Todd Standing, Les Stroud, Jeff Meldrum, Ron Morehead & Others Debate Bigfoot Population
Johnny Manson, the host of the annual Sasquatch Summit in Washington State released this previously unseen footage of the panel debating the population size of bigfoot.
Tierd
ReplyDeleteAll Bafoons, all of them! First this suckers!
ReplyDelete^not first
DeleteCrickets!
ReplyDeleteI don't need no stinking PHD to see that these guys, with little to no definitive data, and. . . . NO specimen, have no clue what they are talking about!
ReplyDeleteThey are just theorizing dumbass!
DeleteThey are theorizing out of their asses - every single one of them.
DeleteVery correct 3:02. Good work. You smoked 12:26 real good!
DeleteI agree they are theorizing. As one of the panelists commented, one data that makes some believe their numbers might be decreasing is the numbers of reported sightings are decreasing.
DeleteBut somehow they missed the counter argument for that, that in recent decades people have had more avenues to report sightings due to the Internet, and many of the reported sightings were old, even reported decades after the encounters happened, but the numbers of these old sightings people report might by drying up, and this might be the reason we're getting fewer reports of sightings.
I think their population is increasing because they are being reported in areas where they previously were not.
Was going to comment earlier but the tax man is waiting.
DeleteI know not from what info they say the reported sightings is down, but they are up and they are up substantially as more and more people are become less afraid to report what they are seeing. There are more sites and avenues for them to report to.
Now DOVER, I could not agree with you more. They are being reported in areas previously not. They have become more embolden towards humans, maybe because they are not as afraid of being shot at anymore, or they have just found it is so much easier getting food being in closer approximation to humans and the nighttime is their ally.
When one knocks on my window here in farm country and leaves me a gift 6 months later of some dried out field corn in an area of few reports in the past, but in the last five years they are coming in hot and heavy here, assuming their numbers are increasing is not to much of a stretch.
Chuck
Chuck, I had read sighting reports had declined before, and I just did a search and found an article on it. It states,
Delete"Are bigfoot sightings really dropping? It certainly looks like as though the number of Bigfoot sightings are dropping. To sum up the year of 2014 in Bigfoot sightings, Citylab put together a list, courtesy of Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO), which has been investigating and recording encounters since 1921.
According to Citylab, sightings have been in decline after reaching their peak between 2000 and 2009. Pennsylvania and Washington lead the chart, each with 4 sightings, followed by Virginia, Illinois, Ohio, Texas, Minnesota, Kentucky, and Georgia (8). At the same time, reports are entered on the BFRO website on a regular basis (9). Why the contradiction?
http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2015/01/bigfoot-sightings-decline/
Now, a likely problem with this is I think they only surveyed BFRO reports, although every year there are more and more organizations being formed that take sighting reports and should chip away at BFRO reports.
The article says the BFRO has been investigating sighting reports since 1921???? It must mean they have been cataloging some old reports, and the study probably only used BFRO info.
I read every new report on Bfro. There are usually 15 to 20 new ones published every month. For every one they publish 10 others do not get published, mostly because they just do not have the personal to investigate what is reported to them.
DeleteI do not know who Citylab is nor do I care, but their information is extremely bogus.
I wish this field had an organization as effecient thorough and good as Mufon is to investigate darn near everything that comes there way, to date over 70,000 thousand cases and as many people as they have they are still overwhelmed.
Oh well, I know what is going on and I am sure you do also.
Chuck
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteChuck, Dr. Meldum gives a low estimate of the numbers of sasquatches. Washington state has the most reported sightings, and he estimates there are 60 to 100 sasquatches in the whole state, and 2,000 to 3,000 in all of North America.
Deletehttp://www.tri-cityherald.com/2015/01/29/3385222_idaho-professor-tells-badger-club.html?rh=1
You commented that for everyone published by BFRO 10 go unpublished due to lack of personal to investigate them. It's impossible to know, but I've read one estimate that for every encounter reported, 100 encounters might go unreported. Again, there is no way of knowing how many go unreported, but I feel their populations are growing.
I don't see a lot of major reasons for their populations to decline. I think loss of habitat is not as great a factor. Some factors hurting their populations could be disease as they come in contact with humans, rummaging through our garbage.
DeleteI also wonder if they are violent toward one another. They have been observed fighting.
They also seem to have a low birth rate due to studies of footprints left by family groups over periods of years, having one new child about every five years, and their infant mortality is an unknown.
As per the thread that got moderated on ISF last night. Do you JREF footers think Alaskabushpilot's rotten teeth happened because he pretended to be a professional fighter who fought 2 weight classes above his weight ?
