Step 1: Pick any drone and any camera. Step 2: Fly it around and take pictures. Step 3: Don't find Bigfoot Step 4: Photoshop a monkey picture into one of your photos. Step 5: Fool no one.
Step 1: Pick any Bigfoot blog. Step 2: Float around making snide, ignorant, uneducated remarks. Step 3: Don't find an original argument. Step 4: Suggest you're here for any other reason than fear of what others think and things that are not under your control. Step 5: Fool no one.
How can they advise on the "right" camera and drone setup to use (to find a Bigfoot or other elusive creature) if it has never been successfully done before?
Ummmmm... Because they've worked finding terrorists/insurgents (who are elusive) and have also worked finding lost peoples (who are elusive geographically).
Yes... For ten thousand years, multiple cultures seperated by geographical divide, cultures who have not found eachothers customs desirable, are all in fact a part of the same secret society of gorilla suit wearing tricksters who jump out and say "boo" to people where there are more hunters on the planet, spanning from a time when natives didn't know what an ape looked like.
many...many...posts and videos about using drones to find bigfoot for over a couple years now... but still no actual footage. just more videos about "which drone?" or "help me fund my drone project." enough already, where are the actual results?
I would agree to an extent. There's been a few videos posted around here with them burning around... Not anywhere near enough though to get results on one of the most elusive creatures on the planet.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Robert "The Duchess" Lindsay says that he is sick and tired of changing Dovers nasty man diapers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteStep 1: Pick any drone and any camera.
ReplyDeleteStep 2: Fly it around and take pictures.
Step 3: Don't find Bigfoot
Step 4: Photoshop a monkey picture into one of your photos.
Step 5: Fool no one.
Must have fooled you a couple times since your panties are all wadded up. Crybaby!
DeleteStep 1: Pick any Bigfoot blog.
DeleteStep 2: Float around making snide, ignorant, uneducated remarks.
Step 3: Don't find an original argument.
Step 4: Suggest you're here for any other reason than fear of what others think and things that are not under your control.
Step 5: Fool no one.
So show us what you got, Joe? Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada. Nothing but a mouth full of feces.
DeleteDermals, audio of an unknown primate, unknown primate hair, anthroplogical & archeological papers on skulls & giant skeletal remains, footage... Stuff like that?
DeleteLike I said before... The only "zero, zip, nada" is between those ears of yours.
Yea Bill Brock is a deadhead come to Chicago this summer!
ReplyDeleteHow can they advise on the "right" camera and drone setup to use (to find a Bigfoot or other elusive creature) if it has never been successfully done before?
ReplyDeleteUmmmmm... Because they've worked finding terrorists/insurgents (who are elusive) and have also worked finding lost peoples (who are elusive geographically).
Delete21st century technology meets 20th century myth.
ReplyDelete21st century technology meets ten thousand year old culturally & contemporary agknowledged hominid.
DeleteWith regards to this social blog and you... 21st century technology meets 15th century intellectual throw back.
But the only ones acknowledging it are the mentally unstable, the delusional and grifters and con artists.
DeleteYes... For ten thousand years, multiple cultures seperated by geographical divide, cultures who have not found eachothers customs desirable, are all in fact a part of the same secret society of gorilla suit wearing tricksters who jump out and say "boo" to people where there are more hunters on the planet, spanning from a time when natives didn't know what an ape looked like.
DeleteKeep up the good work.
many...many...posts and videos about using drones to find bigfoot for over a couple years now... but still no actual footage. just more videos about "which drone?" or "help me fund my drone project." enough already, where are the actual results?
ReplyDeleteI would agree to an extent. There's been a few videos posted around here with them burning around... Not anywhere near enough though to get results on one of the most elusive creatures on the planet.
DeleteThis is the guy hoaxed by a child.
ReplyDelete