Finally: Patterson's Bigfoot(Patty) VS. Freeman's Sasquatch(Paula)


The creature from the Patterson-Gimlin footage is named Patty. Everyone knows that. Right? What about Paul Freeman's creature? What's do we call her? How about "Paula"? That's the name Tyler gave the Freeman creature. We're impressed that someone has finally created a video showing the difference or similarities between Patty and Paula. Watch below:

Link: Patterson's Bigfoot(Patty) VS. Freeman's Sasquatch(Paula)


Comments

  1. It's so refreshing that this blog site has been given back to the believers again. don't miss all that name calling back and forth child stuff. Thanks Shawn for making this blog what it used to be.......top notch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the Iktomi blog here is top notch then you need to raise you're standards.

      Delete
    2. Plenty of monkeys;
      http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002UZNGCM?ie=UTF8&at=&force-full-site=1&ref_=aw_bottom_links

      ... Invest in it.

      Delete
  2. I don't miss the name calling either. But top notch? Lol!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Roger was a stumpy little con man and Freeman was an admitted hoaxer but its all you have so you have to cling to it like grim death.The worst pieces of trash in footin' are the ones you love the most.Its ok that Roger was a thieving little puke because he was dying and needed to feed the money hungry old hag that he married and Gimlin only got involved because of the big pay day that Roger promised him (and never seen until the 90's) but out of pitty for the wife of the little con man still sticks to his story.You idoits put Gimlin on a pedestal because he was there when the big event happened,in other words he was in on the hoax and footers kiss his ass for it.
    Meldrum is the same deal,you kiss his ass like he's some kind of hero because he has a little bit of fame and supports your cause,the guy is a mormon,need I say more? he's full of shit and loves money case closed.
    Freeman admitted to hoaxing but you let that go too because you need that film worse than the 67 hoax.
    See its ok to hoax as long as its to support the cause of the footers.For every 2 people that say the PGF couldnt have been hoaxed at the time there are a thousand that say it could have and was.Footers have double standards,just look at how big Rick Dyer got with the whole Hank thing.Footers hate Dyer but once he came out with that hoax you all ran right to him and his Youtube and blogtalk shows and if you say you didnt you're lying because you could look at this blog and the very same people that hated him on here sure sucked his ass on his blog.
    Go back over the years of footery and you find nothing but hoaxes,you're hero's are in fact money hungry hoaxers but you still fall for it.I'm going to hoax again in september or october and it will make it on here and all the bigfoot pages and most of you will fall for it like you always do,for less than $20 a little blur and some fake hair to glue to the face of a dollar store ape mask I will fool you again because you need to believe.
    Both films are as fake as Jesus but believe what you will.Patterson,Gimlin,Freeman,Dyer,Randles,Meldrum,Cutino,Biscardi,Johnson,Brown,and myself are all hoaxers and we know that you will buy it because you always do and it has no affect on our real lives because the bigfoot world is very small compared to the real world.
    The last time I hoaxed was in 2012 and people still ask for more almost every single day so who am I to deny you fine folks oh and one last thought for you people and I'm being very kind by using that term who will say "you can't fool me with a mask from the dollar store" I assure you I can and will again,you'll be seeing it right here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello chump.

      No, Freeman admitted to manufacturing a set of casts so that he could compare these to real ones, in order to show how the impression of toe bending could be achieved. The books Bigfoot of the Blues or Walla Walla Bigfoot (both authored by Vance Orchard) go at length regarding the Sasquatch in the Utimala range and Mill creek water shed areas, both were visited by Paul Freeman about five times a week after his encounter as a forestry worker. There are at least 15 to 20 people local to that area who had encountered Sasquatch, four of these became friends to Freeman and followed up on sighting reports and footprints. Any way, Freeman stated he made a fake track to see if indeed he could duplicate what they were finding and what this showed was a faked track could not achieve the same kind of movement shown with flexing over rocks and curling toes into mud and sticks. These are the types of people who are involved, people like Vance Orchard, not your average troll clinging to an edited piece of footage.

