ParaBreakdown takes a look at the new Sundance Utah bigfoot footage, and gives us a better look at it as well. Check out his zoomed and stabilized version. Do you think this is a real bigfoot?
Chick, I'm waiting for July 4th, the world cup of Blue Marlin fishing, I'll be in Kona but you can fish anywhere in the world, kill the biggest Blue Marlin and you win.
I really wanted to go bigfooting in the woods at the weekend but i've looked all week for some camouflage trousers but i just can't see them anywhere :) xx
so they turned back and started to film ? That would explain why they weren't just randomly filming. It could be something interesting for sure but it's a night shot so you can't make out a lot
This item of note actually I have a "problem" with. If they've think they've seen something - and have turned around and are driving back...they sure were going a bit FAST?! I mean, he drives right past it AGAIN. (then they "lose sight of it".
If you were driving back it seems to me you would have been going a bit slower. This part of the story doesn't quite "wash".
I was thinking just stop and film it, why did they keep driving by slow or fast. I think I have the answer, ready, because it's another freaking hoaxed video!......
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Did I get it before MMC?
ReplyDeleteNo but you got me!! Congrats.
DeleteHi Rush! Hows the fishing? I always imagine you surfing on Moby Dicks back, fishing pole in hand, reeling in jaws ;)
DeleteChick, I'm waiting for July 4th, the world cup of Blue Marlin fishing, I'll be in Kona but you can fish anywhere in the world, kill the biggest Blue Marlin and you win.
DeleteHello chick and rush
DeleteYou know how to live rush ! I am happy for you
MMC
Wow, keep us updated! Is it covered on tv? Anyway best to ya!
DeleteYo MMC... Chick, actually this is what I look like fighting a fish (sailfish)
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lcKIGAoEAM
What a great time Rush! What a life :)
DeleteHey back at ya MMC
TEAM HOMOS!
DeleteNow that's fishing Rush !
DeleteWhen I am free I am going to become a snowbird and enjoy fishing in Florida in the winter. Or Arizona. Or both. Why not !
MMC
Oooh...another inconclusive piece of vague "bigfoot" footage...how odd.
DeleteLike you'll ever be free.
DeleteI really wanted to go bigfooting in the woods at the weekend but i've looked all week for some camouflage trousers but i just can't see them anywhere :) xx
DeleteGood one Eva !
DeleteMight as well wear your brightest outfit cause the big guy can't be snuck up on. Usually
MMC
:) xx
Deleterush
ReplyDeleteCompelling. Footage of a lifetime. No recreations possible.
ReplyDeleteSundance? Must be Bob Redford in a monkey suit waiting for M. K. Davis.
ReplyDeleteIt would be good for him if it was. Maybe some sweat would re-hydrate that leather he calls skin.
DeleteI wonder why they were filming a night time ride through the woods?
ReplyDeleteso they turned back and started to film ?
ReplyDeleteThat would explain why they weren't just randomly filming. It could be something interesting for sure but it's a night shot so you can't make out a lot
This item of note actually I have a "problem" with. If they've think they've seen something - and have turned around and are driving back...they sure were going a bit FAST?! I mean, he drives right past it AGAIN. (then they "lose sight of it".
DeleteIf you were driving back it seems to me you would have been going a bit slower. This part of the story doesn't quite "wash".
I was thinking just stop and film it, why did they keep driving by slow or fast. I think I have the answer, ready, because it's another freaking hoaxed video!......
DeleteFor all the young tech savy folks out there...do they make cell phones with any kind of 'zoom' capabilities?
ReplyDeleteSeems like they don't - course I never read a phone manual yet.
Sure..you can blow up pictures but what about video ?
TTL!
ReplyDeleteWhat's the news?