We Finally Have The Technology To Zoom Into Todd Standing's Running Sasquatch Footage


Ready to be blown away? Check out this enhancement of Todd Standing's Bigfoot footage. Whatever that thing is, it's clear that it's really skinny -- probably malnourished. Some would even say it's a little small to be a squatch. Standing insists that it's a squatch and even shared it with Les Stroud on last season's Survivorman Bigfoot. Our enhancement GIF of the sasquatch is below:

Here's the clip that Les Stroud shared on his YouTube channel:




Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Probably Uno or big gay john, same person. They r both fags!!

      Delete
    2. MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT!!

      Mike B has got Samurai chatter!! This will be uploaded to Texas Hillcountry Cryptozoological Society in the coming days.

      Delete
    3. I hope.you understand that Mike b. Is a known hoaxer. You're new to this blog but he's been doing it since day 1. Don't believe me? Look back over every post since 2008. Joe I respect you but mike is taking you for a ride. You don't have to respond, I will still get your back but he's messing with you. That's what he does.

      Delete
    4. Where's my girls? Uno big gay jon and chick? Thems my girls.

      -Eva xx

      Delete
    5. What the heck are you on about? I've compiled nearly every last piece of research Mike has put together, and there's is not one instance that you or anyone can point to that's evidence of this being a hoax. He hasn't even been doing this since 2008, he's been only posting around here for the past year and a bit, shortly after starting his field research and habituation. Are you sure you know what you're talking about?

      Also... I'm new to this blog? Are you serious??

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. Joe hes not even from texas, he lives with his parents now on their farm in texas. U are most definitely new to this blog, you have only been here a year. I'm just trying to help you out. I promise I'm being truthful.believe it or not, some of us know better than you. Again, I'm just giving the heads up. You're being taking for a ride. I love what u have done for this blog but you can't believe everything you hear.

      Delete
    9. I'm fully aware of Mike's personal details and I would like for you to prove what you are saying... Show us please.

      Delete
    10. Joe please do a little research on Mike. That's all I ask.

      Delete
    11. That's all I ask is you please provide me with a means to verify your claims.

      Delete
    12. Oh... And your statement is wrong at 1:20 also. It's not my place to divulge Mike's personal details, but for someone who apparently knows all this, you're very wrong and I would like you to provide proof of your claims please.

      Delete
    13. It's up to you now. Please keep what I said in mind and be aware.

      Delete
    14. Eva and Joe are the same person!

      Delete
    15. 1:29... So you readily admit you have no idea what you are talking about?

      Delete
    16. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    17. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    18. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    19. joe it's probably mike messing with you

      Delete
    20. he does have a sence of humour

      Delete
    21. I don't think anyone is being payed to discredit the idea of Bigfoot. I have no doubt there are corporate trolls and maybe even government ones, but for Bigfoot...no, there are plenty of critics doing it on there own. I doubt seriously anyone cares enough.

      Delete
    22. Look... I mean no offence to anyone, Mike is not a hoaxer and in fact is a breath of fresh air with respect to transparency. He's not made a penny off Bigfoot purely because he's so transparent and works damn hard.

      Mike is also VERY closely affiliated with the very best researchers in the US. This is because of the very opposite of your allegations.

      Oh... I don't doubt for one second that the link provided is true.

      Delete
    23. Joe please please don't believe what he says. Please. It's mike b.

      Delete
    24. He's taking you for a ride joe. I wonto say anything else because the trolls will be here soon. It's early here. Just please be warned. Please.


      Delete
    25. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    26. Mike is just another footer going out in the woods and attributing every single natural phenomenon to bigfoot.

      Delete
    27. Communication cannot be attributed to natural phenomena. I'm waiting for your evidence.

      Delete
    28. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    29. Mike b. The notorious mike b is taking you for a ride. Period.

      Delete
    30. "Communication"

      Mike could be lying.

      Could simply be positive result bias.

      Could be other footers.

      What it isn't is a 9 foot ape man.

      Delete
    31. Evidence? Read over this blog since day 1. You are not the first person he has screwed. 2. Google mike b and see his work history and who he lives with now. And there is your evidence. I tried to give you some insight joe. Now you ate catering to the trolls.

      Delete
    32. 2:35... Show it to be the case then son! It should be easy with so much damning areas to highlight, right?

      2:38... Mike is not lying as it's documented. It could be you are party to cognitive bias, could be that you still don't have a single thing to add credibility to your claims, what you haven't is a brain cell as opposed to mush between your ears.

      Delete
    33. If we are talking about the same Mike B, his history is questionable.

      Delete
    34. 2:38... Ok... Show the evidence where Mike has posted here any time before the past year and a half, stop crying and show it, it's pretty simple.

