I want a hoverbike


Deep in the English countryside, aeronautical engineers are perfecting a new generation of aerial drone. With increased stability and manoeuvrability, and able to carry a much heavier payload… it represents a significant leap forward in drone technology. This small drone, however, is just the 1/3rd proof-of-concept model for something much more ambitious. A full-sized quad-copter hoverbike that can be piloted by a person as well as flown by remote. It's the brain-child of engineer and helicopter pilot Chris Malloy, who first tested his concept with this bi-copter design.




Comments

  1. http://www.prisonplanet.com/white-marine-beaten-by-black-mob-in-michael-brown-revenge-attack.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinwalker_Ranch

      Delete
    2. I like to take dumps on my sister.

      Delete
    3. ans WILD BILL old Marine ans Bear Hunter dont has time achasin tham woman folk !!!
      NO SIR !!!

      Delete
    4. Those black ministers where calling for " revenge" in the micheal brown death. Hypachristians. Vengeance against white people ? Sounds that way

      Vengeance is mine say The Lord

      Delete
    5. Bigfoot Mystery Solved

      As aliens traverse the universe in the search of thrills they carry with them pets, much like our own cats and dogs. Once in awhile these pets need to use the toilet. So if they are passing they drop in and off so too speak. However, once in a while their pets fook off, untrained big hairy bastards and cause havoc.

      So that is why you have different types of Bigfoot and also the UFO Bigfoot connection. When special powers are discovered it's simply that their masters have found them again and beam them back up.

      Simple, eh?

      Delete
    6. A white Marine was left in an induced coma after a group of black men brutally beat him as part of a revenge attack in response to the killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri
      Police were called to the scene at 2am but the mob had already left. Despite the context of the argument and the yelling of racial slurs, Police Chief Tim Brinkley said the incident wasn’t being treated as a hate crime. This does not appear to be a hate crime,” Brinkley said in the press release. “We are investigating this as an aggravated assault. It’s very early in this investigation but thus far the evidence and statements suggest that a verbal altercation turned physical and somebody got hurt.”
      THE NEW NORM

      Delete
    7. I'm Black and i am so ashamed of how the majority of my people are conducting themselves in ferguson, mo.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. I WONDER how long it will be before this machine is a GUN PLATFORM ?

      Delete
    2. HILLARY TO RULE US ALL IN 2016

      Delete
  3. So while in the Olympic peninsula the four of us were walking on a trail to the coast, so I would from time to time stop and do a grazing sweep of the area and I noticed on the ridge line an odd looking tree stump cone shape and right next two standing trees. So I made note and we continued to the coast, at about quarter mile in we stopped and took in some water and did another look around there up on the side of a hill a cone shape stump next to a standing tree this was quite odd indeed so I got the others to look @ this odd object so we took a minute or two and all agreed it was a very queer object and we continued our march to the sea. We next came to a turn in the trail and again we saw another cone shape stump now extremely curious two of us started off the trail to this oddity we took several steeps and I said we trading daylight for dark we need to get to the coast and get back to the trailhead before dark so we returned to the trail and finished our quest. After our trek we traveled to a local café and one of us in the group asked the waitress are there any bigfoots abouts she laughed and said more than you can count in these parts! So we started to think wonder if that odd shape stump was a bigfoot observing our movements! Or was it just some odd looking stumps in the bush!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. did you venture back to the original viewpoints to check ? ...probably not and decided just to say you`d seen bigfoot..have to admit it sounds much more dramatic than witnessing a tree stump

      Delete
    2. no not yet its a ways from where we live. didnt say we saw a bigfoot just some oddities,
      Yes we are making plans to go back next June so if they are there we will venture to them - if they are not then it might have been something other than tree stumps time will tell

      Delete
    3. sounds pretty odd though..it is clearly something that stuck out for you all..good luck and take care !!

      Delete
    4. its a away vacation for us so we get out and about up that way once a year so it will have to wait till next June

      Delete
    5. ^ don`t forget to give the missing 411 books a thoroughly good read afore ye go... take care.

      Delete
  4. ans WILD BILL gots that thar BIG KNIFE he shure do

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mexico’s president spoke of the need for U.S. immigration reform on a two-day visit to immigrant-friendly California, saying those who reject diversity and inclusion will ultimately be proven wrong.
    THE NEW NORM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sounds about right..where else will all the scum come from

      Delete
    2. mexicuns much needed voter block for the NEW WORLD ORDER

      Delete
    3. GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY
      "NOW".. you weak gringos!!

