College professor is close to proving Bigfoot exists


Folks. What did I tell you? With enough resource poured into research, someone's bound to find something. The biggest evidence are bones -- not the bones of the actual creature, but what the creatures left behind. Mitchel Townsend, a Winlock resident and teacher at Centralia College in Washington said he stumbled upon a stack of bones near near Ryan Lake. What's unusual was that there were huge human-like teeth imprints in the bones! No animal in the area is known to do this. The professor explains:

“I got to looking at the bones and they had been gnawed on by what looked to me to be giant human teeth,” he said.

After two of his students from Lower Columbia College found two more stacks of bones on the south side of Mount St. Helens, he said it became clear the “kill sites” were similar in a variety of ways. The bone stacking technique is specific to a humanoid and was cited as human behavior, he said.

Again, human-like teeth imprints were notched into the bones.

No predator impressions or tool marks were found on the remains, and after consulting with the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Townsend said, all natural predators in the area were ruled out.

According to the profession, more information will be published in a research paper, and he challenges the scientific community to discredit his information. After four years of research, he believes he's close to proving it scientifically:

here
, or you can check out the full story on YakimaHerald here.


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. HAAAA HAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA HAAAAA HAAA!

      JOE IS SO STUPID ,,
      HE THINKS HOMO SAPIEN IS
      "NOT" A PRIMATE!! HA HA
      HAAAAA HAA WHAT A DINGBAT!
      HAA HA!

      Delete
    2. ^ There is only one "HOMO" in that post.

      Delete
    3. Does anyone else get the impression that 12:51 isn't too stable?

      Delete
    4. 12:33... You'd better hope it's BS.

      Delete
    5. Look up Jonny Dagger on YouTube.
      That's the guy.

      Delete
    6. 2:02 look in the mirror ,lol
      : )

      Delete
    7. You could have addressed me as Iktomi, and I'm not the one coming across like I've relapsed on the meds.

      Delete
    8. Have you seen this crackpot's credentials?

      "The 48-year-old Winlock resident calls himself a lifelong hiker and outdoorsman. He already teaches a Continuing Education course on Facebook at the college. He has also studied several science-related fields at several universities in the West Coast, and he possesses a master’s degree in organizational leadership."

      Wow! I wouldn't be too surprised if he is lying about the Master's degree!

      Delete
    9. 4:08 So what! That is some highly desperate shade throwing! It makes you look like a desperate F UP.

      Delete
    10. Right on cue! What's the matter pal, you need a reason to attack his character?

      At least we know he made it through school, unlike you.

      Delete
    11. Exactly IK> , I don't see what the crap is wrong with having a JOB! And furthermore, the troll here has ben slipping severely the last few days. I do believe he's starting to unravel at a very visible rate. Do trolls take stupid pills?

      Delete
    12. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!! I think it might be a lack of pills taken, most likely a relapse for this particular troll, that might be the issue here.

      : )

      Delete
    13. I believe this might be the same lunatic who once had a YouTube channel called "Townsendmedia" where he would periodically post insane rants fueled by his wingnut belief that the CIA and the IRS were monitoring him because of his insider knowledge of various government conspiracies.

      Delete
    14. Yes, yes, yes, yes... Let's see what he's got first. You can call him a lunatic should the forensics he's utilised fail to stand up.

      Delete
    15. I'm sure that his degree in "Organizational Leadership" will be quite helpful to him in his "forensic" analysis!

      Delete
    16. Who cares if the forensics is clean, you seem suitably sweaty... Good.

      Delete
    17. College professor? Just take a look at some of the other courses offered in the "continuing education" program at Centralia College! Basket weaving, knitting, and ballroom dancing! It appears to be the Harvard of Yokelville!

      https://www.centralia.edu/academics/cont-ed/Documents/CE_Brochure.pdf

      Delete
    18. Who cares if the forensics is clean... Most journalists don't have scientific credentials, if they're consulting the experts in the work they're putting together, it stands up until people like you can show otherwise.

