Possible Bigfoot Photograph From Ohio
 |
| Credit: Ohio Bigfoot Conference |
The Ohio Bigfoot Conference page recently shared this photograph from Coshocton County, Ohio. Is it Bigfoot? They're not sure either. "The person who sent it has no clue what it is or who it is?," the page posted. Check out the uncropped photograph below:
 |
| Bigfoot or Hunter? |
Peace!
ReplyDeleteAmazing how even when the rest of the photo is clear only the BF is not... this proves it... it must be real :)
DeleteI like this Captcha... they are easy, and I really like helping google figure out your home address for Street View. I hope you realize that is what they are doing with those right?! They crowd source it via these captcha to identify home addresses for street view when their image recognition software can't!
Delete5:29... You'd be the only one claiming that son.
DeleteI just wanna know who shot their load on the camera lens ? How convenient.
DeleteI like turtles
DeleteI like penguins.
DeleteI like ponies.
DeleteI give the wrong captcha answer when I know google is trying to figure out what it says.
DeleteGee they don't think that it is a hunter with his BOW blacked the HELL OUT! Maybe they got the picture from the freedom of information ACT/request Cause aren't they the ones who black shit out? Get real people and "no" evidence people putting this B.S. up on this supposed "REAL BIGFOOT" blog-post!
DeleteIt' blurred because it's a Bigfoot hauling a cow away in a hurry!
DeleteOf course it's a bigfoot. Bigfoot only exists as a blurry image.
ReplyDeleteIt in fact exists in the physical, biological and anecdotal evidence, as well as your very real concerns on what's out of your control.
DeleteAnd we know for certain it exists because we have caught 0 of them.
DeleteJackass....
And merely not catching something means what on the existence of that something? Come on kiddo... You're not that dumb surely?
DeleteMy point is just because you have evidence of something existing doesn't prove it exists. I mean surely you aren't that stupid that you know that right? A smart person in your shoes would have said it in fact "could" exist. But to state something does exist with zero specimens caught is embarrassing for yourself. Im guessing you are no newcomer to embarrassment though.
Delete"My point is just because you have evidence of something existing doesn't prove it exists."
DeleteAaaaaargh, is this an admition that there is indeed evidence? Because if it is, considering there is every source short of modern type specimen, there's a little thing called Occam's Razor that says the only one embarrassed is he who digs his own hole considerably larger, kiddo.
; )
... And deeper, of course...
DeleteAny way you want to perceive
DeleteThis image, according to our very own Joe, This subject is
Homo sapien sapien,
"Wow " what a concept??
Day in and day out joe argues
Deletewhether 6 billion homo sapien sapien actuality exist!!
WHAT A KUMQUAT!!
; )
Read my comment below... Amazingly there's another person in the adult world that didn't know human's were primates.
Delete: p
What are you blithering on about Joseph? Put up or shut up SONNY BOY!
Delete; ))
In the mid 1800's, Caucasoid sasquatch used to document the use of buffalo headdress
DeleteBy native sasquatch, known as the commanche,Cheyenne,
And Sioux, to stalk their prey!
Haw lil joe?
^ Butt,Butt,Butt, Im talking about Omatoids and Cro magnon's........... :( joe.
DeleteWikipedia + google + cut& paste ×Joe = 100% "CHUMP"
DeleteLol!
^^^ Hey tard, you still haven't answered my question about how big an Idiot you have to be to get dumped in the sock-puppet program. Your either paid to be a diss-info dick or your a total retard. It's knowbodY'S job here (including Joe) to proove anything to you dipshit. What a looser. Your government supperiors obviously relize you have a very limmited potential and future. How many years you going to sit in a room banging away that people didn't see, WHAT THEY SAW. WHAT A JACKASS, HA HA HAH AH AH AH AH HAH HAH AH AHA HA!
DeleteGo easy on him TK, the poor boy didn'y know humans were primates.
Delete(Pffffft)
And since you brought up the Commanche,Cheyenne,
and Sioux... They all believe Sasquatch to be human too.
: )
Oh... And Otamid are perceived as the American equivalent of Cro-Magnon, there were or are no Cro-Magnon in the US... But after all this time of explaining that, I really don't expect anyone who didn't know human's were primates to absorb that.
Delete: p
smudgefoot
ReplyDeleteIt looks like it has been altered/blurred.
ReplyDeleteI'm going with someone's bad attempt at using a gorilla costume and the crude arm extensions. The legs are too thin and small.
ReplyDeleteLooks like a cow's head/mask?
