major broadcasting network in the world, ABC is often nicknamed as "the Alphabet Network", as its initialism also represent the first three letters of the English alphabet."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Company

      Delete
    70. ^ what in the f#ck is that supposed to prove. Nto ne mention of the cost of the bigfoot costume. You have no leg to stand on. lol. Your making yourself look pathetic.

      Delete
    71. Actually... I have provided nothing but substance to every one of my claims in this thread of comments, not to mention taken apart every one of three different people's in the process.

      You'll notice the big money production capabilities of ABC Network? Anyone knows that the show was watched by literally everybody in the day. Not only did it portray a future of superhuman robots, it also showcased US technology as the finest in the world... You need a pretty mega budget for that. So... Where are these "obvious" suit anomalies in the PGF? This is like trying to get blood from a stone... You're in danger of getting "blown the **** out" here, troll!

      You see the Bionic Man Bigfoot is an obvious costume... And looks obvious, not to mention made with a budget that dwarfed anything Roger Patterson could hope for. If Patty is an "obvious costume", where are the "obvious anomalies"?

      Delete
    72. you are skirting the arguement joe. You claim that the bionic man bigfoot is the best a hollywood big budget company could do and that they put major money into it, as they would never produce a poor product. So show us the money sum that went into the costume. Thats all, show us that amount. Show us where it cost more than 100 bucks, more than 200, more than 50 for that matter. These are your claims not mine, so either produce the evidence, or sit back down, admit that you made it up, and have no idea what the costume cost, or produce the cost of the suit. Whats the matter joe? get caught lying again and trying to bend things to fit your arguments? You have no clue what that costume cost? It could have been a free gift for all we know, or it could have cost 50 bucks to make. You have no clue, admit it. Show us the cost joe? show us the cost?

      Delete
    73. I've supported my claims with the production companies that are affiliated and funded the show, not to mention how much a pop-cultural icon it was for the time. The show revolves around futuristic technologies... I fully expect someone of your god awful logic to be focussing on a futile argument like this.

      You're flogging a dead horse and all the while none of your arguments and p*ss poor logic has come back with an obvious suit anomoly for the PGF subject.

      I'm waiting... ... ...

      Delete
    74. Joe, a link to the wiki entry for the show and the production company proves absolutely nothing. You're really reaching on this one. I'd drop it if I were you. You're looking ridiculous.

      If you cannot demonstrate how much was spent on the suit, then you're just guessing and AGAIN arguing from personal incredulity.

      Delete
    75. Its just getting sad now Joe. You lost this one. We all see it and know it. You are using the supposed big budget of this show and the bigfoot suit within it, as positive evidence of bigfoot. Notice not one of yoru friends is backing you. Because your argument is obliterated.

      So now you are saying because the show is run by a major media branch, that it will automatically have the best quality of things? Are you crazy?

      No, the dead horse is that you think you are making any sense and that you can win this. You backed yourself into another corner, and its halarious to watch you squirm. Show us the money that went into that suit. Show us Joe, thats all you have to do. You are simply assuming the company spent more than 50 bucks on it. Which i doubt they spent more than that. And yet you are prancing around telling everyone that the bionic man bigfoot suit is high quality special effects for the time. How stupid can you get. Show us how much money went into it. Its your burden of proof, as you are using it as evidence to your position. Show us joe? Show us the amount that went into it.

      If not, admit that you embelished and took something you knew nothing about and tried to mold it into points for your argument. This is very dishonest and you have been caught doing it yet again. Show us the budget Joe? Show us the money that went into the suit. Show us Joe? Your not going to be able to change the subject or squirm out of this one. Everyone who has read your replies are laughing there butts off. You made yourself look beyond stupid on this one.