      Delete
    4. si obama el jefe de los estados unidos

      Delete
    5. ^^ aw where else can i get greasy tacos ?

      Delete
    6. sí tacos mejores en México

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-CA/windows-xp/help/on-screen-keyboard

      Delete
    2. All Caps was banned again for trolling a certain bigfoot personality (whose name cannot be mentioned).

      Delete
  7. some more evidence

    We heard three unbelievably low-toned grunts outside of our tent at dawn (around 5 am) on Tueday, September 24th, 2013. Our tent is about 7 feet high when set up and the grunts sounded about a foot or two higher than the tent and about 6 feet away.

    BFRO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The first class was distant and we could here clearly due to no wind and the cold. When elk call each other, people not familiar with wapiti can mis-interpret these calls as whistles. This was no elk. J.D. got out his cow elk call and responded with a short set of chirps. I got out my Rifle. Something was not right. There was no initial response to J.D.'s cow calls. I put some more wood on the fire. Then came the second shrill howl, in the creek bottom right below us. It was loud and like nothing else we have ever heard and believe me when I tell you we have hunted every manner of "known" species in these mountains. This was nothing that we ever encountered.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, amazingly ludicrous.

      Delete
    3. Si bigfoots de los estados unidos

      Delete
    4. 12:38 ..instant dismissal of facts..that is amazingly ludicrous.

      Delete
    5. Sorry, I forgot about the law of bigfoot which requires that any crackpot's wild story be immediately accepted as absolute fact. I apologize.

      Delete
    6. It's just a story man, you come across so sweaty and scared.

      Delete
    7. Did you read my comment? I apologized. Sheesh.

      Delete
    8. I accept your apology Joe.

      Delete
    9. ^ hahahaha ..more delusion

      Delete
  8. Strange but true.....

    pay attention to who this woman actually is and what she has been and done...

    http://www.transients.info/2014/03/karen-hudes-announces-existence-of.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. I WONDER how long it will be before this machine is a GUN PLATFORM ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Joe, White Squatch hunt is on.

      Calling all Chickenfoot Skeptards in central Cali.
      No CHARGE!

      Wish you weere ready to make a trip to the US.
      We're going to get some good recordings!

      Delete
    2. Man, I'm seriously sad at times for being this side, BP... Go have yourselves the times of your lives but be careful!

      Recordings are a top interest of mine man at the moment, you get something you be sure to let me hear it!

      Delete
    3. ^ doncha forget ta tek yo hairy suit

      Delete
    4. I suppose recordings would have to be one of your top interests, as opposed to studying a live subject or analyzing a dead specimen -- or really anything else besides inherently unreliable evidence.

      Delete
    5. What do you mean IF he gets recordings? He affirmatively declared that he would be getting good recordings (and no other evidence of course)!

      Delete
    6. When they're verified by science; nothing better! About as reliable as anthropology, primatology, wildlife biology & conservation.

      Peace.

      Delete
    7. 1:19... And I'll very much be looking forward to those recordings.

      ; )

      Delete
    8. What is as reliable as those other subjects you listed -- bigfootology? I just want to make sure I use the correct nomenclature.

      Delete
    9. ^^^ for goodness sake dont forget to take the suit or there wont be any "evidence" in video shots

      Delete
    10. 1:24... That would in fact be hominology, you're welcome.

      Delete
    11. Hominids include chimps, gorillas, orangutans, and humans. I was asking about a term which specifically describes the study of bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. Yeah... I would call it Hominology to be honest bro, but that's cool.

      "I think that one of the great scientific results of the 20th century was the discovery of relict hominids (homins, for short), popularly known as Abominable Snowman, Yeti, Yeren, Almas, Almasty, Bigfoot, Sasquatch, etc. Actually, it was a re-discovery by hominologists of what had been known to western naturalists from antiquity to the middle of the 18th century, when wild bipedal primates were classified by Carl Linnaeus as Homo troglodytes (i.e., caveman) or Homo sylvestris (i.e., woodman, forestman). As for eastern scholars and rural populations in many parts of the world, they have always been aware of wild hairy bipeds, known under diverse popular names."