      Keep sweating.

      : )

      Delete
    19. Why does it smell so sweaty in here today? ;)

      Delete
    20. It matters because from the very outset, people like you are pimping this clown as something that he's not -- a college professor. If Joeholi wanted to offer a course in this program called "Internet Trolling 101" (that's the only subject in which he has any expertise!), he could easily do so and declare himself to be a "College Professor"!

      Delete
    21. ... I'm getting a hint of bums too. Donald isn't about is he?

      Delete
    22. 6:09... I've actually made no claims as to the extent of his credentials, if he's got science on his side when it's out there then there's pretty much nothing you can do but cry, cry, cry me a river.

      : )

      Delete
    23. Oh no. Another meltdown by Joe.

      Delete
    24. Haha! Check the floor for loose sequins. Likely DC skulking in the shadows as well.

      Delete
    25. So you think it's a hilarious insult to DC when someone makes jokes about him being a transgendered person? Do you laugh at similar homophobic jokes made about Eva? Should Eva be ashamed of being transgendered?

      Delete
    26. I'm sorry psycho, what reference was there to DC being transgender?

      Delete
    27. What was so funny about the joke then?

      Delete
    28. The fact that Danny is most certainly skulking in the shadows... Where was the reference to transgender?

      Delete
    29. The fact that you pretend to care

      Delete
    30. ^ for 6:29 who is flapping like a turkey

      Delete
    31. Typical act of a two faced homophobe -- laughing at a joke at the expense of transgendered people (one of the groups of people most discriminated against in society) and then denying it in a cowardly fashion. I hope poor Eva understands what a backstabbing fake friend you are!

      Delete
    32. Yes, yes, yes... Where was the transgender reference? I think you're a little tapped aren't you?

      Delete
    33. Yes, definitely unravelling there jaws. (yes you are that obvious) And anything to avoid talking about the recent events- with bite marks and papers being written and all.

      Delete
    34. They're little cowards that aren't even here for the subject matter... They breed hate. They are the embodiment of everything people should not lower themselves at becoming.

      These people at least serve the purpose of feeling better about oneself.

      Delete
    35. Ha ha, someone made a lame joke about DC wearing a sequined dress and Joetomi thought it was oh so funny. I wonder how Eva feels about that!

      Delete
    36. Actually, Danny has had this thing of late about me apparently "driving my friends away"... It's more than likely him, but expect his alter ego Donald to be around soon.

      Delete
    37. ^ The foreskin rolls...back n` forth,back n` forth ^

      But not much is ever forth-cumming.

      Delete
    38. These things pop into your head, Burger King.

      Delete
    39. Dan, DC, Haints ------ is a vigina coward.

      More importantly, He's just irrelavent!
      Useless as used toilet paper!

      Whats up my brother Iktomi?

      Delete
    40. useless idiots. you still lost joe. go talk to yourself and troll for online stalking victims elsewhere.

      Delete
    41. YOUR THE USELESS iDIOT.

      HAS ANYONE TOLD YOU THAT WEE HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSIVE END TO THE RESEARCH AND THE MATTER IS SETTLED????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

      WE ARE HERE TRYING TO LEARN, UNDERSTAND, AND SHARE IDEAS.

      You are nothing but a coward little trouble maker. Because you have no possibility of proving your side of this argument (whatsoever), you must be a complete moron to come and piss in peoples cheerios.

      NO POSSIBILITY OF WINNING YOUR ARGUMENT MORON ------------------------------

      TOO MANY HERE HAVE SEEN WITH THERE OWN EYES!

      YOUR CRYING MEANS NOTHING!!!!!!!!


      ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID????

      ARE WE GOING TO LISTEN TO AN ANONA VIGINA NAMED DAN, OR SEEK TO LEARN AND UNDERSTAND WHAT WE HAVE SEEN WITH OUR OWN EYES???????????????