      Mike has always been very open about his past profession and where he's lived and practiced that profession, you're not uncovering anything that Mike hasn't already made known to everyone concerned.

      You're just another troll on the disinformation, back up your claims, or shut up and sit down.

      Delete
    35. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    36. 3 different people are telling you the same thing. The same 3 folks love what you do here. Is it not time for you to get a clue?

      Delete
    37. Joe, I'm not the guy warning you about Mike B. All I did was start checking him out on google because of this thread. Last year in this forum he was asked if he was a certain same Mike B. and he denied it. Yet his google plus seems to indicate that it is him.

      Delete
    38. ^ chick chuck or big gay john! Duh

      Delete
    39. Shut the hell up trolls!! Joe seriously, just keep in mind what has been told to you today.

      Delete
    40. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    41. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    42. I'm not a troll and you can check it out your self. If you are comfortable about someone that's fine. I'm just telling you what I found. I have no opinion on Mike B and his Bigfoot claims. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/07/breakdown-sasquatch-caught-on-video-by.html

      Delete
    43. I don't need to, you're going to post it all here for me, right? I am comfortable knowing that you're a sicko, Mike has been very open about his past career.

      Why would he want to divulge his personal details on a blog whilst being confronted like that? What are you background details, you are non remember, you hypocrite.

      Delete
    44. Mike b will not be here. He will not post anything. I tried to tell joe, he wouldn't listen.

      Delete
    45. Mike b will not be here. Joe, please stop sticking up for him.

      Delete
    46. Mike! Joe said you would produce!! Where are you at??

      Delete
    47. Well I've emailed him and it's early in the morning, so when he notices his email he'll be along to set you straight I'm sure.

      Delete
    48. Joe, it's there in black in white. If in the meantime he's explained, fine. I'm just showing you what happened at the time someone questioned him.

      Delete
    49. Joe says mike b will have proof of bigfoot. I can't wait! Mike has proof that bigfoot is real!!!!

      Delete
    50. This is awesome! Mike b has proof that bigfoots exist! Thanks joe, I can't wait till mike shoes us!!

      Delete
    51. In the mean time, apart from someone seemingly and understandably unwilling to give over their personal details in a pinch, accused by someone seemingly & tellingly unwilling to give over their personal information, you have nothing to back up your claims that Mike is a hoaxer. I have a whole contact book with people who know Mike personally.

      You are a liar sir, and a troll... If you weren't you would have reclined to my opinion a long time ago.

      Delete
    52. Mike has evidence of habituation and audio communication from something consistent with accepted and published audio.

      You trolls are so threatened by Mike it's pure gold!!

      Delete
    53. Somebody should alert shawn. Joe just said that Mike b has proof of a bigfoot! Man this is awesome!

      Delete
    54. Anybody can read back over this thread and see that joe said mike has proof of a sasquatch! This is big!!

      Delete
    55. Mike asked joe to keep a secret. He couldn't.

      Delete
    56. Hey Einstein... Proof would be a body, right? Well evidence contributes to that effort.

      What secret's are you vomiting over 3:40??

      Man.. I must be nuts for baby sitting these twonks...

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    57. Personally, I think you are for being so emotionally invested but it's your life.

      Delete
    58. Mike will be here with proof of bigfoot soon. Joe said he will which means he will!

      Delete
    59. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    60. And aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall this to deflect from the immediate subject matter that shows a potential Sasquatch caught on camera.

      : )

      Delete
    61. I just emailed shawn. Mike b has proof that sasquatch are real! Thanks joe, this is huge!!

      Delete
    62. Bigfoots are real!! Mike B has the proof!

      Delete
    63. 3:58... You don't have to, Shawn's well aware of the audio and I'll be posting the links around here once I upload it to Mike's research channel.

      Exciting eh? Glad you think so!!

      : )

      Delete
    64. Joe, what would your mother think of you calling another person "sicko" for having an opinion that you have become too emotional over a subject? I would hope too that she would not like that you brought up someone else's mother in general.

      Delete
    65. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    66. That's certainly quite a bit of name calling and accusations there. In fact in just reinforces my opinion. I think that's the worst anyone has addressed me, ever. God bless you, Joe.

      Delete
    67. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    68. Don't be too hard on joe, he cant help being that way.

      Delete
    69. Nothing clears a room of trolls than the request that an anon bully reveal his ID.

      ; )

      Delete
    70. Actually my leaving had a lot due to you your behavior. The question I brought up had absolutely nothing to do with anonymity (a real name actually). We can rehash it if you wish, although I don't see much point.

      Delete
    71. And my question was to do with your integrity and he necessity to provide credibility to your accusations... Deal with it.

      Delete
    72. And my behaviour? Please, don't make me laugh anymore...

      Delete
    73. I will deal with it any way I choose...and you cannot stop that.

