Should a Bigfoot Be Killed to Prove They are Real? What's Really Behind the Debate?
Does it take a body to prove bigfoot is real? Why do people feel so strongly about one side or the other? Bigfoot blogger Matt Knapp gives his two cents about the topic via www.bigfootcrossroads.com.
"Why is the subject so heavily argued? It seems on the outside a simple difference in opinion. Either you feel that science zrequires a body as proof, or you feel a body is unnecessary.
The reason for the on-going argument doesn't actually have much to do with the topic itself however. It goes deeper than that, to a personal level. It goes back to what most debates within this field are about, personal motives. What drives the individual. Why they have a particular interest in the subject of bigfoot.
For the entire article, click here.
Onu
ReplyDeleteMexican Bigfoot after onU.
DeleteBigfoot/Sasquatch is Real. Theres not just one type of bigfoot. There are many different breeds i believe. West Virginia has the Yahoo. Chiba has the Yeti an more. So therefore they are around the world an they are real.
DeleteThey don't exist by the way....
ReplyDeleteif you need to prove that big foot is real you can just take a photo and send in instrgram you don ,t need to kill
DeleteGRAYs ground troops so they cant be killed
ReplyDeleteUnashamedly pro-kill.
ReplyDeleteAs soon as we can classify them. We can then protect them.
MMG
Cruel to be kind?
DeleteAbsolutely need a body. Skeptics will otherwise doubt all other evidence.
DeleteThis body would give great insight to their world, and would enlighten us to their genetic lineage.
grassman, yahoo, sheepsquatch, bigfoot, all are on the teaget list.....
ReplyDeletelock and load boys
Israelis killing civilians.
ReplyDeleteThe world need to see this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqBZ-JoxhQY
stalingrad for hamas
Deletewar crimes committed by israel.
DeleteIf you can't eat the soup don't stir the pot
DeleteI love the smell of Roasted Jew in the morning!
DeleteNever harm a Mexican Bigfoot!
ReplyDeleteIf someone could ever good some good pictures or video for bloody sake - that would suffice.
ReplyDeleteThe gist of this argument is really about the fact that there is nothing but crappy pictures and video out there. Hence, people are more inclined to be more "pro-(dead) body".
3:25 I agree 100%
DeleteBD.
i won't dignify this absurb question with a response.
ReplyDeleteThank you dignifying this absurd question with a response.
DeleteMMG
Thank you as for dignifying his response.
DeleteMMP
I've got a zit with a head the size of a quarter on my back.
DeleteMMG
^ call p pimple poppers inc.
DeleteBut when ole paul gets to suckin on that zit, try not to
Fart! As that might GROSS
HIM OUT!! Ha ha haa!
BD
Theres a plenty o bigfoot photos. Yuh harms one and yuz gots sum anserin to do!
ReplyDeletepro-kill what? there are already enough roadkill that should suffice for bigfoot dna evidence such as porcupine,deer, horse, cow and of course the most prevelant bigfoot dna a bear.
ReplyDeleteSHure lack in tham citys lack chicaga thays gits shot everyday
Deleteterrible shots there, they should make them go to the range and qualify
DeleteAKs make that kind of shot spread
DeleteOf course, it is the only effing way!!
ReplyDeleteMy family has been killing Big foots since the early 12920's So what! We just throw their bodies over a cliff on our farm. if you want to prove they exist, just come to our farm!
ReplyDeleteCool, I want to see one.
Deletesoo you would kill it simply for the reason that some uncaring human wont believe you saw one. thats some reason(sick)
ReplyDeleteWHAT THE !!!
DeleteYou cannot kill something that does not exist.
ReplyDeleteCheck out some cryptid hunters hunt a different type of cryptid.
ReplyDeleteMonsters Underground, Destination America.
http://vimeo.com/102164001
IT IS A FAKE
ReplyDelete