      - Dmitri Bayanov

      Delete
    13. So the "discovery" must have consisted of substantial numbers of live and dead specimens.

      Delete
    14. You`re forgetting that the so called "yeti" sample obtained in Tibet (maybe Nepal,I can`t recall) was found to be from a Yak...they revered this for years in the mistaken belief that it was Yeti...or are we misled.

      Delete
    15. You can discover something without capturing or classifying it. That's what scientific research is about. It took 60 years to track a mountain gorilla after they discovered it.

      Delete
    16. 1:47 what discovery ? ...not of a bigfoot or "type" of creature.

      Delete
    17. 1:48... A sample does not account for the length of time the yeti has been agkkowledged in historical cultures and reported.

      If there's an ancient bear up there, what else?

      Delete
    18. Well i agree people are reporting something and i do believe people report genuinely what they see and encounter...normally.

      Delete
    19. I guess I come from a world of belief that says that humans would go all out to discover something like this...it appears not all of humankind feels the same...with all manner of strange inconsistencies and obfuscation from officialdom...I really don`t understand WHY science has not gone all out to find the truth.

      Delete
    20. Can't agree more. If it didn't exist, then people wouldn't be seeing it and they sure as heck wouldn't leave tracks.

      Delete
    21. Yeah and someone actually shot and killed mountain gorillas in 1902, so there were dead specimens. So you didn't answer my question about dead bigfoot specimens.

      Delete
    22. 1:56...

      Some national parks are the primary revenue generator for many cities, Knoxville Tennesee, Great Smoky Mountain National Park drags in a revenue of $700-$800m a year from the area surrounding the park. Any adverse publicity or a discovery of a primate that can twist your head off that decreases attendance at those parks would have a considerable economic impact on the park itself and local community.

      The Forest Products industry in Mississippi has a huge impact on the state’s economy. The total economic impact of forestry and forest products in Mississippi for 2006 was $17.4 billion in output, $7.1 billion in value-added, $4.4 billion in wages and salaries, and 123,659 jobs. Expressed as a percentage of Mississippi’s total economy, the forest products industry generates 10.5% of output, 9.4% of value-added, 9.2% of wages and salaries, and 8.5% of all jobs in Mississippi.

      Delete
    23. 1:59... D'you know, as early as the turn of the 19th century there were giant human skeletal remains with sloping foreheads.

      A perfect example.

      Delete
    24. Oh yeah, and the Smithsonian commenced a gigantic conspiracy to cover up the findings at the same time they were supposedly publishing articles about the subject.

      In summary, there are at least three separate entities engaged in concurrent conspiracies to cover up bigfoot -- the national parks, the forest products industry, and the Smithsonian. How many others are covering up bigfoot?

      Delete
    25. "John Wesley Powell (1834 - 1902) was made the first director of the Bureau of Ethnology in the United States in 1879, which was established that same year by an Act of Congress, a position he held until his death in 1902.

      That bureau, which changed its name to the Bureau of American Ethnology in 1897, was directly connected to the Smithsonian Institution, which had been established in 1846 through the will of the British chemist James Smithson (1765 - 1829) and funded by his bequest of 105 sacks of about 1,000 gold sovereigns each, and pursued the mission of organizing all the anthropological research in the nation.

      In his first year as head of the Bureau of Ethnology, Powell submitted the first of his Annual Reports of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, dated July 1880 and covering the Bureau of Ethnology's efforts for 1879-1880.

      Beginning on page 73 of that publication is a famous essay by Powell entitled "On Limitations to the Use of Some Anthropologic Data." In it, Powell sets forth the doctrine which would become the guiding principle of his Bureau of American Ethnology and of the Smithsonian at large all the way through the present day, a strictly isolationist doctrine which flatly declares that it is "illegitimate" to entertain any line of analysis which attempts to connect any artifacts found in the New World with any "peoples or so-called races of antiquity in other portions of the world."

      A reproduction of the letter, with the passages emphasizing this isolationist doctrine highlighted in yellow, can be found online here as well;

      http://www.scienceviews.com/lostcivilizations/powelldoctrine.html

      Recently, a new aspect of the Smithsonian's policy of refusing to countenance any artifacts that might pose a challenge to Powell's "doctrine" of isolationism has received a lot of publicity in light of the publication of Richard Dewhurst's new book Ancient Giants Who Ruled North America: the Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up. Richard Dewhurst used the capabilities of modern search engines to examine the archives of US newspapers going back to the early 1800s and found hundreds of published descriptions of giant skeletons being unearthed across the North American continent, many of them containing photographs.