      Delete
    74. Ok, I'm bored now, in short... Prove your points or scoot. You make allegations at one of my friends & research partners, you'll have me requesting you explain yourself.

      Laters.

      Delete
    75. Joe showed up about the same time mikey popped back in, maybe a puppet mouthpiece to give his "research" some credibility?

      Delete
  2. Well it wasnt LeBron James going up the side of that hill but it wasnt a muppett either. a fairly strong looking yute squatch that was trying to get away. Why do we keep coming back to these again? I am lost on this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's a comparison shot in Todd's earlier documentary on the bank that the subject negotiates.

      It's VERY telling... I'm very much suprised that this hasn't managed to surface.

      Delete
    2. Joe has become completely deranged. I thought you said he had amazing evidence? A stupid sound clip.
      You deserve a sound thrashing about the head and neck.

      Delete
    3. Stupid sound clip? Show it to be the case... Should be easy right?

      And who's gonna give me that then tough guy?

      Delete
    4. It appears that the pads are lighter in color. That step uphill as I noted last year is just enormous on some very steep terrain. The ankle bone also looks like it is more forward on foot like PG also, and a Sasquatch ankle bone will be 12 to 16 percent more forward than a human.
      Kind of surprised MK and/or Thinker Thunker have not weighed in yet.
      Chuck

      Delete
    5. It's on the cards for sure. In Todd's documentary he does a short comparison shot, I've got the documentary but am obviously not aloud to use it for reference. I've even looked on Google Images to see if someone has done and it's not there.

      Also, Todd sort the advice of a professional in kinetics who stated that no human can move as quickly as the the subject negotiates the terrain during the whole duration of film it's documented on.

      Delete
    6. Well JOE that got me also. When humans climb mountains they trudge up them using short steps. This one puts it left leg so far out there to climb up over an obstacle it just seems to be a non human action and it does it effortlessly. I have climbed mountains back in my younger days in Ca. when I was very fit and I could not have pulled this off. The author above said skinny, it definitely is not skinny, but is not a massive adult either as Average Joe stated.
      Chuck

      Delete
    7. I can't agree more! This is a very interesting piece of footage, THAT'S GOT A MAJOR COMPARISON SHOT!!

      If only I could get my hands on it!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    8. Being a rock climber/back packer most my life, I can't believe the step that thing takes up the hill!! Amazing!!

      Delete
    9. Unfortunately Todd's 'output' doesn't hold up too well under scrutiny.

      https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_rk7apQtOKWajBLdVlZeEwxZHc/edit

      Only here could Standing be considered viable.

      MMG

      Delete
  3. Shawn is a freakin idiot! He has made it very clear that he continues to believe the Standing clips show real wood apes, even though his friends have told him they are fraudulent. Wake up Shawn!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lot of stuff gets printed here without any belief in it. It's not like they endorse everything...they have a need for stories to post.

      Delete
  4. "Check out this enhancement of Todd Standing's Bigfoot footage"
    Enhancement, Are you serious?? Enhancement of what the blobsquatch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. According to Joe, bigfoots hand carved the face on the giant sphinx at Giza.

    Oh boy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You said bigfoots helped build the ancient megastructures did you not?

      Delete
    2. "I'm excluding attributing the major megaliths around the world to alien technology, because we know that ancient cultures have built them... With the help of giant races of course."

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. I'm not the one lying for attention and disinformation.

      Delete
    5. Well if these bigfoots helped build these structures then surely they would be used to help carve that face that sits 100s of feet in the air?

      Delete
    6. Ok... quote request number two... Please find where I've stated that Bigfoot have built megaliths around the world...

      Delete
    7. "I'm excluding attributing the major megaliths around the world to alien technology, because we know that ancient cultures have built them... With the help of giant races of course."

      Where in that have I stated that Bigfoot has built the megaliths of the world?

      Delete
    8. No?? Now... Did I not post this link two comments later?

      http://www.adguk-blog.com/2014/02/dna-analysis-of-paracas-elongated-skull.html?m=1

      ... Here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/the-first-yowie-sample-is-being-sent-to.html

      ... Now... I believe that Sasquatch, or at least some form of relict hominid giant race native to the US had a major hand in the erection of the mounds found there. but I have never once stated that I think that the major megaliths around the world were constructed by Bigfoot.

      Now shut up and sit down son... You silly disinformationist troll.

      Delete
    9. Is a disinformation troll the same thing as a disinformation agent? The NWO crazy people are always throwing that term about. Officially, I believe it's someone employed to spread incorrect information but they tend to use it as a label for others who simply disagree with them.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. Institutions very well may employee these tactics over some things sure, but I don't see any reason to believe they would over Sasquatch. It's people who are trolling or debating on their own. Why would there be a conspiracy to pick off proponents of such a creature? It's all too easy to see the personal motivations of such behavior, as bad as it may be at times.