DeleteA cow being carried ?
DeleteMMC
WOW! Good shout MMC!!
DeleteA calf even?
DeleteMight be right MMC. I thought maybe bear head. They might have rigged up a bear skin rug some way above his head. Kripe it also looks like you can almost see through it. Suppose Thinker Thunker will come along now and notice those really long arms and employ that arm/leg ratio anaylsis to this and proclaim it a bigfoot for sure and we are crazy. It is all in the arms.
DeleteChuck
I will say this. Coschockton county is a bigfoot area. Many sightings here over the years. Part of a triangle. However this ain't one of them.
DeleteChuck
Cows are people food and deer are bigfoot food.
DeleteTijuana cow show.
DeleteMorning guys
DeleteSteaks on the Barbie !
MMC
Gentleman... I really don't mean to change the immediate subject matter... But this footage has always fascinated me. The way it appears to stroll into view, then turns into a burst of quadrupedal motion at very, very high speed;
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlMQ9b2lnE4&list=FLq0p92TM1QsQ5jLmVQqlKpA&index=177
Bloke in a suit
DeletePossibly... I'd be more concerned with the motion and speed the subject achieves though...
DeleteAnon 3:57
DeleteWho said anything bout eating?
80
Thats a cow or cgi cow- the back "leg" is a bent hoof. My son has to weigh (requires lifting and hanging onto a portable scale) and tag newborn calves. On the first day they weigh between 75 and 110 lbs. After 2 days you have a very hard time catching and weighing. After that its a struggle that takes the might of Hercules to subdue them! If that is a real guy lifting that cow- Id like to meet the man.
DeleteCould be wrong, but my vote id cgi.
Curious Chick. Why do they have to be weighed?.
DeleteWhat you say makes sense.
Chuck
My opinion there are 2 seperate entities in this video, there appears to be a gap from when the upright figure appears to when the 4 legged version appears. Could be something obscuring that part but would be more convincing to me if you could see the transformation from bi-ped to quadraped. Could easily be achieved by someone wearing black clothes with a black dog if you dont see the transformation.
DeleteHI there Chuck!! Hope you are staying warm as can be there.
DeleteThey are pedigree angus. All their stats have to me logged into a national database or they cant be sold as pedigree. They are free range and organic - some very expensive meat for sure.
Oh, I showed the picture to my son this morning- he laughed and said thats a cow- not a calf and there is no way a man could lift a cow that size. Let alone a struggling live one.
DeleteHey Chick!!
DeleteHey CHICK. Thanks for the feedback. Pedigree Angus. Jeepers I do not even have a pedigree. This must get sold to expensive restaurants. I always get angus if it is available, best there is for beef. I prefer buffalo, but not easy to get. December has been mild so far 40s at day but the worst is yet to come.
DeleteChuck
Remember that Buffalo Bill related stories told to him by the plains Indians. They said The big Bigfoots could run away while carrying a Buffalo under one arm. Huh? Now that would probably be supernatural wouldn't it!
DeleteA hunter in camo carrying something.
ReplyDeletemaybe a tree stand.
DeleteLook close and you can see an S on whatever it is.
ReplyDeleteIt's a turkey.
ReplyDeleteA turkey for you and a turkey for me. Turkey turkey turkey lurkey durkey...........
DeleteUntil someone proves it is not bigfoot, it is absolute proof of bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteFind an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, a primatologist, a pioneering plastic surgeon and a costume expert to to endorse the data in the source up top, then you have half a point.
DeleteBlah blah blah
DeleteFind ONE, just ONE shred of scientifically verified evidence that bigfoot is real. It's been over 50 years and all you footards have is excuses, hoaxes, and blobs.
Dermals, the uniform morphology of unknown primate hair, etc. You've been shown this and like all good little 'psuedosciencers', when you can't explain something away you deny there's anything to explain... It's quite a spectacle in psychology to see you people in practice.
DeleteUnknown primate hair always makes me laugh:)
DeleteYet you have no method, qualifications or credibility to explain the experts who come to those conclusions away.
DeleteJoke's on you kid.
No really the joke is on you for your constant contradictions to yourself. Standings and Sykes hair both came back human(along with various other REAL animals). Which you claim is because Sasquatch are human. Well human isnt an unknown primate. You keep trying to have it both ways buddy and it dont work like that. Just let us know for sure where you stand and maybe you wont look so stupid all the time. Do you believe its a known primate(human) or an unknown primate? Just answer the question. Quit cherry picking. Dermals can be the result of the casting process, or also the result of making a cast to make fake footprints. This has been proven. And has been stated probably a million times there have been MULTIPLE costume experts to say the PGF was a hoax. You have a few experts,little questionable evidence, a small percentage of eyewitness reports. Hardly anything to trumpet as definitive proof,but hey dont let that stop you from doing so anyway.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOh dear...
