Listen to this amazing interview with a woman who had an encounter with 3 Bigfoots


This to Lon Strickler for bringing this incredible interview to our attention. A woman name Alex describes a very unique encounter she had with 3 Bigfoots. Lon describes her sighting via his blog, Phantom and Monsters:

As Alex sat in the four-wheeler, paralyzed from the shock of this encounter, she noticed the 10 ft Bigfoot made a whistling sound. Her dog Zora approached and laid down near the youngest member of the trio. The Bigfoot remarkably reached down and rubbed Zora’s ear. As it turns out, these Bigfoot have previously brought bones of kills to Zora while tied up on the homestead property at night. The young Bigfoot has also been known to ‘draw’ on rocks.




Comments

  1. Uh oh....a 3 way, or is it a hat trick?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 12 feet? Must have a hard time hiding!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bigfoot dont exist. I have no time for these liars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have the time the spend every day of your life here though, right? Anyone would think you need to convince yourself.

      Delete
    2. Iktomi spanks them thoroughly! Always amusing as hell.

      Delete
  4. Looks like pretty dry country for a 12 foot ape to live in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No dont be naive. There are over 1 million 12 foot apes roaming the country that elude detection in every way and constantly evolve to evade any new technology or attempt to gain evidence.

      God damn joe is dumb.

      Delete
    2. Nobody knows how many there are, putting an estimate on numbers of a creature you don't think is credible is mere baiting... One from the JREF cook book I believe?

      I wouldn't say totally eluded detection, tracks & dermals, hairs, audio, footage, thermal... All thee wouldn't exist if that was the case.

      Delete
  5. "The evidence is coming soon folks" - 1970s footer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. they`ll be saying the same in 10 years time

      Delete
  6. "I am an extremely strong skeptic" - todd disotell

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does that mean he lifts weight or has bad b.o.?

      Delete
  7. Yet another example that if you want a very close encounter with the forest giant it pays to be woman with a nice personality. It is also another example that in some cases ( I have heard of several recently ) a forest giant can befriend a canine. I enjoyed this interview and this San Juan River four corners Native reservation area continuous to pump out information that this has and is a hotbed.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seriously believe anything about Bigfoot.

      Delete
    2. Wait - I thought dogs were afraid of Bigfoot. I read right here on this site that Bigfoot would tear dogs apart that were tracking them. According to this woman both statements are wrong. So which is it? Let me guess - It's whatever will serve the Bigfoot advocates the best in advancing the existence of Bigfoot.

      Delete
    3. No attempted aversion of the eyes. No excess saliva. No other traits of false testimony. Good details and a good interviewer stepping her through the event.

      Good find Shawn

      MMC

      Delete
    4. There are a small number of reports of dogs being treated well by Sasquatch... These are just a anecdotes however. In any event, the Sasquatch COULD have ripped the dog apart in an instant... And the dog capitulated in line with innumerable reports.

      Stop trying so hard sweetheart.

      Delete
    5. just more tall tales from a drunk injun

      Delete
    6. I'll add... Many people try and pigeon whole the behaviour of Sasquatch, like that of an animal. More often than not, Sasquatch coming into contact with dogs in wilderness areas would be a situation in which they would have to respond aggressively in order to maintain evasion. In an unthreatening environment, there is nothing to suggest that Sasquatch wouldn't behave the way suggested up top, they are human after all and very much as subsceptible to temperament as anyone else.

      Delete
    7. And that's your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

      Delete
    8. ^ jerk off stuck in his mamas basement. To lazy to even get his own blog going

      Delete
    9. Exactly as I thought - an excuse for every occasion. No matter what the situation there is an explanation. It's easy to do when you have no hard facts about the creature itself or even if it truly exists.

      Talk about trying hard.

      Delete
    10. "... an excuse for every occasion"... Your naivety is nobody else's problem bro. It's interesting how little responsibility such people take for not knowing the subject enough. There are three whole databases of contemporary reports to theorise on, and if something doesn't exist, it doesn't leave physical sign.