      He also found evidence that, while the Smithsonian in its early years was an enthusiastic documenter of such discoveries, the arrival of John Wesley Powell marked a dramatic change in the Smithsonian's attitude and policy towards such finds, to such an extent that Dewhurst was forced to conclude that: "What my research has revealed is that the Smithsonian has been at the center of a vast cover-up of America's true history since the 1880s" (3). He documents numerous cases in which representatives from the Smithsonian arrived on the scene of any reported discoveries of giant skeletons with remarkable rapidity (sometimes within one or two days, even in the late 1800s and even when the archaeological find was in remote regions of the American west) and in which skeletons reported as being turned over to the Smithsonian were never seen again."

      Delete
    26. Today, if one searches the internet for the terms "Smithsonian cover up," the predominant results will have to do with the cover-up of giant skeletons. Richard Dewhurst believes that the motives for what he calls the "Powell doctrine" of suppressing and denying any archaeological evidence that could indicate the presence of other ancient peoples in the Americas or contact with ancient cultures from across the oceans may have sprang from the fact that John Wesley Powell's father was a Methodist preacher in Palmyra, New York (Powell himself was obviously named after John Wesley, 1703 - 1791, the founder of Methodism), where Joseph Smith first published the Book of Mormon in 1830 and where the early enthusiasm of the people of the area for the new revelations caused Powell's father to lose his congregation.

      Richard Dewhurst also believes that the distasteful US policy of "Manifest Destiny" and the efforts of the federal government following the Civil War to seize the territory to the west of the Mississippi and to suppress the Native Americans who lived there played a role in the Smithsonian's (and Powell's) desire to characterize the native peoples of the continent as primitive barbarians, incapable of producing anything more than "the most rudimentary picture making," (Dewhurst, 6). Dewhurst proposes that such a doctrine may have been deployed in order to help convince the population to support the aggressive plans to exploit the lands of the Native Americans."

      Delete
    27. So the published Smithsonian reports of supposed giant skeleton discoveries date from the 1890's -- AFTER the "ethnologist" hatched of the supposed conspiracy! So they decided to cover up evidence of something they considered distasteful and THEN they published reports regarding the same subject for anyone to read! Makes perfect sense to me. lol

      Delete
    28. Not only that, but the supposed giant skeletons were reported to be "red haired" and "Caucasian," so if the racist "ethnologists" really wanted to boost European superiority, they would have championed the "giant skeletons" and not buried them. lol

      Delete
    29. 2:29... Read my comments properly and stop panicking.

      2:30... Amazing.

      2:32... Read the comments properly.

      Delete
    30. Yes, the chap you mentioned was appointed Director in 1879, and then more than a decade later, the Smithsonian published "giant skeleton" reports. Some cover up (unless I missed the part about the time machine!). lol

      Delete
    31. "He also found evidence that, while the Smithsonian in its early years was an enthusiastic documenter of such discoveries, the arrival of John Wesley Powell marked a dramatic change in the Smithsonian's attitude and policy towards such finds, to such an extent that Dewhurst was forced to conclude that: "What my research has revealed is that the Smithsonian has been at the center of a vast cover-up of America's true history since the 1880s".

      Read properly.

      Delete
    32. "In the Twelfth Annual Report from the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian, published in 1894, Cyrus Thomas and Thomas Powell of the Bureau of Ethnology wrote of several discoveries where large, seemingly human skeletal remains were found."

      I suppose I don't have to highlight the date for you, but by my calculation, the year 1894 came 15 years after 1879 (without the use of old Doc Brown's Delorean of course). lol

      Delete
    33. "He also found evidence that, while the Smithsonian in its early years was an enthusiastic documenter of such discoveries, the arrival of John Wesley Powell marked a dramatic change in the Smithsonian's attitude and policy towards such finds."

      Powell died in 1902.

      (Sigh)

      Nighty, night.

      ; )

      Delete
    34. I'd sigh too if I just suffered a tremendous throttling like Joe did. lol

      Delete
    35. Denial can eat a way at a man... Let it go, you're cleverer than that.