ReplyDelete....And do you shit for brains take up for him like he's your husband because you're afraid to be kicked out of the pretend skeptic herd ?
I'm a skeptic....I'm not sure what you're talking about, but I'm flattered you think about us.
DeleteWhy don't you head on over there and voice your concerns? I'm sure they would be happy to discuss it with you.
DeleteThere are more bigfeet than you can shake a stick at and if you did shake a stick at one it would snatch that stick and stick it up your taterh0le. :) xx
ReplyDeleteLOL!! Eva :)
DeleteYou is being a bad bad girl. Go to your room!
DeleteHAHAHAHAHA!! So naughty yet so hilarious!
DeleteChick, Are you the Girl on Farmers only, or the Cow?
DeleteI have an idea lets debate something about nothing...FFS!
ReplyDeleteI like turtles,, Also!
DeleteListen to how much more intelligent those people sounded than the skeptard troll StankApe.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to like skeptics, I for one welcome you...
DeleteAnonymous yu are a jerk and I hope when you run into a big foot, he knocks the shit out of you.
DeleteWhy don't these stupid assholes get off their fat asses and get out in the field and interact instead of running their mouths about shit they know little about.
ReplyDeleteBecause getting out into the field has produced so much!
DeleteTru, dat. Fifteen minutes of pulling made-up Bigfoot information out of your yazz produces more data than fifteen years in the field.
DeleteTodd Standing who wears fake costumes and probably never saw a bigfoot in his life knows all there is to know about bigfootin' and stuff.
ReplyDeleteGo Todd!
Todd Standing's reputation was completely destroyed on the FINDING BIGFOOT show.
DeleteThat Team made Todd look like a fool!
he wanted Fame but got smoked!
Obviously you don't watch finding Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteFinding Bigfoot and in particular Cliff Barakman aided a great deal in the destruction of Standing's reputation. The term "muppet" often used by critics to describe the sasquatch faces video taped by Standing originated from Barakman.
DeleteThe Bigfoot claim that they are not endangered. They just want USFS Archeologist Kathy Strain to stop shooting at them, because it really pisses them off.
ReplyDeleteStanding is full of it that's obvious. What IN THE HELL is Meldrum and Les Stroud doing in the same room with this loser? The brfo not having the personel to investigate reports is because they are an old boys club. In other words, only a few are worthy of being a member of this piss poor excuse for a investigative organization. Todd Standingdong
ReplyDeleteClassic disinformation talking about bigfoot habitats decreasing. Bigfoot is not of this world and these people don't want people to know the truth.
ReplyDeleteGreat site. I have now started my own analysis of the data being presented by various groups. If we look at most animal populations it can be concluded that they do indeed live where humans are. On the outskirts of major cities even as they are a good source of easy food for a foraging animal.
ReplyDeleteFor those saying there is NO species given the vast expanse of North American Forest especially up here in Canada where I live is like looking up at the stars on a cloudless night seeing the milky way galaxy and saying "there is no life in the universe other than our own". In my opinion a very narrow minded view, however as of yet we do not know for sure. My own view is that there is more advanced and less advanced species in the universe. You see we only measure the possible existence of life as we know it. Yet the possibilities are endless. Why does an extraterrestrial have to breath oxygen or need the sun (like us). Perhaps their science is so far advanced we cannot even perceive it yet. Looking beyond the obvious is the only way to view the universe. Space is vast and there is a lot we do not know. So too are our forests. Can native people and a host of others who claim to have seen something humanoid for centuries all be wrong? People who live from the land? I doubt it. Probabilities alone state that your paths will cross at some point. Not very often which is what most sightings are. They are chance or extremely lucky sightings. I live in the woods. I know black bears, coyotes, racoons, owls, wild turkey's, deer and a host of other wild animals live all around me. I hear them, see their tracks on my own property, see their droppings, yet I can count the number of times on one hand that I have seen them. Mostly wild turkey's and only in the time of year when they know that they cannot be hunted. As for the others. Not very often. Never seen a bear. I walk these woods all the time folks. Every day. Yet nothing. However I know they were there. I know how to read fresh tracks. Would it be that hard for a large humanoid species to avoid detection in the vast wilderness of the North American western mountain areas? Hell no. We have no idea how smart they are either. They might be smarter than us for all we know. Could I avoid you in the woods? Especially if you knew nothing about being in the woods? Of course. It would be child's play. I could probably make it so that you would never even find my tracks. Even the people trying to find them would have a hard time. I have seen enough evidence of something humanoid to say they are all fake. No something is making tracks off the beaten path. Something is breaking trees and leaving signs. I have decided to join the search. Not because I am crazy but because I choose to believe based on my knowledge and research of the forests of Canada that something is there.