Watch: The Making of the Amish Sighting Paintings [Bigfoot Illustrated]


In this video, Dred Funn explains how he illustrated the Amish Bigfoot Sighting paintings. It's one of the craziest Bigfoot stories ever.



If you haven't seen the Amish Sighting video, you can watch it here:



Comments

  1. For the guy who's had the worst meltdown ever... Take your meds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It must be a little soul destroying to have out in all that effort, ruining every thread and cheesing everyone but me off, only to see me post here after it all.

      Keep up the good work bro.

      Delete
    2. Recognition means it bothered you.

      Delete
    3. Ten threads with my name in every other post... How could I not recognize it exactly? If anything. I'm faltered.

      We'll see how much it 'bothers' me when I'm still here months down the line.

      Delete
    4. Easily, don't mention it. You think Brad Pitt addresses everyone that mentions him, especially those that do so in an unsavory way? Sometimes the better man is the man that says the least, even when wrong.

      No one thinks you'll leave, no one truly cares. It's to make fun of you, not to inspire you. You've already shown and stated just how large of a peice of you is defined on the comment section of a bigfoot blog. That's enough for even the staunchest skeptic or proponent to see your true colors.

      Delete
    5. Did you just compare me to Brad Pitt? Now I'm flattered.

      I think you've taken things way too personally and are a little upset. Who cares about someone on a blog? Why let it ruin your life??

      Anyone comparing a Bigfoot blog to Hollywood, or let posters upset them the way you have, shouldn't be suggesting anything about anyone else, me thinks.

      Delete
    6. Joe, this guy is starting to remind me of elementary school when I shoved a girl on the playground and called her a dumb-dumb because I had a crush on her.

      Delete
    7. You fail to see that I'm not the person doing it. I'm being a calm mediator in the process, I have no dog in this fight. I think both of you, or both sides, however you define the atrocity that is this comment section, are childish, impish, and have nothing better to do every day of the week than bicker and taunt each other. It's tiresome and off putting.

      I don't know if bigfoot exists, I've never seen one. I'd like to believe it but without actual proof, not your worn out cliches, it's too large of a pill to swallow. None of this connect the dots, or if you look at it this way, or the proof will be here soon just trust me dialogue will ever be good enough. Clear cut undeniable scientific evidence. Until then I'm fairy neutral on the subject but am conflicted because of the presence on this blog.

      Delete
    8. OOOHHHH! Brad Pitt = Joe! My My My ;)

      Morning Joe and Big Jon!!

      Delete
    9. 5:49... Stop crying. If you don't like it, or don't recognize the real idiots when they post, then you can write me an essay, and I couldn't care.

      PS. Your failure to recognize/trust consistent scientific method/evidence, isn't my problem.

      Delete
    10. I always pictured Joe as more of a Clooney than Pitt.

      Delete
    11. Joe, when responding to a post that describes childish responses and taunting, it's probably best to not respond in a taunting and childish manner.

      I recognize the idiots abroad, regardless of affiliations or groupings. Just because one may align themselves with a certain group doesn't afford them protections from idiocity.

      Delete
    12. Joe is Brad Pitt? Is this the Green Goblin?^

      Delete
    13. 6:11... When trying to explain how a thread get's dragged into a soap opera, it's probably best to not propel that into reality with your own comments.

      Delete
    14. "Sir , Brad Pitt was a Sigma Chi briefly at the University of MO while I was at Westminster some 20 minutes away in the Phi Delta Theta Fraternity". Mr Pitt once stole 50% of my girlfriends at one Miami Triad event. I have met Brad Piitt and I have partied with him. You sir are no Brad Pitt". Hell your not even Michael Pitt who portrayed Curt Cobain in "Last Days". Perhaps one of the cookers on Destination Americas Pitt Masters? PSA. Don't let your Bulldog mouth override you chihuahua ass ! :)

      Delete
    15. MMC is a fish-eyed fool!

      Joe F

      Delete
    16. I picture PJ as Cartman

      Delete
    17. Joe they talk about you so much around here you gotta take that as a form of flattery. You are pretty famous.

      Delete
    18. tham border jumpin folks heers fer shure

      Delete
    19. Hey 5:49
      Here's one for you snivel about!!!
      BIG JON IS A FAT CLUCKING HEN!!
      Ha haa haaaha haaaaa,

      Delete
    20. Wow, really dumb. Let me guess, that was your A-game destroyer as well?

      Sigh.

