Guy Explains Bigfoot In 60 Seconds
The science Bigfoot, Yeti & Sasquatch’s existence explained in 60 seconds. How they evolved, their closest relatives the orangutan & gigantopithecus, and why no proof, definitive sightings or Bones & remains have been found.
I claim this first for myself! Muahahaha.
ReplyDeleteI was looking for that.
Delete: (
Sorry buddy :)
DeleteThat's ok! Congrats!!
DeleteI come here everyday hoping to find the news that Sasquatch has been discovered.
ReplyDeleteSo, has it been discovered today?
Plenty discovered, none caught.
DeleteWow! How did I miss that?
DeleteCould you please link me to the scientific papers/journals/sources with the official statement? Also if you can provide me with a couple of TG video sources please!
found1
DeletefaÊŠnd/Submit
adjective
1.
having been discovered by chance or unexpectedly.
Plenty found;
http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
... None caught. Oh... And such a mind bending and obviously offensive topic, you'll need a body before anything science paper is published, but the evidence for the mountain gorilla didn't stop being a reality until it was finally successfully tracked 60 years later.
You were welcome.
Wow What? Have I said something wrong or offensive? Why did you answer that way?
DeleteSorry Sir, I re-read my previous post and I can't find anything wrong with it! Maybe you confused me with someone else! I am an habitué of this blog but never read the comments!
DeleteI know that I ain't a very smart or literate man, but I don't deserve to ne treated this way nonetheless
DeleteI have a debhilitative brain injury come from my military period in Afghanistan, it can happen to forget or not pay attention to something!
DeleteReally? I ruined my life only to be freely insulted like that?
DeleteNow I am depressed
Wow, Joe. Brilliant research! Brilliant! What's next? The memory of water?
Deletejoe...the evidence for the mountain gorilla didn't stop being a reality until it was finally successfully tracked 60 years later. ..is a mountain gorilla bigfoot?.if not why use it as an example ? because if it only took 60 years to catalog the gorilla, and bigfoot " evidence" has been around for hundreds of years...thats a problem
DeleteWhy use the mountain gorilla? Because it's a rather large primate that evades in similar terrain? Whilst the comparison highlights why the research is taking so long; tracking the subject is a major stumbling block. Considering natives are some of the very best trackers in the world, the name "boss of the woods" (Hoopa) is telling.
DeleteSasquatch evidence has been traced back for hundreds of years but it's only since 1967 that there has been a consorted effort in locating them. The natives have far more respect for the creature and are very open about their approach to leaving it be and this has been the case for thousands of years.
Now... You have a far more calculatively evasive subject in Bigfoot than a gorilla, and since 1967, we have another 13 years in comparison to the duration it took to track down the mountain gorilla, and we have world beating genericists applying their expetise by the way.
There is no such thing as bigfoot. No. Such. Thing.
DeleteWow Joe you are brutale
ReplyDeleteJT
*brutal
DeleteJT
This guy had some good things to say. I think they are either giganto or evolved from giganto, however no evidence to show giganto is a relative of orangutan. I think giganto is more likely a relic hominid but of course this is strictly just an opinion. Hopefully in future enough of a giganto will be found to prove closer to what it actually is. As for the bigfoot it sure seems from what all I have learned it is another human type relic hominid born and adapted to the forest to ensure its survival against the homo sapiens that surely would have killed it off long ago.
ReplyDeleteChuck
They do seem to be a human hybrid of some sort. There have been many shot, all covered up!!!!! Daniel Boone was the first recorded shooting, and Columbus wrote of them when he discovered America.
DeleteBF will push over large trees 60ft tall, and bury their dead in the hole where roots were, then stand the tree back up, which will grow again. This is why no bones have been found...IMO.
DeleteNothing's shaking on Shakedown Street
ReplyDeletePretty stupid, as there is no such thing as evolution. What a moron!
ReplyDeleteThat's correct! But I think he meant evolution within the species.
Delete1975, The US Army Corps of Engineers published the Washington Environmental Atlas which does state that bigfoot is a native species..
ReplyDelete