      Delete
    12. Did you not open the link? I think there is plenty reason to believe so. There is no debating going on here, you are very much mistaken, and there is plenty of reason to drive away public expression of such a topic, again, open the link.

      Don't get me wrong, there are just sickos out there, but in my opinion this goes on and certainly here to a degree.

      Delete
    13. I did. Again, the things the reports seemed to me talking about were government agencies trying to disrupt and influence specific things that were deemed important to it. I see nothing that makes me think Bigfoot would be of any consequence. Even UFOs would rate higher, and I have doubts there would be interest in that. Why do you think there would be government or corporate interests in disrupting the idea of Bigfoot?

      Delete
    14. Really? Are you aware of how much the government and the economy would lose if a new primate was confirmed to reside in the wilderness of the US?

      Delete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    16. I don't know how much really. It would depend on where and how widespread it was. I can't see it being that widespread without being discovered already.

      If the government were really concerned don't you think they would be trying to disrupt the people looking in a major way? I don't recall may people reporting that, other that Matthew Johnson saying something about a road being blocked. I have a hard time believing him much of anything from him.

      Delete
    17. Are kitakaze, dmaker, and others on BFF and old JREF forums government agents?

      Delete
    18. It is certain there are gov/t agency(s) that have taken a keen interest in bigfoot as they have ufos. and I have first hand information of this on a case I investigated this past memorial day outside of a rural farming community called New Lebanon, OH. You can read the report on the bfro, new lebanon, oh, of sightings that occurred in July of 2013. The gentleman that owned the property and saw the Sasquatch after his daughter did told me the strangest part was a government official who visited him shortly after the incidents from Wright Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH. The gov't man told him what he, his family, and the other neighbors who lived south of him had seen was an escaped Asian monkey. I looked at the owner and laughed as did he. So somewhere in the outlying areas of Montgomery, Prebble and Darke counties is an Asian monkey that can run at high speeds over 30 miles per hour on two legs and although Asian monkeys are quite short, in this area of the country they transform to over 7 foot tall and over 500 lbs.
      Chuck

      Delete
    19. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    20. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    21. There has also been plenty of slip ups.... But it's the same as the UFO phenomena to a degree; the government aren't gonna admit to not having the skies under their total control to have the opposite affect of reassuring the public over security... Same as Bigfoot, they're not going to admit there's a large unknown primate living in the US wilderness that's too clever for them.

      Delete
    22. If it's too clever for the US government all these years then it probably doesn't need any type of protection.

      Delete
    23. That's something I very much agree with, but you'll have trouble persuading the people who would naturally want species protection and habitat set aside of that.

      Delete
    24. WOW JOE. Thanks much for that link. Really like that Abby Martin. Wonder if the person from the top that is trying to discredit MIKE is part of this as both you and I know different.
      Chuck

      Delete
    25. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    26. Chuck... If you hadn't noticed, it's the same person (s) who drove Travis away, it's the same person (s) who drove Bandini away, it's be same person (s) who try and drive everyone else like Big Jon, Chick, Uno, Ernie, Eva away, it's the same person (s) who then complains when it's dead around here that the blog's gone crap and "finished", it's the same person (s) who makes all the claims that others have ruined the blog (in his agenda placed opinion), it's the same person (s) who spreads lies and misleading quotes... It's an effort at manipulating the blog and the views expressed here as a whole from everyone; admins and enthusiasts.

      I've personally experienced all the techniques listed in those video links and there is not a shred of doubt in me that apart from the normal psycho trolls, this is what's going on.

      Delete
    27. Makes all the sense in the world to me JOE.
      Chuck

      Delete
    28. Yeah every anon is the same person

      Delete
    29. "It's all the same......only the names have chaaaanged, every day, it's seems we're wasting away, sometimes you judge a man, by the bottle that he drinks, sometimes when your alone.....all you do is think, see I'm a cowboy, on a steel horse I ride and I'm wanted (waaaaaaaaanted)......dead or alive ". :)