      Delete
    42. Sorry I missed that.

      Can you type louder? And maybe a bit more angry?

      Delete
    43. Oh and I am not Dan.

      What is your obsession with him?

      Delete
    44. Obvious mistake when you have to deal with coward anona viginas with big mouths and no brains or ass to back it up!

      So theres two in the bag!

      GET IN THE BAG YOU SKEPTARD TROLL!

      POKE, POKE POKE!

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Another gay slight from Dan!

      Ban Dan for Homophobia!

      Delete
  3. Oh good,this sounds like the proof nobody will be able to ignore,i would like to know how big the teeth are xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From what I can gather they are exactly the same size as Maurice Gibbs.And its common knowledge that the bee Gees have a holiday home in that area

      Delete
    2. Ha ha ha ha!!!

      Eva... You watch my darling, the Panicin' Skywalkers will be out in there droves looking for every angle imaginable to discredit the person putting the paper together, and find this reason enough to dismiss the data.

      I can wait for the smelly, sweaty, fat boys' reaction.

      Delete
    3. http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/livenews/3168318-8/proof-of-bigfoot-is-in-the-bones-winlock

      Delete
    4. "Townsend’s information will be published in a research paper, and he challenges the scientific community to discredit his information. He said the four-year project helped solve the mystery because the focus was based on forensic evidence. The information used was also heavily based on comparison proof from the top scientists in the world.

      “The evidence stands on its own, you prove the evidence wrong,” he said, adding that the bones would be made available for examination to any scientist who wanted to examine the remains. “. We’ve put thousands of hours in this. We just want to give this to the world and the scientific community free of charge to add to the scientific body of knowledge.”

      Very exciting stuff.

      Delete
    5. Hello Elvis and Iktomi,

      I had a pet mouse called Elvis,he didn't live very long though :(.................he got caught in a trap :) xx

      Delete
    6. The bite ratio is calculated at 2 and a half times wider than that of a normal human, Eva.

      Delete
    7. Good to see good people post, NC! Hope you are well buddy.

      Delete
    8. 19 year old Kyran Young is hiking the 2,663 mile long Pacific Crest Trail in order to raise money for the mountain gorilla, which is on the verge of extinction. He will be blogging his adventure on GorillaWalker.com. Good for him!

      Delete
    9. ^ Head is usually "up" somebody anus...he likes the aroma as it reminds him of his mother.

      Delete
    10. ^ Joe is in his head for life. It's the complete owning of a individual.

      Delete
    11. Those who prefer to go by "Anonymous" must surely have an identity problem. This forum would benefit greatly if that moniker did not exist.
      On the matter in front of us, DNA matching ftom the saliva on the bones would help in identifying the many different creatures that sampled them. Teeth impressions, unless in the bones themselves offer nothing but speculation. Gigantapithicus (sp?) is an enigma that will soon be elevated from myth as to whether it still walks among us.
      Let's stop acting like children. Please.

      Delete
  4. So the forest giants are bone knawers and may have given themselves away with such activity. I much look forward to the paper. One facebook friend of Mitches warned him to be taken apart and personally attacked due to the nature of the project. I concur. Forensics will not lie and what he has told us of the project so far is indeed most promising.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This guy wouldn't know a porcupine if it stuck him right in the cheek.

      Delete
    2. Very good Iktomi. Hope same for you. I am a bone knawer myself. Sweetest part of the meat is next to the bone. Seems I am in good company.

      You are right NC. 2 and half time our teeth if they can prove it is a game changer. Will see when paper comes out. First I have heard of this project. Kudos to them for keeping it under wrap so far.
      Got to go and lead a poker run to raise money for cancer in our county.
      Chuck

      Delete
    3. Ya, and Danilla doesn't know shit from wild honey.