      Delete
    11. Well "bro" your naivety in thinking that such a creature exists and not being able to prove it seems to be a problem for you. I know the subject quite well thank you and have come to the logical conclusion that it simply could not escape detection this long. So - Bigfoot can ONLY be the explanation for physical signs left? You do realize us humans can be VERY clever with trickery - yes? There is being naive and there is being gullible - you seem to have mastered both categories.

      Delete
    12. Sigmund Freud postulated that:

      When one tries relentlessly to convince others that a said meaningless question only has one answer then indeed the said person is indeed confused about the question as a whole. Or said person is dealing with deap seated homosexual tendancies.

      You sir make Sigmund freuds case. So the question to you is this:

      Which one is it with you?

      Delete
    13. Having the evidence to base confidence upon, requires a little more than mere naivety... It actually requires a ten year old's knowledge of the subject. I wouldn't be too quick to reel off Freud when you, quite embarrassingly, have a negative proof fallacy at the helm of your plethora of scientific theory face falls.

      It's pretty simple, if relict hominids had evaded detection for so long, we wouldn't have forensic sign of them, we wouldn't have hair fibres, we wouldn't have audio and we wouldn't have footage and we certainly wouldn't have three databases of contemporary reports... All these things wouldn't be the case if something evaded detection as well as one would "prefer". Let's just stretch the boundaries of denial in you for a second, and assume that they do indeed exist, yes? They would naturally have to be the most amazing biological entity on the planet to have existed and survived in the harshest and most uncompromising environment on the planet and done so without being classified to science.... Now, should a world leading geneticist prove that there were relict hominids living on the planet only 150 years ago... Smashing the previously considered time line for such ancestors out of the ball park, what's a 150 years to reports and physical evidence in the present?

      To hoax convincing biological dermals, one would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the same biological idea States and 20 years apart, and then fool multiple forensic experts. I know you are not aware of this, but the three main examples of dermals that I adhere to were verified in the early 1980's when even less was known about biological dermal ridges... It's a leap of faith, dear boy. No, there is being naive and there's being ignorant to express that naivety. Lucky you have people like me to baby sit you, eh?

      A comment regarding psychoanalytics and homosexuality in the midst of an exchange on Sasquatch? Freudian slip, dear boy?

      : )

      Delete
  8. "At the present time, photographic evidence is being suppressed. There is much more research required on the various clans within the habituation area. This is also tribal land...and all respect to the privacy and customs of its resident must be maintained."

    Come on!! One picture !!! This is the problem with this non-sense. It's like kids in a candy store drooling ..and then ..made to leave with not one piece of candy. Sorry I don't buy it!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am 92 years old. I have been waiting, watching for someone, anyone to bring in PROOF that these Bigfoots exist, since the 1960's!

    Pretty soon, I will "Pass Gas", Ops, sorry, "Pass on" Can anybody please find one before I'm gone! Please anybody?
    I am sick and tired of all these "Bigfoot Stories" (Which I now believe are ALL Lies, All of them) and stupid Videos. It is coming readily apparent, that these creatures, DO NOT EXIST!
    You "Bigfoot Researchers" must be a bunch of in-competent fools! You can't find Crap!
    Oh, one more thing. Stick that "Gifting Bowl/Stump" up your arse!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahah!! That was pretty good lol!! I feel your pain !!!

      Delete
  10. Another lying redskin,nothing new here.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yet another entirely unsubstantiated bigfoot story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats like saying the sky is blue. Silly mythical creature believers.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Two cowboys come upon an Indian lying on his stomach with
      his ear to the ground.
      One of the cowboys stops and says to the other, "You see
      that Indian?"
      "Yeah," says the other cowboy.
      "Look," says the first one, "he's listening to the ground.
      He can hear things for miles in any direction."
      Just then the Indian looks up. "Covered wagon," he says,
      "about two miles away. Have two horses, one brown, one white.
      Man, woman, child, household effects in wagon."
      "Incredible!" says the cowboy to his friend. "This Indian
      knows how far away they are, how many horses, what color they
      are, who is in the wagon, and what is in the wagon. Amazing!"
      The Indian looks up and says, "Ran over me about an hour ago...

      Delete
  12. Hello there, im from southwestern new mexico. I have encountered the sabe or saquatch many times down here. If you want to trade stories feel free to ring me. 575-654-1111 brennen burton

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story