      Delete
  6. The pgf was dismissed by scientists back in the 60s and that was that. Patterson was the dyer of his time. Hoaxing bigfoot and driving round in a truck with "bigfoot" in big letters plastered all over it. Touring the country with his film and cashing in on his hoax. Patterson is only now seen differently by footers because at the time none of it was documented. These days we have the internet and smart phones which means dyer cannot get away with the repeated hoaxing. People have gone back to the source, Yakima and found the real truth about Patterson. A truth that survives only in the memories of those who were around at the time, as nothing about Patterson was documented at the time. Patterson and his film provide the perfect basis for the modern day role playing game that is bigfootery. 47 years. Zero bigfoots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The PGF was dismissed by a majority of scientists that were both not even aware of such cryptids before, or had the luxury of seeing the footage stabilized. If it's being suggested that evidence of hoaxing is letters of your career pursuits on a van (I've just searched the internet and not found a single thing on Roger doing this), then I would say you need to try a little harder son. Roger Patterson was a pioneering researcher and attempting to spread awareness of such a topic. Your only source to base belief that Roger's credibility in Yakima is tarnished is Greg Long. He's been caught out falsifying interviews that were published in his book. The 'costume expert' that 'made the suit' has no record of Roger buying anything from him and had to hire a costume expert to make a gorilla suit that looked nothing like Patty. Bob H has more contradictions about the suit he wore than anything I've heard and can't even find the 'film site'. You see... There's money in hoaxing a hoax, especially when your target audience are largely skeptical of the subject already. Author David Murphy had spent 11 years writing the biography of Roger Patterson. In this time he interviewed over 70 people who had some acquaintance with Roger and Bob or people who knew them extremely well, and in that time he came across not one person who didn’t think highly of both individuals, not to mention endorse their credible nature. This is in direct contrast to Greg ‘Liar’ Long who’s book was an attempt at making money from hoaxing a hoax.

      You don't play the role of 'confident PGF skeptic' too well, obsessing over it more than the enthusiasts is a sure way to show it too.

      Delete
    2. Oh... And before I forget... Plenty found;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU

      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM

      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w

      ... None caught (and that's just three cases).

      Delete
    3. Are those supposedly the three best cases?

      Delete
    4. Luxury of seeing PGF stabilized? It was the stabilization that convinced many people PGF is a hoax. Think turret like upper body movement. Giant clown feet. It is a sloppy costume at best.

      Delete
    5. Pictures;

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      It's just so easy.

      Delete
    6. Meldrum? He is the king of cashing in on bigfoot.

      Delete
    7. If someone makes money from there considerable efforts towards pioneering research, then who are you to judge, burger flipper?

      Delete
    8. Sure Joe, you're making loads of money posting here daily... LOL

      Delete
    9. Just how old are you? You seen to call everyone "son" as if you are an elder.

      Delete
    10. I'm being deliberately condescending towards an effort at being deliberately rhetorical.

      Not to mention... The obvious age of some of these people I'm well within any boundaries to do so.

      Delete
    11. No... Spending every day & all day of one's time devoted to reading, listening, watching everything about a subject that only fills one with hate, denial and fear...

      That's weird.

      (Not suugested on your part)

      Delete
    12. ^^^ I must say Skeptics,Joe makes a very good point. If someone is truly interested in a subject,be it real or unreal or better yet not proven to be real, so what. I'm fascinated about the Bigfoot subject, not knowing 100% if it is truly a myth or a actual living breathing undiscovered species at this time and if it turns out to be proven 100% false, so be it. One thing I do not do or ever have done is bash someone else belief in something just because I/they might not believe in it at all or have some belief of said topic and just find it to be a interesting hobby(so to speak) to discuss/chat with folks who share a similar interest. A lot of chatters call you people trolls, but does one actually really know it is called bullying. If you are not a believer of said topic then grow/man up and leave and find a site that suits you to your liking folks.......

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Fat deposits, skin folds... All this is expected from a human body with considerable age and exposure to various elements.

      Delete
    2. Or it could be an ill fitting costume.

      Delete
    3. ... With fat deposits, muscle groupings & skin folds not even seen in costume today, let alone the late 1960's

      Delete
    4. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I thought the question was about the video posted on the story.

      Delete
    5. Up top? Yes, you could be right... If so I apologize.

      To be honest I really can't make out enough detail to see lose skin.

      Delete
    6. http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2010/01/german-blog-sylvanic-bigfoot-fake.html

      http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qXcRUWD1NVc/Sz_QxthnFjI/AAAAAAAABNI/_aI_XBC90aE/s1600-h/german+standing1.png

      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_qXcRUWD1NVc/Sz_OY2rQBnI/AAAAAAAABNA/pbWYfVBHAuQ/s1600-h/german+standing2.png

      Loose suit = HOAX

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. There's simply not enough pixelation detail to make any claim on any level of texture on the subject either way.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. Also... I've got the documentary on now in front of me, and the light parts highlighted in the link appear to be consistently isolated prior to the subject entering that spot and then leaving, suggesting that the lighter areas on the subject is in fact light peering through the trees. This might be why the subject's suggested 'suit opening' may deminish in appearence as the subject moved out from view towards the top left, leaving such lit up areas consistent on the ground.

      The subject takes three seconds to climb a 20 foot bank, and another second to move from out of view. In the documentary, Todd climbs this bank to show how difficult a bit of terrain to negotiate it is.

