Okay, so I saw a reese's monkey, the cowardly Lion, a big poodle face, male genitals, 60's singing sensation Bobby Goldsboro, and a bunch of little tiny faces. Why am I to believe any of those are Bigfoot?
it's faked,doctored evidence and matt you know this. so why do you post this?...and the good dr hoax can type in caps until the cows come home! this is why folks are leaving this blog, the trolls,skeptic's have and always will be here, the all hoaxers all the time have not
Watching DS go out and "look for" Bigfoot is hilarious. He pans his camera around the trees and grass while blurting out "there's one" and "there's another". Of course sometimes he doesn't see all of them until he (or one of his viewers) looks at the video afterwards- you know by adding stuff in.
He`s not the only "researcher" that sees bigfoot behind ever leaf and branch...check out Joe Black aka Scott Carpenter..he who scours his recordings and finds faces from years back that are behind almost every leaf.
Most of those 'faces' are not even worthy to be called pareidolia. Here's a tip for the budding blogsquatcher - if you've got to stand on your head, squint and scan back and forth across the photo to find anything that remotely looks like some kind of facial feature then that probably means there's nothing meaningful in the photo.
I've spoken to DS several times on here, and I'm glad he's in the field trying to find evidence, BUT he has to agree this is not evidence. Drawing pictures on stills does not make it evidence.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
hugga
ReplyDeleteSack
Deleteas tk say's firmly and gently
DeleteOkay, so I saw a reese's monkey, the cowardly Lion, a big poodle face, male genitals, 60's singing sensation Bobby Goldsboro, and a bunch of little tiny faces.
DeleteWhy am I to believe any of those are Bigfoot?
it's faked,doctored evidence and matt you know this. so why do you post this?...and the good dr hoax can type in caps until the cows come home! this is why folks are leaving this blog, the trolls,skeptic's have and always will be here, the all hoaxers all the time have not
ReplyDeleteMatt ?
DeleteMatt K. posted this particular one. He and Shawn split the duties.
DeleteHmmmmmm,I wonder why that branch obscures the subjects face,can anyone guess why?.............
ReplyDeleteBecause the thing is always hiding dumass.
Delete^Wrong pal^ no more guesses for you..........
DeleteDoubt it as most have been fakes. Besides what self-respecting Bigfoot would allow someone that close to take pics?
ReplyDeleteWatching DS go out and "look for" Bigfoot is hilarious. He pans his camera around the trees and grass while blurting out "there's one" and "there's another". Of course sometimes he doesn't see all of them until he (or one of his viewers) looks at the video afterwards- you know by adding stuff in.
ReplyDelete. . . and by God he's going to KEEP filtering until he gets a Sasquatch.
DeleteHe`s not the only "researcher" that sees bigfoot behind ever leaf and branch...check out Joe Black aka Scott Carpenter..he who scours his recordings and finds faces from years back that are behind almost every leaf.
DeleteDoctor Squatch is not the most credible voice in the Bigfoot community today.
ReplyDeleteThat is his pet dog. DS is insane. DS stalked me on YouTube and made it clear to me that he has several screws loose.
ReplyDeleteI can believe it.
DeleteMost of those 'faces' are not even worthy to be called pareidolia. Here's a tip for the budding blogsquatcher - if you've got to stand on your head, squint and scan back and forth across the photo to find anything that remotely looks like some kind of facial feature then that probably means there's nothing meaningful in the photo.
ReplyDeleteJoe F I t z g e r a l d aka Iktomi openly supports DS and communicates with him by private emails.
ReplyDeleteI've spoken to DS several times on here, and I'm glad he's in the field trying to find evidence, BUT he has to agree this is not evidence. Drawing pictures on stills does not make it evidence.
ReplyDelete