      Hey Dan, do you have that typical wide eye spacing from the alcohol fetal syndrome. I bet if we saw a pic of you, you could tell right off that your a little screwy. I'm sorry your mom drank while she was pregnant with ya Dan. But just because you got a raw deal in life, doesn't meen that you should go around being a giant VAGINA to others. It's not there fault your so screwed up! like I said, Leave your number Dan. If anything good like a Bigfoot hand comes along, I'll call and let you know. That way, you don't need to hang around and look like such a retarded crybaby!

      Delete
  5. How is it we can find other animal bones yet not any from bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is widely theorised that they bury their dead, in line with classified hominids. If this is the case, it shows a level of culture, which in turn shows a level of intelligence that renders them far cleverer in evasion than animals.

      Delete
    2. Yet we have no evidence that they bury their dead, or that there are even dead to be buried, or that there are bigfoots to do the burying. Stop making up excuses for the lack of evidence.

      Delete
    3. We in fact have physical evidence of an unclassified bipedal primate, twice the size of normal human primates. We also have almost 150 years of giant skeletal remains found across the U.S. This is in line with native cultures such as the Cherokee that have maintained in their traditions that they have over time shared burial mounds with Sasquatch.

      My "excuses" are in fact your shortcomings on knowing the subject matter sufficiently... Sorry kid, you're learning at least.

      Delete
    4. Oh no. A copy and paste meltdown in progress. You ok, sport?

      Delete
    5. I hear you, Joe. It's difficult living in a world of intellectual inferiors, isn't it, kiddo.

      Delete
    6. I'm not the one regularly looking for a counter argument darling, I wonder where that puts you?

      Delete
    7. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Did Dan just write a joke about intellectual inferiors, ha ha ha ha ha ha

      IQ TEST CHALLENGE BITCH --------------------------------------- iF i DON'T SMOKE YOU BY A MINIMUM OF 20 POINTS, i'LL LEAVE FOREVER -------- HA HA HA HA HA HA

      It will be more like 40 or 50, ha ha ha ha

      The Guy with brain damage is making a funny, ha ha ha haha ha hah a hahaha ah ha aha hahahh ahah hahahahah ah ah a ha hahahaha.

      Holly crap you are a dipshit!

      Delete
    8. That's a lot of "ha"s! Did the h and a keys get stick on?

      Delete
    9. Well, the ahhh, ahhh, ahhhh aaaahhhhhhhh!! is what gets stuck on around here. Oh yeah.

      Delete
  6. "... he challenges the scientific community to discredit his information..." LOL. Classic words of either a crackpot or a hoaxer. No one with any scientific credibility says something like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He challenges the scientific community to evaluate his work and that's a sign of hoaxing?

      Where have all the adults gone?

      Delete
    2. He didn't say I want the scientific community to evaluate his work. That's perfectly normal in science. What he said is that he challenges the scientific community to discredit his work. That's different. That is a perfect set up for presenting a conclusion that was never proved in the first place but can't be disproven, there by he gets to continue making the claim.

      Delete
    3. To discredit, you would be required to evaluate his findings. Making claims about his credentials and character, which is what will more than likely happen as opposed to addressing his work, is what is expected from everyone, nobody more so than him.

      Circular logic, you haven't even the data in front of you yet.

      Delete
    4. You,iktomi,know absolutely NOTHING about what this guy has researched aside from what you`ve read here...so shut the feck up...until you have studied, in depth,his reports and findings you are no more entitled to comment than anybody else...you`re opinion is merely that,an opinion...so shut up with your nonsense.

      Delete
    5. Nice straw man, Joe. Try to keep up, son.

      Delete
    6. Make me chump. I've made no assumptions about how solid his data is, merely put hateful little psychos like you in your places for attacking his character before his work is out there.

      Don't like it? What you gonna do about it?

      Delete
    7. All the superfriends on here are so excited about the promise of his research when you haven't seen the data either. Are you going to treat his research fairly or jump to a bunch of conclusions that support your belief? Your daily reminder. You're welcome, son.

      Delete
    8. Joe, calm down, kiddo. You don't need to go into another meltdown.