      Delete
    36. Okay, I admit that your racist ethnographer became Director in 1879 (and shortly thereafter outlined his "isolationist" theory regarding the study of anthropology), but then for unexplained reasons, waited for at least 15 years while the Smithsonian published reports "enthusiastically" about the discoveries, which, according to you, directly contradicted the racist Director's theories. It's difficult to imagine how someone could deny such an obvious scenario. lol

      Delete
    37. ... Yeah, when the penny drops, it's pretty remarkable.

      Peace.

      Delete
    38. I look forward to the next discussion when you can perhaps offer a reasonable timeline of events for your proposed conspiracy (not requiring a time machine of course).

      Delete
    39. Man, ha ha ha!! I woke up to that? Man... This 'timline' would account for an easily attainable explanation if you can read properly, the guy died in 1902 at a reasonably young age, to which all documentation of the remains was made, but still accumulated with certain people in a position to have arranged these for display; the decision at this stage was to not. This is all in the comments and easily attainable if you can read properly.

      Also... You've been shown two references to which the guy tells you what he's done. Man... Denial is one heck of a thing, I would recommended you leave it go. Anyone would think you're a little too desperate to hang on to your delusions and in fact censor facts. Not only do you have the documentation of skeletons, you have a direct quote from the person in charge saying they won't be considered (twice), and a 'timeline of events' that concurs with what's being presented... An accumulation of sources, and later a failure to display to the public.

      Every one of your arguments, well and truly knocked out of the ball park.

      "The eyes of that species of extinct giant, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara as our eyes do now.”
      - Abraham Lincoln, 1848

      You see, this is how common knowledge this field was at the time... Right up until the remains we're being listed in Smithsonian Bureaus in the early 1890's... By this time a decision with what to do with these remains is to sit on them and leave time pass.., a decision that took a long time to implement in the face of such wide spread acknowledgement of these finds.

      Learn to read properly... Oh, and I'll be using this time and time again.

      ; )

      Delete
    40. "The Smithsonian Institution aggressively acquired the remains of a vast preponderance of giants’ remains unearthed in North America. Newspaper articles from the period tell this as well as science journals. The technique that Smithsonian curators used to coax people to ship the evidence to them was quite ingenious. First, the museum established itself as the anthropological authority bar none. Often, this was enough to attract flies to the “bug zapper.” And if it wasn’t, then requests were mailed by the museum, which asked to see the evidence. After bones and artifcacts were shipped from another museum, or from a private party, the Smithsonian then proceeded to “sit on them” for a long, long time. In retrospect, it’s obvious that the material was simply put into a top secret warehouse somewhere. Inquiries from the parties involved would produce stalling. Years typically became one or two decades.

      Yes, the Smithsonian’s modus operandi tended to use passive aggressive means to confiscate evidence. This time-honored tradition worked like a charm. Museum staff (from other institutions) tended to give up the easiest. Private parties that had personally discovered or bought the remains were more persistent. Eventually, though, the person would die, as folks tend to do. When another generation of family members deigned to keep up the fight of getting back their property, the Smithsonian would then shift into second gear: refusing to even acknowledge that it had ever received the skeletons and artifacts. Most times, the next generation of family members did not keep badgering the Smithsonian. Why? Well, primarily because they were busy with the travails of earning a living and raising a family. Of course, public perceptions about such things might also have been a contributing factor. The sciences had not only brushed off the evidence; they had also taken a firm stand against the possibility that a giant race of hominids once lived in North America. So, by the 1950′s, children and grandchildren of the original owners of said artifacts, which were stolen by the Smithsonian, could have started to doubt “grandpa’s stories” about a giant skull, copper jewelry, etc. Plausible deniability worked like a charm when new staff and new scientists at the Smithsonian replaced the older generations, which originally accepted the remains. How’s that for sneaky? It’s why I call the Smithsonian “Land of the Lost.”

      Delete
    41. I look forward to the next discussion when you can perhaps offer a reasonable explanation of events for your proposed straw man arguments (not requiring to lean against questions a ten year old can answer from deducing said comments).

      ; )

      Delete
  10. sí pie grande de los estados unidos

    ReplyDelete
  11. George Bush had everthing under CONTROL
    NOW KAOS RULES US ALL

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story