      Delete
    76. Futile argument??? really joe. You have been preaching this bionic man suit crap for about 2 weeks now. And now that your logic has been defeated and blown into left field, you are calling it a futile arguement? As dmaker said, and as we ALL are seeing, even your friends, you are making yourself look beyond stupid

      Delete
    77. joetomi please get a job or new hobby watching u get blasted on this blog day in day out is getting painful. keep up the good work dmaker!

      Delete
    78. Sorry peeps! The plain and simple facts are that the Bionic man was a big budget futuristic Hollywood series produced by by budget Hollywood production companies. If you want the exact cost of the Bigfoot suit, then you are likely requesting something only a handful of film producers know.

      Bionic Man = Hollywood Production = Lame arss costume
      compared to the Patterson Gimlin subject.

      So where are those "obvious suit anomalies" guys? Why is it so hard to get you to post them??

      Delete
    79. What difference does it make what the Bionic Man bigfoot looks like? Isn't the mantra of the Pattycakes to focus on what is on the film only?

      Delete
    80. Shribes... One day you MIGHT grow a brain cell, not to mention a pair of b*lls, and progress from cheerleading and tough talk to contributing to an intellectual exchange... Not that I'm suggesting anything of the sort has happened in this comment section.

      How's this... How about you people prove me otherwise. I've put my cards on the table and made the obvious claim that the a big Hollywood Production would have the budget, why don't you prove me wrong? Requesting that I produce an exact figure for a costume in that production is not realistic, whereas the multitude of claims made by three of you are not so difficult to support?

      Hmmmmmmmm... I wonder why???

      : )

      Delete
    81. Don... Because it makes the allegation that someone could manufacture something of that apparent realism totally unlikely, as Roger Patterson didn't have a Hollywood production budget. He was "broke' remember? "Trying to tie up lose ends"? Think of that... It doesn't matter if the suit in the Bionic Man cost a few hundred bucks, if that's what was available then for a costume of that nature in a Hollywood production that adheres to futuristic scenes, that was that.

      You have to remember the basic storyline, the Bigfoot was in fact a cyber-alien, it didn't look half as good as anything we see in the Patterson Gimlin film.

      Delete
    82. Your not going to be able to weasel your way out of this Joe, you are looking like a FOOL. Its your burden of proof. Produce the amount of money the suit cost, or that it was even "costly" or shut up and retract your statement. You got caught trying to fabricate stories yet again. You are looking like an idiot. Show us the amount it cost as you claim it was top of the line effects. Guess what Joe, even the wealthiest film companies will still use the cheapest materials they can if given the opportunity. Its not like anything in the bionic man looked realistic whatsoever, so why would they spend thousands of dollars on a suit, when its doubtful the whole episode cost more than a few thousand to film! The suit is ridiculous, and as dmaker says, this was around the first star wars and planet of the apes. I mean are you crazy? You are looking like an idiot and getting so far blown the f#ck out that its amazing.

      Delete
    83. How ignorant of you Joe. Simply google cheap movies made by major film studios. There are so many major movies that cost thousands to make, and made 100s of millions, produced by major studios. Major studios dont have to use major money to make a good movie with good effects. In fact, if they dont have too, they wont. Your arguement is crazy and you are looking amazingly stupid

      Delete
    84. Excuse me? I'll "shut up and retract" zero, dear boy, ha ha ha!! If you strongly believe that the Bionic Man was not made by an extensive budget, then that's your burden. Remember I have put forward a case for the amount a production like that would cost, via basic pop culture and the production companies invested in the show... If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof. There is nothing to fabricate about stating facts about Hollywood productions, it is in fact painfully obvious. Mind you, I am exchanging with someone who claims a production would try and look incompetent by making a bad suit... This by a production that won numerous awards for the series, ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      It is impossible to know how much was spent on the costume, it is in fact very simply to acknowledge that a Hollywood budget would trump what old Roger was able to get his hands on. Using the argument that the costume in the Bionic Man is bad does not help your case one bit. It merely shows that real organic tissue was not even attempted years after the PGF, or that a big budget couldn't pull it off. Using Chewie that possesses not one of the PGF traits, and Planet of The Apes subjects that wear suits does not help one bit.