      Delete
  8. I find it hard to believe a BF is going to be standing on an open trail at the top of the hill, when 2 people come along huffing and puffing.If it did just so happen to be there, it would have taken a step to the left, and hid. It would not have kept walking in the open, IMO.
    The legs look thick, arms look puny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well that settles it...if dr. scammer says its fake then by god its fake just ask the whino d.l. saucey....or scott the bigfoot is in my garden carpenter...aka larry,moe and curly

      Delete
    2. It was my opinion, I didn't say it was a fact.
      You're a douchebag!

      Delete
    3. DS, you know you're doing something right when creeps like that start following you about.

      Keep up the good work.

      Delete
  9. Joe is here to support the hoaxers. Plain and simple. Joe knows what Munns and Meldrum figured out a long time ago and that there is no bigfoot and that they had invested way too much of their lives to concede to that. So they come up with false evidence and lies so that people will keep going to bigfoot conferences and buying books and such. Any one who says "Plenty found" and links you a bunch of blurry non-conclusive videos as proof of that, well it should be obvious they are misleading you.
    http://doubtfulnewscom.c.presscdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/todd-bigfoot_big-400x234.jpg
    Thats a real bigfoot according to Joe is really all you should need to know. See Im 100 percent certain that this whole Standing thing is going to blow up in your face. Theres so much evidence out there to suggest that he's a fraud and a hoaxer. So you can continue to defend him but be sure they day that this blows up Ill be here to point out how you stuck to his side.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I support hoaxers = show it to be the case.

      Munns and Meldrum are lying about their stance = show it to be the case.

      False evidence = show it to be the case.

      Blurry non-conclusive videos = show them to be the case.

      Misleading people = show it to be the case.

      I've stated categorically that the subject in the link is a Bigfoot = quote me.

      100% Standing is gonna blow up in our faces = show how.

      Standing is a fraud and hoaxer = show it t be the case.

      And by whom do I refer to you should Standing so the opposite of what you pray for son?

      Delete
    3. That's right... You'll no doubt slime back into the shadows where you are never accountable for your claims and never accountable actions.

      Well put it like this... I'll be calling you out should Standing deliver and your absence will say a lot about your character, so readily ready to make allegations about others. And you still haven't proved any of your points.

      : )

      Delete
    4. BF evidence is always covered up!! 2013 was supposed to be the year, and it all got covered up! Munns and Meldrum solved the puzzle, and it was covered up! If BF doesn't exist, why all the cover ups?????

      Delete
    5. All the evidence you present could not be a hoax?
      Show it to be the case.
      As for the Standing thing blowing up in your face, time will bring that to us, for sure. I look forward to your usual excuses and denial to try and worm your way out of that one.

      Delete
    6. Well that's down to you to test the evidence, isn't it Einstein? By yet again... You can't do that and you, as always, are just resorted to allegations & accusations. Nothing you say holds weight with facts after reported requests. Come on bro, when you gonna man up, eh?

      No... Should Standing deliver (and I'm not claiming he is going to, just reiterating what's being touted by the experts), you'll be nowhere to be seen, and to be honest no one will care, me included. On the flip side, you come see me whenever you want, I've grown to quite enjoy making you look stupid.

      : p

      Delete
    7. "Blurry non-conclusive videos = show them to be the case."
      Seriously? Thats all you link. Show me one damn video that you have that you can say conclusively without a doubt isnt a hoax and a legitimate Sasquatch. This is more of your redundant B.S. You think because you deny your wrongdoings that it makes it not so. Just because you refuse to acknowledge it doesnt mean it is occuring, child. How does one link blurry and non-conclusive videos all day and then ask someone to show them that they do it? You must think the people here are idiots. There are a few people here who buy into everything you say. But to everyone else its obvious. As for the Standing and Meldrum being frauds, type in Standing and Meldrum fraud or hoax into your search engine and read the wealth of knowledge available on the subject. Which Ive said multiple times. That should be enough for any rational human being that doesnt believe in giant monkey people roaming our forests to make a sound conclusion about their credibility. And then one only has to look at your blatant denial apparent on this very post to make a sound conclusion about your credibility.

      Delete
    8. Ill man up and say that everything I say holds just as much water as anything you say. If Standing produces anything close to some kind of proof of the existance of Sasquatch then you better believe I will be here to apologize to you. But it better be a lot more than this video and a damn muppet face or a bigfoot face that looks just like his. And then he better issue an apology for his past footage and explain why he hoaxed it. But I stand on sure ground that this will not be the case. What he is doing now he has done before, had people waiting on great footage that turned out to be so bad its actually comical from what Ive heard. And this has been the telltale signs of every big hoax lately, we have something HUGE coming wait and see. So yeah I know how this is going to end for you. To think I actually respected your opinion at one point, until I saw that refuse to step away from people less than credible. Defend them even. Sad.

      Delete
    9. Have done son!

      edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf


      The best you've got is to respond with "Meldrum is a fraud, waaaaaaaaaaa!"