      Delete
    2. Author David Murphy has spent 11 years writing the biography of Roger Patterson. In this time he has interviewed over 70 people who had some acquaintance with Roger and Bob or people who knew them extremely well, and in that time he came across not one person who didn’t think highly of both individuals, not to mention endorse their credible nature. This is in direct contrast to Greg ‘Liar’ Long who’s book was an attempt at making money from hoaxing a hoax. He's been caught out falsifying interviews that were published in his book. The 'costume expert' that 'made the suit' has no record of Roger buying anything from him and had to hire a costume expert to make a gorilla suit that looked nothing like Patty. Bob H has more contradictions about the suit he wore than anything I've heard and can't even find the 'film site'. You see... There's money in hoaxing a hoax, expecially when your target audience are largely skeptical of the subject already. For further reference, see the link below;

      http://sasquatchresearch.net/billmiller.html

      This is the basis in which people like you claim Roger was a con man. People like Long would shamefully use the details of a terminally ill man failing to tie up loose ends, as a means to support these lies.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. ... For the "thousands" that say the PGF was a hoax, you must have a monkey suit, right?

      Delete
    5. Ohhhh shhhiiit

      Joe just got fu.cking rekt.

      BLOWN THE FU.CK OUT.

      Superb post 3:59 please post here more!

      Delete
    6. 427, negative proof fallacy, sweetheart

      Delete
    7. Oh... And lastly, you hateful little punk, Gimlin was offered $1M to come clean and didn't, took many involved in the footage to court over the rights... So why didn't he spill the beans? He could have made his money easily and stopped trouncing around the country doing talks at his age.

      You people make me laugh, angry little twonks who will go to any lengths to lie and distort the reality of the situation, sadly to lie to yourselves as well as anyone else that there are not creatures in the wilderness that can twist your heads off like a soder bottle top.

      Delete
    8. 4:31..:

      Negative proof fallacy;
      Body... The data is not present to analyse, therefore the data cannot be assumed to either exist or not exist.
      The footage... The data is present, there is no question of the data existing, and the nature of it has only one means it must be tested in accordance with what premises are drawn from that data. In this case, the premise is organic tissue.

      Monkey suits...
      The data is present, hole databases of suit making techniques & artistry that can be drawn from, that need to be utilised to determine that the source can be replicated. If it can't, then there is data on that footage that accounts for organic tissue stands.

      Data... If it exists then it can be scientifically tested, therefore requiring no assumptions on it's existence either way.

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    9. That's just about wraps it up nicely.

      See you later children!

      Delete
    10. Hateful little punk lol,A punk would constantly be on her asking people "What ya gonna do about it" Does that sound familiar? You are one tough dude behind a keyboard Joe thats what punks do.

      Delete
    11. Can't do anything about it over the internet and you know it,thats why you do it because you can avoid any consequences now if we we were face to face I would do plenty but we both know that isn't going to happen because thats not how punks like you work.

      Delete
    12. Ooooooooooh! Please tell me tough guy, what would you do to me?? I'm curious???

      Delete
    13. I'm not trying to be a tough guy,you are.I have a different opinion than you thats all but you cant handle hearing that you monkeyman does not as of right now exist and that your hero's are mostly lying douchebags so you try and act tough which nobody is buying btw but as far as what I would do if we were face to face and you asked me that 3rd grade question I would do what any man would do but you wouldnt understand anything about being a man.Posting on what is left of this blog over and over like some kind of authority figure doesnt make you as important as you think you are right now,I've seen bitches like you come and go since day 1 on here.Jesus man let go of the got mokey suit thing too,not everyone that doesnt buy that shitty film thinks it was Bob H or that it has anything to do with Phillip morris.Its a fake in my opinion and Patterson was scum and that has nothing to do with Greg Long.

      Delete
    14. Hey darling... If Sasquatch does not exist, show your ideas to be the case in reality, support your ideas man. If my "heroes" are lying "douchebags" (are you like 16 or something ?) then please, show it to be the case... This is very simple, it's what is required from adult debate. Putting it in writing ten times when you have a choice of many different rebuttals to the idea doesn't even begin to get your ideas to stick around people who know he subject matter better than you. This is how it works... You post your vomit, I post a rebuttal, the obligation is now on you to present a case for your argument. If you can't; you lose.

      Oh... Right, so please, tell me what you'd do to me if we were face to face? I'm very curious??

      Delete
    15. Once again the Englishman Iktomi has brought out the truth much to the dismay of the - well fill in your own words. Seems this Englishman knows vast amounts of knowledge more that his antagonist who when they can not face the facts or just do not want to as it does not serve their daily agenda will resort to name calling and character assasination in classic Olinski sytle.