      So how about those obvious suit anomalies for Patty?

      Delete
    85. I keep reading about me allegedly looking "stupid" and "foolish", yet where is the evidence that a Hollywood production cheaped out?

      Where are these obvious suit anomalies on Patty?? Is there anybody out there????

      Delete
    86. I'm at work and I don't have all day to debate patty I live in south western ny where there's actual bigfoot activity and evidence. I don't need a 50 year old hoax to justify what I know to be fact and oh btw.. f uck off Pricktomi u dickless wonder!

      Delete
    87. Oh how i pray that tomorrow may bring even a smidgen of evidence ,real evidence,so i can rest easy in the knowledge i am not a complete dipstick to everybody.

      Oh...please Lordy ,i promise to refrain from mas-urb-ating too,for at least a week.

      Joe

      Delete
    88. ^ i don`t believe i can keep that promise ..maybe a day is more realistic for me.

      Joe

      Delete
    89. where is the proof, even the slightest notion that any money at all went into that ridiculous suit on the bionic man. Yet joe claims it was top of the line special effects. Can you get more pathetic?

      Delete
    90. You've really gone off the deep end today, Joe. Wow.

      On another note, did you get around to watching Black Robe?

      Delete
    91. Shribes... Let's not pretend you're capable of debate now.

      Ok... Let look at it like this then;
      http://youtu.be/AQlPAFV6yaI

      ... On the 15 second's mark, you'll notice the "Foam Muscle Suit Test". Ok... You can see that this source is partly CGI, right? You've got some ape dude, likely from the planet of the apes or something having a meltdown of troll proportions, who then turns to another subject he's about to have it out with. In these short seconds we have plenty of opportunity to see just how expensive Hollywood budget foam muscle can imitate realistic aggressive muscle movements; are we fulfilled? No, we can see that even with the obvious assistance of CGI, we still have no back & neck muscles, spinal erectors, or muscle movement in comparison to that of Patty;
      http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/p-g44-buresh/

      We have what's very obviously a massive budgeted movie that can choose it's preference of lighting, can choose how much CGI it wants to incorporate, has access to the best materials and still we have nothing that closely resembles organic tissue the same way as Patty displays. Also... People weren't using foam muscle suits in the late 60's, it was pointless the shoddy video even suggesting it really. So... How about that burden that the Bionic Man cost a few dollars? Oh wait... I just made that argument totally irrelevant with a big money production decades later that doesn't even stand up.

      Oops!!

      (Whispers... How about those "obvious" suit anomalies on Patty???)

      Delete
    92. Don! I haven't got around to watching it yet! This week for sure and I'll let you know when I do.

      Delete
    93. 11;14

      I prefer titles such Black Hole...but I have promised not to mas-tur-bate for a day (changed it from a week as no way could I handle that sort of frustration) so I`m not watching any films for fear of un-containable excitement.

      Joe

      Delete
    94. 11;24 wow Joe...you sure you can go that long without a solo trip to the bushes area ?

      Delete
    95. debate what? I know what I know about sasquatch and they're very real existence. it's your existence that really fascinates me. what's the point? of your life that is..have u ever reflected on how you spend your days and what it means about you as a person? I'm seriously concerned that bigfoot has made you delusional and given u a false sense of purpose..

      Delete
    96. BILL BROCK cryptid GURU hunter he can get the JOB DONE !!!

      Delete
    97. 11:27 Hmmm...maybe i should pray for strength as well a bigfoot proof.

      Joe

      Delete
    98. Shribes... You claim to be someone who believes in the existence of Sasquatch evidence, yet you have an issue with me defending that idea? What's the matter pal, did you get made to look a fool down the line about believing in this stuff? A little bitter? And what's it to you what I do with my life, you homophobe? Anyone that prejudice could be interpreted as hiding a little skeleton?