      Delete
    21. bigfoots atakin me chickins and hawgs dang tham ctitters

      Delete
    22. Have you ever asked him to bring them back? ;)

      Delete
    23. 8:53. There's only one dummy on this blog that would respond to such a stupid comment such as 8:43
      And his name is,,
      BIG DUMB JON, aka.anon troll!

      Delete
    24. ^ oops i forgot,
      Haaahaaaaaahaaaahh hhaaa!

      Delete
    25. 9:22- I heard someone dropped a log on your head. Tragic but explains so much.

      Delete
    26. ^ if that anon troll big jon had some brains!! 9:24 should have been his comeback,,
      However he is nothing more than,, BIG DUM, DUM, JON.
      : (

      Delete
    27. Oh no big jon is trollin up the place.

      Delete
    28. i gots 9th grad eddicated

      Delete
    29. Many millionaire's had even less, what does that teach you?? You cant teach intelligence,, you are born with it.

      Delete
    30. Was that dumb troll big jon born with a gift of bieng a doofus???

      Delete
    31. ^ oops i forgot, Haaaahaaahaaahaa,

      Delete
    32. Hey Ernie! If that's the case, we're all a-list celebs!!

      Delete
  2. 5 seasons of going to all the hotspots where bigfoots have been seen yet failing to acquire a single piece of sign or evidence that such a creature was even there let alone exists.

    Check mate footers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yet, we have the physical and biological evidence you struggle with daily.

      Remember... We've checked.

      Delete
    2. No clue what you have been smoking but there certainly isn't any physical or biological evidence.

      Delete
    3. Yes, yes, yes... We know your denialism borders on perverse, keep muttering your therapy, remember to breath...

      Delete
    4. You are the one thinking there are 9 foot apes running around america. Get help.

      Delete
    5. ... That has physical and biological evidence to support... Yes.

      Wipe your brow, take some valium and get some rest. Nothing will hurt you.

      Delete
    6. Derp.

      If there was evidence it would be an accepted species.

      There isn't and it isn't.

      Deal with it.

      Delete
    7. Sorry, do you have wind or something? It isn't an accepted species because we don't have body.

      When you have hair and tracks left by something akin to an unknown primate, then what does that tell you?

      Deal with it? If your claim was the case, you wouldn't be here.

      ; )

      Delete
    8. If your claim was the case then you wouldnt be here. This blog wouldn't be here. Instead bigfoot would be accepted in real scientific venues and not just by nut cases such as yourself.

      Delete
    9. Sykes gets two unique Bear samples, now it's already in the early classification stages with research expeditions already planned. Proposed name is already in existence.

      All of that off 2 unique sequences.

      If bigfoot had a sliver of that evidence in it's favor, it too would take precedence but it doesn't and it isn't.

      Delete
    10. 3:54... In fact your comment doesn't make sense. If Bigfoot was a recognized species, this blog wouldn't be here? I wouldn't be here??

      3:55... You're stating facts, well done... This affects this filed how exactly? Didn't Sykes also rally around researchers to go find the evidence? Didn't he theorize that what people were seeing were Neanderthals? Funny, you should semi-celebrate his bear expedition, is he a nut case for thinking along those lines??

      Delete
    11. The circus show of bigfootery is made up of the various groups / forums and blogs like these. It is similar in nature to most other woo topics like UFOs / ghosts etc. If this was a real species then none of it would exist because it would have been discovered decades ago and therefore not developed into a woo culture that we see today.

      You gotta feel a bit sorry for footers but at the end of the day they are enjoying themselves so just leave them to it.

      Delete
    12. If this subject was overly 'woo', then why would we have people like Sykes conducting hominid studies? I think he'd have better things to do, wouldn't he??

      What you have to do is convince enthusiasts that the evidence isn't worth considering. That's all I seem to keep getting from you is an uncreative assertion that evidence isn't there, when it clearly is. In the place where this should be you bring cynicism and brandishing; it's limited intelligence, especially when you have the Catholic church even recognizing the possibility of alien life.

      What I feel sorry for, is someone who repeatedly spends all his time bringing nothing but hate to a place he then states should be left alone... You demonstrate a knack for contradicting yourself, as well as not supporting your arguments.

      Oh... And plenty discovered, none caught.

      Delete
    13. Yea plenty.

      Got 10 foot rock throwing gorilla?

      Delete
    14. Got magic monkey suit? If you haven't, then there's your monkey.

