Fake or real? Creepy girl with deer
This photograph is being passed around on Facebook. The original poster ask what we thought about the photograph. Fake or real? It's hard to say, but we want to know how many people get this one right. Our poll is below:
First for my friend Joe
ReplyDeleteMMC
High 5 MMC!!
DeleteGod bless ya MMC!!
DeleteGod? How inconsistent of you. (Just yanking your chain, Joe. No need for a lengthy reply. Or a short one, I suppose.)
DeleteRight back at you Joe
DeleteMMC
Harvard Gives Student Full Ride After He Tells Them He’s Illegal Immigrant !!!
DeleteTHE NEW NORM !!!
Everytime I see joes avatar I want to brutally kill an orangutan.
DeleteWay to go jerk.
There's no need to be envious of a intellectually superior primate, bro.
Deleteintellecshun gits to tham richin folks
DeleteMountain Monsters Marathon
Deletethis FRIDAY
WE SAVED on Friday
^impossibull like all tham monsters ons 1 dayz
DeleteDestination America shure is
.................
DeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
Oh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
.....
^ plaster wont work for fake prints, way too brittle! Im tellin ya you gotta use fast set silicon gell an some chopsticks to simulate bones
DeleteAnd structual resistence for varied substrate's,
DUAL FLEX OF METATARSAL
AND DERMAL RIDGES OF THE CORRECT SIZE& LAYOUT!
Are trade secrets!!!!
Ps,,piss off Joe Troll.
YEAH!! A FRESH NEW TOPIC!!! HAVE A GREAT DAY ALL!!
ReplyDeleteHey Chick
DeleteMMC
................
DeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
Oh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
.................
Like
ReplyDelete..............
DeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
Oh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
...........
What girl? The only thing I see is the reticle from my scope on that dudes chest. Come on deer season!
ReplyDelete..........
DeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
Oh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
...............
thats be like tham bigfoots gitin tham deers
ReplyDeletehistorickull tham bigfoots be seein neers tham deers
ReplyDeleteThat buck ain't a shooter, let em' walk.
ReplyDeleteDisagree Rush. That boy's thicker than Beyoncé. If you're willing to wait for a better specimen, we'll swing the truck around and pick you up in April.
DeleteBeyonce.
Delete8-0
Jay Z
Delete0-8
They are moving as of this week up my way. They are all fattened up and looking good
DeleteMMC
@ 9:58, That's fine. Just wondering where you are located and hunt? Hunters at my ranch have a minimum of a 140" eight point they can take per my regulations. This deer is right there, however for myself I try to best my largest 184" net B&C, I would let that buck walk.
Deletei hunt for food,can't eat the horns..however i won't shoot a yearling or a doe ( unless i have a permit )
Delete^^ Northwest Mo. Clay and Clinton Counties. Within 40 miles of K.C. I'm dropping the sucker.
DeleteShe doesn't look creepy to me xx
ReplyDeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
DeleteOh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
I'm sorry. I'm just a lonely divorced bald headed fat guy.I have no life but this blog.I know, it sucks to be me.I just wish that I had friends other than the imaginary ones that my mom made up for me.Oh well,I still have Angry Birds to look forward to. And I do like Joe. It's just that I have a inferior complex when it comes to Bigfoot. I know they're out there. But I get all scared when it's my bed time. I apologize to everyone cause my mommy caught me acting like a punk ass beech.Good night and if another CowardJoeyBoy post it's not the real one.;-).
DeleteStand-in CowardJoeyBoy.
What's wrong with lonely guys, and divorced? I'm divorced and get lonely at times. Though I do have a full head of hair and ain't fat. Though I do w*nk a lot, is that bad? ;¬)
Deleteyeah big jon went a little overboard trying to be funny at 12:13
DeleteGirl and deer be SAFE because Bigfoots dont go near
ReplyDeletetrail cams : )
but dem bears bein attakin you
Deletetham bigfeets keeps tham bear away and the trail cam keepin tham bigfoot away sos thay be SAFE
DeleteHi ..I`m the JoeBoy and the BIGGEST TROLL on the whole SITE.
DeleteOh YEAH ...I`m going to be here for a VERY VERY LONG TIME.
Bigfoot or Monkey Suits and Fake Feet?