DeleteHumans are primates (cringe), so a type of human that is very similar to us, but not classified would no doubt be an unknown primate, would it not? The hair's morphology that's been verified by primatologists are usually described as if coming from a "wild human", but are categorised as primate because they follow traits of known primates but are not quite like anything we can point at in the classified human or non-human primate... And humans are primates.... Wow...
(Sigh, cringe)
Cro-Magnon has its own classification but shares our exact DNA... So yes, when you try and expand your intelligence beyond that of a ten year old, you can have it like that. Dermal ridges are sometimes found in the actual impressions. Half way down this page;
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/32050-dermal-ridges-or-casting-artifact/
... Dermals in the actual impression. And half way down here;
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/36334-suit-possibly-key-to-final-hoax-proof/page-5
A comparison of casting artifacts and actual dermals. Artificial desiccation has it's own uniform style that does not match one school of alleged Sasquatch traits, whilst the only way to mimic dermals is under laboratory methods... Which the average anyone attempting to hoax wouldn't be aware of or have access to. Actually... Not one of these experts can provide a fur cloth technique from the past 100 years that explains how the subject has its texture, who are like the majority of the population sceptical of the subject, who are in the spotlight and have careers to look after, and who also have passed a two minute opinon prior to the footage being stabelized and digitalized. If you like, post these experts and I'll very easily counter them as I have done before. I in fact have experts who are ahead of their respected games, and if my evidence is so questionable then why do you struggle to explain it away so badly then son? We in fact have datases of reports; hardly a "small percentage" (whatever that means), and again, who's claiming to have definitive proof? The only thing I have is the evidence for an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the U.S... And you still haven't proven any of your points.
I know Im talking to an idiot, so I dont expect any kind of real acknowledgement from you when I state that Ive proven it time and time again. Seems you are sticking to the plan of denying it and pretending it didnt happen, good for you. How mature of you.
DeleteNot sure why you need to insert a cringe after stating what I allready stated. Humans are primates, yep I said that we know you can echo, I applaud you. Let me try and clarify this for you. See you said that we have unknown primate hair. You also stated that when Sykes and Standings hair samples came back as human that was because Sasquatch are human. Yet the samples didnt come back as cro magnon human, or wild man human, or unclassified human did they? Nope just human. Or are you trying to say they just didnt check for that. Because I know you are just some unqualified Welshman with an unhealthy obsession in pretend animals. But you have to be smart enough to know that if those studies came back as anything other than a normal human then we would have known. Perhaps you think this slipped by as they merely werent checking for these anomalies, well then you are even more of an idiot than I previously thought, which is quite an accomplishment. You think Sykes would catch the DNA of an extinct polar bear and miss the fact that its an unclassified human. Dumb, dumb, dumb, DUMB. This is why the world didnt stop when the results came back human, because its just a plain old human that we have an abundance of here on earth. I feel like Im talking to a rock at this point. Your constant backpeddling out of all your mistakes is getting old. Until the world can fix stupid, theres really no hope for you. As far as me struggling to explain your questionable evidence thats only a reality in the same place as bigfoot, your imagination. Of course you can counter my experts with your own. Who cares? Its the worlds evaluation of those experts that I care about, and the world says its a guy in a monkey suit and theres no bigfoot. Convince the world your magic monkey is real then you've got me on your side. Until then your just some Welsh kook, with some kook scientists on his side. Until next time, toodles, pooky bear.
Oh and I dont have time, but go ahead and go to the BFRO database and add all those numbers together, and divide that by the population of those countries and let me know the percentage, Im guessing it comes out to be a small number. You think because you add the word database in front of reports it makes it a big number? Thats what I meant by a small percentage. Im sorry Ill try and explain it more simply next time ::shrugs::
DeleteObliterated
DeleteWhat have you proven? Please, please show us?
Delete(Cringe)
You didn't know humans were primates.
(Cringe)
There's no such thing as a "Cro-Magnon human DNA" sequence, again... They share our exact DNA, and a wild human, is just a wild human and would have the same?
(Cringe)
Sasquatch, should they share our DNA, means they wouldn't show up as "Sasquatch human" either (sigh). If Sasquatch are human then why would we have known anything else by human DNA? Also... Did you not read about the 15 percent difference?