      Delete
    15. It affects your consistent tripe about legitimate unknown primate sequences. Had you one legitimate unknown sample, it could be placed on the tree of life. We may not understand or fully define the Ape but we can accurately trace the lineage to the genetic branch.

      Take Sykes 2 unique bear samples for example again, it has already had it's ancestory traced and we know the genetic lineage but lack the type specimen to fully catalogue.

      Bigfoot doesn't have a smidgen of worthwhile evidence. Every few years there is a new study accepting the best samples, every few years there is a big cryptid show that tests samples, every year researchers spend their own money having samples analyzed and through all of that the most interesting result has been one unique subspecies of bear in the Himalayan mountain chain.

      What else is Bryan supposed to say? Better luck next time? Everyone of you are liars or misidentified extant creatures? Bigfoot isn't real? He's a scientist that tests samples, he's not an adventurer that collects samples worldwide. He can't say bigfoot doesn't exist with just his results, he says these samples were bad, here's why all of you are conducting unscientific research, your best wasn't good enough but there is always next season! Feel free to help me recoup my losses though, send me $2500 and your dog hair?

      You have valid points occasionally, Joe, but this whole Sykes mess has you reaching. It's ok to say you were wrong sometimes.

      Delete
    16. Actually!!

      Two bear samples don't affect anything in the slightest regarding anything Bigfoot. Quite a leap of closure desperation there old boy. When Sykes is stating that Bigfoot researchers are having a rough time, and that they should continue to look for sample to which he is interested in testing, and then theorises that it could be Neanderthal; that's pretty self evident. Here in also lie another problem; a lack of one source does not mean a lack of another. It's a negative prof fallacy. We also have the controversial area in that Bigfoot are human and that sequences are just going to tell us of an alignment with our own.

      For Sykes to conclude on 'no Bigfoot', that's what I would expect from someone akin to what your fictional death nail suggests, the reality is something very revealing about an obvious agenda.

      And after four paragraphs, out still don't really make a case for not considering unknown primate dermals and hair, except an insistence that it's not worth while (when in fact it's a major obstacle), a negative proof fallacy and a case for which wonders what else is hidden up in the Himalayas.

      Delete
    17. Joe. Email me. Have something for ya. ;)

      Delete
    18. ^ I bet you do. The wink says it all. Got lube?

      Delete
    19. Stupid. Is this supposed to be your a game?

      Delete
    20. Irrelevant no name trolls making comments trying to be relevant.

      Delete
  3. Hi Joe what do you think about the independence day footage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you only need to look at the Thinker Thunker analysis to decide. I think it's great footage but am not sure of the circumstances it was attained.

      Delete
    2. So you do read the BFF. Interesting. What's your account there I would like to send you a PM.

      Delete
    3. He only reads, after his ban there, he's never been quite the same. Something about footers turning on him for being a self-righteous wanker.

      Delete
    4. I apologize, I don't have an account, never have.

      Delete
  4. Hey joe fitz !! It's TTL!!! It's been very busy on my end in the coming months I will be putting up your cameras like I promised it's not worth it putting anything up in my hunting area till end of summer, anyways anything new in the bf community ? I'm way out of the loop these days! Lol hope all is well! Cheers bud!
    TTL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey buddy! All's well this end, thank you for that. Being busy ain't a bad thing remember!

      Did you sort out your email????

      Delete
    2. He has his 70th account made up just for you joe. Hautsmenot@youzafool.ca

      Delete
  5. Standford university locomotion and primate experts successfully recreate the gait seen in the pgf.

    Check mate footers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great... Can they now present a case for proportions and magic suit?

      Drop a comment when they get around to that... Oh, and we've checked.

      Delete
    2. Party's proportions are of a human in a suit. Nothing magic about that.

      Delete
    3. Reality says differently. Are we on to another therapy coping mechanism?

      It appears that way.

      Delete
    4. JREF vs JFIT

      Gay Cult vs imaginary Creature

      Delete
    5. Reality? You know nothing of reality.

      Delete
    6. Do you know how dumb that sounds? After decades they finally duplicated the gait? By what, studying it over and over again? And that proves it was human, that it can finally be duplicated? Hah! That's so utterly ridiculous.

      Delete
    7. Actually they haven't been studying it for years they just decided to do so after claims that it couldn't be done.so perhaps you should research some before you kiss Joe's buttocks.say hello to your man bert also....

      Mmg

      Delete
    8. Speaking of honesty, how about you not forge someone else's sig on here, hmmmm?