      My conservatory is likely bigger than your house, that's all you need to know about what I do with my days... Get iPhone, you can do wonders with multitasking.

      Delete
    99. Joetomi, you're a racist piece of sh^t, you have explicitly claimed that red haired giants were responsible for building the burial mounds and now you are changing your racist position in a cowardly attempt to scrub the blatantly racist parts of your stupid idea. At least overt racists are honest about their views, but you pathetically attempt to cover it up. Disgusting.

      Delete
    100. "Racist, racist, racist, racist, blah, blah, blah, fart, poop, plop!"

      I've never said that the red headed Giants made the burial mounds, only that Giants were found across the US in different circumstances. For example, the red headed Giants were found in cave systems in Nevada, not burial mounds, you poor ******* dense twat?

      Delete
    101. Oh... And even if I had claimed that, red headed skeletons in the US have had tests conducted on their hair fibres and determined that their pigmant is genuinely red... These are European traits, if ya didn't know.

      Delete
    102. You had a debate about giants a few years ago and, if you look at the thread, you subsequently deleted several posts. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2014/10/ron-morehead-explains-bigfoot.html

      Fortunately, I copied one of the posts before it was deleted and here it is:

      Tuesday, October 14, 2014 at 2:52:00 AM PDT
      Have you never heard of the Solutrean hypothesis? Why do you think that Powell didn’t want to entertain any line of analysis which attempted to connect any artifacts found in the New World with any "peoples or so-called races of antiquity in other portions of the world.”? It was called isolationist theory and no evidence of European descent involving the giant mound builders would be considered. If they werent European, how did they have red and blond hair? You tell me son.

      Delete
    103. That's odd? Where has the guy who wanted an impossible costume cost gone?

      (Tumbleweed goes by)

      Delete
    104. And who was that post by? You don't seem to have a name to that pasted comment? There is no physical evidence that has been tested to show that red headed Giants made the elaborate mounds systems. But like I said... There is evidence that giant red headed mummies had genuine red hair, which is a European trait.

      Do you think that be Native Americans who wanted the remains of Kennewick Man back has issue with their lineage being European?

      : )

      Delete
    105. Do you think that they would consider me racist??

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

      Delete
    106. HELLOOOOOOOOOO????????

      Where's the guy who wanted an impossible costume cost gone?

      (... More tumbleweed goes by)

      Delete
    107. "Now comes a surprising twist, from the complete nuclear genome of a Siberian boy who died 24,000 years ago—the oldest complete genome of a modern human sequenced to date. His DNA shows close ties to those of today’s Native Americans. Yet he apparently descended not from East Asians, but from people who had lived in Europe or western Asia. The finding suggests that about a third of the ancestry of today’s Native Americans can be traced to “western Eurasia,” with the other two-thirds coming from eastern Asia, according to a talk at a meeting here by ancient DNA expert Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen. It also implies that traces of European ancestry previously detected in modern Native Americans do not come solely from mixing with European colonists, as most scientists had assumed, but have much deeper roots.

      “I’m still processing that Native Americans are one-third European,” says geneticist Connie Mulligan of the University of Florida in Gainesville. “It’s jaw-dropping.” At the very least, says geneticist Dennis O’Rourke of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, “this is going to stimulate a lot of discussion.”

      Delete
    108. ^ Gone for a quick hand shuffle.

      Joe

      Delete
    109. To dmaker, shribes etc- bollocks to you all. When you come up more meaningful arguments then maybe you'll be taken more seriously otherwise you only come back to get schooled over and over again by Iktomi . it's very painful to watch on a daily basis. Do use a favor and spare us the daily trouncing ]

      Joe

      Delete
    110. Joe is Iktomi's nut hugger.

      Delete
    111. I think dmaker said it best when he said that joe completley lost it today and went off the deep end. If anyone ever got blown the f#ck out, joe sure as pee did. I mean he got blown the f#ck out!!!!!!!!!!! AAHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    112. Um... Wait until you see the next comment section...