(Cringe)
Sasquatch are human, and multiple sequences from Sasquatch hair samples have come back human, that's how I can make the claim dear boy.
(Cringe)
Sykes is only as good as his samples and again... If Sasquatch shared our DNA, how could anyone, sod Sykes, know otherwise of an unclassified human? Its a matter of getting a type specimen then, like that of the Cro-Magnon skulls to classify under morphology; kids stuff dear boy. Neither did the majority of the enthusiast camp celebrate the Sykes results, but that's because they're looking for a woodape, to which the general understanding of someone sceptical of that subject would in turn be.
My mistakes = please show us where they are?
The evidence is my imagination = please show us it's that?
Who cares if I can counter experts? (Cringe) me you prized pratt, it means nothing but positive for me (my word?)... And the evidence stands. Oh and you care, quite obviously son. Pioneers were always in the minority, and considering we have every significant stepping stone in the evolution of science made my a select few that account for the best in their respected fields... It stands for what it is; the best in the business endorsing this "imaginary subject". And you still haven't proven any of your points.
PS. Eyewitnesses have always been in the minority, that can in fact be expected from something so elusive? Multiple databases & contemporary reports that accounts for tens of thousands helps your argument, how?
(Pfffft)
He's right JOE on one statement. He is talking to an idiot. He needs to move away from the mirror
DeleteChuck
Poor guy's angwy.
Delete: )
12:14 . Is 100% correct, lil joe
DeleteYou are a redickulas <(my made up little word,as you can relate)....
I would expect someone who also didn't know humans are primates... To have to make up words for poor grammar and fob it off as anything else... Actually.
DeleteLooks like a black bear jumping onto a guys back lol.
ReplyDeleteJust watching some of the other "missing evidence" channel 5 episodes. 9/11 conspiracy's got debunked, loch ness got debunked and bigfoot got debunked. If Joe is saying the bigfoot documentary was worthless then he has to also admit that Nessie is real and that 9/11 was an inside job.
ReplyDeleteI've never paid much attention to 9/11 stuff and have never even commented about it here, I watched the Nessie episode being largely sceptical about it and actually found the last ten minutes about sonar hits in the Loch fascinating (are you sure you watched the actual episode?) and I've taken the Bigfoot episode apart here;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/witness-gets-emotional-while-retelling.html
... And here;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/in-1883-possible-bigfoot-was-killed-in.html
Peace.
yeh JOE. Sonar hits have been achieved of something that is too large for the normal fish in the Lock going back to the serious expeditions in the 1970s. Watched a show couple weeks back ( do not normally back acting was good and got 3 stars ) called The Water Horse or something like that. I say water horse, what the heck. People have seen something.
DeleteSpeaking of Scotland The oak island boys were in Scotland last night getting leads from Alan Butler and a lady about the Templars at Roslin Chapel. Seen this chapel before but it has stone carvings on the walls of what sure looks like corn. Being built in 1456 by William St. Clair it predates the Europe introduction to corn by at least 50 years.
Chuck
I've been reading up on oak island Chuck, and as much as I would love for it to be a secret history if civilization buried there, or an ark that can melt peoples faces, it's probably just silver, lots and lots of silver.
DeleteThe photograph is obviously intentionally modified and therefore is not a bigfoot. No point speculating exactly what it is really is there?
ReplyDeleteI think you are right 3 51. Modified in some way. superimposed maybe.
DeleteChuck
Better get thinker Thuner on this to check the ratios. This might be the real deal.
ReplyDeletethunker
DeleteOn my way to work, but wanted to send my greetings to Joe, Chuck, Eva, Chick, & others! Have a GREAT DAY, folks!!!
ReplyDeleteBless ya BS!!!!!!!
DeleteJoe, If Kathy Strain took a huge dump on your face. Would you stll respect the dump in the morning?
DeleteHave a good at work BigfootStudent xx
DeleteHave a great day BigfootStudent! Hey Eva^, hows your kitties doin'? Morning Joe!!
DeleteHello Chick,they're fine thanks,i think one of them is missing her friend though,hope all is well with you xx
DeleteHow convenient the only part of the photo that matters is blurry. This rest is crystal clear.
ReplyDeletePretty obvious hoax.
Something carrying something. It's look like a cow (!)
ReplyDeleteLOL I needed a good laugh this morning, so fake, why even post this crap, save it for april fools...