      Delete
    9. No...YOU are on one of your usual rides whereby you pretend to know what this guy is talking about..you`ve read perhaps a few lines posted on a blog and then try to shove it as the ultimate proof down peoples throats...you`re a charlatan of the highest order...and know nothing of bigfoot aside from your petty trips into the ethersphere.

      Take the dick out of your arse and use it as a plug for your gob...you know nothing of bigfoot or any other creature of the field.

      Delete
    10. 7:20, 7:21... You're on a Bigfoot blog remember. Naturally people are gonna get excited about a study of potentially forensically verified evidence. What I'm excited for is having another source to cause you to pull your hair out over. Forensics is pretty difficult to hoax, you know this already from the links I've posted you, right?

      You're a little lost for an indentity it seems? Living your life hating on the Internet will do that to a young man, for sure.

      Delete
    11. Right. We're on a bigfoot blog. I forgot. I guess my expectations were a bit off. I expect people to practice great critical thinking skills and evaluate scientific data fairly. Instead, we should call this for what it really is, an entertainment blog.

      Delete
    12. 7:24... What you so angry about sweetheart? You worried I'm gonna have another source to mind bend you over? You'd better hope and pray this guy hasn't got the goods, but I'll reiterate; forensics is hard to hoax.

      : p

      Delete
    13. I hate nobody...in fact I visit this site to laugh at you...you`re a joke and a figure of fun here.

      But to the point...yes,I`m mighty glad to read that there is a source of potential validation regarding a creature out in the woods...but you`re gushing nonsense is foolish in the extreme...you`ve pushed so many hoaxes and gushed over so much non-proof that to try to shove something that has been posted here for less than a day and you know NOTHING of,is a nonsense...you`re a foolish and ignorant prick and I doubt you are even capable of taking a trip to your local park before becoming breathless.

      Delete
    14. How would YOU know anything about "forensics" ?

      You don`t...but are relying on something you`ve read...and as we all know,you`ve fallen prey to so many false dawns that you ought to have learned to tread a little more carefully...you don`t...and that is the mark of an ignorant fool.

      Now,I`m off to a football match.

      Delete
    15. Oh I think your hate is genuine darling, and pretty much all you've got. For someone who's supposed to be laughing, you really don't read like you're a happy bunny.

      You are of course invited to list the hoaxes I've supported and these "non-proofs", whatever they are, but for someone who's best argument is about a trolley, then I'm not about to start holding my breath.

      What's the matter darling, you getting agitated? Knowing that I'll have another source of forensic evidence to remind you of, I would be too.

      : p

      Delete
    16. Joe, maybe he isn't hoaxing. Maybe he's just incorrectly drawing conclusions. Maybe he's right. We don't know without the data. But will you take an honest look at his evidence and acknowledge if it is insufficient? Can you do that?

      Delete
    17. Dan, put in a fresh tampon, your bleeding all over the place. Your just a nasty little bitch aren't you. How many times do I have to tell ya retard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commies think it's there business to tell others what to think and believe.

      You a commy DAN? Exposed to the educational brainwashing of the Progressive elite! ha ha ha ha

      Boo!

      Delete
    18. pricktomi at 7:45

      Let`s start with just yesterday and your foolish belief in the "Smithsonian Giant Bones" HOAX...one that has been known about for around 3,maybe 4 months ...that`s merely a few hours ago and indication,as ever,of your pathetic inability to read and discern the facts...of which in this particular instance you failed miserably...another false dawn that rained on you and I can`t be bothered to go back any further as your posts are riddled with suppositions and falsehoods as is plainly seen by everybody.

      Facts are a thing you`re not fully conversant with,usually merely supplying your own unfounded suppositions and guesswork based upon wishful thinking.

      As for "hate" ? why would anybody feel they need to waste emotion on an unknown moron on a site dedicated to falsehoods and fantasies ? ...much to your dismay I imagine,I actually DO visit here for the laughter to bring to this forum...you truly are a figure of FUN.