      My wrong doings = show them.

      Test the evidence, that's how you show me how you do it. You test a claim of organic tissue, how? No, I don't think everyone is an idiot, just you and the like minded who spout allegations & accusations they haven't the intelligence to back up.

      You seem to have a major issue with the prospect of someone "buying into what I say"? Truth is... I don't really know anyone around here who does that, where did you get that idea exactly? Are you aware of something we don't?

      If something's obvious = show it to be.

      Hey! How about you go and type in "Meldrum and Standing frauds" and show me the evidence? It's easy right? Remember, I'm open to you proving your theories, but for all your stamping and winjing, I think you're in fact angry at me because of your failures. Remember I'm not the one making the claims, you can't even quote me... You are making the claims you cannot reinforce and like a spoilt child that's anyone else's fault but yours.

      Blatant denial = show us where.

      My credibility an issue = show us how.

      Come on son, man up... The money where your mouth is please.

      : )

      Delete
    10. joe you sure talk a big game boy...lets see some of your work boy,not others work boy your own.....c'mon boy man up...you have zero joe...you rely on others hard work boy, you said your mikes research partner so c'mon boy show us the squatch

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    12. 9:25... My work get's posted here sonny Jim, and when I use references I post them, it's what get's you all stampy and complainy that I'm spamming, remember? Do you remember your own arguments?

      Chi-Ching!

      ; )

      Delete
    13. 9:13... No, you have not presented one case for anyone to base a conclusion that the evidence is bunk. You will not apologize, you won't even be in anyone's minds should Standing deliver, you're an insignificant that's merely been flattered with attention and nothing more.

      You want Standing to apologize for his previous work should he deliver? I know you're dumb but I'm afraid... This will go some lengths to verify that work and you're not getting out of it, ha ha ha!! A sure sign you're nervous that you should try and manufacture a situation of excuses already, to a situation ou won't have the guts to be accountable for, ha ha ha!!

      Nwah... Did you get a little upset when the Dyer hoax was evident? Did that hurt your feelings and make you look a little stupid? I think we're coming to the main reason why you're stamping and squeeling all the time, aren't we?

      If I'm defending people with no credibility = quote me, show it to be the case.

      : )

      Delete
    14. I have no idea what the hell you are even talking about here, do you? You're obviously so mad you are reduced to babbling, and babbling the same nonsense over and over. I said I would apologize and I will, but I wont need to. You seem supremely confident in footage you havent seen yet. So are you to tell me that Standing hasnt promised substantial footage of Bigfoot before only to release a laughable re-enacted documentary with a quick, pointless clip of an allegded Bigfoot. That never happened? Is that the kind of footage you are going to shove in my face as proof of bigfoot? Sadly this is the kind of crap you use to promote yourself and people buy it. And his footage this is different this time how?Because Meldrum stands behind it? LOL. The same Meldrum that makes his money off of Bigfoot conferences that are sure to sell lots of tickets to the kind of people that believe your fairy tale nonsense. Go ahead and insult my intelligence all you want. You need proof that this is fake.
      http://doubtfulnewscom.c.presscdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/todd-bigfoot_big-400x234.jpg
      Me or the vast majority of sane adults dont need any proof of that. To suggest that Im nervous when most people look at that and laugh hysterically is comical. I like how you added all the ha ha has. That really drives in your point(not)To further prove how much of a walking idiot you are, you would have us believe that 2 Bigfoot supposedly taken from the same region could look so vastly different. But the Matilda footage is fake because it doesnt look like the majority of bigfoot reports? So another hole in your flawed fairy tale. Bigfoot can look completely different from each other as convenient for you. Even though you have been sourced articles where people have seen wookie like bigfoot plus the whole Dogman phenomena which as far as you can prove, could be Bigfoot too. But nope, thats where your open mindedness ends. So while you require proof for some things to be fake, others you dont. Obviously because you arent so invested in the Matilda footage as you are anything connected to Meldrum. And you never proved the Matilda footage to be fake. Niether did Munns, who threw a half ass report with 3 different wookie masks together to try and explain one mask. Which you defended with more of your redundant babble, and more of your hypocritical criteria that you use to make your excuses work. So when the time comes I would make an apology, but I wont have to because Ill be to busy laughing at you as you deny, deny, and further deny the truth like you do everyday. You are a classical example of a well educated moron.

      Delete
    15. "You're obviously so mad you are reduced to babbling, and babbling the same nonsense over and over."

      Son... Humorously... This is coming from some one who has posted the exact same link for the past week. This is the same person who constantly claims I'm deceitful but can't show us one instance. This is a guy who repeatedly slams Meldrum and Standing, but can't reinforce it with facts.

