Thursday, October 15, 2015

This Is What The Patterson Film Site Looks Like From A Drone


Rowdy Kelley of the Bluff Creek Project has captured some amazing aerial footage of the Patterson Film site area with his Phantom Drone and a GoPro. It gives you a bird's eye view of just how remote and vast those woods really are where the legendary Patty was caught on film. Just think, her or her descendants could still be down there!


30 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Obama to keep 5,500 US troops in Afghanistan when he leaves office... US is there FOREVER

      Delete
    2. I like the video. A great choice for the Beatles musical score. Too bad the Bluff Creek Project is non-committal on whether bigfoot exists or not.

      Delete
    3. So sasquatch now have gracil jawbone structure (pronounced chin)Are you and you're lapdog Joe starting to stray away from ALL upclose anecdotal sightings ??,not to mention EYESHINE!!..
      You tapetum-lucidum much there , Mr special pleadin cherry picker?
      The good Dr B Sykes. :-))

      Delete
    4. If they keep looking, they'll find varriation, whats your point besides being a jerk?

      Delete
    5. It's lucky that the Hunboltd skull jaw is robust, and one of the most prioneering forensic experts in the country has taken eyewitness accounts of normal eyes.

      Tell me DBS... How does your tapetum lucidum fit in to your homo erectus theories? Something about "cherry picking" and "special pleading"?

      Delete
    6. MAYBE WHEN A COMPLETE. NUCLEAR DNA PROFILE IS MADE KNOWN OF A SASQUATCH. YOU'RE FOOLISH. ASSUMPTION (not hypothesis) WILL SHUT YER CHERRY PICKING AND SPECIAL PLEADING FAUCET OFF IN MID STREAM...
      TAPETUM. LUCIDUM MUCH THERE
      JOTOMI?
      LOL !

      Delete
    7. Robust for a 6-1 native american !
      naw, talk to Brock Lesner.
      Mr bigfoot enthusiast! lol !

      Delete
    8. HEY. TK AINT YOU THE ONE SPOUTING OFF ABOUT YER EYESHINE ENCOUNTERS?? YEP JUST AS I EXPECTED !!
      HOAXER OR A LIAR ! WICH ONE ARE YOU .. JERK ??
      AC collins. haa haa lol.

      Delete
    9. You didn't answer the question... How does your tapetum lucidum fit in to your homo erectus theories? Something about "cherry picking" and "special pleading"?

      Using someone like Lesner as a model for the skull was a cardinal sin in any forensic facial reconstructionist, as even by means of an amalgamation of artistry, forensic science, anthropology, osteology, and anatomy, it is still easily the most subjective, as well as one of the most controversial techniques in the field of forensic anthropology. Also, using a robust human to model what is fundamentally a robust human's skull; not too smart.

      Delete
    10. Oh... And TK, along with thousands and thousands of witnesses who report eyeshine are not wrong. They may be falling in line with the Sasquatch reports of "big black eyes". Just in the same manner in which a percentage of those reports report normal human like eyes.

      You're even more butthurt than the tracking dog guy.

      Delete
  2. like tham bigfoots bein in da boosh we needin tham a woodman to find 1 of tham critters shure do

    ReplyDelete
  3. sume trolls bein cuzins to tham bigfoots thay shure is

    ReplyDelete
  4. it just shows you how vast the area is and even though there must be a ton of wildlife in the area none were seen by the drone . if you stuck a few hundred men in that area you could go days without seeing any signs of one much less a creature who is an expert in hiding oneself .

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bullshit ,, Tell that to a APACHE HELICOPTER. GUNSHIP. sporting the Latest foliage penatrating (synthetic aperture radar) W FLIR!!
      Jive turkey...lol

      Delete
    2. SASQUATCH ARE MODERN HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN ,,JUST LIKE YOU AND ME !!


      IKTOMI

      Delete
    3. Another explanation is that you could go days without seeing signs or of Bigfoot itself because they don't exist. I suppose dogmen are experts at hiding as well because they have never found any of those either.

      Delete
    4. If something doesn't exist, then people wouldn't be seeing it, and it certainly wouldn't be leaving tracks... Such signs have lasted thousands of years.

      Delete
  5. Why don't you go rustle up a bucket of grits hillbilly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. we be eatin sume coon ans possin pie cawz tham critters bein heers fer da takin thay shure is
    nowadays tham bigfeets heers ans needin to shoots tham critters fer da hide

    ReplyDelete
  7. Replies
    1. BOBO would know about Squatchy he a Bigfoot GURU

      Delete
    2. Steven Struetalfart has shit for brains. The P/G location is visited by dozens of big footers regularly, he is wasting money on cameras that are only going to capture droves of footers

      Delete
    3. No it isn't. No one could even find the place until they located it in 2011. They have cameras all over the area besides. Shows how little you know.

      Delete
    4. Bob Gimlin can't even find the exact place nowadays.

      Delete
    5. PG site is worthless for research. Bluff Creek is over ran with Bigfoot enthusiasts & tourists every year, so what Bigfoot was seen there 50 years ago. She hasn't been sitting there on her thumb waiting for Gollum look a like to come along & find her. Nothing there because droves of tourists driving them away. All they gonna find is a colorful big weasel or two,

      Delete
    6. From what I understand that bigfoot bookstore owner has been recklessly selling dozens of maps to the location to any joe shmoe with the cash. And then taking by hand anyone that can come up with more money to the supposed Patty location. The area is pretty much worthless now for any credible research it is being ran over my lemans. Including the duechbag & his stooges who seem to think they are experts because they found Patterson & Gimlins film site & are now turning it into their cash grabbing honey hole.

      Delete
    7. Why that damn FISH EYED FOOL!!!!!! He ruins it for everyone!!!!!!

      Delete