ReplyDeleteOff topic but dodgy;
ReplyDelete"The village that fell asleep: Kazakhstanis hit by mystery sleeping sickness that causes them to doze for days have fluid on their brains, doctors claim
*Locals in Kalachi, north Kazakhstan say mystery illness is getting worse
*Dozens of residents regularly hit by 'sleeping epidemic' for days at a time
*Doctors have ruled out viruses and contaminated water as possible cause
*Uranium mine near Russian town and Kazakhstan village considered cause
*Radiation at old mine shaft found to be 16 times higher than normal
*Symptoms do not match radiation poisoning while radiation levels in village have been found to be the same as normal background radiation
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2876077/The-real-Sleepy-Hollow-Doctors-say-Kazakh-villagers-hit-mystery-sleeping-sickness-excess-fluid-brains.html
Probably Putin using old kgb cronies to experiment with some new chemical agent they developed. For there safety of course. Strange indeed.
Deletetks JOE
Chuck
Hey Hoaxers! If your going to hoax, please do a better job! Your computer skills are that of a 10 year old. And your IQ level must be below 30!
ReplyDeleteBut when the people you are trying to hoax have an IQ of 25, 30 is quite enough.
DeleteIt's a hunter in camo, wearing a taxidermied black bear skin and head.
ReplyDeleteClearly this is a sasquatch wearing a cape. This particular creature is known around certain parts as "Super Biggie." Super Biggie is simply a bigfoot turned into crime stopping super hero.
ReplyDeletethe bigfoot says why buy milk when you can steal a whole cow ?
ReplyDelete^ lol
DeleteI see an octopus wearing a top hat.
ReplyDeleteUmmmmmmm, Blurfoot like soooooooooo many others and can ya guess what that usually means, hint, h_ _x..........
ReplyDeleteI figured it out! It's a sasquatch in a bear costume!
ReplyDeleteRED FLAG ! I don't like the transparent cloud all around the critter and the cow. Maybe a blurcowrobber or a cowsquatchstealer.
ReplyDeleteNot reading the rest of the comments, but...looks like a compound bow in there.
ReplyDeleteNice observation! It does look like a bow hunter possibly packing out a treestand.
DeleteWhy post something like this? So sad whover runs this site.
ReplyDeleteIt got you to click and comment, so...mission accomplished.
DeleteAhh! "Skeptical Omniscience" an oxymoron of the highest degree....with an emphasis on "MORON"!! You idiots know NOTHING. Lmao..sasquatch would make you all look like the mental pygmies that you really are quaking in your boots...! It is very possibly a bigfoot carrying a bovine, hands are viewable, head to right of cow and right hand on long arm clutching cow around the body. No11 it's photoshop, it's a man in a suit, carrying a cow...lmao!
ReplyDeleteOMG. Really? REALLY!? This is a guy in a Carhartt jumper and then someone smeared the photo with a sharpie and spittle. In all of photographic history no one would be able to reproduce such a terrible photo again. Unless of course its another pic of Bigfoot. And this was presented in a "conference"?
ReplyDeleteThis is a psychological test, right? What you see says something about your personality?
ReplyDeleteIt looks like someone altered it to look like the lens of the camera were wet or fogged over to me. I am going to go with hunter on this one, I think I can make out some mossy oak cammo and or some ghille suit type material on the left leg/lower abdomen area. It also looks like the subject is carrying something non organic in his/her right hand. The dimensions of what are in the head region look off, but it could easily just be a rifle/bow/bag/pack/chair/etc slung over a shoulder and obscured by the strategic blurring.
ReplyDeleteYou gotta be a moron to present this as bigfoot evidence, I hope the context this photo was presented under was to highlight hoaxing techniques or visual Pareidolia.
This is exactly the kind of BS that should never see the light of day.Perfect example of why everyone in the science world thinks we are all batshit crazy..not sure they aren't right on about 99 percent of us.
ReplyDeleteIt's a man in camo coveralls carrying a calf. You can see the mossy oak pattern on the coveralls. Someone just blurred the pic with photoshop to make it more "mysterious", or there was dew or possibly raindrops on the lens that gave it the "blurred" effect. It's clearly a person carrying a black calf with a white face. Don't try to make it into something it's not folks. And before I get attacked for my comment, I'm actually a believer, not a skeptic. There's just no point in jumping up and yelling "It's a BIGFOOT!!" on every picture, especially when it's more than OBVIOUS that's NOT the case here.
ReplyDeleteIt's a bigger just like the person who will erase this post!
ReplyDelete