      No, you wouldn't apologize, you haven't the guts... The way you throw empty allegations around under Anon like a little coward attests to that. I'm quietly confident that Standing has what's swayed people like Meldrum and Bindenagle, that's not to say that I think he's ground breaking stuff will be presented at the Sasquatch Summit, if he does, bonus! No... Standing did not promise anything of the sort before releasing those images, again you show you have no clue what you're talking about. The only thing he's promised is a body or crystal clear footage that's undeniable to the 'skeptical' world. Ironic you should talk of promises, when you've made them in relation to showing everyone how deceitful I am (cringe!) promises don't appear to be a strong point of yours, let alone the average intelligence of someone your age (16). Should Standing deliver, it won't be me shoving anything in your face, it'll be Standing for all your accusations son.

      I'm sorry... I'm promoting myself off of what? Um... The news of Standing's yet to be released footage was posted here by Matt and Shawn, not by me or anyone else, why would I be benefiting from anything of the sort? I seem to remember about ten days ago, the only person who brought Standing up was you, like you have done jumping from subject to subject in an effort to find something to go on. I've been quite open about how I feel about the subject, that I would simply like someone to point out where the source is fake, confirming my intial thoughts on the matter... Cringingly audacious that you should suggest anyone else is babbling repeatedly. This is serious reason to consular that you are of very limited intelligence, and simply NEEDING an angle to verify your efforts for that past few weeks you've been making fruitless allegations about me. What footage? Joe a clue... Will it be different? Not a clue.

      Jeff Meldrum is an authority on evolutionary bipedalism, he's also considered pioneering in his work in getting be attention of some of the very, VERY best conservationsts and primatologists in the planet to take note... If he makes money from traveling to country and giving talks, then who the heck are you to judge burger flipper? Ha!

      Delete
    16. And yes... The one thing you've been right about your whole vomiting session; I do require proof. This is how normal, impartial people think, especially considering we are taking into account a creature that very few have seen, let alone even documented as close up. It is therefore ignorant for enthusiasts to assume what this would look like, even more ignorant from someone so agenda driven and baseless in supporting evidence as yourself. I'm not the one making excuses already remember... Not someone too confident, eh? You take someone from multi-ethnic/racial comminites, you would no doubt have convincing someone from Mars that thy are the same species. Not that I'm stating there's comminites in Sylvanic, just that considering that very obvious answer, we also have reports of Sasquatch looking identical to the two types you see in those sources, and yes... From the same areas. It's as convenient as the facts on data; something as alien to you as actually looking at a topic properly before embarrassing yourself so often. And no... There is not one report of Sasquatch looking like Chewie... Plus we have Chewie masks to compare it to.

      (Sigh)

      No... You referenced one Dogman account, I was not sourced 'articles', again... You appear to have to excaggerate as well as throw unsubstantiated claims and inaccuricies. But hey... Not like you're clever enough for anything else.

      No... I've always required you to test the evidence, like science requires, but prove to me that Standing's photos are fake because it's you making very sincere accusations.

      I was invested in the Matilda footage the first time it came around, it looked like Chewie then as it does now and Bill Munns contributed to its laughable comparisons. Three comparisons... And you have not one to back up your claims, and then you slate Munns? Something about hypocritical?

      (Pfffft)

      When you haven't got insults, you have nothing and really are just a big bag of hot air. And you still haven't proved any of your points.

      : p

      Delete
    17. Oh... And I will say this also, it's a matter of time before I stop flattering you, you're running out of chances of me even responding to you... You want my attenion then you start challenging the subject matter like an adult, or someone who can offer the challenge and justify a response for that matter.

      Delete
  10. While vacationing near Pikes Peak recently, I came upon a carved bigfoot statue with a tablet beneath recounting the story of a ransacked cabin and an encounter with a pair of sasquatch who ran off. DNA was confirmed as unknown. This occurred in1988 and even aired on Unsolved Mysteries Feb 15th, 1989. The video of this episode has since been taken down. Compelling stuff, to say the least.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Standing = HOAXER
    Oh yes he did. Can't wave new magic evidence and make it disappear.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hellooooooooooo, It just took me one look at this video clip to determine it's a darn bear folk's, a skinny one at that.......

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh. We can finally talk about the video.

    Gee thanks Joe for finally letting others chat about the subject of the post.

    I agree with anon 9:58, it's a bear that runs up hill on 2 back paws and swings it's unusually long front limbs in a bipedal manner.

    Yep. Just another bear.

    ReplyDelete
  14. My oh my.

    Just look at the length of that first step on the video.
    It appears to be somekind of super hero in a suit.

    I think maybe Todd can go back and get some measurements on that step now that you can clearly see it on the video.
    Of coarse he must have a objective witness along considering his ridicules face photo's

    I doubt if that first leap or step could be duplicated by a human.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?