Cliff and Ranae Can't Agree on Strange Footprints
While in Fairbanks, Cliff and Ranae, of the Finding Bigfoot team, meet up with a man who found some strange footprints at a river bank when the water level was low. The tracks have some characteristics that seem human, but some that lean towards bigfoot as well.
It's ME
ReplyDeleteWhere's MY brat??
ReplyDeleteStay away from MMG! Sparkles is mine!
Delete-Rainbow Buttstreak
6:45 didn't know human's were primates.
Delete(Pfffft)
Pot Pies and Bot Flies-the Mike Brookreson Story
ReplyDeleteWell there you have it, the game is . . . wait for it . . . AFOOT!
ReplyDelete^ hasn't read a book.
DeleteIS this why proving the existence of Bigfoot gets such a bad rap, who is the liar him or her or both.......
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bYNWfowaDM
Cliff is usually pretty good about doing follow ups and in depth analysis that can take hours if he finds something good. Will wait and see if he posts this later or passes because the tracks are not there anymore due to river rising.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Renae gets paid to find some way to disagree to the 3 Amigos. However, she failed to analyze the tracks based on A. Does it look like it spent a lifetime in a shoe and has a tapered toe line, B. is their a human arch or is it a flat Bigfoot arch, C. is the length or width of heel extraordinary D. is the stride extraordinary, and E. how deep of an imprint was made compared to a human shoe.
ReplyDeleteSince Renae failed to analyze the track pictures and trackway based on any of the 5 points of comparison, Renae passes the Paid Scoftic Test, and can be officially labeled as someone who overlooks the facts in an attempt to cast doubt on authentic evidence.
Renae's approach is not that of the scientist that she claims to be. It is that of a person who has issues with telling the whole truth because she deliberately ignores simple arguments that do not support the position that she is paid to represent. Unfortunately, as a supposed TV documentary scientist, she is held to a higher standard. Consequently, she appears to have failed her former profession of a Biologist, and has failed to pass the minimal ethical standards that apply to someone that presents herself to the public as someone that can be trusted.
DeleteMore utter nothing. More arguing about which version of stupid will pass for "truth".
ReplyDelete