In the last section, we saw that many believers propose that the sasquatch is a giant primate, descended from the prehistoric gigantopithecus. Skeptics recognize that such a creature could exist, but hold that it is highly unlikely the creature could have lived close to inhabited areas for hundreds of years without anyone gathering conclusive evidence. The more likely explanation, according to the debunkers, is that several independent hoaxers have built up a collection of false evidence that has duped a very large number of people.
One of the most common types of sasquatch evidence is casts of giant footprints. Skeptics point out that this evidence is fairly simple to fake.
To make "bigfoot" prints, a prankster would just mold two large feet out of plaster, attach them to the bottom of his shoes and walk with a very long stride (possibly leaping with each step). The size and shape of supposed sasquatch footprints do vary considerably, which may indicate a number of unrelated pranksters. Sasquatch sounds could also be faked fairly easily, critics say, possibly using a computer program that alters sounds from an animal or human so the noise sounds completely alien.
As for photographic evidence (which is relatively rare), skeptics suggest that the documented sasquatches are actually people dressed in ape suits. Sasquatch-believers recognize that many photos and films are hoaxes, but they say that a few of them would be very hard to fake. The most famous piece of sasquatch evidence, the 1967 film shot by Roger Patterson in Bluff Creek, Cali., is at the heart of this debate. Several Hollywood insiders, including "An American Werewolf in London" director John Landis, have claimed that the film shows a man dressed in an ape suit. According to Landis, the suit was designed by John Chambers, the special-effects master who created the costumes for the original "Planet of the Apes" movies. Chambers denies any involvement, but the rumor persists.
Sasquatch believers say there are several details in the footage that indicate the creature is not a person. The main evidence is that the figure in the film keeps its knees bent while it is walking (see The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization for pictures from the film). When humans walk, they lock their knees with each step, holding their legs straight. Believers also point out that the figure's skin and fur has a rippling motion, like a living creature's moving flesh, and that the surface of a costume would not move this way. Skeptics counter that the rippling-skin effect can be achieved by attaching a "water-bag" under the suit. According to E! Online: Bigfoot Movie: A Hollywood Hoax?, several Hollywood effects artists say the figure is obviously a guy in an ape suit with a water-bag fastened to his stomach.
But what about all the reported sightings? Believers make the point that people from all age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels say they've seen the creatures, indicating that the sightings are not an isolated phenomenon limited to a few pranksters and kooks. Skeptics counter that while these people aren't necessarily lying about what they've seen, they may be mistaken. A bear in the wild will stand up on its hind legs, possibly giving the impression of a tall primate. Impressions are highly subjective, skeptics note, and may be skewed when a person
but dem bears be attakin yous when yous on yous way buy a kamera.
DeleteWolfman, Devil Dog, Grassman, Wampus Beast, Mothman, Lizard Demon - for generations, these mysterious Appalachian monsters have spawned countless sightings in the 1500-mile long mountain chain. With a distinctive landscape of dense woods, murky lakes, and hidden valleys stretching the length of the eastern U.S., the region is a hotbed for creatures both legendary and unidentified.
DeleteNow in Destination America's MOUNTAIN MONSTERS, a band of hardcore hunters and trappers native to West Virginia and known as The Appalachian Investigators of Mysterious Sightings (AIMS) is at the ready to identify and snare these shadowy figures in the hope of helping local mountain communities rest more easily when night falls and nature comes out to play.
Having spent a lifetime with the mountain wilderness as their home, hobby, and hunting ground, the AIMS and its founder John "Trapper" Tice expertly tap into their backwoods ingenuity using both traditional techniques and modern technology to capture the supernatural beast.
I'm sorry. I'm just a lonely divorced bald headed fat guy.I have no life but this blog.I know, it sucks to be me.I just wish that I had friends other than the imaginary ones that my mom made up for me.Oh well,I still have Angry Birds to look forward to. And I do like Joe. It's just that I have a inferior complex when it comes to Bigfoot. I know they're out there. But I get all scared when it's my bed time. I apologize to everyone cause my mommy caught me acting like a punk ass beech.Good night and if anyone else post after my time stamp on this post they're not me. Again I'm sorry.
DeleteStand-in CowardJoeyBoy.
you fit the build for Monster Hunting! gets get you a GUN and U in : )
Deletejettrollboy has no girlfriend and has no hope of ever getting one so he gets his jollies from copying and pasting the same article over and over again.