      Anyway Freeman did indeed make a false foot in order to show the difference between a real forest giant track. Interestingly enough, one of the truly great current researchers that being Cliff Barackman has taken a page out of Freemans book in order to authenticate the famous London trackway and to date has not been able to achieve the find in Oregon.
      Chuck

      Delete
    16. You're asking me if I'm 16 when you keep asking that 3rd grade question of yours? Whats next Joe,neener neener neener? You just descibed exactly what you do in your last post but you can't see that either.
      The fact that you act the way you do and try to sound like an expert on Bigfoot just proves my point.If Im ever proven wrong I would admit it but every day that goes by without a body or live capture is a day that I'm still right and you're still wrong.I'm not going to threaten you on here Joe,im not that stupid because you would go running to shawn crying your little eyes out until I got banned.I was here before you got here and I will be here long after you're gone,Like I said bitches like you have come and gone and sooner or later you will get sick of constantly being driven to the point of meltdown and you'll go too.I would be willing any time to have an intelligent debate with you or anyone else at any time but you keep hacking up the same shit over and over again while telling everyone else how stupid they are.Glass houses Joey boy Glass houses.

      Delete
    17. The negative proof fallacy is where one assumes something is true if it cannot be proven false. It can also happen when one assumes that something is false if it cannot be proven true.

      One of your many logical fallacies, dear boy, and I'm proven wrong every day? Ha ha ha!! Buddy... Take a little look at this thread of comments and do a little reassessment of where the meltdown occurred, ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    18. I also been here way before (joe/ik ?). This use to be a great site.Now its about clicks and hits and trolls vs. trolls. It's very annoying and rarely come here anymore .

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. like Fukushima type meltdown 😠😠😠

      Delete
  5. Here's the way I see it. You fools? You're entitled to your own opinion.Scientists aren't acting scientific- boil it down to Occam's Razor- people have been reporting something for thousands of years.the Romans knew about it.Seems that the simple truth is that there's something out there.What? Hope to clear that up someday.Arguing about belief /skepticism is a non productive
    pissing contest about who thinks they sound smarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why we rely on proof, not anecdotes.

      Delete
    2. Thousands of years and no proof. What are the odds?

      Delete
    3. "In the ancient world, and even later, when the number of sciences was smaller, when scientists were philosophers and encyclopedists, they well knew of the existence of wild hairy bipeds whom they called troglodytes, that is “cavemen”. One of such philosophers and lumenaries of natural history was Carolus Linneaus, the author of the terms Homo sapiens and Homo troglodytes. For the latter he also used the terms “silvestris” and “nocturnus”. Thus Linnaeus is the forefather of our direction of science. Anthropologists are still unaware of the remarkable historical fact that the central and pretentious term of anthropology – Homo sapiens – appeared in science just in contrast to Homo troglodytes, the Caveman, whose existence was known to naturalists of antiquity and the Middle Ages."
      - Dmitri Bayanov

      The "proof" may have past us by over the past 200 years when giant skeletal remains were churned up from native lands during the industrial revolution... Outlining quite a task locating burial sites when the creature in question has 70% of the country's wilderness to evade in. When you have the current frequency of evidence, then the proof might be a conclusive means of research not quite reached yet. For thousands of years of anecdotes, we have the evidence to support it.

      Delete
  6. Joey dear...you better take your pills and go lie down. You're getting upest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you wishing, or fishing? I love this **** boy!

      Delete
    2. Does goody 2 shoes Chuck see you calling people names Joe? Isn't that the sign that you have in fact lost when you resort to such things?

      Delete
    3. I've got no qualms calling people like you the occasional name in banter. You're not getting all sensitive on me now, are you?

      : )

      Delete
    4. Not at all,just pointing out the hypocrisy.

      Delete
    5. Such a victim aren't you? Didn't you just to tell me you would beat me up just now? Ha ha!!

      Delete
    6. Where did you read that I would beat you up? I would never strike a special needs bloke like you Joe but if I did.."What you gonna do about it"? Hit me with all caps.

      Delete
    7. Yes, yes tough guy... People who try and act tough from behind anonimaty, tend to have small ***** and a small man complex. Pair that with your inferiority complex around this subject matter... You get an angry little man like you.

      : )

      Delete
    8. Well I hate to break it to ya Joe but that has your fake name all over it,before you say shit like that maybe you should look at your own comments.You use a fake name,talk tough behind a keyboard on a daily basis so I guess that makes BFE's first admitted case of micro penis.if the little shoe fits Joey.how do you manage to get that foot in your mouth so often with those rotten english teeth of yours?