      Delete
    19. Did Iktomi actually think that the article about the Supreme Court ordering the Smithsonian to release records of giant skeletons was real?

      Delete
    20. More clippings from your Iktomi scrapbook? How sweet, how quaint! Only problem is that nobody ever reads your retarded proclamations of loooooove.

      Delete
    21. ^ a clipping wasn`t necessary...it is easily recalled from yesterdays iktomi breakdown...sorry your hero has been smoked ag`in !!! ...but what do you expect from you ignoramus hero ?

      And as for reading the post ?

      YOU certainly do and it grates for you doesn`t it ?

      ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      LMFAO

      Delete
    22. "In the monuments of antiquity found throughout North America, in camp and village sites, graves, mounds, ruins, and scattered works of art, the origin and development of art in savage and barbaric life may be satisfactorily studied. Incidentally, too, hints of customs may be discovered, but outside of this, the discoveries made have often been illegitimately used, especially for the purpose of connecting the tribes of North America with peoples or so-called races of antiquity in other portions of the world. A brief review of some conclusions that must be accepted in the present status of the science will exhibit the futility of these attempts."
      - J W Powell

      http://www.scienceviews.com/lostcivilizations/powelldoctrine.html

      The discovery of human antiquity was a major achievement of science in the middle of the 19th century, and the foundation of scientific paleoanthropology. The antiquity of man, human antiquity, or in simpler language the age of the human race, are names given to the series of scientific debates it involved, which with modifications continue in the 21st century. These debates have clarified and given scientific evidence, from a number of disciplines, towards solving the basic question of dating the first human being. A key date was the 1859 re-evaluation of archaeological evidence that had been published 12 years earlier by Boucher de Perthes. It was then widely accepted, as validating the suggestion that man was much older than previously been believed, for example than the 6,000 years implied by some traditional chronologies. In 1863 T. H. Huxley argued that man was an evolved species; and in 1864 Alfred Russel Wallace combined natural selection with the issue of antiquity. The arguments from science for what was then called the "great antiquity of man" became convincing to most scientists, over the following decade. The separate debate on the antiquity of man had in effect merged into the larger one on evolution, being simply a chronological aspect. One of the cornerstones of the Smithsonian Institute was the theory of evolution/natural selection, and that in a nutshell says we keep getting bigger and smarter over time. This means that you can't be having 7-10 foot giant skeletons being found everywhere over the US in ellaborate mound systems and argue the case.

      So you see my darling, you have written confirmation from the anthropological authority of the day that no giant bones will be endorsed. This is no hoax, because you can't hoax written statements. Would you now like me to proceed to post you the actual journals by the Smithsonian? Lastly... Posting a spoof link that I've never used, doesn't even begin to getting around to explaining away these journals. You make having this ego easy.

      Delete
    23. Kiddo, I want to see a giant skeleton. Where is one being stored?

      Delete
    24. The Smithsonian has many, many, many miles worth of storage vaults that are scattered all across the United States. Where they are amongst all that is anyone's guess.

      Delete
    25. Evolution does not claim that any life form keeps getting "bigger and smarter over time." It simply states that life forms change to adapt to their environments -- that could mean that life becomes smaller or dumber if the change causes it to be better adapted to a certain environment.

      Delete
    26. Maybe so... Put yourself in the mind of a scientist from the 1800's though.

      Delete
    27. A scientist in the late 19th Century (similar to the early 21st Century) would be dismayed at the number of shysters and frauds who, among other misdeeds, reject science and attempt to use obvious hoaxes to support a fairy tale bible story of giants. It's natural that the 19th Century scientist would publicly warn others of the issue. If there were some huge conspiracy, I would think that the scientist would avoid making public statements declaring his intention to cover up evidence.