      Delete
    9. BTW, yes they have had years to duplicate it, considering they just did it. Humans are pretty smart at figuring things out if given a long enough period. Therefore, this is ridiculous.

      Delete
  6. Joe types a lot but has never once provided an actual bigfoot.

    Skeptics just let the lack of bigfoot do the talking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plenty found;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU

      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM

      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w

      ... None caught.

      Delete
    2. None found.

      None caught.

      None in existence.

      Plenty of hoaxes.

      Delete
    3. border jumpers gits U fer shure

      Delete
    4. No brains.

      No clue.

      No intelligence.

      Plenty of opium for the masses.

      Delete
    5. marijuana for all your obamacare needs

      Delete
  7. Bart Cutino is, perhaps, the best tracker in the bigfoot community. If he was a regular on Finding Bigfoot they wouldn't go season after season with no evidence. I'm not saying he should replace a cast member but should be added on to the cast. It's crazy that the guy most likely to find bigfoot is not on "Finding Bigfoot". He was paralleled in the woods by a full grown adult Sasquatch. Terrifying...and he's still around to share the experience. Cast iron, man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can you find something that doesn't exist? Serious question.

      Delete
    2. ^ What is up Rictor? Wouldn't YOU know?

      Delete
    3. 8:14's Mother asking his pediatrician a serious question about his brain. "But doctor, how can you find something that doesn't exist?"

      Yes, now that is a serious question.

      Delete
    4. A human being alive but without a brain? Sounds like another woo topic to go along with bigfoot UFOs and all that nonsense.

      Delete
    5. Thats what the mother kept saying but the doctor said that the xray results were infallible.

      Delete
    6. 8:35 You're just mad because JREF is gayer than you.

      Delete
  8. 8:14 Bart Cutino can locate a Sasquatch. He was paralleled by one and did a thermal. Do you get that? They was pararallelling him in the forest and he cracked off a therm. They was at a right angle, y'know 90 degrees or prependicular, they was parallel. It's like if you had two lines and one was right besides the other , not crossing. Better idea- it s like streets that run besides each another thats parallel. Well, thats how the bigfoot was with him and he thermed it. Shot a therm which is conclusive evidence. Game over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting new character developing here^

      Delete
    2. I should of should they wasn't at a right angle. What i was trying to do was to explain parallel because its different than perpendicular. That part i should have said WASN't at a right angle. Because parallel lines don;'t cross. They was paralleling him when he thermed him, NOT breaking the parallel and getting into degree territory where they'd eventually merge. Not even 1 degree. Well, maybe a degree or so but I'm talking virtuaql paralleling and then BOOM snapping a therm. Game over, like i said.

      Delete
    3. Okay, in the above I started off with "should of should" when I meant to say "should of said". I'm not going to get into any long winded explanation but it would suffice to say that i didn't proof read what I had previously posted. In fact, my second post was a response to something I made an error on in my first post. Now, this post is a response to my response to my first post. I know, it's confusing. Its kind of like looking at a mirror in a mirror and the reflections keep going and going EXCEPT that I'm going to proof read this OR maybe not but I'm not going to worry if I got something wrong UNLESS its a real bad error which I doubt there will be.

      Delete
    4. Dont worry it happens to all of us. Plus I think the Grammar Natzi is asleep at the wheel so you are good to go!

      Delete
    5. " What i was trying to do was to explain parallel because its different than perpendicular"

      Welcome to the forum Captain Obvious

      Delete
    6. ^ its because of the degrees, right? I was trying to explain that parallel line aren't angled in any way in relation to each other. Now perpendicular-thats a whole different story. That means 90 degrees. Its like the total opposite of parallel. Now if you have 89 degrees thats not the most degrees you can have cause theres 90. Okay, so you say what about 91 . Well, tthat might as well be 89. You see , when you go over 90 you're kind of like going back the other way, so 89 is like 91 and 88 is like 92. It's can be confusing but you just have to think about it real hard aand this is really suppossed to be about Bart Cutino anyways. He paralleled a Squatch and thermed him too!

      Delete
    7. what about the angle of the degree of the dangle?

      Delete
  9. Everyone says they have to catch a bigfoot to prove they exist. What about grizzly bears, no one ever caught one but they are an official species....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ans thos melonhears abin heers fer shure

      Delete
  10. Obama administration was warned about VA scheduling issues after 2008 election
    DUDE

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story