      Delete
    9. Please tough, please tell us all what you would do to me off this blog? I'm curious as heck??

      You lost, you got threatening, you're a dumb, dense kid who can't even conjure up his own insults now, let alone a decent argument on the subject, haha ha ha!!

      I don't talk tough, I talk truth, sorry it hurts!

      Delete
    10. I dont need to come up with my own insults,you do a fine job of that yourself.

      Delete
    11. What? Come up with the insults you use? Yes, we're agreeing at last.

      Delete
  7. Joe lost the argument before he even got out of bed. Same as it ever was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Donald "7000 posts" Maker, "doesn't take this topic seriously"... Funny as heck.

      Delete
    2. Can't take Joketomi seriously when he refuses to even acknowledge he had to change his name on here because he was always losing every argument
      He used to be Joe and now he's Joewho

      Delete
    3. This one needs a gweat big band-aid for them boo boos! ^

      Delete
  8. So little Joey's an englishman huh? Now all the copy and paste stuff makes sense,he's too drunk to type and cant see past those buck teeth.

    ReplyDelete
  9. On Dec 1, 1946, Paula Weldon was a sophomore at Bennington College in Vermont. It was a Sunday, and Paula had worked the breakfast and lunch shifts at her dining hall. She went back to her dorm room and told her roommate that she was going on a hike to Glastenbury Mountain. She put on blue jeans, sneakers, and took her red parka.
    A motorist who was passing Paula picked her up and dropped her at Long Trail at the base of the mountain. Somewhere Paula had met fate and was never seen again. Her roommate reported her as missing the day after Paula went to the mountain, hoping she would return. She never did.
    Once news came of Paula's disappearance , her parents responded to the campus and stayed onsite for almost two weeks while the search was conducted. The police did find the person who gave Paula the ride and confirmed it. Police also found a person who was hiking down the trail and saw Paula at approximately 4pm. The man stated that Paula asked him how long it was to the top of the mountain. The man stated that he was slightly concerned because it got to be dusk at 5pm, and then it started to snow.
    Searchers scoured the mountain until weather started to deteriorate, all SAR operations were terminated for 1946.
    On May 26, 1947 there was an article in the Meridian Daily Journal.The article explained that another two-day search for Paula was conducted over 24 square miles. The following statement appeared in the article:
    Among spots investigated by searchers were the Bickford Hollow area where a "strong odor" at first believed to be that of an animal or human body was detected Saturday and the swamp section in Manchester where screams of a young girl were reported on the night that Paula disappeared.
    Law enforcement did have reports of a woman screaming in the swampy area that they were now searching again. Two days of search efforts did not produce positive results. The search was touted as one of the largest ever conducted in the area.
    A Dec 17, 1961 article in the Sunday Herald had an interview with the Vermont State Police still working the Welden case. The article stated that Vermont investigators had come to some definitive conclusions about the Paula Welden case: " Paula was either dead somewhere in the vast whiteness of Glastenbury mountain or she had been carried away and killed." The last portion of that statement has me a bit perplexed: " Carried away and killed."-- By what? A normal sized man would have an extraordinarily difficult time carrying someone down off the mountain, let alone carrying her without being seen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. let me guess had to be bigfoot right?..young girl, picked up by a stranger then dropped off in the middle of nowhere? had to be bigfoot.looking in a swamp that contains swamp gas. had to be bigfoot ( odor )...cops can't find a body. had to be bigfoot.....

      Delete
    2. Thanks for taking the time to post that NC!!

      Delete
    3. You're welcome, brother. And now it's happened again in Horca,Colorado. Tragic.

      Delete
    4. On July 23rd, 19 year old Joe Keller, from Cleveland,TN, took a run in the remote area of Conejos County,CO near the town of Horca. He has been missing ever since, and there have been no clues as to his whereabouts.

      Delete
    5. NC, you're well into this. Thanks for every time you give updates brother, I too am fascinated by it and appreciate every time you post.

      Delete
    6. And it has all the earmarks of the 411 cases. Bradley County has offered the Conejos County Sheriff's department help in the search for this poor kid, and they declined the offer.-Why? Law enforcement are asking the parents not to speak to the public concerning this tragic event.-Why?

      Delete
    7. Christ on a bike... This sh*t is crazy????????????????

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story