Deletewhat a sad lonely pathetic person he is
Attorney General Eric Holder To Step Down...
ReplyDeleteAll going according to PLAN
pic was taken by photographer who has many images just like it.
ReplyDeleteyour welcome assholes!
^^^ you mad bro ?
DeleteThe most endangered species, the honest man will still survive annihilation forming a world state of integrity,sensitive , open and strong
ReplyDeleteReagan be DEAD : (
DeleteMy Granma be DEAD :( xx
DeleteI'm still here
Deleteand me MOM be DEAD : (
Deletebush jr be alive:-)
DeleteGood to hear it rumfer xx
DeleteAnd this eva....person. Just gonna make me beat the piss out of a tranny one day. I hate you all.
DeleteHate,that's very self destructive you know and anyway she beat the piss out you xx
Delete^ poor boy in his breakdown is seeing 'tranny's' everywhere now, whatever they are.
DeleteIt's funny... People calling other people cowards when they're behind anonimaty being tough.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html
I know what he means,i found one xx
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ptoCJfUb8
I am seriously going to kill a monkey because of you.
ReplyDeleteEnjoy the blood on your hands.
JOEYTROLLBOY FOR BFE PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDelete^ JOEYTROLLBOY ^
DeleteRomney in 2016
DeleteFOR YOUR SAFETY
Joeytrollboy is none other than Big Jon in anon mode, because he is green with envy cause Joe is president of the super friends
Deleteand ROMNEY president for life
Deletehow true 12:51 ...and ole big gay jon is still just a wonder twin
DeleteThe deer and the girl are escaping from the Mudhole Monster.
ReplyDeletebut t he bigfoots wont get near that trail cam sure wont
DeletePLENTY OF GNOMES FOUND!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guZRtZ_5MLQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2LMMTJkftk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F677g88kw8Y
NONE CAUGHT!
hobbits created gnomes to mined GOLD for them
DeleteWhen you get scientists enthusiastic about gnomes... You'll have a point.
DeleteWhen you get an actual bigfoot found, you'll have a point.
Deletewho created them JEWs
Delete^ our anunaki gods,, of course
Delete12:13...
Deletefind
fʌɪnd/Submit
verb
1.
discover or perceive by chance or unexpectedly.
"Lindsey looked up to find Niall watching her"
synonyms: discover, become aware, realize, observe, notice, note, perceive, learn, detect
discover after a deliberate search.
discover or perceive by chance or unexpectedly.
"Lindsey looked up to find Niall watching her"
synonyms: discover, become aware, realize, observe, notice, note, perceive, learn, detect More
discover after a deliberate search.
"I can't find my keys"
synonyms: locate, spot, pinpoint, unearth, obtain, detect, put one's finger on;
Do you ever get tired of looking stupid?
JEWs got that Rosh Hashanah and be causing a ruckes in that middle east WW 3 a comiiiin
DeleteGRAYs are mermaids hybrids just like them bigfoots are GRAY hybrids!
ReplyDeleteWhen you get scientists endorsing mermaids... You'll have a point.
ReplyDeletePLENTY OF LEPRECHAUNS FOUND!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-Rt56n-vC4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgdnKl_5IJY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yHos-8Uf7E
NONE CAUGHT!
WHO ELSE SEEN DA LEPRECHAUN SAY YAY!
YAY!!!!!!!
DeleteGRAYs created leprechauns to mined GOLD for them
DeleteWhen you get an actual bigfoot found, you'll have a point
ReplyDeleteGet some physical and biological evidence, locate it's residing habitat and you've found mermaids... But not caught them.
ReplyDeleteHaving a meltdown much?
: p
elves like faires some say they be the same thing so bewares
ReplyDeleteFind the GRAYs you find the Bigfoots, Mermaids and other hybrids that they have created
ReplyDeleteZERO biological positively identified as bigfoot found.
ReplyDeleteEVER.
Mermaids live in the ocean dumbass.
Yes, you are having a meltdown.
GRAYs have USOs to track mermaids
ReplyDelete12:28... No biological evidence of a Bigfoot, no... But plenty of an unknown primate;
ReplyDeletehttp://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
The hunt troll is open !
ReplyDeleteFor it to be real T-FATS would have to submit it..Right T?
ReplyDelete