      Delete
    28. Yet we have it in writing... Pretty much as futile an argument as you can get. Scientists are not always morally superior to other people around the world; and to suggests otherwise is an appeal to authority fallacy. You wouldn't think we would have scientists in the late 21st century being dishonest either, yet we have examples of them manipulating peer review processes and presenting it as solid science to the public.

      Were three generations of scientists all concerned with propping up Biblical legends? Quite a leap of FAITH there, dear boy?

      : )

      Delete
  7. He's teaching a course about this:

    (from the Centralia College Continuing Ed catalog... in the "Personal Enrichment" category:

    Course Title: New Bigfoot Solved
    Description:
    Proving the legal and scientific cases for a new giant ape species in
    the Pacific Northwest. This course will prove the existence of Bigfoot
    beyond a reasonable doubt. With newly discovered forensic dental
    evidence and a very large collection of contemporary science, this
    course will create the atmosphere for a scientific inquiry under
    courtroom conditions. Students will become jurists in the search
    for truth by maintaining a unique courtroom “Scientific Inquiry”
    Evidence Assessment Instrument from which they will render a
    verdict. Instructor Mitchel Townsend

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evidence to prove the scientific discovery of the age and this course shares a page in the catalog with a class on belly dancing.

      Delete
    2. Yah, Dan is taking the belly dancing class with Rictor!

      Delete
    3. WOW!!!!!!!

      Where can I send my money to this learned man?

      Delete
    4. pricktomi has been smoked,again

      Delete
    5. ^^^ HE MEANS HE GAVE IKTOMI A BLOWJOB.

      Delete
    6. Sorry I missed that.

      Can you type louder? And maybe a bit more angry?

      Delete
    7. Well, thats because your a retard, like a told ya.
      Your really having comprehention problems!

      Delete
    8. ^ the comprehension difficulties are all entirely yours ...what is more,you know it but are desperately seeking a swerve manoeuvre from your own problems

      Delete
  8. Well, Since my baby left me, ive found a new place to dwell etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its down at the end of lonely street, please excuse me while I kiss the sky etc.

      Delete
  9. Unless you can provide the specimen that made the teeth marks, science will dismiss this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But footers will still claim it.

      Delete
    2. They claim many things but it doesn`t add up to more than another wet dream.

      Delete
  10. pricktomi - smoked ag`in !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dan worshiping at the Falic alter of IKTOMIS PENIS.

      Little mouse balls wishing, no praying for normal size genatalia!

      Delete
    2. ^ Try learning to spell

      or is your problem due to having a penis in your mouth ?

      it is a typically male problem ... one of trying two tasks at once and failing ...keep sucking the dick , at least that way you`ll be giving a little satisfaction to others

      Delete
  11. A course about an animal bone that an imaginary creature allegedly chomped on that will prove the existence of that imaginary creature.

    Blue bags, fake Indians, now this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ where IS the fake Indian that was here for a day or so posting fake tribal inanities ?

      Sitting in pricktomi`s bedroom.

      Delete
  12. If Bigfoot ain't real, Jesus ain't real, U ain't real

    ReplyDelete
  13. There will be no paper. There is no formal forensic wildlife odontology analysis. There is only the hot air of the newspaper article, and obviously the Herald did not vet this character, an amateur, being labeled as a "college professor." - being labeled as such may cost him the position of teaching a free, continuing education weekend class at Centralia Community College. The bite mark by bigfoot theory has merit, however it is really unfortunate that such an amateur has gotten hold of the case.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If some of you people don't believe in these creatures get the fuck off this webpage and troll someone else!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. It has become impossible to have an intelligent conversation about anything on this site. The incessant, moronic, idiotic, childish posts here have made this place unbearable. I, for one, do not know if this creature exists. I have been interested in this subject since I was a child and appreciate the opportunity to discuss the evidence, or the lack of, with others like adults. Seems there's an infiltration of adolescents that love to post childish and sexual insults since they have nothing intelligent to, add to the conversation. Please take your arses to the teen sex chat sites please.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?