      (Ouch!)

      Delete
    113. I wanna say one time joetomi I have no problem with your belief in bigfoot and I used to enjoy some of your comments but seeing you belittle honest commenters especially on the Spanish yeti thread made me realize your a pretentious pompous ass and u need to chill out and as far as a huge conservatory come on man that's all I have lot say

      Delete
    114. Shribes... You felt the need to comment about me prior to anything on the Spanish Yeti, you dense schmuck... And anyone thinking that the sick ******** psychos around here don't deserve confronting is as bad as them.

      If you ever confront me on here you'll end up far more stressed out than you'd prefer... Remember that.

      Delete
    115. the guy pointed out you could by a yeti suit and you had to be a smart ass but that's how you are. as for stressed out from a commenter on a bigfoot blog? unlike you my life doesn't revolve around this.. and I'll keep it simple if your being a prick I'll let you know seems to be more often than not these days.

      Delete
    116. I recognised the poster, the same troll that puts words in people's mouths about believing crap like that, and then pretends like he's a genius "debunking" the obvious.

      I can be civil, if you want altercations then you know where to find me. Sounds like multitasking isn't your forte.

      Delete
    117. guess I don't know my anons like I thought seemed like an honest comment to me. I'm fine with multitasking this blog is simply not high priority.

      Delete
    118. No hard feelings Shribes... You have a a friend in me if you want it.

      Peace.

      Delete
  2. Ooh ... what`s the matter with our Phil ?

    He`s just soooooo sceptical ... why doesn`t he see it is a real bigfoot ? ... goodness,these people are out there in the wilderness trying their very best !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He wasn't so sceptical with Cutino's thermal... Go check it out.

      Delete
    2. Lol the one where they see thermal blobs when pointing the camera at camp in which they know their friends are there and then claim them to be bigfoots? Mental.

      Delete
    3. No... The one where they circled the camp and were observing two subjects in the height range of nine feet... Comparitive scale to boot.

      "Lollaz!"

      Delete
    4. ^^Bad case of resting bitch face^^

      Delete
    5. ^ bad case of being a bitch with a dog resting on his face

      Joe

      Delete
    6. That sounds like your friend Vegas, Joe.

      Delete
    7. GRAYs have a major underground base in Vegas the GOV knows all about the base been there for years

      Delete
  3. A backed-up septic system can cause major problems. Don't let yours reach that state. When you need septic tank pumping or sewer cleaning, call Ketchum Sewer & Drain in Casstown, Ohio. Plumbing service can be arranged by appointment, or we offer 24-hour emergency services.

    " It don't have to get too stinky "

    Dr Melba Ketchum.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here At Moneymaker Chapels

    We follow the official Ohio Cremation with Confidence™ 10-step process, guaranteeing positive identification and integrity of cremated remains. We ensure that your loved one is treated with dignity and respect.

    Many cremation providers outsource cremation to a third party; at Wappner Funeral Directors & Crematory we own our own crematory, so your loved one never leaves our care. Cremation with Confidence™ means peace of mind.

    Matt Moneymaker

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome to Erickson Mobile Car Cleaning.

    Fully Licensed And Insured.

    Erickson Supershine offers the finest mobile auto detailing services available in North West Ohio. I specialize in hand car wash and automotive detailing services for both the interior and exterior of your vehicle.

    " You can eat your eggs offof It "

    Adrian Erickson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are brilliant and PJ is probably destroyed by them

      Delete
  6. I'm a 100% panties guy.
    BUT I have to be comfortable. Victoria's Secret is my favorite panties brand. Thongs are thongs, not much to worry about what brand as it's just 2 ounces of material lol. I don't like the see through thongs though, too slutty. Panties are so much more comfortable and sexy too .


    Les Stroud Survivorman

    ReplyDelete
  7. Snallygaster - enough said

    ReplyDelete