YouTuber The Sasquatch Hunters posted a video of a trail cam photo showing something behind a tree. In a comparison shot it is not there. But I have no idea what it actually is...
Yes, just like the #Kitakraze approved "exact match" of photos of Bob H and Patty, the dimensions of the latter having been altered in a miracle of force-fit-photoshopping.
He's a polyglot, yet makes mistakes in writing English and is wrong on many things and says some bad things, wrong things. The blog is sometimes interesting for bigfoot news or history, but marred by weird wrong-feeling stuff.
it may come as a shock to you to learn that your hero wasn`t correct about his theories 99% of the time..and even the "theory" he is known for is now challenged by modern knowledge,mr bean.
WTF??? "we had it examined...." They had what examined, the sticks and grass shadows in the background? If someone photoshopped a Hunter or a Sasquatch in this photo, they forgot to actually include the Hunter or the Sasquatch. I thought the "cloaked bigfoot" was bad but this one might have it beat.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Last.
ReplyDeletePhotoshop and faked as always
DeleteYes, just like the #Kitakraze approved "exact match" of photos of Bob H and Patty, the dimensions of the latter having been altered in a miracle of force-fit-photoshopping.
DeleteLooks human to me.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteits a cloaking owl ya fooks
bigfoot can sense a trail camera from 600 miles away- no sale
ReplyDeleteNext..
ReplyDeleteI swear I have yet to even SEE anything there
ReplyDeleteNext. Worthless Shawn.
ReplyDeleteHoly fuckin shit Ebola is in the United States!
ReplyDeleteIs it true that Robert Lindsay is a genius? Asking for a friend
ReplyDeleteHe's a polyglot, yet makes mistakes in writing English and is wrong on many things and says some bad things, wrong things. The blog is sometimes interesting for bigfoot news or history, but marred by weird wrong-feeling stuff.
DeleteBuch of morons
ReplyDeleteHave you checked the spelling of your "name" there, Einstein, not to mention that of your "comment"?
DeleteThat's an embarrassingly public, worldwide self-detonation.
it may come as a shock to you to learn that your hero wasn`t correct about his theories 99% of the time..and even the "theory" he is known for is now challenged by modern knowledge,mr bean.
DeleteMr bean?? thats one i will NEVER live down!! : (
DeleteWTF??? "we had it examined...." They had what examined, the sticks and grass shadows in the background? If someone photoshopped a Hunter or a Sasquatch in this photo, they forgot to actually include the Hunter or the Sasquatch. I thought the "cloaked bigfoot" was bad but this one might have it beat.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I need glasses.
ReplyDelete^ aww come on now! At least less "might" come up with some good evidence, i trust him More than most others..
DeleteOops . so sorry clive, carry on!
DeleteNot to worry...I saw it too !
DeleteIt's, it's, ITS.... Not a dad gum thing.
ReplyDelete